Hi,
please try me help me with following Problem.
My TV Panasonic Viera G20 has an external HDD, formatted in FreeBSD/386 system
( recognized via my standard Notebook with Win XP and SW Partition Magic 8.0.
I can see in SW format style and some info about partitions, but nothing more
is
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:56:22 +0100, Pavel Matoušek wrote:
Exist some SW for Win SW for reading this FreeBSD formatted HDD ?
You should ask this question on a Windows related list. :-)
But during my data recovery journey, I came across a program
that can be used to read UFS formatted disks,
2011-11-26 20:56, Pavel Matoušek skrev:
Exist some SW for Win SW for reading this FreeBSD formatted HDD ?
You can try this one, open and free.
http://ffsdrv.sourceforge.net/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/06/2010 01:49:39, Chad Perrin wrote:
What I *do* find to be of value, however, is improving the installation
process so that it is clearer what is going on at each step and improving
the efficiency of it without damaging its flexibility. I
On Jun 13 2010 09:24, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/06/2010 01:49:39, Chad Perrin wrote:
What I *do* find to be of value, however, is improving the installation
process so that it is clearer what is going on at each step and improving
the
- Forwarded message from Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com -
On Jun 12 2010 18:39, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:12:55PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
Call me fatalistic, but I think there is a direct relationship between
FreeBSD's high quality and it's lack of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/06/2010 04:33:02, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I'm working on a project for my client, and I spent the better part of
two days trying to get my laptop running OSX to have the right
combination of BerkeleyDB and Perl modules to build what I
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 08:06:52AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Absolutely. Especially when you compare it to MacPorts and consider the
disparity in numbers of users between MacOS and FreeBSD. Given that the
ports is maintained by a bunch of volunteers basically in their spare
time, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/06/2010 16:38:13, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 08:06:52AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Absolutely. Especially when you compare it to MacPorts and consider the
disparity in numbers of users between MacOS and FreeBSD. Given
On 6/12/10, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/06/2010 16:38:13, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 08:06:52AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Absolutely. Especially when you compare it to MacPorts and consider the
On Jun 12 2010 13:53, Tim Judd wrote:
These market statistics are pointless. The numbers are based on
people reporting their OS and usage. A system like Microsoft or Apple
can use a unique host id when checking for system updates which can
tabulate this data. Linux is possible to do same,
On Sat 12 Jun 2010 at 13:12:55 PDT Chip Camden wrote:
Call me fatalistic, but I think there is a direct relationship between
FreeBSD's high quality and it's lack of popularity. If it catered to
the common herd, its compromises would be many.
I think we're straying from the original topic,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 06:43:19PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/06/2010 16:38:13, Chad Perrin wrote:
I don't mean to belittle anyone's accomplishments, of course, but I don't
find it astonishing at all. FreeBSD's development model is one that
encourages people to develop what they
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:12:55PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
Call me fatalistic, but I think there is a direct relationship between
FreeBSD's high quality and it's lack of popularity. If it catered to the
common herd, its compromises would be many.
I believe there is such a relationship,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:51:32PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
I worked at Microsoft Developer Support in a previous life, beginning at
the time that Visual C++ and MFC were first introduced. One of
Microsoft's big selling points was what they called wizards --
basically, a set of simple,
Hello Charlie Kester,
Am 2010-06-12 15:51:32, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I worked at Microsoft Developer Support in a previous life, beginning at
the time that Visual C++ and MFC were first introduced.
Hahaha, you where Killed by a Microsoft Customer...
And when you knoked at the door of
On Sat 12 Jun 2010 at 18:17:22 PDT Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Charlie Kester,
Am 2010-06-12 15:51:32, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I worked at Microsoft Developer Support in a previous life, beginning at
the time that Visual C++ and MFC were first introduced.
Hahaha, you where Killed
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sat 12 Jun 2010 at 18:17:22 PDT Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Charlie Kester,
Am 2010-06-12 15:51:32, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I worked at Microsoft Developer Support in a previous life, beginning at
the
I'm working on a project for my client, and I spent the better part of
two days trying to get my laptop running OSX to have the right
combination of BerkeleyDB and Perl modules to build what I wanted.
Turns out my Perl 5.10.1 install was incompatible with BerkeleyDB on
OSX, but the macports
Jason W. Morgan [Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:49:15PM -0400]:
GRUB menu. It's not difficult, but it does add an extra step. Also, be
sure to keep a backup of your modified GRUB config---it seems that
each time Ubuntu decides it needs to perform a significant update, it
replaces the GRUB config with
On 2008.08.11 18:05:10, Jack Raats wrote:
I would like to put FreeBSD, Ubuntu and WInXP on one system using a boot
manager.
Which version do I have to put first on the harddisk, which second and which
last?
I also want to know which bootmanager to use?
Thanks for your time
On Monday 11 August 2008, Jason W. Morgan wrote:
it seems that
each time Ubuntu decides it needs to perform a significant update, it
replaces the GRUB config with the default, making FreeBSD once again
inaccessible. There is probably a way to prevent this, but I never
got around to
hors configure your kernel-img file correctly :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grep hook /etc/kernel-img.conf
postinst_hook = /usr/sbin/update-grub
postrm_hook = /usr/sbin/update-grub
just comment out these.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Mike Clarke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 11 August 2008,
On 2008.08.14 19:05:22, nicodache wrote:
hors configure your kernel-img file correctly :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grep hook /etc/kernel-img.conf
postinst_hook = /usr/sbin/update-grub
postrm_hook = /usr/sbin/update-grub
just comment out these.
Good to know, if I ever use Ubuntu again.
Thanks,
Jason W Morgan wrote:
Also, be sure to keep a backup of your modified GRUB config---it seems
that each time Ubuntu decides it needs to perform a significant update,
it replaces the GRUB config with the default, making FreeBSD once again
inaccessible. There is probably a way to prevent this,
I would like to put FreeBSD, Ubuntu and WInXP on one system using a boot
manager.
Which version do I have to put first on the harddisk, which second and which
last?
I also want to know which bootmanager to use?
Thanks for your time
Greeting
Jack
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Jack Raats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to put FreeBSD, Ubuntu and WInXP on one system using a boot
manager.
Which version do I have to put first on the harddisk, which second and
which last?
I also want to know which bootmanager to use?
Thanks
I recommend installing FreeBSD first, then Windows and then Ubuntu. For
reasons that I don't know, WinXP SP3 will become unable to start if you
installs FreeBSD after it (It will freeze on the welcome screen). - I don't
know if this problem just happened with me or with others people too, but it
Le Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:05:10 +0200,
Jack Raats [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I would like to put FreeBSD, Ubuntu and WInXP on one system using a
boot manager.
Which version do I have to put first on the harddisk, which second
and which last?
I also want to know which bootmanager to use?
On Monday 11 August 2008, Bruno Schmitt wrote:
Ubuntu uses GRUB boot manager and as far as I remember it won't
recognize FreeBSD partition out of the box, so you will have to add
some lines to /boot/grub/menu.lst
# For booting FreeBSD
title FreeBSD 5.2
root (hd0,a)
chainloader +1
Sorry for not making myself clear... When I said Ubuntu uses GRUB boot
manager and as far as I remember it won't recognize FreeBSD partition out of
the box I was referring to the GRUB installed by Ubuntu installation which
won't come with FreeBSD partition configured.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at
I recommend installing FreeBSD first, then Windows and then
Ubuntu ...
Unless something has changed since the last time I was messing with
this sort of thing, one hazard of installing a Linux last is that
there may by then be no space left for the /boot partition, which
has to be below cylinder
At 2003-08-27T21:17:47Z, Charles Howse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, what is the answer to your intrepretation of the question?
No.
In that case, wasn't the pointer to samba the answer to what the OP
really wants?
(Just being obnoxious.)
--
Joel Rees, programmer, Systems Group
Altech
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:55:12PM +0200, Martin Vana wrote:
Hi,
is there any utility that can mount Freebsd UFS under win for read/write.
You could do worse than ask the author of ext2fs whether he knows of any
tools similar to his for UFS (his tool allows you to mount ext2 fs on
win):
http
Hi,
is there any utility that can mount Freebsd UFS under win for read/write.
Thank you
Martin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
is there any utility that can mount Freebsd UFS under win for
read/write.
Thank you
Martin
Samba will let you read and write to UFS in Windows.
Sharity-Light will let you read and write to Windows shares in FreeBSD.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
At 2003-08-27T19:28:45Z, Charles Howse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Samba will let you read and write to UFS in Windows.
Um, no. Samba will let you browse a filesystem residing on a FreeBSD
server. It will not let you mount the filesystem natively on a local drive.
--
Kirk Strauser
Samba will let you read and write to UFS in Windows.
Um, no. Samba will let you browse a filesystem residing on a FreeBSD
server. It will not let you mount the filesystem natively on
a local drive.
The question was:
is there any utility that can mount Freebsd UFS under win for
read
At 2003-08-27T20:52:04Z, Charles Howse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The question was:
is there any utility that can mount Freebsd UFS under win for read/write.
I am almost 100% certain that the real question was:
Is there a utility that can mount a FreeBSD UFS partition read/write from
The question was:
is there any utility that can mount Freebsd UFS under win
for read/write.
I am almost 100% certain that the real question was:
Is there a utility that can mount a FreeBSD UFS partition
read/write from
a hard drive installed in a Windows box?
I have
At 2003-08-27T21:17:47Z, Charles Howse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, what is the answer to your intrepretation of the question?
No.
Also BTW, I said I could *mount* Samba shares, what I should have said is
that I can *map* Samba shares to Network drives, sorry.
Close enough for guv'mnt
41 matches
Mail list logo
