Hi,
I have serveral questions about the update procedure.
1) starting from 4.10 RELEASE I have cvsup-ed to 4.10 RELENG. Now what
is the command to build FreeBSD?
The hand book says "do not use make world, but use make buildworld",
and look at /usr/src/UPDATING first. But in /usr/src/UPDATING it
Hello-
what is the differnece between these two files?
standard-supfile
stable-supfile
in what situation would one cvsup one or the other?
the other question i have is what are the differnence between these two
processes:
config GENERIC
cd ../../compile/GENERIC
make depend; make; make install
orm this when a security vulnerability is found?
I am trying to achieve maximum uptime for these systems and want to confirm how often
I should perform a core system update.
Please advise.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Computers are like Air Conditioners: They stop working prope
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:34:22AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have serveral questions about the update procedure.
>
> 1) starting from 4.10 RELEASE I have cvsup-ed to 4.10 RELENG. Now what
> is the command to build FreeBSD?
>
> The hand book says "do not use make world, but use mak
> Where does it say that? I see only comments in passing about 'make
> world', but the explicit directions on how to update (correctly)
> mention the separate buildworld/installworld steps.
Around line 490 of /usr/src/UPDATING (version 4.10-p5) it reads:
To rebuild everything
---
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:55:27AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > Where does it say that? I see only comments in passing about 'make
> > world', but the explicit directions on how to update (correctly)
> > mention the separate buildworld/installworld steps.
>
> Around line 490 of /usr/src/UPDAT
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:11:13AM -0500, Brian Henning wrote:
> Hello-
>
> what is the differnece between these two files?
> standard-supfile
> stable-supfile
> in what situation would one cvsup one or the other?
stable-supfile always contains the configuration to cvsup the RELENG_4
branch, w
Hi!
> the other question i have is what are the differnence between these two
> processes:
> config GENERIC
> cd ../../compile/GENERIC
> make depend; make; make install
This is what you would do if you want to re-compile the generic kernel.
Since the generic kernel is already on your system, do
> From: "Toomas Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:03:28 +0300
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi!
>
> > the other question i have is what are the differnence between these two
> > processes:
> > config GENERIC
> > cd ../../compile/GENERIC
> > make depend; make; make install
>
Hi,
How I can update system completely some thing like apt-get dist-upgrade in
Debian?
---
Best Regards,
Ashkan R
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
make installkernel
> #
> # mergemaster -p# make installworld# mergemaster# reboot
>
> Should I only perform this when a security vulnerability is found?
>
> I am trying to achieve maximum uptime for these systems and want to
> confirm how often I should perform a core
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Moran
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 1:31 PM
> To: Kenneth A. Bond
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Core System Update
>
> "Kenneth A. Bond" &l
2004 1:31 PM
> To: Kenneth A. Bond
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Core System Update
>
> "Kenneth A. Bond" wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I am trying to determine how often to update my systems.
> > Currently I am using anoncvs in order to synch my sourc
Hi,
Is it safe to ignore a sting in gmesg:
GEOM: ad10s1: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 16h,63s).
This appeared after system update 7.4-stable --> 8.2-stable.
Everything seems to work fine, but "disklabel ad10s1" is anxious too:
disklabel: partition c doesn't co
On 25/10/2012 20:19, Ashkan Rahmani wrote:
> How I can update system completely some thing like apt-get dist-upgrade in
> Debian?
You can't. With FreeBSD it's always a two step thing, because it has
the distinction between the base system and ported software.
You probably want freebsd-update(8)
The closest equivalent of `sudo apt-get dist-upgrade` in FreeBSD is
`pkg_upgrade -a`. This tool is a part of bsdadminscripts package. If
you also wanted to upgrade a kernel, look at freebsd-update.
But don't forget that in FreeBSD all is not so simple like in Debian.
You have to monitor /usr/ports
,63s != 16h,63s).
>
> This appeared after system update 7.4-stable --> 8.2-stable.
> Everything seems to work fine, but "disklabel ad10s1" is anxious too:
>
> disklabel: partition c doesn't cover the whole unit!
> disklabel: An incorrect partition c may cause p
I have recently done a system update to address some security issues and
discovered that during the update the soft links in my /usr/sbin
directory were re-written back to the system defaults. I believe that I
have changed the mailq, sendmail, and newaliases soft links back to what
they should be
Tim Hogan wrote:
I have recently done a system update to address some security issues and
discovered that during the update the soft links in my /usr/sbin
directory were re-written back to the system defaults. I believe that I
have changed the mailq, sendmail, and newaliases soft links back to
On 2005-04-16 21:10, Tim Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have recently done a system update to address some security issues and
> discovered that during the update the soft links in my /usr/sbin directory
> were re-written back to the system defaults. I believe that I hav
Mike Woods wrote:
Tim Hogan wrote:
I have recently done a system update to address some security issues and
discovered that during the update the soft links in my /usr/sbin
directory were re-written back to the system defaults. I believe that I
have changed the mailq, sendmail, and newaliases
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-04-16 21:10, Tim Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have recently done a system update to address some security issues and
discovered that during the update the soft links in my /usr/sbin directory
were re-written back to the system defaults. I believe
On 2005-04-17 06:19, Tim Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I edited the /etc/mail/mailer.conf before I did the last update and it
> did not seem to work. I think that I will try the NO_SENDMAIL option
> in the make.conf file and see what happens. One question though, the
> NO_MAILWRAPPER option
23 matches
Mail list logo
