Is it possible, when booted into FreeBSD, to run Linux programs from an actual
Linux installation, instead of the Linux-emulation ports?
User would have both FreeBSD and Linux installed on hard drive, and might
possibly
mount -t ext2fs /dev/ /compat/linux
I noticed there was a Gentoo Linux
ks with stty that
has to be performed to make serial communication work through the linux
emulation layer?
/Morgan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Morgan Wesström wrote:
> Dear list.
>
> I have an USB smartcard reader that emulates a serial port. It uses the
> uftdi.ko kernel module and creates the following device nodes when
> plugged in. System is FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64.
>
> crw-rw 1 uucp dialer0, 110 Jan 14 19:27 /dev/cua
Dear list.
I have an USB smartcard reader that emulates a serial port. It uses the
uftdi.ko kernel module and creates the following device nodes when
plugged in. System is FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64.
crw-rw 1 uucp dialer0, 110 Jan 14 19:27 /dev/cuaU0
crw-rw 1 uucp dialer0, 1
The problem is solved. I used a recent reply to fix an error. Yes, I followed
and yes, thanks for the help from everyone.
--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
From: Boris Samorodov
Subject: Re: linux emulation problems
To: "Super Biscuit"
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebs
/054046.html
--- En date de : Mar 3.11.09, Super Biscuit a écrit :
> De: Super Biscuit
> Objet: linux emulation problems
> À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Mardi 3 Novembre 2009, 21h58
> I'm using linux_base-f10. During the
> installation of ports. The error comes to to
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:58:19 -0800 (PST) Super Biscuit wrote:
> I'm using linux_base-f10.
How do you?
> During the installation of ports. The error comes to to use at least base-f8.
> Ports have been updated.
Did you pay attention at /usr/ports/UPDATING?
--
WBR, bsam
I'm using linux_base-f10. During the installation of ports. The error comes to
to use at least base-f8. Ports have been updated.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Desmond Chapman wrote:
> I don't know if anyone else is trying; but, I am attempting a Linux
> installation of virtualbox on FreeBSD amd64.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.virtualbox.devel/853
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulato
I don't know if anyone else is trying; but, I am attempting a Linux
installation of virtualbox on FreeBSD amd64.
Here is the output first:
"sh Desktop/VirtualBox-1.6.0-Linux_amd64.run
Verifying archive integrity... All good.
Uncompressing VirtualBox for Linux installation
VirtualBox Ver
Hi,
We have recently upgraded a machine that runs a Linux app from 4.11 to
7-STABLE. Most things are just fine apart from the app can only be
started once. If stopped and then restarted, we see
"semget error
Server Stopped"
Googling and reading led me to ipcs and ipcrm:
(after stopping the ap
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:52:14 +1000
Da Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 20/03/2008, Da Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:50 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > > > I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux
> > > > > compat under freebsd.
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:52:14 +1000 Da Rock wrote:
> Also, on the linux compat- am I correct in my observation that you have
> to actually chroot to enable the running of a linux binary? Enter the
> file structure of the linux compat? Or can you just run it?
Just run it.
WBR
--
bsam
___
> On 20/03/2008, Da Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:50 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > > I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat under
> > > > freebsd. I am particularly interested in drivers under linux compat.
> > >
> > > emulation
Da Rock wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:50 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat under
freebsd. I am particularly interested in drivers under linux compat.
emulation allows execution of normal linux programs, not drivers
Ok
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:50 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat under
> > freebsd. I am particularly interested in drivers under linux compat.
>
> emulation allows execution of normal linux programs, not drivers
Ok. So input devices wo
I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat under
freebsd. I am particularly interested in drivers under linux compat.
emulation allows execution of normal linux programs, not drivers
1. How do I install the drivers for all users under linux compat?
2. Is it possible for fr
I think you're talking about Linux binary compatibility.
While I have heard of project(s) for device driver compatibility I do
not believe anything exists in a usable state.
-Patrick
On 19/03/2008, Da Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compa
I've read the handbook and just about anything on linux compat under
freebsd. I am particularly interested in drivers under linux compat.
1. How do I install the drivers for all users under linux compat?
2. Is it possible for freebsd programs to use the linux drivers?
3. Anything I should be aware
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:28:54 +0200
Sereno Ternullo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Sereno Ternullo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Making a new libmap.conf for linux emulation
>
nux distribution.
# mount /dev/md0 /mnt/FedoraISO
# cd /mnt/FedoraISO
# for rpm in *.rmp
> do
> rpm --ignore-os -i --root-install /compat/linux ${rpm}
> done
After these commands I had my problem with ldconfig and the linux
emulation.
Now the strangest thing: my /etc/libmap.conf file disap
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 00:54:32 +0200
Sereno Ternullo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I made too many mistakes configuring my /etc/libmap.conf file and now
> I'm having problems with my "linux sub system".
why do you think you have to do that for?
>
> If I have linux.ko loaded into the ke
Hi all,
I made too many mistakes configuring my /etc/libmap.conf file and now
I'm having problems with my "linux sub system".
If I have linux.ko loaded into the kernel, ldconfig fails like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc]# ldconfig
Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped)
With linux.ko loaded into th
On Tuesday 20 February 2007, Lorin Lund wrote:
> A program I'm using, which is distributed only in binary form
> wants the Mesa library.
Do you already have Linux emulation installed? If so, does installing the
graphics/linux_dri port solve your problem? That got Secondlife (which
A program I'm using, which is distributed only in binary form
wants the Mesa library. So I suppose I have to compile it but
it would have to be into a Linux format. Where is development
for Linux covered in the documentation?
___
freebsd-questions@free
Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 07
Feb 2006 10:16:49 -0500:
> "Manfred Usselmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I can't get the linux emulation installed under FreeBSD 4.9:
> >
> > ===> linux_base-rh-9 depends on executa
"Manfred Usselmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't get the linux emulation installed under FreeBSD 4.9:
>
> ===> linux_base-rh-9 depends on executable: rpm - found
> ===> linux_base-rh-9 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg_info - found
> ker
Hi,
I can't get the linux emulation installed under FreeBSD 4.9:
===> linux_base-rh-9 depends on executable: rpm - found
===> linux_base-rh-9 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg_info - found
kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 -> 3
glibc-2.3.2-27.9.7.i386.rpm
execution of glibc-2.3.2
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "K Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Antoine Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: about linux emulation
On 10/5/05, K Anders
On 10/5/05, K Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Antoine Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 7:14 AM
> Subject: about linux emulation
>
>
> Is it possible to chroot into
- Original Message -
From: "Antoine Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 7:14 AM
Subject: about linux emulation
Is it possible to chroot into a fully functional linux environment on
freebsd?
--
Hi Antoine,
I don't know if this fully
Is it possible to chroot into a fully functional linux environment on
freebsd?
--
Antoine W. Solomon Jr.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL P
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:32:04PM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote:
> MSG In-short: what is, or where do I find info on, the current status of
> linux binary compatability on FreeBSD/amd64 platform
32-bit x86 Linux binaries should run just fine on FreeBSD/AMD64 5.4 or
later. You will have to install
board probe/chipset of the Compaq
300-series amd64 platform, if anyone knows the status of that fix it'd be
great to know too (of course assuming I've got the option of better linux
emulation with 5.4R).
Ideally, I'd like to be able to run the linux/amd64 binaries... But I really
do
64bit versions, I decided to use the
Linux based versions and simply use the Linux emulation
base 7.
I was able to get Helix Universal Server (by realnetworks)
installed along with the Flash Communications Server. Both
at the time functioned properly (i believe). I then upgraded
to FreeBSD 5.3 and no
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 07:38 am, Dick Davies wrote:
> * Mikko Heiskanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1244 16:44]:
> > I've been wondering about this some time now.
> > The linux compatibility layer (kernel module + linux_base -port)
> > is told to be able to run linux binaries. The handbook even describes
> >
* Mikko Heiskanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1244 16:44]:
> I've been wondering about this some time now.
> The linux compatibility layer (kernel module + linux_base -port)
> is told to be able to run linux binaries. The handbook even describes
> for a couple of heavy-duty applications how this is done.
I've been wondering about this some time now.
The linux compatibility layer (kernel module + linux_base -port)
is told to be able to run linux binaries. The handbook even describes
for a couple of heavy-duty applications how this is done.
However, after reading that part of the handbook and googlin
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 02:17 am, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Nov 11), Malcolm Kay said:
> > I am attempting to run a commercial CAD software suite compiled for
> > Linux on a FreeBSD 4.10 OS. It runs as well or perhaps better than on
> > a Linux box until the PID becomes large.
> >
> > Th
In the last episode (Nov 11), Malcolm Kay said:
> I am attempting to run a commercial CAD software suite compiled for
> Linux on a FreeBSD 4.10 OS. It runs as well or perhaps better than on
> a Linux box until the PID becomes large.
>
> The MAX_PID for FreeBSD is 9 while Linux has a limit of 0
I am attempting to run a commercial CAD software
suite compiled for Linux on a FreeBSD 4.10 OS. It runs
as well or perhaps better than on a Linux box until
the PID becomes large.
The MAX_PID for FreeBSD is 9 while Linux has a
limit of 0x8000.
Once the current PID gets high the interaction
> It looks like the linux_base-6 port installs a libc.so.5 file (into
> /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libc.so.5, though). You should also be able
> to just copy the required libraries off a working Linux system. Just
> make sure you don't overwrite existing files with older ones.
dan,
thanks man!, t
In the last episode (Nov 08), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> hi,
> i need to make setl programming language
> (http://cs1.cs.nyu.edu/bacon/download-setl.html) work under freebsd5 (for
> discrete math lab), no srcs available, i just found linux2.0.18 binary (from
> latter link), the problem is that th
hi,
i need to make setl programming language
(http://cs1.cs.nyu.edu/bacon/download-setl.html) work under freebsd5 (for
discrete math lab), no srcs available, i just found linux2.0.18 binary (from
latter link), the problem is that this is linked to libc.so.5 and it seems to
be broken compatibili
on 22.10.2004 14:18 Konrad Heuer said the following:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Linux binaries often need to access files outside the emulation directory
> tree, just think of data files in the user's homes when running
> applications like acroread, linux-mozilla, staroffice et
On Friday 22 October 2004 12:18, Konrad Heuer wrote:
> Linux binaries often need to access files outside the emulation directory
> tree, just think of data files in the user's homes when running
> applications like acroread, linux-mozilla, staroffice etc. So you
> absolutely need to break out.
Yes
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Under Linux emulation "/" resolves to real root directory, not
> /compat/linux directory and I am very curious why this is so.
>
> I see that in linux_emul_convpath() there is a special check for this
> case with the followin
Under Linux emulation "/" resolves to real root directory, not
/compat/linux directory and I am very curious why this is so.
I see that in linux_emul_convpath() there is a special check for this
case with the following comment:
/*
* We now compare the vnode of the linux_root
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 03:50, Rob DeMarco wrote:
> While I have some familiarity with the ports tree, I didn't install
> it this time because of limited disk space (though I suppose I could
> do a partial port-tree install). Also, my P150 makes compiles long
> and painful :)
> To avoid all tha
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 07:50:17 +, Rob DeMarco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 15:55, Paul Mather wrote:
You should be able to use portupgrade to upgrade your linux_base-6.1_6
to a more recent version. This does assume you have the ports tree
installed (and preferably up to d
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 15:55, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:03:01 +, Rob DeMarco
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
>
> I am using linux_base-8-8.0_4 on my FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE system, so I can
> confirm that it is possible to use something more recent that
> linux_base-6. (In f
n
There you have it: Firefox with Flash Plugin enabled.
Complicated?
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:03:01 +, Rob DeMarco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Questions,
>
> I wanted to run Mozilla FireBird 6.1.6 under Linux emulation so
> that I could use the Flash plugin. I insta
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:03:01 +, Rob DeMarco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted to run Mozilla FireBird 6.1.6 under Linux emulation so
> that I could use the Flash plugin. I installed linux_base-6.1_6
> from the 4-stable packages directory and downloaded FireBird. But
>
Hello Questions,
I wanted to run Mozilla FireBird 6.1.6 under Linux emulation so
that I could use the Flash plugin. I installed linux_base-6.1_6
from the 4-stable packages directory and downloaded FireBird. But
FireBird required a later version of Linux emulation (7.???) that
I could only find
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:08:19AM +0400, Roman Vasiliev wrote:
> First run glxgears shows ~2000 fps but second ~10 fps. And whole OpenGL
> application lags.
>
> Problem solves in changing on NVidia mx 4400. All works fine.
I have the same problem with a GF4-Ti/4200: first run is fast, second
is
Hi.
I have two question. I hope what someone helps me.
First:
I have NVidia fx5600 and installs drivers from
/usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver
# cat /boot/loader.conf
hw.ata.ata_dma=0
nvidia_load="YES"
linux_load="YES"
Lately fonts in linux-programs running under the linux-emulation on my
FreeBSD system aren't rendered as they used to. The antialiasing doesn't
seem to work anymore. I'm not sure what caused this, but it happened after
a major portupgrade of lots of ports.
Both Mathematica, Mapl
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:27:29AM -0500, Jason Godfrey wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have a perl module (Adobe's FDF toolkit) that uses two .so files as part
> of it's magic. These files come precompiled for Linux. Not surprisingly, when
> I try to do a perl "use" on the module I get an error like this:
Hello.
I have a perl module (Adobe's FDF toolkit) that uses two .so files as part
of it's magic. These files come precompiled for Linux. Not surprisingly, when
I try to do a perl "use" on the module I get an error like this:
Can't load '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/FDF.so' for module Acro
At 2004-03-12T03:54:03Z, "Aaron Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> it runs chrooted to /compat/linux/ so it uses the linux libraries, and
> that's that.
No. The binaries are not chrooted. Other than that, you're mostly correct.
> is there more too it than that? is there any reason i cant
I'm under the impression that linux.ko provides linux kernel emulation,
and linux binary base libraries are installed in /compat/linux/ for linux
binaries to use in linux emulation mode. when you execute a linux binary
(recognized by branding in the binary) it runs chrooted to /compat/linu
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:39:17PM -0700, Joseph Davida wrote:
> Are these syscalls not implemented in Linux kernel
> 2.4.x?
Surely, but Linux != FreeBSD. They're not present in older Linux
kernels, so glibc will fall back to other syscalls if they are not
present, and the binary continues to op
On 4.8-20030810-STABLE, with
linux_base-8-8.0_1
When I run Linux Netscape 7.1, I get the
following messages on the console:
linux: 'ipc' typ=258 not implemented
Also, when I run Linux OpenOffice, I get many
instances of the following messages on the console:
linux: syscall mmap2 is obsoleted
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:08:59PM +0200, Jaco van Tonder wrote:
> linux: 'ipc' typ=17 not implemented
> *** Assert in file lnasdbc.c at line 2373. ***
>
>
> The program then freezes. Anyone got any ideas? I've googled for this, and
> found only _1_ result, also somebody struggling with the same
Hi all,
I receive the following error when running Pervasive.SQL for linux
(www.pervasive.com) on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE with both linux_base_6.1 and
linux_base_7_1 and linux_base_7_4.
linux: 'ipc' typ=17 not implemented
SQLManager is being started in console mode, intended for debugging only.
Ple
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:43:13PM +0200 or thereabouts, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> On 29 Jul Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 July 2003 14:03, Franz Stieber wrote:
> > I have a GeForce TI 4200 and TV out works great :)
> > > [ ... ]
> > I'm using it und
On 12-Jan-2003 Rus Foster wrote:
> Hi All,
> I was just debating about trying to install UML under the linux emulation
> and wondered had anyone tried it before? Does it even work or does UML
> rely to much on the linux kernel functionality to work at all under
> FreeBSD?
I
Hi All,
I was just debating about trying to install UML under the linux emulation
and wondered had anyone tried it before? Does it even work or does UML
rely to much on the linux kernel functionality to work at all under
FreeBSD?
Cheers
Rus
--
http://www.fsck.me.uk - My blog
http://www.65535.net
Hello everybody!
I have some problems with linux support.
For example while I try to add rpm package I see next:
/hw/z/Mandrake/RPMS# rpm -i wine-20001206-ipl9mdk.i586.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
sed is needed by wine-20001206-ipl9mdk
awk is needed by wine-20001206-ipl9md
Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any ideas what to try next?
I think I've already suggested this, but did you try
"dagrab" from the FreeBSD ports collection ...?
Regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München
Any opinions expressed in this me
Lowell wrote:
> "Lucky Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Do you believe that the ATAPI/CAM patches at
> > http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/ might make cdparanoia
> > compatible with an ATAPI drive on FreeBSD?
>
> Probably.
>
> >I
> From: "Lucky Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:35:03 -0700
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Lowell wrote:
> > "Lucky Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Nick wrote:
> > > > > Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
> > > > > Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() in
> From: "Lucky Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:46:44 -0700
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Nick wrote:
> > > Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
> > > Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
> > > /dev/acd0a is not a cooked ioctl CDROM.
> > >
"Lucky Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you believe that the ATAPI/CAM patches at
> http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/ might make cdparanoia
> compatible with an ATAPI drive on FreeBSD?
Probably.
>I guess that would mean the
> patche
Lowell wrote:
> "Lucky Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Nick wrote:
> > > > Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
> > > > Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
> > > > /dev/acd0a is not a cooked ioctl CDROM.
> > > > Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI interfac
"Lucky Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nick wrote:
> > > Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
> > > Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
> > > /dev/acd0a is not a cooked ioctl CDROM.
> > > Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI interface
> > > /dev
Nick wrote:
> > Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
> > Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
> > /dev/acd0a is not a cooked ioctl CDROM.
> > Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI interface
> > /dev/cdrom is not a SCSI device
>
> That doesn't look quit
Thus spake Lucky Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
> Testing /dev/cdrom for cooked ioctl() interface
> /dev/acd0a is not a cooked ioctl CDROM.
> Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI interface
> /dev/cdrom is not a SCSI device
Tha
joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On October 8, 2002 02:11 am, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am in the process of ripping a large CD collection. Fidelity is
> > > paramount. By all accounts, the ripper of choice for audiophiles
> > > is cdparanoia.
On October 8, 2002 02:11 am, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am in the process of ripping a large CD collection. Fidelity is
> > paramount. By all accounts, the ripper of choice for audiophiles
> > is cdparanoia.
>
> dagrab has worked fine for me for IDE driv
Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am in the process of ripping a large CD collection. Fidelity is
> paramount. By all accounts, the ripper of choice for audiophiles is
> cdparanoia.
dagrab has worked fine for me for IDE drives. It's in the
ports collection. (For SCSI drives I prefer
drives accessible to root found.
-
At this point, cdparanoia dumps core.
Now I have no idea what a "cooked ioctl" is and Google was of no help,
but I suspect that somehow the Linux emulation layer in FreeBSD does not
provide cdparanoia with a device it knows how to talk to.
D
Hello !
I want to use a streamer under the freebsd linux emulation. I don't know
if it is possible and if it is possible how to do it ? Where can i find
documentation or who can help me ?
kind regards
Peter Will Internet Management GmbH
--
83 matches
Mail list logo
