On Monday 17 September 2007, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> This flash issue has made me reconsider buying a low-end laptop running
> vista, so I dont have the urgency to deal with this issue. One thing I need
> flash to work is that I watch mlbtv, and it requires flash plugin to
> initiate. A
This flash issue has made me reconsider buying a low-end laptop running
vista, so I dont have the urgency to deal with this issue. One thing I need
flash to work is that I watch mlbtv, and it requires flash plugin to
initiate. Also for some other multimedia on the internet, having flash
working
On Monday 17 of September 2007 04:52:06 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> *(my symptoms were a bit different though, it would just time out when
> calling flash... so each flash object in a page would take 40 seconds or
> sosllooo brooowwwsssiiinnn :-) )
This same behavi
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:16:43 -0400
"Tsu-Fan Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> not sure if these two are really related, only know that my flash plugin
> doesnt work after I update xorg and re-enter x windows. I first re-install
> plugins by deleting the
Hi,
not sure if these two are really related, only know that my flash plugin
doesnt work after I update xorg and re-enter x windows. I first re-install
plugins by deleting the old plugs directory and then running nsplugwrapper
-v -a -i, anyhow, here is the error message:
The program
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:41:06 +
"Aryeh Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had flash 7 working reasonablely well under fb 6.2 but it is marked
> as broken under 7.0
>
It's nothing to do with 7.0, the binar
I had flash 7 working reasonablely well under fb 6.2 but it is marked as
broken under 7.0
--Aryeh
On 9/14/07, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 02:36:41 +
> "Aryeh Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I hav linux-flashp
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 02:36:41 +
"Aryeh Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hav linux-flashplugin9 installed with firefox 2.0.0.6 on FreeBSD
> 7.0-Current when I view a page that has a single flash file on it
> there is no problem but if there aer multiple flash
I hav linux-flashplugin9 installed with firefox 2.0.0.6 on FreeBSD
7.0-Current when I view a page that has a single flash file on it there is
no problem but if there aer multiple flash movies I get grayed out windows.
See attached screen shot
I have linux-flashplugin9 installed with firefox 2.0.0.6 on FreeBSD
7.0-Current when I view a page that has a single flash file on it there is
no problem but if there are multiple flash movies I get grayed out windows.
See screen shot at http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flash.jpg
--Aryeh
ile or
> > > > directory".
> > >
> > > What does "ls -l /dev/da3*" print? Maybe the
> filesystem is on a
> > > different slice. Or, if there's no slices, try
> mounting /dev/da3
> > > directly.
> >
> > Mountin
he filesystem is on a
> > different slice. Or, if there's no slices, try mounting /dev/da3
> > directly.
>
> Mounting /dev/da3 directly worked (thought I had tried that last
> night, but must not have). Thanks!
>
> I don't understand why there is a difference be
da3
> directly.
Mounting /dev/da3 directly worked (thought I had tried
that last night, but must not have). Thanks!
I don't understand why there is a difference between
the two flash drives (both are FAT). Is there a way to
accurately predict what the mount point should be on these?
No such file or directory".
What does "ls -l /dev/da3*" print? Maybe the filesystem is on a
different slice. Or, if there's no slices, try mounting /dev/da3
directly.
> When I plug in the I-Stick, I get:
>
> umass0: USB Flash Disk, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2
> da3 a
Under FreeBDS 6.2, the following command works for a
256MBMemorex Mini TravelDrive, but not for a 256MB
Intelligent Stick (I-Stick):
mount_msdosfs /dev/da3s1 /mnt
It fails with "mount_msdosfs: /dev/da3s1: No such file
or directory".
When I plug in the I-Stick, I get:
umass0: USB
chael S
> wrote:
> > Good day all,
> >
> > I am trying to install flash 7 from ports, I keep
> on
> > getting this message linux-flashplugin -- critical
> > vulnerabilities.
> >Reference:
> >
>
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/b42e8c32-34f6-11dc
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael S wrote:
>
> I am trying to install flash 7 from ports, I keep on
> getting this message linux-flashplugin -- critical
> vulnerabilities.
>Reference:
> <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/b42e8c32-34f6-11dc-9bc9-001921ab2f
Yes you can diable it with make DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes in the
linux-flashplugin directory.
Cheers
Oliver
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:53:33AM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> Good day all,
>
> I am trying to install flash 7 from ports, I keep on
> getting this message linux-flashplugin
Good day all,
I am trying to install flash 7 from ports, I keep on
getting this message linux-flashplugin -- critical
vulnerabilities.
Reference:
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/b42e8c32-34f6-11dc-9bc9-001921ab2fa4.html>
I know that I uninstalled portaudit. Is there a way to
Adobe. For example it runs on many platforms where Adobe's Flash
doesn't run. It will also perhaps soon hit the iPhone.
Useless to say Adobe are not so happy about it ;)
We are also not happy about that Adobe ignores other platforms. Blame i
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:45:29 -0400
Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jona Joachim writes:
>
>
> > > The only native solution I know of is "gnash" but last time I
> > > tried it it was very unstable and very slow.
> >
> > gnash 0.8 is not in the ports yet.
>
> Is there an estim
Jona Joachim wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:38:12 +0200
Laszlo Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
Hello,
can I ask you for help, how to set up flash in Firefox natively,
step by step?
The only native solution I know of is "gnash" but l
Jona Joachim writes:
> > The only native solution I know of is "gnash" but last time I tried
> > it it was very unstable and very slow.
>
> gnash 0.8 is not in the ports yet.
Is there an estimated date of arrival?
Robert Huff
___
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:38:12 +0200
Laszlo Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > can I ask you for help, how to set up flash in Firefox natively,
> > step by step?
> The only native solution I know of is "gnas
om ports
> Step 6 when you type about:plugin into your Firefox it should list Flush
>
Ok, so now that you've gotten my flash to work... :) (THANKS!)
How about Java ;)
Tuc
___
freeb
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:05:17 +0200
Laszlo Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The flash-related questions/answers appeared probably >10 or 15
> > times on various FreeBSD lists in last 3-4 months. These threads
> > contain everything related to installation problem
The flash-related questions/answers appeared probably >10 or 15 times on
various FreeBSD lists in last 3-4 months. These threads contain
everything related to installation problems, warning messages and other
problems. In total, if Flash7 and Acrobat plugins don't work inside
native
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:38:12 +0200
Laszlo Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > can I ask you for help, how to set up flash in Firefox natively,
> > step by step?
> The only native solution I know of is "gnas
Thank you a lot all.
Best wishes,
Zbigniew
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ush. I did not play much with it
but should work.
*
*
Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
Hello,
can I ask you for help, how to set up flash in Firefox natively, step by step?
I need it to see online stock market in Poland on some banking pages, for
example here is a page (in Polish language), when I c
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:51:42 +0200
Zbigniew Komarnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can I ask you for help, how to set up flash in Firefox natively, step
> by step?
>
> I need it to see online stock market in Poland on some banking pages,
> for exampl
Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
Hello,
can I ask you for help, how to set up flash in Firefox natively, step by step?
The only native solution I know of is "gnash" but last time I tried it
it was very unstable and very slow. I would rather try
linux-flashplugin7 and linuxpluginwrapp
Hello,
can I ask you for help, how to set up flash in Firefox natively, step by step?
I need it to see online stock market in Poland on some banking pages, for
example here is a page (in Polish language), when I cannnot see the plot in
flash:
http://dlaciebie.bzwbk.pl/11949
Please for help
Written by fbsd2 on 08/06/07 09:08>>
>
>
>> You are correct, there is no option for a USB flash drive for your
>> installation media. However, it is not a show stopper - you have the
>> "file system" media option. You should mount the flash disk and use thi
Written by fbsd2 on 08/06/07 09:08>>
You are correct, there is no option for a USB flash drive for your
installation media. However, it is not a show stopper - you have the
"file system" media option. You should mount the flash disk and use this
option.
-Original M
>You are correct, there is no option for a USB flash drive for your
>installation media. However, it is not a show stopper - you have the
>"file system" media option. You should mount the flash disk and use this
>option.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PRO
Written by fbsd2 on 08/04/07 07:42>>
I was really taken with the idea for using a USB flash stick disk drive to install FreeBSD from. I used the script from the mentioned URL below as the starting point. After some changes to the script I got it to work. I was able to boot off the USB flash
I was really taken with the idea for using a USB flash stick disk drive to
install FreeBSD from. I used the script from the mentioned URL below as the
starting point. After some changes to the script I got it to work. I was able
to boot off the USB flash stick disk drive, But then was faced
install a system on a machine that doesn't have an optical
> > > drive. I plan on using a USB flash drive to do the job and found a
> > > messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg55434.html )
...
Hello,
The
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:34:15PM -0600, Ross Penner wrote:
> I'm using a via chipset and yes, the bios is set to boot from
> USB-FDD. I used the 6.2 boot only image.
I don't think that that option, which is for USB floppy drives, is what
you want. USB flash memory uses a di
4>>
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to install a system on a machine that doesn't have an
> > optical
> > > drive. I plan on using a USB flash drive to do the job and found
> a
> > > messages
chine that doesn't have an
optical
> drive. I plan on using a USB flash drive to do the job and found a
> messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg55434.html
<http://www.mail-archive.c
On 8/1/07, Reid Linnemann < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Written by Ross Penner on 08/01/07 13:34>>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I'm trying to install a system on a machine that doesn't have an optical
> > drive. I plan on using a USB flash driv
Written by Andrey Shuvikov on 08/01/07 14:17>>
On 8/1/07, Ross Penner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to install a system on a machine that doesn't have an optical
drive. I plan on using a USB flash drive to do the job and found a
messages from [
On 8/1/07, Ross Penner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm trying to install a system on a machine that doesn't have an optical
> drive. I plan on using a USB flash drive to do the job and found a
> messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (http://www
Written by Ross Penner on 08/01/07 13:34>>
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to install a system on a machine that doesn't have an optical
drive. I plan on using a USB flash drive to do the job and found a
messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to install a system on a machine that doesn't have an optical
drive. I plan on using a USB flash drive to do the job and found a
messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg55434.html)
about just such a thing.
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> IMHO this should be a handbook section. If someone wants to help me
> out, I'll write the section.
Using 7.0-current, linux_base-fc6 firefox 2.0.x from ports, and,
nspluginwrapper from ports, and linux-flashplayer7 from ports:
echo "OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=fc6" >> /et
Hi,
I've tried this on and off over the years and I think I saw it work once
back in the days of 4.9 or so.
googling turns up things for 6.x, and firefox 1.5.
ls -1 | egrep 'firefox|flash'
firefox-2.0.0.4,1/
flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.13_1/
libflash-0.4.13_2/
What next ?
IMHO t
Written by Anton Galitch on 07/02/07 18:07>>
and no, with flash7 It doesnt even load the application, just the grey
square, thats the log from the console:
%firefox
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING: unhandled variable 11 in NPP_GetValue()
The program 'npviewer.bin' received an X Window System
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 02:45:58PM +0100, RW wrote:
> Can anyone comment on how well Flash9 works in a real Linux
> distribution?
>
> In particular does it have the problem where the flash item turns
> into a blank box after a few seconds. If that problem exists in Linux
> there
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:57:08PM -0500, Richard Lynch wrote:
>
> "Need" is relative, but personally, I stopped installing Flash even
> operating systems where it actually sort of works, albeit sucking down
> CPU and RAM like there's no tomorrow, and crashing on a sem
Quoting Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Richard Lynch writes:
I found my surfing experience vastly improved without Flash.
Formerly dog-slow sites are much faster.
And there isn't any content I've felt deprived to not get.
There are an increasing number of s
Quoting Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:15:55 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Need a trick to get folks to recognize it as flash9. I have an
idea, possibly incorrect, that most folks who are asking for flash8 or
higher will work with flash 7.
I agre
Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO, this is one of the reasons that more users do not use
> alternative operating systems like FBSD.
FreeBSD needs native support from Adobe. Flash, although I dislike it,
is needed in modern web experience. Flash works very well on windows,
utube would feel differently, but...
Personally, I disagree. Many sites that I use, including business
sites, require the use of Flash. Your statement that Flash is only
relevant for those who view 'YouTube' is grossly incorrect. It is due
to the numerous problems of getting Fla
work-time :-))
> > watching youtube would feel differently, but...
>
> Personally, I disagree. Many sites that I use, including business
> sites, require the use of Flash. Your statement that Flash is only
> relevant for those who view 'YouTube' is grossly incorrect. It
On July 02, 2007 at 11:57PM Richard Lynch wrote:
> "Need" is relative, but personally, I stopped installing Flash even
> operating systems where it actually sort of works, albeit sucking down
> CPU and RAM like there's no tomorrow, and crashing on a semi-regular
&g
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:15:55 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> P.S. Need a trick to get folks to recognize it as flash9. I have an
> idea, possibly incorrect, that most folks who are asking for flash8 or
> higher will work with flash 7.
I agree with you here, and I will test any
Richard Lynch writes:
> I found my surfing experience vastly improved without Flash.
>
> Formerly dog-slow sites are much faster.
>
> And there isn't any content I've felt deprived to not get.
There are an increasing number of sites - including way t
On Sun, July 1, 2007 2:25 pm, kalin mintchev wrote:
> and which port do i exactly install to be able to whach flash video?
> i did the /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-mozilla - didn't work. the other
> one
> is marked as broken...
> now that cnn moved to that i can't watch it
/cgi/mid.cgi?200706020235.l522Zv7p002571
Can't seem to get YouTube working in Opera though. Just get the grey
square and some download activity, although the Flash player part of
this works:
http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/
--
John.
Hey, I tried what those tips and it worked but no
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 20:07:35 -0300
"Anton Galitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and no, with flash7 It doesnt even load the application, just the grey
> square, thats the log from the console:
> [...]
People,
I think that you can find answers to a lot of problems mentioned here
if you read the th
and no, with flash7 It doesnt even load the application, just the grey
square, thats the log from the console:
%firefox
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING: unhandled variable 11 in NPP_GetValue()
The program 'npviewer.bin' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the pro
seem to get YouTube working in Opera though. Just get the grey
square and some download activity, although the Flash player part of
this works:
http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/
--
John.
Hey, I tried what those tips and it worked but not for much. after some
seconds of running appears
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:55:55AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:00:41 +0100
> RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > The problem with Flash7 is that it works mainly with youtube and
> > similar sites, and with irritating adverts.
>
> hardly the fault of the port ;-)
than nothing. It wont work with sites that use
> flash for navigation.
I've found Flash 7 to work pretty damn well in, say, 90% of the websites. In
the remaining 10%, it's blocked by the content creators and Macromedia wanting
me to upgrade. No crashes, no issues with navigations
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:39:10 -0400 (EDT)
"kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> ___
> >
> > I installed linux-firefox and linux-flashplugin9, from the ports.
> >
> > They compiled flawlessly and work fine.
>
> thanks... but i'm running
t; If you install www/nspluginwrapper, and follow the
> > > > instructions, the flash plugin will work with native firefox
> > > > and opera browsers.
> > >
> > > This is flash-9, and not flash-7?
> >
> > Yes
> >
Norberto Meijome writes:
> So I decided to give this a try again, with some mixed results. I
> double checked what I was doing with the steps shown in the URL
> Gaye kindly provided, it all checked out as expected.
Ditto.
> Downs: Flash videos, such as those in
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:41:09 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ###
> ### tried with youtube.com.
> ### Flash loaded ok, simple flash stuff like the 'videos being watched now'
> worked fine.
> ### Clicking on the suggested videon on the to
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:54:51 -0300
"Anton Galitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I tried flash9 and flash7, the flash9 just crashes, and flash7 shows a grey
> square in the place where the flash application should be showed. I tried
> both, linux-firefox,
gin/libflashplayer.so
Checked video.google.com, works OK (the usual slight video / sound async) :
http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=2241387385572734828
Youtube works great (well, 'as designed' ) too .
CNN doesn't work because they want me to have flash => 8 . Other t
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
"kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can you use that flash7 to watch videos on the new cnn site and youtube?
Sorry, forgot to answer this. Yes, with linux-firefox, linux-flashplugin7 and
linux-pluginwrapper (and possibly other dependencies?), you
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
"kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:42:13 -0400
> > Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> RW writes:
> >>
> >> > If you install
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:54:51 -0300
"Anton Galitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried flash9 and flash7, the flash9 just crashes, and flash7 shows a grey
> square in the place where the flash application should be showed. I tried
> both, linux-firefox, and nspluginwrap
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:42:13 -0400
> Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> RW writes:
>>
>> > If you install www/nspluginwrapper, and follow the instructions,
>> > the flash plugin will work with native firefox and opera browsers.
>
Hi.
I tried flash9 and flash7, the flash9 just crashes, and flash7 shows a grey
square in the place where the flash application should be showed. I tried
both, linux-firefox, and nspluginwrapper methods, it shows the same grey
square. Any idea of what could it be
On Sunday 01 July 2007 19:17:17 RW wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:42:13 -0400
>
> Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > RW writes:
> > > If you install www/nspluginwrapper, and follow the instructions,
> > > the flash plugin will work with native firef
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:42:13 -0400
Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> RW writes:
>
> > If you install www/nspluginwrapper, and follow the instructions,
> > the flash plugin will work with native firefox and opera browsers.
>
> This is
RW writes:
> If you install www/nspluginwrapper, and follow the instructions, the
> flash plugin will work with native firefox and opera browsers.
This is flash-9, and not flash-7?
Robert Huff
___
f
>
> If you install www/nspluginwrapper, and follow the instructions, the
> flash plugin will work with native firefox and opera browsers.
thanks... i'll try that. see what happens
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>
>> ___
>
> I installed linux-firefox and linux-flashplugin9, from the ports.
>
> They compiled flawlessly and work fine.
thanks... but i'm running freebsd. already stuffed this machine with a
lot of linux 'extra'-ware when installing java. i was loo
inux compat enabled
>
Please don't top post.
If you install www/nspluginwrapper, and follow the instructions, the
flash plugin will work with native firefox and opera browsers.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
:14PM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote:
> and which port do i exactly install to be able to whach flash video?
> i did the /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-mozilla - didn't work. the other
one
> is marked as broken...
> now that cnn moved to that i can't watch it anymore and i have ne
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:25:14PM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote:
> and which port do i exactly install to be able to whach flash video?
> i did the /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-mozilla - didn't work. the other one
> is marked as broken...
> now that cnn moved to that i can't
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, kalin mintchev wrote:
and which port do i exactly install to be able to whach flash video?
i did the /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-mozilla - didn't work. the other one
is marked as broken...
now that cnn moved to that i can't watch it anymore and i have never been
a
and which port do i exactly install to be able to whach flash video?
i did the /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-mozilla - didn't work. the other one
is marked as broken...
now that cnn moved to that i can't watch it anymore and i have never been
able to see any of the videos on youtube
I have read various tutorials following google searches and still could not
make flash work on FreeBSD. Is there some native flash player for FreeBSD as
there is for Linux now?
Rest of the things are working very well :) FreeBSD is getting cooler with
each release. Here is how it went, I
On 24/04/2007, at 3:35 PM, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
If we don't, BSD is gradually going to be usable only by software
developers.
*cough* OSX *cough*
:)
Marcus
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote: . . .
> > >
> > > > Porting Flash to more OSes will sure will make adobe beats MS
> > > > when it comes to web media.
> > >
> > > I hope they kill each other and take the w
On 19/04/07, Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 18 April 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri said:
> On 4/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 17/04/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote: . . .
>
Tom Evans wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 06:59 +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
On 4/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 17/04/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
. . .
Porting Flash to more OSes will sure will make adobe beats MS w
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 06:59 +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
> On 4/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 17/04/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > . . .
> > > Porting Flash to more OSes will sure will mak
On Wednesday 18 April 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri said:
> On 4/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 17/04/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote: . . .
> >
> > > Porting Flash to more OSes will sure will
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
On 4/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 17/04/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
. . .
> Porting Flash to more OSes will sure will make adobe beats MS when it
> comes to web media.
I hope they k
On 4/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 17/04/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
. . .
> Porting Flash to more OSes will sure will make adobe beats MS when it
> comes to web media.
I hope they kill each other and take the whole
re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I hope they kill each other and take the whole
> retch-media enhanced web experience with
> them flaming into the pit of hell from which
> they came.
>
> But that's just my opinion.
And this is the problem!
Were it not your opinion, but something likely to happen, it w
On 17/04/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
. . .
Porting Flash to more OSes will sure will make adobe beats MS when it
comes to web media.
I hope they kill each other and take the whole
retch-media enhanced web experience with
them flaming into the pit of hel
Microsoft's answer to Adobe Systems' Flash Player has an official
name--Silverlight--and a coveted target audience: media and
entertainment companies bringing video to the Web.
On Monday at the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) Show in
Las Vegas, Microsoft launched Silverli
601 - 700 of 1388 matches
Mail list logo
