On 0, Kirk Strauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2003-02-03T16:57:16Z, Justin P. Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Spam Assassin is tagging the e-mail properly, however, it's still being
sent out to the clients.
This is OT to your question, but still: are you certain that you want
Greetings,
Thanks to all who replied regarding installing the
Sendmail/Procmail/SpamAssassin combination! It appears to be working very
well, and is marking spam nicely.
Now, I'd like to take it to another step. Instead of delivering the
messages that get marked as spam, is there a way to move
this is how to use procmail to put mesgs with scores = your threshold into a
folder:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
your_spam_folder
I think if you want to do this system-wide, you can put this in
/etc/procmailrc.
/ayn
On 0, Justin P. Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Thanks to all
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 04:23, Dragoncrest wrote:
Looking for a good anti-virus to go with my spam filter. Currently using
spam assassin with mixed results, but now I'm getting more and more of
these stupid viruses coming into the mail server I'd rather deal
without. Anybody got
Looking for a good anti-virus to go with my spam filter. Currently using
spam assassin with mixed results, but now I'm getting more and more of
these stupid viruses coming into the mail server I'd rather deal
without. Anybody got a good suggestion for a good spam filter/virus filter
I am using amavis-perl with the auto update and spamcop BL list with
sendmail.
Works awesome, maybe 1 spam gets thru a week and 50 or more rejected a day
with about 10 users on the system.
amavis is in the ports under security
look to www.spamcop.net for the blocklist and how to add it to your
Dragoncrest schrieb:
Looking for a good anti-virus to go with my spam filter. Currently
using spam assassin with mixed results, but now I'm getting more and
more of these stupid viruses coming into the mail server I'd rather deal
without. Anybody got a good suggestion for a good spam
://www.sendmail.org/tips/relaying.html
anti-spam cfg control:
http://www.sendmail.org/m4/anti_spam.html
hope this helps!
/ayn
On 0, Jan Voelker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I think this is more freebsd related than just sendmail, but please forgive
if I'm wrong,
I have a server with virtual
that you're not being used by spammers
http://members.iinet.net.au/~remmie/relay/
check out this link to see what you can do stop spam.
http://imgate.meiway.com/index.cfm
It talks about using it with Imail, but you can use it with anything.
the program works great. I've been using it for couple of months
All,
I think this is more freebsd related than just sendmail, but please forgive
if I'm wrong,
I have a server with virtual hosts using freebsd 4.0 and sendmail 8.9.3
and find the server domain user mail flooded with messages , definitely
spam messages,
that appear to be relayed by [EMAIL
using freebsd 4.0 and sendmail 8.9.3
JV and find the server domain user mail flooded with messages , definitely
JV spam messages,
JV that appear to be relayed by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JV I put [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 in /etc/mail/access and did makemap,
JV and this stops the emails. I'm not comfortable
Brett Glass wrote:
At 07:05 AM 1/1/2003, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Let's stop kicking Richard Stallman.
He has his own agenda.
It should remain his own.
But GCC is why you can compile FreeBSD.
No, it's not. You can compile FreeBSD because it's
written in C. GCC just happens to
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 18:58, Mike Jeays wrote:
Brett Glass wrote:
At 07:05 AM 1/1/2003, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Let's stop kicking Richard Stallman.
He has his own agenda.
It should remain his own.
But GCC is why you can compile FreeBSD.
snipped
Please
Please stop cc'ing the list on this thread.
1. Don't bottom quote, it's terribly annoying.
2. Since you're a clueless negro who couldn't compile helloworld.c if his
life depended on it, shut the fuck up.
Sincerely,
Paul
--
Paul Saab
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://fastmail.fm -
On 04 Jan 2003 19:13:13 +, Stacey Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Dude,
You don't know me, nor have any idea what I'm about.
Well, since Vicki gives me head everyday, I'd say I know you quite well.
Not that she's good at it, but hey, what more can you expect for $5?
For your
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 01:58:59PM -0500, Mike Jeays wrote:
Brett Glass wrote:
GCC is a great gift to the world, and has made a huge difference to
the development of open-source software. It can't be all that mediocre
if it has destroyed the market for higher-quality compilers!
Windows is
Oh come on, we can behave better than this...In normal conversation,
there is no reason to use such potentially offensive language, when
discussing FreeBSD. Which I might add what this list is supposed to be
about. At least, I know that's why I signed up for it.
On 04 Jan 2003 19:13:13 +,
On Saturday, 4 January 2003 at 17:05:26 -0500, Daniel Goepp wrote:
On 04 Jan 2003 19:13:13 +, Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Dude,
You don't know me, nor have any idea what I'm about.
Well, since Vicki gives me head everyday, I'd say I know you quite
well. Not that she's
On Saturday, 4 January 2003 at 13:58:59 -0500, Mike Jeays wrote:
Brett Glass wrote:
At 07:05 AM 1/1/2003, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Let's stop kicking Richard Stallman. He has his own agenda.
It should remain his own.
But GCC is why you can compile FreeBSD.
No, it's not. You can compile
At 2003-01-05T00:27:01Z, Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there's one thing that everybody on the list can do to help: don't reply
to off-topic or offensive mail messages.
Actually, Greg, there are two things we can do. The second is to GPG-sign
*and* GPG-verify email. I'm as
Mike, this message was originally posted to the FreeBSD-chat mailing
list, where by definition it's on topic. It is definitely not on
topic for FreeBSD-questions. Please don't forward this sort of thing
to this list.
Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
On 31 Dec Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-12-30 13:24, dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
define(`PROCMAIL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/procmail')
a) Why /usr/bin/procmail and not the default path of the procmail port
installation [/usr/local/bin/procmail]? I use procmail for local
On 2002-12-31 09:56, dick hoogendijk wrote:
On 31 Dec Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
b) You don't really need to use procmail as the delivery agent of ALL
the local users. You can enable procmail on a per-user basis by
proper .forward files in their home directories.
Yeah, I've heard.
Use postfix.
--
Regards
Cliff Sarginson
The Netherlands
[ This mail has been checked as virus-free ]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Take a look at spamprobe in /usr/ports/mail/spamprobe. It uses
Bayesian analysis and catches about 99% of the spam I get (and I get a
*ton*). Also see http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamprobe/ for more
information.
Everybody who reacted I say thank you!
I'm gonna try a few filter programs
On Monday, December 30, 2002, at 04:05 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
Take a look at spamprobe in /usr/ports/mail/spamprobe. It uses
Bayesian analysis and catches about 99% of the spam I get (and I get
a *ton*). Also see http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamprobe/ for
more information.
Everybody
define(`PROCMAIL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/procmail')
FEATURE(local_procmail,`',`procmail -t -Y -a $h -d $u')
MAILER(procmail)dnl
Am I right about this or do I put them in submit.mc?
Spamprobe doesn't require any changes to sendmail, you only need to
tweak your .procmailrc.
I know that,
On 2002-12-30 13:24, dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
define(`PROCMAIL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/procmail')
FEATURE(local_procmail,`',`procmail -t -Y -a $h -d $u')
MAILER(procmail)dnl
Am I right about this or do I put them in submit.mc?
Spamprobe doesn't require any changes to
Hello,
It need not be state-of-the-art, but a good .procmailrc-file that
filters a lot of spam would come in very handy.
Does any of you have such a file and would you be willing to share it
with me (us?).
Links to procmail and anti-spam would also be welcome.
Thanks 2all.
--
dick -- http
Dear/Beste dick,
Sunday, December 29, 2002, 5:12:16 PM, you wrote:
Hello,
It need not be state-of-the-art, but a good .procmailrc-file that
filters a lot of spam would come in very handy.
Does any of you have such a file and would you be willing to share it
with me (us?).
Links
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(12.29.2002 @ 0812 PST): dick hoogendijk said, in 0.5K:
It need not be state-of-the-art, but a good .procmailrc-file that
filters a lot of spam would come in very handy.
Does any of you have such a file and would you be willing to share
At 09:03 AM 12.29.2002 -0800, Adam Weinberger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(12.29.2002 @ 0812 PST): dick hoogendijk said, in 0.5K:
It need not be state-of-the-art, but a good .procmailrc-file that
filters a lot of spam would come in very handy.
Does any of you have
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-28 13:49:31 -0700:
Seems to me that this is an invitation to government
regulation -- interfering with the mail is a criminal
offense for good reason.
so you think you have a *right* to send me email? you must be
joking.
--
If you cc me or remove the
At 06:13 PM 12/28/2002, Harry Tabak wrote:
I've been in contact with the port maintainer. His position: 1) This problem is out
of scope for him, 2) He is away on holiday and can't easily access the FreeBSD
cluster, 3) Other pressures will keep him from this problem for several weeks. He
On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 08:12 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
It need not be state-of-the-art, but a good .procmailrc-file that
filters a lot of spam would come in very handy.
Does any of you have such a file and would you be willing to share it
with me (us?).
Links
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account]
I am not sure which list is best for this issue, hence the cross
posting. I believe spam and anti-spam measures are security issues --
the 'Availability' part of C-I
is Inflow's. A quick groups.google.com search shows that
Inflow does have spam-friendliness problems.
None of this has anything to do with the FreeBSD port.
I suggest you contact, in this order, your ISP, Inflow, and then the
spambouncer authors. Success in getting Inflow to change its ways would
help
, and submit
it to the author for distribution. This is how Open Source works.
If people would stop sending spam or harden their computers connected to
the Internet to keep from sending spam accidentally, there would be no
need for this software either. Might as well wish for world peace though.
Chuck
, but spam filters never add default blocks unless an ISP has
spammed, and refused to anything about it. Therefore, Inflow had to
do at least 2 things:
1. Spam
2. Refuse to stop spamming after being contacted about it.
I, personally, fully support their decision. There really needs to
be some
Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter.
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:19:32 -0600 (CST)
From: Chuck Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harry Tabak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's not much you can do but what you already are doing. Complain.
You complain
Tabak
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Harry Tabak
Subject: Bystander shot by a spam filter.
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account]
I am not sure
Someone, quite probably Harry Tabak, once wrote:
From: Chuck Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's not much you can do but what you already are doing. Complain.
You complain to the people using the software, and if they can't
configure it, they will probably stop using it if they care.
I know only
How do you find if you are on the list? And who has the list?
Can they be sued?
Thanks,
Duncan (Dhu) Campbell
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 08:45:23 -0500
Harry Tabak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send
Tabak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account]
I am not sure which list is best for this issue, hence the cross
posting. I believe spam and anti-spam measures
support for the Five-Ten-SG blacklist is disabled by
default in the sb.rc file.
(see http://www.spambouncer.org/#BlacklistSupport).
Regards,
Abe Ro
Harry Tabak wrote:
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account
At 09:16 AM 12/28/2002, Harry Tabak wrote:
I can't really stop the Spambouncer people from shouting fire from their own
website -- freedom of speech and all that. But should FreeBSD act as an amplifier.
I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
my paper at http
Seems to me that this is an invitation to government
regulation -- interfering with the mail is a criminal
offense for good reason.
Email is not regulated by the government.
Rick
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:00:12PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
my paper at http://www.brettglass.com/spam/). However, be warned
that this list's Supreme Moderator may declare your posting to
be off-topic, because it doesn't relate
Abe wrote:
Are you sure that the 66.45.0.0/17 block is from sb-blockdomains.rc file?
Nevermind. I found the Inflow entry in sb-blockdomains.rc file. :)
Regards,
Abe Ro
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:00:12PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
my paper at http://www.brettglass.com/spam/). However, be warned
that this list's Supreme Moderator may declare your
(please tell me this is just a dream, and this thread really isn't
happening and I am not participating...)
++ 28/12/02 08:45 -0500 - Harry Tabak:
| I am not sure which list is best for this issue, hence the cross
| posting. I believe spam and anti-spam measures are security issues
. This is currently the case. But lets say we have
some real business to conduct. And lets say I send you
some mail, and your SP blocks it 'cause someone used
the DIP I'm on to spam some months ago. So then, our
business gets fucked up. I think we'd have a real good
case for suing the ass offa
for good reason.
Email is not regulated by the government.
Rick
Yup. This is currently the case. But lets say we have
some real business to conduct. And lets say I send you
some mail, and your SP blocks it 'cause someone used
the DIP I'm on to spam some months ago. So then, our
by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account]
I am not sure which list is best for this issue, hence the cross
posting. I believe spam and anti-spam measures are security issues --
the 'Availability' part of C-I-A. I apologize if I am wrong. A FreeBSD
?
Thanks,
Duncan (Dhu) Campbell
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 08:45:23 -0500
Harry Tabak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account]
I am not sure which
Harry Tabak wrote:
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account]
I'm sorry to hear that you've had problems with spam filters; like most things
(and most people), they aren't perfect and they sometimes make mistakes
(Dhu) Campbell
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 08:45:23 -0500
Harry Tabak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account]
I am not sure which list is best
No. The automated systems to filtre spam and virii better
be *really* careful about what they block.
If you block or subvert discrete communications between humans then
you are asking for real trouble. That's all.
Dhu
On 28 Dec 2002 17:00:54 -0500
Shawn Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So
*doesnt want to get laws very involved with the internet*
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
No. The automated systems to filtre spam and virii better
be *really* careful about what they block.
If you block or subvert discrete communications between humans then
you
at 17:02, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
No. The automated systems to filtre spam and virii better
be *really* careful about what they block.
If you block or subvert discrete communications between humans then
you are asking for real trouble. That's all.
Dhu
On 28 Dec 2002 17:00:54
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Chris Orr wrote:
*doesnt want to get laws very involved with the internet*
better yet, who's laws should be followed then? should the world follow
the american laws like loyal puppies or should we follow another countries
laws? perhaps the law of the country of the sending
. *
- SPAM TRAP ADDRESS - DO NOT EMAIL -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- SPAM TRAP ADDRESS - DO NOT EMAIL -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
CAN WE GET THIS THREAD KILLED NOW ???
It has nothing to do with FreeBSD.
Please shut up and move this thread somewhere else!
Poul-Henning
In message 1041114029.3577.60.camel@pitbull, Shawn Duffy writes:
--=-hYgamAC/8Ubo1V9A/Ysq
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Brett Glass wrote:
At 09:16 AM 12/28/2002, Harry Tabak wrote:
I can't really stop the Spambouncer people from shouting fire from their own website -- freedom of speech and all that. But should FreeBSD act as an amplifier.
I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
my
, etc, etc.
How many bounced messages are you talking about, approximately? Would
you be willing to give those individuals a phone call to talk about your
message, instead, or ask their postmaster to change their spam-filter to
let your mail through?
In this case, the package configuration puts
your
message, instead, or ask their postmaster to change their spam-filter to
let your mail through?
In this case, the package configuration puts 'spam' in a separate folder
and doesn't send a bounce message. I may not get feed back until and
unless I do a follow-up call. A follow-up
-0800 (PST)
from mx2.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.225]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 550 5.0.0 We brook zero SPAM)
-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Gary D Kline wrote:
Several weeks ago someone posted the location of a spam
list for sendmail's /etc/mail/access file. I understand
the file was large... but that makes no difference! I'd
just like to filter out most of the spam I've been
Matt Smith wrote:
I agree, but how do I run spam filtering locally?
As an average desktop user, I simply use a client to POP mail from a
server -- are there client plugins that filter for spam? I currently
use Evolution, but am willing to change if there a spam filter plugins
for other clients
I've 2 DNS servers that are in different subnet. My freeBSD4.6.2 server is
master and the other one is slave. Slave server connects to My freeBSD
server for DNS updates but always FreeBSD gives the message:
/kernel: arplookup x.x.x.x failed: host is not on local network
How can I prevent this
On 2002-11-21 08:44, Stephen Hovey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Gary D Kline wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:07:57PM -0500, Stephen Hovey wrote:
Oh bite me already
man, that was worth a laugh! the endless reams of this spam
make me think of pt barnum
Quoth Giorgos Keramidas on Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 15:58:03 +0200
This very spammer has hit the lists more than once, and every time I
mailed {abuse|postmaster} at a2000.nl. If they receive a few hundred
messages for each spam message they let through they will certainly
start acting fast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(11.21.2002 @ 0600 PST): Yann Golanski said, in 1.3K:
Would it be possible for the owners of the lsit to install something
like SpamAssassin so that those messages actually don't get to us?
end of Re: Reacting to spam targetted to freebsd.org
their FreeBSD box that's currently being used as a spam
relay (and is on many blackhole lists)?
For what it's worth, I run SpamAssassin locally, and use it to *mark*
possible spams, but never drop them. Then I configured my client to filter
based on the `X-Spam-Status' header into a spam folder
I agree, but how do I run spam filtering locally?
As an average desktop user, I simply use a client to POP mail from a
server -- are there client plugins that filter for spam? I currently
use Evolution, but am willing to change if there a spam filter plugins
for other clients.
As a slightly
don't top-post please.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-11-21 10:00:43 -0500:
I agree, but how do I run spam filtering locally?
As an average desktop user, I simply use a client to POP mail from a
server -- are there client plugins that filter for spam? I currently
use Evolution, but am
On 21 Nov 2002 08:47:40 -0600
Kirk Strauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Erm, I'm roughly 99.999% against that idea. What if someone's writing
to
What about the other 0.001 percent? :)
ask how to secure their FreeBSD box that's currently being used as a
spam relay (and is on many
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:00:56PM +, Yann Golanski wrote:
Quoth Giorgos Keramidas on Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 15:58:03 +0200
This very spammer has hit the lists more than once, and every time I
mailed {abuse|postmaster} at a2000.nl. If they receive a few hundred
messages for each spam
Thus spake Yann Golanski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoth Giorgos Keramidas on Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 15:58:03 +0200
This very spammer has hit the lists more than once, and every time I
mailed {abuse|postmaster} at a2000.nl. If they receive a few hundred
messages for each spam message they let
Did anyone get this JUNK mail?
This is junk mail that I got from this mailing list.
It is in THAI language about work from home.
Does anyone have an idea to block this kind of
mail from junk people.
And for you, getrich, I am able to know where are you.
I know that you are connecting
A How-To describing the setup of system-wide virus and spam scanning
of incoming email using qmail-scanner is now available here:
http://logicsquad.net/freebsd/qmail-scanner-how-to.html
The setup described uses qmail-scanner to filter incoming mail through
Clam AntiVirus's clamscan
such a
website, please read the remainder of this message for
resubmission instructions.
Due to the variety of reporting formats we receive,
it is possible that our automated preprocessing has
misidentified your report. We strongly encourage the use
of SpamCop http://spamcop.net/, a spam reporting
How do I stop getting these emails. This incident happened over a month
ago.
On Fri Jul 5 10:40:05 2002, the user root was editing a
file named fstab on the machine , when it was saved for recovery. You
can recover most, if not all, of the changes to this file using the -r
option to vi:
From: sagacious [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPAM from charlie root.
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:50:40 -0400
How do I stop getting these emails. This incident happened over a month
ago.
On Fri Jul 5 10:40:05 2002, the user root was editing a
file named fstab
On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 06:50:40PM -0400, sagacious wrote:
How do I stop getting these emails. This incident happened over a month
ago.
On Fri Jul 5 10:40:05 2002, the user root was editing a
file named fstab on the machine , when it was saved for recovery. You
can recover most, if not
801 - 885 of 885 matches
Mail list logo
