Can we name files in freebsd with unicode characters?
Also are unicode characters supported in file i/o system calls like open,
dllopen, fopen? i.e. can we open a file with unicode pathname?
for e.g in windows CreatefileW is used for opening files with unicode pathnames
(wide characters).
If so
> As the FreeBSD license is less restrictive than the GPL, it's pretty
> much safe to say that wherever you are permitted install GPL'd software,
> you could substitute FreeBSD licensed software without legal penalty.
> (Note: *install* -- redistribution is a different matter)
You do not have to a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
> Free BSD representative,
>
> I am inquiring if Free BSD is installable under the The GNU General Public
> License (short: GNU GPL or simply GPL)? Need to verify that for the
> requester of this software as coming through our subcon
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, jegue...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> Free BSD representative,
>
> I am inquiring if Free BSD is installable under the The GNU General Public
> License (short: GNU GPL or simply GPL)? Need to verify that for the
> requester of this software as com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/03/2010 14:40:15, jegue...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> Free BSD representative,
>
> I am inquiring if Free BSD is installable under the The GNU General Public
> License (short: GNU GPL or simply GPL)? Need to verify that for the
FBSD has it's own licensing. I'll defer to others as to the details, or visit
www.freebsd.org
- Original Message -
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue Mar 23 09:40:15 2010
Subject: Free BSD Licensing
Free BSD representative,
I am
Free BSD representative,
I am inquiring if Free BSD is installable under the The GNU General Public
License (short: GNU GPL or simply GPL)? Need to verify that for the
requester of this software as coming through our subcontracts division.
Jack Guelff
Subcontracts Administrator
Software and
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
>
> >
> Understood now, Adam.
>
> I have no FBSD VM, but just about every other OS vms. LeoOSx, Win7(32&64),
> Several XPs, several 2003, Fedora and even an OS/2 warp. They all work. In
> fact, LeoOsx and Win7 (32) are up as I type this.
>
> The
E. From what I've been able
> > > to gather I think this only applicable to amd64. You might have a
> > > different reason for wanting to know this, but I can assure you my
> > > lockups aren't
> >
> > due
> >
> > > to a lack of memo
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Mario Lobo wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:51:33 Brandon Gooch wrote:
> > I'm also seeing something similar although perhaps not related to
> > (lack of) free memory. Are you able to enable debugging in the kernel
> > and maybe get a (tex
le to amd64. You might have a different
> > reason for wanting to know this, but I can assure you my lockups aren't
> due
> > to a lack of memory from the host anyways. I have an order of magnitude
> > more free memory(according to top) in my hosts than my VM requir
Mario Lobo writes:
> On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:03:03 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by "free memory".
>
> Free physical memory available.
Not precise enough to have a clear answer. Does it have to be zeroed
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 20:31:04 Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:03:03 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > > First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by "free
> >
> &g
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:03:03 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by "free
> memory".
>
> Free physical memory available.
>
> >
> > Add
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:51:33 Brandon Gooch wrote:
> I'm also seeing something similar although perhaps not related to
> (lack of) free memory. Are you able to enable debugging in the kernel
> and maybe get a (text)dump?
I can't ! The machine freezes completely !! NOT
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:03:03 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by "free
memory".
Free physical memory available.
Add the "-H" flag to ge
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:03:03 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by "free memory".
Free physical memory available.
>
> Add the "-H" flag to get that value more precise. I suspect, however,
> that precision
Mario Lobo writes:
> I am trying to get the most precise reading I can of all free memory (8-
> STABLE).
First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by "free memory".
> I am using
> /usr/bin/vmstat | grep -a 2 | awk '{print $5}'
>
>
Hi to all;
I am trying to get the most precise reading I can of all free memory (8-
STABLE).
I am using
/usr/bin/vmstat | grep -a 2 | awk '{print $5}'
But I'm not sure if this reflects ALL free memory.
Would anyone have a more precise place to read free memory from?
Thanks
bly CDDL for stuff from Sun like ZFS.
> i mean the free bsd operating system, not the software
> i plan to modify then redistribute it, under a new name. it will remain under
> the same license, with the same copyright docs, but the help or other docs
> will be gone, my own put in.
&g
is the FreeBSD-8.0-amd.iso itself under the bsd license?
i mean the free bsd operating system, not the software
i plan to modify then redistribute it, under a new name. it will remain under
the same license, with the same copyright docs, but the help or other docs will
be gone, my own put in
Hi--
On Jan 29, 2010, at 8:51 AM, James Smallacombe wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:59 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
>>> To follow up on this: Noticed the issue again this morning, which also was
>>> accompanied by latency so high that I could not connect (some pings got
>>> through at very h
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:51 AM, James Smallacombe wrote:
> Some updates that may confuse more than inform: I caught this while it was
> happening yesterday and was able to do a tcpdump. I saw a ton of UDP
> traffic outbound to one IP that turned out to be a colocated server in
> Chicago. I pu
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:59 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
To follow up on this: Noticed the issue again this morning, which also was
accompanied by latency so high that I could not connect (some pings got
through at very high latency). I emailed the provider and they told me that
they had my
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:59 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
> To follow up on this: Noticed the issue again this morning, which also was
> accompanied by latency so high that I could not connect (some pings got
> through at very high latency). I emailed the provider and they told me that
> they h
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:15 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error sending
response: not enough free resources
Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #59830: error sending
response: not enough free
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:15 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error
sending response: not enough free resources
indicates a problem sending UDP traffic; netstat -s output would be
Unfortunately, I did not
Hi--
On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:15 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
>>> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error sending
>>> response: not enough free resources
>>> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #59830: error sending
>>> response: not enough fre
nough free resources
Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #59830: error sending
response: not enough free resources
Were these client IPs expected to be talking to this machine? It
This server is authoritative for a few hundred domains, so I would imagine
anybody doing a query on any of them
t; rebooted it and it was fine.
>
> After getting home, I looked in the syslog and see thousands of these:
>
> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error sending
> response: not enough free resources
> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #59830: error sending
over IP. CPU was fine and
there wre no full partitions. As I had to catch a flight, I just rebooted it
and it was fine.
After getting home, I looked in the syslog and see thousands of these:
Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error sending
response: not enough free resources
Rajesh Makwana wrote:
> Respected Sir,
> Myself Rajesh D Makwana from ahmedabad, india, a
> computer engineer,kindly request you for a free cd of free bsd software to
> install it on my computer. If your firm provide a free of cost service to
> provide t
Respected Sir,
Myself Rajesh D Makwana from ahmedabad, india, a
computer engineer,kindly request you for a free cd of free bsd software to
install it on my computer. If your firm provide a free of cost service to
provide this open source software to people round the
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:46:38 -0500, Roger Agraviador
wrote:
I clicked the ISO link and I was brought to a directory, this to be
exact (
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/7.2/)
Once I have downloaded all Iso Images do I burn the 'boot only.iso' file
on
one DVD or
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Roger Agraviador
wrote:
> I clicked the ISO link and I was brought to a directory, this to be exact (
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/7.2/)
>
> Once I have downloaded all Iso Images do I burn the 'boot only.iso' file on
> one DVD or CD
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:46:38PM -0800, Roger Agraviador wrote:
> I clicked the ISO link and I was brought to a directory, this to be exact (
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/7.2/)
>
> Once I have downloaded all Iso Images do I burn the 'boot only.iso' file on
> one D
I clicked the ISO link and I was brought to a directory, this to be exact (
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/7.2/)
Once I have downloaded all Iso Images do I burn the 'boot only.iso' file on
one DVD or CD only? or do I burn that along with 'disc1.iso', and how do I
go abo
from which you could start it based on an ISO image and free the
CD-ROM/DVD player for whichever purpose you want.
~
Also I would like to experiment with DTrace using FreeBSD. Any hints?
~
Thank you
lbrtchx
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Abhilash Shukla wrote:
> Hello,Respected Sir/Madam,Actually i tried to install free BSD on my >system,
> I have 1 TB hard disk of 500GB X 2 in which i made a partition in >one of my
> hard disk which even contains some data. Unfortunately i lo
Hello,Respected Sir/Madam,Actually i tried to install free BSD on my system, I
have 1 TB hard disk of 500GB X 2 in which i made a partition in one of my hard
disk which even contains some data. Unfortunately i lost all my data, as i
think but its truly very important for me. As after the
share with you the SINGLE element that every business MUST
have in order to be successful. This is not a suggestion. In fact, I will be
bold enough to say that without this ingredient...your business will fail. And
what is it??
Yes -- an email newsletter!
*** FREE PHONE SEMINAR: How to Create a
Le Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:56:53 +0300,
eyup yavas a écrit :
> http://www.tr.freebsd.org/
>
> Add yoru Turkish Language Updated Please (Upayi Network)
> Based on BSD UNIX® =
Thanks, I think you should submit this to the "doc" mailing list
(freebsd-...@freebsd.org).
Regards.
__
=Devamı
Get FreeBSd Now =Şimdi Free BSD Edinin
Latest Realse=En Son Bültenler
SHORTCUTS=Kısayolllar
LATEST NEWS=En Son Olaylar
UPCOMING EVENTS=Gelecek Olaylar
SECURITY ADVISORIES=Güvenlik Uyarısı
Home=Ana Sayfa
About=Hakkında
Documantation=Dökümantasyon
Support=Destek
--
www.upayi.tr.cx test proxy low
Hi,
IACmusic.com has started a major song contest and this one you can
enter for free! &n= bsp; Thanks to a major new
sponsorship, we're
throwing a party that = will make major waves in the Indie
World.
Got a
song= you know is good ? You could w
This is a dedicated server in a datacenter. I don't know the exact
switch specs but it's likely a
layer 2/3 managed switch. Probably a 1U catalyst.
you mean cisco?
there are actually most problematic switches. They don't properly
autonegotiate speed and full/half duplex with many network card
ink this is necessary. If cutting down the http traffic or
raising the port speed doesn't
fix it, I'll look into further debugging with this.
...one more time, don't attempt to throttle your own traffic to
troubleshoot what looks like a throughput bottleneck.
Start with the coll
Not really. The point is that at the time the network card goes from up to
down, named spits out this error. If you log named to a different log file
then /var/log/messages, you will not see the relation. The reason for changing
this is one reason i always change syslog.conf to configure everyth
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 11:48:48 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >> possible reasons
> >> - your firewall rules are the cause - check it.
> >> - your network card produce problems (REALLY i have that case)
> >> - the network/LAN named tries to sent UDP packet is somehow flooded.
> >
> > - the network c
possible reasons
- your firewall rules are the cause - check it.
- your network card produce problems (REALLY i have that case)
- the network/LAN named tries to sent UDP packet is somehow flooded.
- the network card changes from UP to DOWN state at the time of the error
See that a lot running
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 00:46:20 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > named[69750]: client *ip removed*: error sending response: not
> > enough free resources
>
> quite misleading message, but the problem is that named want to send UDP
> packet and get's error from kern
- the network/LAN named tries to sent UDP packet is somehow flooded.
Dns is probably fairly busy. It's the primary authorative dns for some
busy domains.
Is there a setting I can do to increase the limits of UDP packets to keep
it from
causing problems?
it would need t
> I don't think this is necessary. If cutting down the http traffic or
> raising the port speed doesn't
> fix it, I'll look into further debugging with this.
...one more time, don't attempt to throttle your own traffic to
troubleshoot what looks like a throughput bott
- the network/LAN named tries to sent UDP packet is somehow flooded.
>>
>
> Dns is probably fairly busy. It's the primary authorative dns for
> some busy domains. Is there a setting I can do to increase the
> limits of UDP packets to keep it from causing problems?
>
If you extend the SOA
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
> lot of searching and have found others with similar problems, but no
>> solutions.
>>
>> named[69750]: client *ip removed*: error sending response: not
>> enough free r
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Chris St Denis wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
possible reasons
- your firewall rules are the cause - check it.
Nope
eureka# ipfw list
- your network card produce problems (REALLY i have that case)
I have had this kind of error on mul
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> Chris St Denis wrote:
>>> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
possible reasons
- your firewall rules are the cause - check it.
>>>Nope
>>>
>>>eureka# ipfw list
>>>
- your network card produce problems (REALLY i have that case)
>>>I have
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Chris St Denis wrote:
>> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
>>> possible reasons
>>> - your firewall rules are the cause - check it.
>>Nope
>>
>>eureka# ipfw list
>>
>>> - your network card produce problems (REALLY i have that case)
>>I have had this kind of error on mult
Chris St Denis wrote:
> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> possible reasons
>> - your firewall rules are the cause - check it.
>
>Nope
>
>eureka# ipfw list
>
>> - your network card produce problems (REALLY i have that case)
>
>I have had this kind of error on multiple servers over the years
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
lot of searching and have found others with similar problems, but no
solutions.
named[69750]: client *ip removed*: error sending response: not
enough free resources
named[69750]: client *ip removed*: error sending response: not
enough free resources
named[69750
lot of searching and have found others with similar problems, but no
solutions.
named[69750]: client *ip removed*: error sending response: not
enough free resources
named[69750]: client *ip removed*: error sending response: not
enough free resources
named[69750]: client *ip removed
I occasionally get named errors like these in my messages log. I've done
a lot of searching and have found others with similar problems, but no
solutions.
named[69750]: client *ip removed*: error sending response: not
enough free resources
named[69750]: client *ip removed*:
Rafael E Garcia wrote:
Gentlemen
Please How I can copy the Free BSD Handbook in my computer? Any
Sugestion will be apreciate. Thank you Rafael E Garcia
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/handbook/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Rafael E Garcia wrote:
> Gentlemen
> Please How I can copy the Free BSD Handbook in my computer? Any
> Sugestion will be apreciate. Thank you Rafael E Garcia
>
/usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook
-- Frederique
___
freeb
>Gentlemen
>Please How I can copy the Free BSD Handbook in my computer? Any Sugestion
>will be apreciate. Thank you Rafael E Garcia
Try the following and download the pdf.zip file
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/en/books/handbook/
regards,
Johan Hendriks
No virus foun
"Rafael E Garcia" writes:
> Please How I can copy the Free BSD Handbook in my computer? Any
> Sugestion will be apreciate. Thank you Rafael E Garcia
Look at the Handbook on the web.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html
Right at the start ar
Gentlemen
Please How I can copy the Free BSD Handbook in my computer? Any Sugestion
will be apreciate. Thank you Rafael E Garcia
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
the best part is, whenever I send out information about upcoming events and
news, it will automatically get sent to your Toolbar so you always know what's
going on!
It works on Macs and PCs and you can get the Toolbar now for free here:
Download the toolbar: http://40GLOCC.fanbridge.com/toolb
dev = twed0s1d, block = 1, fs = /archive
panic: ffs_blkfree freeing free block
looks like ffs related panic, not ZFS.
something is completely wrong here.
cpuid = 1
Uptime = 11m23s
Physical memory: 1011 MB
Dumping 67 MB: 52 36 20 4
Dump complete
/archive has no files in it as it is an empty
About every 5-10 minutes, my freshly installed freeBSD 7.1 stable box
hangs and begains a kernal dump. I get the following error message:
dev = twed0s1d, block = 1, fs = /archive
panic: ffs_blkfree freeing free block
cpuid = 1
Uptime = 11m23s
Physical memory: 1011 MB
Dumping 67 MB: 52 36 20 4
Free BSD Team,
iMac with the 2.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with Mac OS X version 10.5.6
Model Name: iMac
Model Identifier: iMac8,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed:2.8 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 6 MB
Memory: 2 GB
Bus
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Ian Fitzgerald wrote:
> Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Ian Fitzgerald
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov wrote:
>>> cd /usr/ports/lang/fpc
>>> pkg_add -r fpc
>>>
>>
>> You should do
>>
>> # cd /usr/
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:41:49 +1100
Ian Fitzgerald wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a method of installing Free Pascal Compiler?
>
/usr/ports/lang/fpc
or
pkg_add -r fpc
we use gpc (gnu pascal compiler):
/usr/ports/lang/gpc
or
pkg_add -r gpc
--
In friendship
Can anyone point me to a method of installing Free Pascal Compiler?
I am running FBSD 7.1, with KDE4.
The last attempt deleted a file used by X-windows (and perhaps others),
but I had no specific instructions as a guide.
___
freebsd-questions
dred accredited business and their
= cards up on
the site to start. This will be a FREE listing for your bus iness.
Please do one of the following:
Check
out our Site! [1]www.WorldsBusine= ssCards.com
=
1.
[DEL: Scan
a business card (both sides)= and e-mail to us
Hi guys,
Not sure if anyone would want them, but I have 2 x 512MB DDR667
working Dimms laying around unused that I'm more than happy to part
with. Please note that it is standard laptop ram (this is compatible
with some of the ultra small form factor machines though). So if
interested
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:33:48 +0800, Fbsd1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the past (alt.binaries.warez) contained monthly posts of a list of
> Free usenet nntp servers. I dont have access to a nntp server so I
> can't search foe the list. Does any one here know of a Free usenet
Fbsd1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the past (alt.binaries.warez) contained monthly posts of a list of Free
> usenet nntp servers. I dont have access to a nntp server so I can't search
> foe the list. Does any one here know of a Free usenet nntp server I can
> access?
In the past (alt.binaries.warez) contained monthly posts of a list of
Free usenet nntp servers. I dont have access to a nntp server so I can't
search foe the list. Does any one here know of a Free usenet nntp server
I can access?
___
fr
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:31:57 +0100, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nash Nipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>> char *
>>> function(void)
>>> {
>>> char buffer[100];
>>>
>>> return buffer;
>>> }
>>
>> that is an easier approach because you g
> console.
The idea that malloc() allocates memory is really a C language
abstraction. What it actually does is allocate a region in the
process's virtual address space. The mapping of physical memory to
virtual address space is handled at a lower-level and doesn't rely on
malloc()
t; --
> > Mel
>
> thanks for making it even more clear to me.
> actually what i meant was this:
>
> void function(void){
> char *p;
> p = malloc(1);
> }
> int main(void){
> while (1){
> function();
> /* in the end of this function function()
>
function();
> /* in the end of this function function()
> * the memory is still allocated
> * even when the only pointer who knows its address
> * does not longer exist
> * which is why we have to free() the memory
> * during the application runtim
/* in the end of this function function()
* the memory is still allocated
* even when the only pointer who knows its address
* does not longer exist
* which is why we have to free() the memory
* during the application runtime
* to avoid it from growing to ridi
On Saturday 20 September 2008 13:46:23 Nash Nipples wrote:
> can someone please explain to me what happens to the allocated memory
> called within a function assigned to its local pointer after this function
> ends
Ok - let's see if I get this right:
- the allocated memory
- called within a func
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 07:04:03 -0700 (PDT), Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 9/20/08, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> : free(0xbfbfc9c9)
>>>
>>> 1. This clearly shows my program is trying to free a memory that
>>> has not be
--- On Sat, 9/20/08, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ktrace.out shows:
> > malloc_init()
> > 0x8103400 = malloc(1024)
> > malloc_init()
> > malloc_init()
> > 0x810b0b0 = malloc(400)
> > :
> > so many malloc
> > :
> &
actually what i think someone should really tell you is that
maybe you should take a look at the free() manual which is available
here
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=free&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE&format=html
or you can try to run `man free` in th
> I checked again, up to the this problematic free(),
> functions return newly allocated strings properly:
>
> char *f( )
> {
> char *newstr = NULL;
> :
> newstr = (char *) malloc(p - sp + 1);
> if (newstr == NULL)
> return NULL;
> :
> return new
--- On Sat, 9/20/08, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. This clearly shows my program is trying to free a
> memory that has
> > not been allocated. How it could have happened?
>
> Aha. This looks remarkably like an address in the runtime
> sta
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:31:41 -0700 (PDT), Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Sat, 9/20/08, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You are probably calling free() multiple times for the same buffer.
>>
>> Try tracing the malloc and free calls, u
--- On Sat, 9/20/08, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Segmentation fault when free
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Saturday, September 20,
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:03:03 -0700 (PDT), Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi thank you very much for your reply and the test case.
>
> That is, in a trivial case like this, free() works well. Hopefully
> free() works well in all cases too.
>
> But my main program is 1900
--- On Sat, 9/20/08, Nash Nipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Nash Nipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Segmentation fault when free
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Saturday, September 20, 2008, 4:14 AM
> --- On Fri, 9/19/08, Unga <[EMAIL
--- On Fri, 9/19/08, Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Segmentation fault when free
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Friday, September 19, 2008, 9:17 AM
> Hi all
>
> I'm running FreeBSD 7 on i386.
) + 1);
c[0] = '\0';
strcat(c, a);
strcat(c, b);
free(a);
free(b);
}
When it executes free(b), my program exits with Segmentation fault: 11. The
free(a) executes well.
The problem is with free(b). Even swap free(b) first and free(a) next, it still
crashes at free(b).
If I c
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:17:59 +0530 Blessan wrote:
> I have installed free bsd 7 on on Intel Xeon Machine with 1 Gb ram.
> But i cant use the mailing facility .. i can send mail by typing [mail
> username] then follows the subject and message then EOF. but i when i check
> mail of tha
(creating a new thread with a new subject)
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:17:59 +0530 Blessan wrote:
> Also i have to configure my network card each time i reboot..
How do you configure your network card? Did you write your
configuration to /etc/rc.conf[.local]? You may consider
reading rc.conf(5) for m
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:17:59 +0530, Blessan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have installed free bsd 7 on on Intel Xeon Machine with 1 Gb ram.
> But i cant use the mailing facility .. i can send mail by typing [mail
> username] then follows the subject and message then EOF. but
I have installed free bsd 7 on on Intel Xeon Machine with 1 Gb ram.
But i cant use the mailing facility .. i can send mail by typing [mail
username] then follows the subject and message then EOF. but i when i check
mail of that particular user it shows No mail for that user ??
Why is it so
> I would like to know seek any advices from all people here about any free
> tools for analyzing netflow data which can generate nice management report
> (chart, graph) like SolarWinds/any commercial products, that can be run
> either or Windows or FreeBSD (prefer).
Not sure if
201 - 300 of 883 matches
Mail list logo
