On 7/28/2005 at 11:57 AM Bob Johnson wrote:
|Microsoft used to claim that NTFS doesn't need defragmentation.
|Compared to MSDOSFS, that's a reasonably accurate statement, but
|if you push it hard enough, it will still become fragmented.
=
The process of installing Windows on a
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:13:49 +0800, MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/28/2005 at 11:57 AM Bob Johnson wrote:
|Microsoft used to claim that NTFS doesn't need defragmentation.
|Compared to MSDOSFS, that's a reasonably accurate statement, but
|if you push it hard enough, it will still become
This is one of the things I find really hard to get Windows users to
understand. They just won't believe that a company like Microsoft would
still be using a filesystem that needs defragmenting if it were possible
to design one that didn't. I often wonder why myself - after all, they
must
On 7/27/2005 at 7:30 PM Mike Jeays wrote:
|This is one of the things I find really hard to get Windows users to
|understand. They just won't believe that a company like Microsoft
would
|still be using a filesystem that needs defragmenting if it were
possible
|to design one that didn't. I often
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:20:31 +0300
From: Victor Semionov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
This is one of the things I find really hard
On 7/28/05, Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it unnecessary to defragment UFS?
In normal use, files never become fragmented enough to affect performance. In
a (loose) sense, files are intentionally fragmented in a controlled way so
that fragmentation doesn't cause problems.
Gayn Winters wrote:
What I get from reading this article is that if the use of the file
system is to store lots of small files, then use a small block size. Am
I missing something?
No and yes! There is a minimum block and fragment size. In this case
there were not enough contiguous
Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:20:31 +0300
From: Victor Semionov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Freminlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gayn Winters wrote:
What I get from reading this article is that if the use of the file
system is to store lots of small files, then use a small block size. Am
I missing something?
No and yes! There is a minimum block and fragment size. In this
On Thursday 28 July 2005 03:07 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Victor Semionov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Why is it unnecessary to defragment UFS?
In normal use, files never become fragmented enough to affect
performance. In a (loose) sense, files
Hello,
How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are available
for this ?
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, demigor wrote:
How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are available
for this ?
Why should you want to do this? There's no harmful fragmentation in
the UFS of FreeBSD unless you exceed the max capacity of 100% which is 92%
when looking closer but
How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are
available
for this ?
None as I know. Usually there is no reason to defragment a ufs partition.
Norbert
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are
available
for this ?
Why should you want to do this? There's no harmful fragmentation in
the UFS of FreeBSD unless you exceed the max capacity of 100% which is 92%
when looking closer but reported as 100% by df.
On 7/27/05, demigor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are
available
for this ?
Why should you want to do this? There's no harmful fragmentation in
the UFS of FreeBSD unless you exceed the max capacity of 100% which is 92%
when
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 07:54, Norbert Koch wrote:
How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are
available
for this ?
None as I know. Usually there is no reason to defragment a ufs partition.
Norbert
___
16 matches
Mail list logo
