I am wanting to learn about ldap so I am trying to build a pdc with
ldap. I have finally gotten the bugs worked out on the samba pdc part
and now I want to try and use ldap as the password manager(is that the
right term?). I have O'Reilly's LDAP book and they are talking about
installing from sourc
I have the chance to buy a new computer. It will take a long time before
I can do this again.
My options are:
Athlon64-3000+ (Newcastle) on a MSI K8T NEO-FSR board (1Gb 3200 mem)
Athlon64-3400+ (Clawhammer on the same board
Intel Prescott 3.4Mhz on a Intel 915p board (1024 Mb DDRII pc4300
memory
dick hoogendijk wrote:
> Is there much difference between the athlon3000/3400 ??
> Will the intel platform have (dis)advantages ?
Well, the 3400+ will be slightly faster when it comes to number
crunching. They'll be up to par to the Intel chip, but the Intel system
will cost more.
If price is imp
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote:
I have the chance to buy a new computer. It will take a long time before
I can do this again.
My options are:
Athlon64-3000+ (Newcastle) on a MSI K8T NEO-FSR board (1Gb 3200 mem)
Athlon64-3400+ (Clawhammer on the same board
Intel Prescott 3.4Mhz on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
dick hoogendijk wrote:
> I have the chance to buy a new computer. It will take a long time
> before I can do this again.
>
> My options are:
>
> Athlon64-3000+ (Newcastle) on a MSI K8T NEO-FSR board (1Gb 3200
> mem) Athlon64-3400+ (Clawhammer on
On 28 Jul Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> >My options are:
> >
> >Athlon64-3000+ (Newcastle) on a MSI K8T NEO-FSR board (1Gb 3200 mem)
> >Athlon64-3400+ (Clawhammer on the same board
> >Intel Prescott 3.4Mhz on a Intel 915p board (1024 Mb DDRII pc4300
> >memory
Benjamin Lutz wrote:
If price is important, why not go for a Sempron 3100+ using the Palermo
core? Granted, it's a bit slower than the Athlon64 3000+, but it does
have an advantage: Under load, it outputs 62W of heat instead of 89W
like the 130nm Athlon64 cores. And of course it only costs half
On Friday 29 July 2005 09:35, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Windows just for gaming to me means w98se. It's faster, smoother and
> smaller.
One problem problem with w98 is that it has problems with modern amounts of
memory. I have a similar w98/freebsd dual-boot with AMD64 2.8G and 1.5 GB of
ram, an
On 28 Jul Trevor Sullivan wrote:
> I would recommend purchasing an Athlon 64 3000+ Venice core. I just
> picked one of these up along with 2 gigs of ram and a 6600GT and it
> runs sooo nice. Not only that, but it's cheap.
I tend to switch to this 3000+ Venice core thing. Problem is finding a
m
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 28 Jul Trevor Sullivan wrote:
I would recommend purchasing an Athlon 64 3000+ Venice core. I just
picked one of these up along with 2 gigs of ram and a 6600GT and it
runs sooo nice. Not only that, but it's cheap.
I tend to switch to this 3000+ Venice core
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> On 28 Jul Trevor Sullivan wrote:
>
>> I would recommend purchasing an Athlon 64 3000+ Venice core. I
>> just picked one of these up along with 2 gigs of ram and a 6600GT
>> and it runs sooo nice. Not only that, but i
I am looking for an alternative MTA to replace sendmail on my freebsd
4.7-rel box. My question is i have searched google quite extensively and
found :
Qmail
Courier
Postfix
I would like some opinions as to which of the 3 above is better in
regards to security, authentication features, reliabil
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:20:55PM -0600, sweetleaf wrote:
> I am looking for an alternative MTA to replace sendmail on my freebsd
> 4.7-rel box. My question is i have searched google quite extensively and
> found :
>
> Qmail
> Courier
> Postfix
>
> I would like some opinions as to which of the
sweetleaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> etc... and i guess which would be recommended for providing
> ./Maildir/ accounts to about 200-300 people VIA Courier IMAP.
This depends on your usage pattern. If large attachments are to be
handled every day and if they are sent to multiple receivers at t
sweetleaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, so qmail does not handle large attachments well?
I didn't say that.
qmail does send a copy of the mail to every receiver while postfix
does a (limited) kind of grouping receivers based on the destination
domain. This may perform better when
a) you or
sweetleaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks again, Sir. The only other question would be: Is there a good
> admin utility for postfix such as the one for qmail.
I cannot answer this - I didn't use Postfix extensively.
> usersmaybe add the user to a databas and the server finds it
> there
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank Tegtmeyer
Sent: Wednesday, 5 February 2003 9:19 PM
To: sweetleaf
Cc: freebsd-questions
Subject: Re: need some advice on MTA
sweetleaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks again, Sir. The only other quest
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-04 14:20:55 -0600:
> I am looking for an alternative MTA to replace sendmail on my freebsd
> 4.7-rel box. My question is i have searched google quite extensively and
> found :
>
> Qmail
> Courier
> Postfix
>
> I would like some opinions as to which of the 3 above i
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:02:29PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> I run four Postfixes (one of them with Courier-IMAP), and one Qmail
> with vpopmail.
>
> Postfix is IMO easier to install and administer, but doesn't have a
> point'n'click interface.
>
> It also looks like Po
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 14:37, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:02:29PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > I run four Postfixes (one of them with Courier-IMAP), and one Qmail
> > with vpopmail.
> >
> > Postfix is IMO easier to install and administer, but doesn't h
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-05 13:37:05 +0100:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:02:29PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > I run four Postfixes (one of them with Courier-IMAP), and one Qmail
> > with vpopmail.
> >
> > Postfix is IMO easier to install and administer, but doesn't have a
> >
Hello everyone and Happy Holidays.
I was hoping to get some suggestions and advice here for a particular setup
im designing.
Here is what I want to do.
I am going to use FreeBSD 4.9 as our Mail server. It will be running
Postfix, courier-IMAP and a few other goodies. I also want to run webmail
o
Hi,
We have a couple of cisco routers. There was one time when suddenly we cannot
login remotely via telnet. I investigate further and was shocked when I found
out that there where 16 telnet connections coming from outsiders ip addresses.
I immediately called our Director(the only cisco certi
> 3. How do you secure your cisco routers in your office?? Our
> director said that we should look for best practices in securing
> our routers.
The very first step would be to limit where from you can telnet to the
router. There is no good reason why whole internet could telnet to the
router.
The best practice I follow for securing routers, is to disable any remote
access unless remote access is really necessary. If remote access is
required, I always limit the access to a small number, usually 1-3 remote IP's.
It is also a good idea to enable remote logging to keep a record of eve
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
>> We have a couple of cisco routers. There was one time when suddenly we
>> cannot
> login remotely via telnet. I investigate further and was shocked when I found
> out that there where 16 telnet connections coming from outsiders ip
> addresses. I
> immediately called
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Swiger
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 4:41 AM
> To: Mark Jayson Alvarez
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: need some advice on our cisco routers..
>
>
> Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
> >> We have
D]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chuck Swiger
>Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 4:41 AM
>To: Mark Jayson Alvarez
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: need some advice on our cisco routers..
>
>
>Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
>>> We have a couple of cisc
28 matches
Mail list logo
