Re: portupgrade -o strangeness...

2007-06-12 Thread Josh Tolbert
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > It doesn't look like what I was suggesting is the issue so it's all > moot, but the example I can see: > >sudo portupgrade -fo devel/bison2 bison > > is different from what I was suggesting: > >sudo portupgrade -f -o devel/

Re: portupgrade -o strangeness...

2007-06-12 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Josh Tolbert wrote: On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:04:38PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Josh Tolbert wrote: (15:38:21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>) $ pkg_info | grep bison bison-1.75_2,1 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with Yacc (15:38:30 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>) $ sudo portu

Re: portupgrade -o strangeness...

2007-06-11 Thread Josh Tolbert
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:04:38PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Josh Tolbert wrote: > > >(15:38:21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>) $ pkg_info | grep bison > >bison-1.75_2,1 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with > >Yacc > >(15:38:30 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>) $ sudo portupgrade -o devel/bi

portupgrade -o strangeness...

2007-06-07 Thread Josh Tolbert
Hello, Having successfully completed my update from Xorg 6.9 to Xorg 7.2, I decided to install a few things, one of which required devel/bison2 instead of bison. Usually, portupgrade -o would handle this for me, but lately it seems like portupgrade -o doesn't want to replace ports. Has anyone else