Xiaobo Zhu wrote:
Hi,
I have read the handbook and spent hours on the configuration of ipv6
on laptop, but still can't get it done.
The local network administrator only suggest the following steps to
setup ipv6 on windows xp and it works fine on that platform. I just
don't know to get
Christer Hermansson wrote:
Xiaobo Zhu wrote:
Hi,
I have read the handbook and spent hours on the configuration of ipv6
on laptop, but still can't get it done.
The local network administrator only suggest the following steps to
setup ipv6 on windows xp and it works fine on that platform. I
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
on laptop, but still can't get it done.
The local network administrator only suggest the following steps to
setup ipv6 on windows xp and it works fine on that platform. I just
don't know to get it work on FreeBSD, would anyone guide me in detail
so I can als
Xiaobo Zhu wrote:
Hi,
I have read the handbook and spent hours on the configuration of ipv6
on laptop, but still can't get it done.
The local network administrator only suggest the following steps to
setup ipv6 on windows xp and it works fine on that platform. I just
don't know to get
on laptop, but still can't get it done.
The local network administrator only suggest the following steps to
setup ipv6 on windows xp and it works fine on that platform. I just
don't know to get it work on FreeBSD, would anyone guide me in detail
so I can also help the people aroud me.
M
Hi,
I have read the handbook and spent hours on the configuration of ipv6
on laptop, but still can't get it done.
The local network administrator only suggest the following steps to
setup ipv6 on windows xp and it works fine on that platform. I just
don't know to get it work on Free
Hi,
I have read some tutor and spent hours on configuring ipv6 on my
desktop with FreeBSD, but still can't get it work.
The network administrator only suggested the configuration on windows
xp platform(come as follows), so would any one tell me what should I
do to get it work on FreeBSD.
ons
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
>
It doesn't matter, I've had it since 6.0 and it is still present in version
6.3,.. not sure about 5.3 though from the point I've started using IPv6 and
SMP FreeBSD has been letting me down.
--
View t
Ofloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When using 6to4 extensively the system crashes I've never had this with gif
> tunnels though every since I've started using 6to4 and stf interface this
> happens especially when the v6 gateway is unreachable for short time, ..
>
> I haven't seen the error yet bu
ems which have
this issue.
Regards, ..
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPv6-6to4-tp15921128p15921128.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
Why certain hosts of freebsd can be configurable with unspecified (::)
(all-zero) IPv6 addresses in its interfaces? RFC 4291 clearly mentions
"this address must never be assigned to any node". Is there is any use-case
or motivation behind accepting this address in an interface?
si
Hi,
Why certain hosts of freebsd can be configurable with unspecified (::)
(all-zero) IPv6 addresses in its interfaces? RFC 4291 clearly mentions
"this address must never be assigned to any node". Is there is any use-case
or motivation behind accepting this address in an interface
Is this behavior exists from the beginning of KAME integration or available
in latest freebsd code? Because I was using a box which derives its ipv6
code from KAME project and the behavior was different from this. Also, in a
host which uses Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4
In host implementation, if I manually configure global ipv6 address via
ifconfig command then those addresses are not persistent after making the
interface DOWN and again UP, which is not the case for IPv4 addresses. Is
this an intentional behavior that all ipv6 address needs to be removed from
Hi,
In host implementation, if I manually configure global ipv6 address via
ifconfig command then those addresses are not persistent after making the
interface DOWN and again UP, which is not the case for IPv4 addresses. Is
this an intentional behavior that all ipv6 address needs to be removed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running FreeBSD 6.2 in a totally IPV6-only aware environment. I
> want to set up an NTP server by pointing to an IPV6 stratum 1
> address. Can I just add an IPV6 address in the NTP.conf file just as
>
I am running FreeBSD 6.2 in a totally IPV6-only aware environment. I want to
set up an NTP server by pointing to an IPV6 stratum 1 address. Can I just add
an IPV6 address in the NTP.conf file just as I would do for an IPV4 server?
--
Joe
Wojciech,
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 09:03 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > AFAIK, IPv6 setup is much more difficult than IPv4 setup. Still i don't
>
> i don't think so. it is no more difficult, or even easier.
>
> more difficult is to put rev-dns entrie
AFAIK, IPv6 setup is much more difficult than IPv4 setup. Still i don't
i don't think so. it is no more difficult, or even easier.
more difficult is to put rev-dns entries but still not a problem
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On 11/5/07, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to set my machine up to be on both IPv4 and IPv6. I have read
> the stuff on 6over4 and such and still a little confused on a few things:
>
> 1. The machine I want to do the tunneling on is behind a NAT'
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 03:16 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> I want to set my machine up to be on both IPv4 and IPv6. I have read
> the stuff on 6over4 and such and still a little confused on a few things:
>
> 1. The machine I want to do the tunneling on is behind a NAT'
I want to set my machine up to be on both IPv4 and IPv6. I have read
the stuff on 6over4 and such and still a little confused on a few things:
1. The machine I want to do the tunneling on is behind a NAT'ed firewall
how do I reliabelly obtain the external IP of the firewall (dhcp
assigned
Hi All,
Thank You for the reply.
But I still haven't got the information I am expecting.
I am using the *FreeBSD IPv6 stack*.
I would be very grateful if you help me to know the following:
1) I wrote the UDP client server program, the client is continously sending
packets to server till
Hello,
I'm having problems with ipfw + IPv6 keep-state rules, if I use a
keep-state rule on IPv6 it will only work intermittently (eg. I can
connect to an FTP site with IPv6 and start to grab a file, but it will
stall after a few seconds). I am using deny all by default on ipfw, my
ru
Hello,
I'm having problems with ipfw + IPv6 keep-state rules, if I use a
keep-state rule on IPv6 it will only work intermittently (eg. I can
connect to an FTP site with IPv6 and start to grab a file, but it will
stall after a few seconds). I am using deny all by default on ipfw, my
ru
Hi,
I'm a little bit confused about the purpose of ip6fw(8). The
manual page suggests that the standard ipfw(8) supports both
IPv4 and IPv6, so why is there a seperate ip6fw? Can it do
anything that ipfw can't do?
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG,
"Prasad Dandra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have some doubts regarding the BSD stack flow.
> I am very much interested to know the code flow from sendto (UDP case) upto
> udp6_output function when used in IPv6 client (simple client) and also how
> the local port
to (UDP case) upto
> udp6_output function when used in IPv6 client (simple client) and also how
> the local port and destination address are assigned without using bind
> when 1st time the sendto is called i.e where the pcbconnect and pcbbind are
> called (particularly in case of ipv6)?
>
>
Dear All,
First, I would like to thank you all for the wonderful work of developing
FreeBSD.
I have some doubts regarding the BSD stack flow.
I am very much interested to know the code flow from sendto (UDP case) upto
udp6_output function when used in IPv6 client (simple client) and also how
the
Have you tried using -W on netstat? "In certain displays, avoid
truncating addresses even if this causes some fields to overflow." I
tested it on my own IPv6 server after establishing a connection and
reproduced your behavior with the truncated IPv6 addresses; however,
once I added t
Hello All:
I'm curious if there is any timeline for the correct display of IPv6
addresses in various displays. In particular, I'm interested in being
able to see a full address in 'who' and 'netstat' so I can track
connections to the server. Presently, the di
On Friday 31 August 2007 15:23:23 Prabhu Harihar wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 31 August 2007 11:15:51 Prabhu Harihar wrote:
> > > I wish to know whether FreeBSD supports NIS server running over IPv6
> > > protocol?
&g
I think, the underlying RPC portmapper needs to be "ipv6-aware". Whether
this is supported in FreeBSD? Do you think no other configuration changes
needed for NIS server / client running natively over IPv6 network?
Thanks!
On 8/31/07, Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On
On Friday 31 August 2007 11:15:51 Prabhu Harihar wrote:
> I wish to know whether FreeBSD supports NIS server running over IPv6
> protocol?
>
> I'm clueless in getting information about NIS server over IPv6
> configuration and availability in any Unix flavors including *BSDs
Hi Group,
I wish to know whether FreeBSD supports NIS server running over IPv6
protocol?
I'm clueless in getting information about NIS server over IPv6 configuration
and availability in any Unix flavors including *BSDs, Solaris or Linux
distros.
Thanks in Advance,
Pra
e that I should have new 'v6' type binaries in the
>> ./bin directory, but I do not see those.
>
> To answer my own question, and to ensure quality in the archive, thanks
> to this:
>
> http://tomclegg.net/djbdns-ipv6
>
> I managed to solve my own question
not see those.
To answer my own question, and to ensure quality in the archive, thanks
to this:
http://tomclegg.net/djbdns-ipv6
I managed to solve my own question.
I had to:
# echo WITH_IPV6=yes >> /etc/make.conf
...and now I have:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 78 Aug 21 20:58 add-alias6
Hi all,
I am doing some serious testing with IPv6, however I can not get the
name resolution side of things on my DJBDNS DNS servers to work as expected.
On my legacy 4.10 box running BIND, I can resolve v6 addresses
inherently even without v6 enabled in the kernel, but on my
pre-production
Hello list,
I'm having a problem trying to develop a proper generate record for
my IPv6 reverse zones.
Can anyone point me to the correct FM in this case? Preferably
something with some examples?
Thanks!
-
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Net
Hello,
I am having a question about if_bridge and IPv6 link-local addresses
I am using FreeBSD 6.2-p7 and after setting rc.conf like the following
and rebooting, I get no link-local address for bridge0
ipv6_enable="YES"
cloned_interfaces="bridge0"
ifconfig_bridge0=
Hi,
I've been recently playing with just established ipv6 tunnel (thanks to
all who provided their feedback to "IPV6 Tunnel Brokers" topic) and have
found one problem - mail coming in from ipv6 addresses is greylisted
regardless of spf records, for example:
addr mx2.freebsd.org[20
On Aug 1, 2007, at 4:41 PMAug 1, 2007, Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, August 1, 2007 16:12, Christopher Hilton wrote:
Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
Hey list,
While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an
IPv6
tunnel to
On Wed, August 1, 2007 16:12, Christopher Hilton wrote:
> Javier Henderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
>>> Hey list,
>>>
>>> While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
>>> tunnel to the
>
> I second that recommendation. The ISP in question is Hurricane Electric
> and the process is 100% web driven. It took me less than a day to get a
> gif tunnel up and an ipv6 /64 assignment.
>
>
They are FAIRLY response to service issues (I had problems getting
t
Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
Hey list,
While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
tunnel to the internet, there seems to be a large number of routing
problems upstream from them that prevent us from accessing the
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
> tunnel to the internet, there seems to be a large number of routing
> problems upstream from them that prevent us from accessing the
&g
Sure I was:
"[T]here seems to be a large number of routing problems upstream from
them that prevent us from accessing the majority of the IPv6 net."
Eric
On Aug 1, 2007, at 10:06 AMAug 1, 2007, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
http://ipv6tb.he.net/index.php
You aren't clear on
Hey list,
While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
tunnel to the internet, there seems to be a large number of routing
problems upstream from them that prevent us from accessing the
majority of the IPv6 net.
So, I ask two things really.
1) Does anyone know
Mike Tancsa writes:
> >+TCP: [::1]:49478 to [::1]:4080 tcpflags 0x2; tcp_input: Connection
> attempt to closed port
>
> Does
> sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain=0
> get rid of them ?
Thank you - this led me down a different path and I now know
what needs to happen.
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:00:05 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
>
>Hello:
> I've recently started getting these in the system log:
>
>+TCP: [::1]:49478 to [::1]:4080 tcpflags 0x2; tcp_input: Connection
>attempt to closed port
>
> The program affected works anyway, but
Hello:
I've recently started getting these in the system log:
+TCP: [::1]:49478 to [::1]:4080 tcpflags 0x2; tcp_input: Connection
attempt to closed port
The program affected works anyway, but I'd like to dispense
with the clutter. What's happening, and is there a way to fix it
Hi! You can find more about the status of Samba and IPv6 in my
presentation from SambaXP (see
http://www.ipv6consultancy.com/ipv6blog/?p=8).
I have also provide a patch that enables IPv6 in the Samba4 server. A
Howto and the Samba4 IPv6 patch can be found at
http://www.ipv6consultancy.com
Jun 22 15:46:45 spark kernel: Jun 22 15:46:45 spark sshd[69427]: error:
ssh_msg_send: write
The system is up for 3 days now and hasn't crashed like it did daily since
the last 20 days, now all i changed was not connecting to ssh using IPv6 so
I searched my logs, and I found the error
On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:23 PMJun 22, 2007, Eric F Crist wrote:
Hello all,
I've been toying with getting IPv6 installed and running for a
while, and I've got only one hurdle remaining.
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary
firewall is configured with an IP
On Jun 23, 2007, at 7:17 AMJun 23, 2007, Tilman Linneweh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 04:36 , Eric Crist wrote:
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say
1000:2000:1::6 and is connected to my ISP through a gif t
On Jun 23, 2007, at 04:36 , Eric Crist wrote:
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say
1000:2000:1::6 and is connected to my ISP through a gif tunnel
(router doesn't support IPv6 yet, on my end) to 1000
On Jun 23, 2007, at 7:17 AMJun 23, 2007, Tilman Linneweh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 04:36 , Eric Crist wrote:
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say
1000:2000:1::6 and is connected to my ISP through a gif t
Hello all,
I've been toying with getting IPv6 installed and running for a while,
and I've got only one hurdle remaining.
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary firewall
is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say 1000:2000:1::6 and is
connected to m
Hello all,
I've been toying with getting IPv6 installed and running for a while,
and I've got only one hurdle remaining.
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary firewall
is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say 1000:2000:1::6 and is
connected to m
gt;> > from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link
>> > in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6.
>>
>> There's a link on the Samba front page from last week.
>> The short version is that it doesn't do it yet, and probably won&#
On 6/14/07, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Andrew Falanga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information
> from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link
> in
"Andrew Falanga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information
> from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link
> in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6.
There's a link on t
Hi,
Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information
from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link
in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6.
Andy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
Ofloo wrote:
>
> I use 6to4 IPv6 tunnels, when using applications which use a lot of
> bandwidth (400kb/s), it is not that much but still, the server gets in
> trouble.
>
> May 28 19:51:21 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for
> 192.88.99.1
> May 28 19:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:01:49PM -0700, Ofloo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Ofloo wrote:
>> >
>> > I use 6to4 IPv6 tunnels, when using applications which use a lot of
>> > bandwidth (400kb/s), it is not that much but
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:01:49PM -0700, Ofloo wrote:
>
>
>
> Ofloo wrote:
> >
> > I use 6to4 IPv6 tunnels, when using applications which use a lot of
> > bandwidth (400kb/s), it is not that much but still, the server gets in
> > trouble.
> >
&
Ofloo wrote:
>
> I use 6to4 IPv6 tunnels, when using applications which use a lot of
> bandwidth (400kb/s), it is not that much but still, the server gets in
> trouble.
>
> May 28 19:51:21 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for
> 192.88.99.1
>
I use 6to4 IPv6 tunnels, when using applications which use a lot of bandwidth
(400kb/s), it is not that much but still, the server gets in trouble.
May 28 19:51:21 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for
192.88.99.1
May 28 19:51:22 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 08:24:43AM -0700, Ofloo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to jails, but from what I understand is that a jail allows one
> to have multiple virtual systems on one system, now I was wondering if
> this could be done through IPv6, I would want to setup multi
Hi,
I'm new to jails, but from what I understand is that a jail allows one
to have multiple virtual systems on one system, now I was wondering if
this could be done through IPv6, I would want to setup multiple IPv6
only systems, does anyone know if this is possible with FreeBSD6.2 ? Or
an
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> is in possible? in what version of FreeBSD?
There's no IPv6 support for jails, yet.
Regards,
Mikhail.
--
Mikhail Goriachev
Webanoide
Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501
Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.weban
is in possible? in what version of FreeBSD?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
is there such a thing? or patch? standard talk/talkd use IPv4 only
thank you very much
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
is it planned? jails are great, but no ipv6.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 3/20/07, Nikos Vassiliadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 17:01, Eric F Crist wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My ISP tells me it should be prefixlen 126, not 128
> >
> > On 3/20/07, Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > E
Eric F Crist schrieb:
[...] I'm performing the configuration as follows:
ifconfig gif0 create
ifconfig gif0 tunnel
ifconfig gif0 inet6 alias ::a::a ::b::b prefixlen 126
When I execute the last command, I get:
ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): Invalid argument
[...]
Use a prefi
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 17:01, Eric F Crist wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My ISP tells me it should be prefixlen 126, not 128
> >
> > On 3/20/07, Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > Eric F Crist schrieb:
> > > > [...] I'm performing the config
On 3/20/07, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My ISP tells me it should be prefixlen 126, not 128
On 3/20/07, Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Eric F Crist schrieb:
> > [...] I'm performing the configuration as follows:
> >
> > ifconfig gif0 create
> > ifconfig gif0 tunnel
>
Hey all,
I've got a FreeBSD 6.2 system, compiled from source only two days ago, so it
should have the routing patch applied. I'm trying to get a tunnel between
my systems and my ISP. I'm performing the configuration as follows:
ifconfig gif0 create
ifconfig gif0 tunnel
ifconfig gif0 inet6 al
; Ok, yes, I think I would like to do it manually like
> this. I notice you do not have a ipv6 default route
> statement there - is it not needed ?
Sorry, I forgot that.
ipv6_defaultrouter="1234:1234:1234::1"
Thank you so much - this all worked perfectly.
So now I have reboote
Arone Silimantia schrieb:
--- Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Add the following line in /etc/rc.conf
ipv6_enable="YES"
This is enough to let FreeBSD configure the
interface with IPv6
automatically using router solicitation.
Hmmm...that sounds very nice - just addi
--- Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Add the following line in /etc/rc.conf
>
> ipv6_enable="YES"
>
> This is enough to let FreeBSD configure the
> interface with IPv6
> automatically using router solicitation.
Hmmm...that sounds very nice - j
default route. BUT, I
keep reading that with ipv6 you don't want to manually configure
addresses and routes - there is some kind of fancy autoconfigure you
can do with your gateway so that you don't need to manually configure
the addresses (?)
So two questions:
- is there indeed
Hello,
I am in a datacenter that provides native (not tunneled) ipv6 connectivity.
Unfortunately, all of the howtos for FreeBSD are focused on tunneling ipv6 and
using gif0, etc. This does not apply to me because I have a real ipv6
connection.
Right now things are simple - I have a single
Arone Silimantia wrote:
Hello,
I am in a datacenter that provides native (not tunneled) ipv6 connectivity.
Unfortunately, all of the howtos for FreeBSD are focused on tunneling ipv6 and
using gif0, etc. This does not apply to me because I have a real ipv6
connection.
Right now things are
Hello,
I am running a 6.1-RELEASE system, one IP (v4) address
configured, everything is wonderful.
Now, in the past I have added additional IPv4
addresses with this command:
ifconfig fxp0 alias 192.168.0.2 netmask
255.255.255.255
Easy. So now, I need to add a ipv6 address for the
first time
Hello.
I am trying to implement a mobile ipv6 testbed.
May I use any release of freeBSD or I need a specific one?
My email addrs are [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am looking forward for your answer.
Ioannis Kandirakis
>I would like to ask you a few questions.
> I am trying to implement an IPv6 testbed as a part of my thesis.
> Following the instructions for the 4.9 release and using 6.2 I tried to
> recompile the Kernel but there are not options for IPv6.Does mobile IPv6
> supported by the
john kandirakis wrote:
I would like to ask you a few questions. I am trying to implement an
IPv6 testbed as a part of my thesis. Following the instructions for
the 4.9 release and using 6.2 I tried to recompile the Kernel but
there are not options for IPv6.Does mobile IPv6 supported by the
I would like to ask you a few questions.
I am trying to implement an IPv6 testbed as a part of my thesis.
Following the instructions for the 4.9 release and using 6.2 I tried to
recompile the Kernel but there are not options for IPv6.Does mobile IPv6
supported by the current release (6.2)?
Do I
Is there anything different with entries in resolv.conf for IPv6 addresses?
I'm looking at the manual page for resolv.conf and didn't find anything
specific to IPv6. Therefore, I'm assuming that the entry would simply be:
nameserver fec0::3
vs.
nameserver 192.168.0.1
Or wha
This is a repost of an earlier message. I have some problems that seem to be
related to the interoperation of ipv4
client programs and ipv6 servers or the other way round.
Does anyone have some examples of how to configere FreeBSD to have a smooth
interoperation of IPv4 and IPv6? What lines do
I have some problems that seem to be related to the interoperation of ipv4
client programs and ipv6 servers or the other way round.
I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE.
I have the following problems:
MySQL and JDBC client
--
I run MySQL 5.1 server at the FreeBSD ma
Hi,
At work I have a FreeBSD machine that I use for various testing and I need
to setup an IPv6 only LAN using this machine. To this end, I have a few
questions.
1) How can I remove an address from an interface using ifconfig (or other
utility)? That is, I want to remove all IPv6 addresses
I want to know whether mpd (multi-link PPP daemon) could possibly
support IPv6. When I want to establish a PPTP connection with a PPTP
server running mpd, could I use IPv6CP instead of IPv4CP to set up the
PPP? If it supports, how could I configure the related parameters in the
configuration
Hi, all:
I want to know whether mpd (multi-link PPP daemon) could possibly
support IPv6. When I want to establish a PPTP connection with a PPTP
server running mpd, could I use IPv6CP instead of IPv4CP to set up the
PPP? If it supports, how could I configure the related parameters in the
> Are you using antispoofing rules on your external interface? If you've got
> something like this in your ruleset:
>
>antispoof log quick for $ext_if
>
> Then it will expand into a series of rules containing the following when
> you load them:
Thank you for responding!
No, this is not the i
Peter Schuller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using pf on a 6.1 machine. I have a tunneling interface (gif0) for my
> IPv6 feed. The problem I am having is connecting to myself in spite of
> firewalling.
>
> I am allowing traffic on port 22 to my public ipv6 address. I am al
Hello,
I am using pf on a 6.1 machine. I have a tunneling interface (gif0) for my
IPv6 feed. The problem I am having is connecting to myself in spite of
firewalling.
I am allowing traffic on port 22 to my public ipv6 address. I am also allowing
all outgoing traffic on the tunneling interface
a DSL-Box (NAT) with one network
interface. This server is connected with two other workstation
through a switch. I register by sixxs (a IPv6 service provider).
After some installation I got my IPv6 connection between the sixxs
provider and my FreeBSD server running! I can ping www.kame.net an
201 - 300 of 444 matches
Mail list logo
