Hi,
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On September 26, 2007 9:06:57 PM -0700 Eric Osterweil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Eric Osterweil wrote:
make use of it's 6GB of memory, and FreeBSD can only see about 4GB
of it.
Can anyone help me figure out how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On September 26, 2007 9:06:57 PM -0700 Eric Osterweil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Eric Osterweil wrote:
make use of it's 6GB of memory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 26, 2007, at 10:35 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On September 26, 2007 9:06:57 PM -0700 Eric Osterweil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 2007,
unless you have actual
swap to back everything, whereas with malloc backing it reserves in
memory. This means that it is easy to overcommit memory and the system
will probably panic when it suddenly finds no free memory for the md (as
in the original email).
Ah. Swap backing with no swap
reserve) doesn't work unless you have actual
swap to back everything, whereas with malloc backing it reserves in
memory. This means that it is easy to overcommit memory and the system
will probably panic when it suddenly finds no free memory for the md (as
in the original email).
Ah. Swap
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Ian Smith wrote:
[..]
But is running out of memory with swap-backed md (with no swap) likely
to be any prettier than the panics from (unreserved) malloc backing?
Probably not. No worse though.
Couldn't be :)
By 'ideally' I guess you mean
Ian Smith wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 19:34:41 +0200 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
I use a memory file system for some tmp files and last night I saw
I use a memory file system for some tmp files and last night I saw this,
followed by a reboot. Bad memory? 6-STABLE from April..
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=259244032,
length=131072)]error = 28
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=259375104,
length=131072)]error
I use a memory file system for some tmp files and last night I saw this,
followed by a reboot. Bad memory? 6-STABLE from April..
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=259244032, length=131072)]error
= 28
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=259375104, length=131072)]error
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
I use a memory file system for some tmp files and last night I saw this,
followed by a reboot. Bad memory? 6-STABLE from April..
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=259244032,
length=131072)]error = 28
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=259375104
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
I use a memory file system for some tmp files and last night I saw
this, followed by a reboot. Bad memory? 6-STABLE from April..
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=259244032,
length=131072)]error = 28
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
I use a memory file system for some tmp files and last night I saw
this, followed by a reboot. Bad memory? 6-STABLE from April..
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=259244032,
length=131072)]error = 28
foo
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
I use a memory file system for some tmp files and last night I saw
this, followed by a reboot. Bad memory? 6-STABLE from April..
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=259244032,
length
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
I use a memory file system for some tmp files and last night I saw
this, followed by a reboot. Bad memory? 6-STABLE from April..
foo-bar kernel: g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 19:34:41 +0200 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
I use a memory file system for some tmp files and last night I saw
this, followed
Hi all
Is there any possibillity to fsck a 1.2 TB 40% filled volume with a
machine that has not that much memory, in this case only 1.5 GB.
The fsck gives me a friendly
# fsck /dev/da1
** /dev/da1
** Last Mounted on /fileserver
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
fsck_ufs: cannot alloc
Hi all
Is there any possibillity to fsck a 1.2 TB 40% filled volume with a
---
Just out of curiosity: Is this an embedded NAS/SAN platform with RAM
limitations?
i386 32-bit has adres space limit per one process, no matter how much
RAM/swap there is
dmesg |grep memory
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Prakash Poudyal wrote:
Hello everybody,
Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ?
Thank you
Sincerely
Prakash
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On 05-Aug-07, at 8:53 AM, Prakash Poudyal wrote:
Hello everybody,
Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ?
you may try:
sysctl -a | grep -i mem
shanatnoo
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
I tried what people said to do and I get different values that do not match
what the bios say.
Why is there so large a difference?
How can this be explained???
# /root sysctl -a | grep -i memory
Virtual Memory: (Total: 2871K, Active 91444K)
Real Memory:(Total: 37324K Active
fbsd2 wrote:
I tried what people said to do and I get different values that do not match
what the bios say.
Why is there so large a difference?
How can this be explained???
# /root sysctl -a | grep -i memory
Virtual Memory: (Total: 2871K, Active 91444K)
Real Memory
# /root dmesg | grep -i memory
real memory = 67108864 (64 MB)
avail memory = 56094720 (53 MB)
this is true - 64MB
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
of RAM memory
# /root dmesg | grep -i memory
real memory = 67108864 (64 MB)
avail memory = 56094720 (53 MB)
this is true - 64MB
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
fbsd2 wrote:
What is the meaning of the 67108864 number?
Its 64MB in bytes.
[08:42 PM](ttyp0)[EMAIL PROTECTED] j0 h2 c502
/usr/home/pgollucci
bc
64*1024
65536
.*1024
67108864
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hello everybody,
Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ?
Thank you
Sincerely
Prakash
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 8/4/07, Prakash Poudyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ?
Thank you
Sincerely
Prakash
It should be displayed early in the dmesg(8) output shown during the
boot process. You may review this by executing the dmesg
Prakash Poudyal wrote:
Hello everybody,
Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ?
Thank you
Sincerely
Prakash
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Mark Busby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running apache-1.3.37_4, php4-4.4.7, and eGroupWare-1.2.106_1.
Apache error file is returning the following error when trying to access
the calendar.
PHP Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 16777216 bytes
I'm running apache-1.3.37_4, php4-4.4.7, and eGroupWare-1.2.106_1.
Apache error file is returning the following error when trying to access the
calendar.
PHP Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 16777216 bytes exhausted (tried to
allocate 23040 bytes) I've searched but have not found
Hi all,
hope this is the right list.
I have a problem with booting from a 128MB USB-memory-stick with the ASUS
A7V-133 motherboard. I downloaded the boot-floppy-imageboot.flp (version 6.2)
from the FreeBSD-FTP-server and dd-ed it to a memory stick. Booting from this
stick works fine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
hope this is the right list.
I have a problem with booting from a 128MB USB-memory-stick with the ASUS
A7V-133 motherboard. I downloaded the boot-floppy-imageboot.flp (version
6.2) from the FreeBSD-FTP-server and dd-ed it to a memory stick. Booting
Hi Steve,
I have a problem with booting from a 128MB USB-memory-stick with the ASUS
A7V-133 motherboard. I downloaded the boot-floppy-imageboot.flp (version
6.2) from the FreeBSD-FTP-server and dd-ed it to a memory stick. Booting
from this stick works fine with every other computer I
I am running imapsync and keep getting the error:
Out of memory during large request for 67112960 bytes, total sbrk()
is 495640576 bytes at /usr/local/bin/imapsync line 1050.
When trying to copy a mailbox that has some large attachements.
I found on the internet that I needed to set
Scott Mayo wrote:
I am running imapsync and keep getting the error:
Out of memory during large request for 67112960 bytes, total sbrk()
is 495640576 bytes at /usr/local/bin/imapsync line 1050.
When trying to copy a mailbox that has some large attachements.
I found on the internet that I
Hello,
I've got a memory disk that i made and now i have to increase it's size
so i can add about 3 megabytes more information on to it. I'd rather not
have to remake it. Is there a way i can use something to increase it's size
without destroying/remaking it?
Thanks.
Dave
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:21:00AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
What if you just want to see how much is installed, what speed it is, et
cetera? It isn't clear to me that Prakash was necessarily looking for
RAM usage.
True, I made a few assumptions here, based
On 6/17/07, Prakash Poudyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
Can any body tell me how to see the RAM memory in freebsd.
for your reference I had already used dmesg and top command and now I want
to know specifec command to see the Ram memory only.
$ sysctl hw.physmem | awk '{ print $2
Hello All,
Can any body tell me how to see the RAM memory in freebsd.
for your reference I had already used dmesg and top command and now I want
to know specifec command to see the Ram memory only.
Thank you
prakash
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Prakash Poudyal wrote:
Hello All,
Can any body tell me how to see the RAM memory in freebsd.
for your reference I had already used dmesg and top command and now I
want
to know specifec command to see the Ram memory only.
Thank you
prakash
Hello Prakash,
vmstat is the command you are looking for.
Try 'man vmstat' for more information.
Hope this helps,
James Stanley
--
Get a free email address with REAL anti-spam protection.
http://www.bluebottle.com
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:04:53 +0300
Manolis Kiagias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prakash Poudyal wrote:
Hello All,
Can any body tell me how to see the RAM memory in freebsd.
You are looking for the equivalent of the Linux free command. This
does not exits in FreeBSD per se, you can however
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:04:53PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Prakash Poudyal wrote:
Hello All,
Can any body tell me how to see the RAM memory in freebsd.
for your reference I had already used dmesg and top command and now I
want
to know specifec command to see the Ram memory only
On 17/06/07, Prakash Poudyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
Can any body tell me how to see the RAM memory in freebsd.
for your reference I had already used dmesg and top command and now I want
to know specifec command to see the Ram memory only.
sysctl hw.physmem perhaps
Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:04:53PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Prakash Poudyal wrote:
Hello All,
Can any body tell me how to see the RAM memory in freebsd.
for your reference I had already used dmesg and top command and now I
want
to know specifec command
First of all,
Each process has its own private address space. The address space is initially
divided
into three logical segments: text,
data, and stack.
But if the address is just something like 343556 then how does it
really work? The memory is divided into segments is that what it means
cadastrosonline cadastrosonline wrote:
First of all,
Each process has its own private address space. The address space is initially
divided
into three logical segments: text,
data, and stack.
But if the address is just something like 343556 then how does it
really work? The memory
does it
really work? The memory is divided into segments is that what it
means?
An answer to this is a very long introductory course in UNIX systems
internals. In general, you can find a lot of detail about memory
management and allocation in books like ``The Design and Implementation
, and stack.
But if the address is just something like 343556 then how does it
really work? The memory is divided into segments is that what it
means?
An answer to this is a very long introductory course in UNIX systems
internals. In general, you can find a lot of detail about memory
and variables
data is data for the program, this defines variable used in a program
But if the address is just something like 343556 then how does it
really work? The memory is divided into segments is that what it means?
Segments are kept separated by the CPU, and some treatment of segments can
Hi all
Is there any possibillity to fsck a 1.2 TB 40% filled volume with a
machine that has not that much memory, in this case only 1.5 GB.
The fsck gives me a friendly
# fsck /dev/da1
** /dev/da1
** Last Mounted on /fileserver
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
fsck_ufs: cannot alloc
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Andreas Kuehl wrote:
Hi all
Is there any possibillity to fsck a 1.2 TB 40% filled volume with a
machine that has not that much memory, in this case only 1.5 GB.
The fsck gives me a friendly
# fsck /dev/da1
** /dev/da1
** Last Mounted on /fileserver
** Phase 1
How do you force a memory dump from a specific PID?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the last episode (Jun 04), Sean Murphy said:
How do you force a memory dump from a specific PID?
/usr/bin/gcore
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
:
In the last episode (Jun 04), Sean Murphy said:
How do you force a memory dump from a specific PID?
/usr/bin/gcore
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
wheel 512 Apr 3 17:03 ..
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 04), Sean Murphy said:
How do you force a memory dump from a specific PID?
/usr/bin/gcore
gcore is one of the few programs left that still requires procfs.
You'll need to mount it: mount -t procfs /proc /proc
Don't top-post, please.
Sean Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get this error when trying gcore what am I doing wrong?
# gcore 581
gcore: /proc/581/file: No such file or directory
# cd /proc
# ls -la
total 4
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 8 2005 .
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Don't top-post, please.
Sean Murphy [1][EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get this error when trying gcore what am I doing wrong?
# gcore 581
gcore: /proc/581/file: No such file or directory
# cd /proc
# ls -la
total 4
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:08:02PM -0700, Sean Murphy wrote:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Don't top-post, please.
Sean Murphy [1][EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get this error when trying gcore what am I doing wrong?
# gcore 581
gcore: /proc/581/file: No such file or directory
OK Fetch completed.
Out of memory during request for 80 bytes, total sbrk() is 536813568
bytes!
I'm running imapsync on the target system, which is FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
with 1 GB RAM.
I'm wondering if I could adjust some resource settings to let the
imapsync job finish?
To unsubscribe, send any mail
I'm using imapsync to transfer maildirs to a new server. One of the
mailboxes is about 4.7 GB. While into the syncing to about 3 GB,
imapsync quits with this message:
END
while processing LITERAL
Read: * 5330 FETCH (UID 5337 BODY[] )
12835 OK Fetch completed.
Out of memory during request for 80
[] )
12835 OK Fetch completed.
Out of memory during request for 80 bytes, total sbrk() is 536813568
bytes!
I'm running imapsync on the target system, which is FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
with 1 GB RAM.
I'm wondering if I could adjust some resource settings to let the
imapsync job finish?
Check
of memory during request for 80 bytes, total sbrk() is 536813568
bytes!
I'm running imapsync on the target system, which is FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
with 1 GB RAM.
I'm wondering if I could adjust some resource settings to let the
imapsync job finish?
Search for my name and imapsync and you'll have the answer
. One of the
mailboxes is about 4.7 GB. While into the syncing to about 3 GB,
imapsync quits with this message:
END
while processing LITERAL
Read: * 5330 FETCH (UID 5337 BODY[] )
12835 OK Fetch completed.
Out of memory during request for 80 bytes, total sbrk() is 536813568
bytes
of memory during request for 80 bytes, total sbrk() is 536813568
bytes!
I'm running imapsync on the target system, which is FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
with 1 GB RAM.
I'm wondering if I could adjust some resource settings to let the
imapsync job finish?
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I forgot
of the
relativeadvantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory 3.5GB not
used?))
On 27/04/07, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't devote time and
resources into being renaissance people.
Human intelligence is hardly limited in that regard.
While I do not subscribe to the Colin Wilson
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 02:10:16AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
The true value of Wikipedia is that it can deal with controversial
subjects. ...
on the other hand, for some instances it doesn't _deal_ with controversial
subjects, but only reflects the most common opinion. Currently(*) the
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:59:43PM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen
wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom:
GNOME guy)
describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected
false
information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a
On Apr 25, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Wednesday, April 25, 2007 15:29:04 -0400 Thomas Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account
banned,
and the head of his
On 27/04/07, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't devote time and
resources into being renaissance people.
Human intelligence is hardly limited in that regard.
While I do not subscribe to the Colin Wilson theory,
the vast majority of people contain so little information
it is
Ivan Voras wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Does this test demonstrate usage of memory over 4G? It's my
understanding
that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G
(which
is the problem it's intended to solve)
If your entire test fits in under 4G, you're not seeing
: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the
relative
advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory 3.5GB not used?))
Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom:
GNOME guy)
describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected
false
Dickey; Bill Moran; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the
relative
advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory 3.5GB not used?))
Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom:
GNOME guy
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:17:32AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Perhaps this was all just a devious plan by me to make you all look like
fools by watching your argue about the importance of checking sources
while none of you checked your sources ...
Muhahaha ...
In any event, it's been a
In response to Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:17:32AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Perhaps this was all just a devious plan by me to make you all look like
fools by watching your argue about the importance of checking sources
while none of you checked your sources
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:48:46PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you had provided the guy's Wikipedia account, we'd be able to check
*your* sources -- wouldn't we? As long as you don't tell us the
necessary information for checking up on it,
Bill Moran wrote:
Does this test demonstrate usage of memory over 4G? It's my
understanding
that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G
(which
is the problem it's intended to solve)
If your entire test fits in under 4G, you're not seeing the worst
# To make a PAE kernel, the next option is needed
options PAE # Physical Address Extensions Kernel
# Compile acpi in statically since the module isn't built properly. Most
# machines which support large amounts of memory require acpi.
device acpi
# Don't build
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:56:09 -0700
Don O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2,
...
What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16
GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get 4GB?
AFAIK all the reasons for staying 32-bit
In response to Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
Does this test demonstrate usage of memory over 4G? It's my
understanding
that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G
(which
is the problem it's intended to solve)
If your entire test
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:31:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
(of course, everyone knows that Wikipedia is the ultimate source of
information and is infallible, right?)
hardly. I'd expect that most intelligent readers would have encountered
at least one wikipedia article which is inaccurate.
In response to RW [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:56:09 -0700
Don O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2,
...
What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16
GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get
In response to Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:31:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
(of course, everyone knows that Wikipedia is the ultimate source of
information and is infallible, right?)
hardly. I'd expect that most intelligent readers would have encountered
On Apr 25, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME
guy)
describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false
information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research
assignment
that involved that
Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME guy)
describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false
information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research assignment
that involved that information. Apparently the number of
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:59:43PM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME guy)
describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false
information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account banned,
and the head of his department should be informed of his vandalism. I
don't suppose you know the name of his Wikipedia account, or his legal
name. . . .
yawn.
--On Wednesday, April 25, 2007 15:29:04 -0400 Thomas Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account banned,
and the head of his department should be informed of his vandalism. I
don't
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:29:04PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account banned,
and the head of his department should be informed of his vandalism. I
don't suppose you know the
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:58:55PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
I definitely agree that's suboptimal. I'd expand that to include other
sorts of pages, other than webpages, as well. It's pretty rare for this
particular brand of intellectually lazy person to realize that about the
printed page,
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 21:21:47 Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:58:55PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
I definitely agree that's suboptimal. I'd expand that to include other
sorts of pages, other than webpages, as well. It's pretty rare for this
particular brand of
of the relative
advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory 3.5GB not used?))
Bill Moran wrote:
A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME guy)
describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false
information into Wikipedia, then gave his students
I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a
Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard.
When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will be
ignored.
Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this:
real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB)
avail memory
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don O'Neil
Sent: 24 avril 2007 13:56
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Memory 3.5GB not used?
I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a
Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard.
When I boot
memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB)
avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB)
Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there something I
need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? What if I want to
install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 GB... Do I need to go
memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB)
avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB)
Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there something I
need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? What if I want to
install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 GB... Do I need to go
it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this:
real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB)
avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB)
Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there something
I
need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? What if I want
Don O'Neil wrote:
Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there something I
need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? What if I want to
install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 GB... Do I need to go to
the AMD64 platform to get 4GB?
You need a PAE
Message-
From: Bill Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:05 AM
To: Don O'Neil
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Memory 3.5GB not used?
In response to Don O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a
Gigabyte
.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:05 AM
To: Don O'Neil
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Memory 3.5GB not used?
In response to Don O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Memory 3.5GB not used?
On 4/24/07, Don O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all who pointed out the obvious PAE option...
When I went to rebuild the kernel I got this message:
+++
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
601 - 700 of 1440 matches
Mail list logo
