Re: make world failed

2000-04-03 Thread Eric Ogren
Hi- IMO this thread has gone on long enough. However, since I'm hypocritical, I'm going to post one (and hopefully only one) message regarding it. > > 1) The responsibility for locating available documentation > > rests with the user. Who else should the responsibility fall on? Blindly doing t

Re: make world failed

2000-04-03 Thread Walter Brameld
On Mon, 03 Apr 2000, in a never-ending search for enlightenment, David Murphy wrote: > Quoting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > by Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > As I said, the documentation project can always use fresh > > blood. I suggest you subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so you can get an >

DNS/host file in 4.0-STABLE

2000-04-03 Thread John Saunders
While setting up a local named as a cache I came across some strange behaviour in name lookups. It doesn't seem to consult the hosts file. I have setup named as authorative for a domain called "home" under which I have configured A records for my home network. It is also authorative for reverse l

3.4 -> 4.0 cruft

2000-04-03 Thread James Housley
xntp changed to ntp in 4.0, this would include xntpd, xnptdc and their man pages and probably some more. Jim -- Nothing is fool proof, because fools are too ingenious. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: better documentation

2000-04-03 Thread Dan O'Connor
>I seem to have touched a nerve after I had problems with upgrading my home >box ot 4.0. The confusion was that I was relying heavily on my experience >with FreeBSD 3.x in the last year along with any documentation that I can >find on freebsd.org. I also read other sites like daemonnews.org and

Re: journaling fs

2000-04-03 Thread Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED] g>, Kri s Kennaway writes: > On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Alexander Frolkin wrote: > > > I always thought it was possible to use ReiserFS under FreeBSD. Am I > > mistaken? (I could well be, since I haven't done much research into this.) > > Yes. > To change the topic sligh

Re: make world failed

2000-04-03 Thread Bryan Bursey
> I'd be glad to help in this area, as I'm a very good writer. Can someone Gotta love the modesty... ;) I wouldn't mind getting more involved in this project as well (as time permits). Maybe we should continue this type of discus

Re: make world failed

2000-04-03 Thread Nik Clayton
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 03:55:59PM -0700, R Joseph Wright wrote: > Sorry to jump in in the middle of this thread, but I must agree with > Brennan that FreeBSD's online documentation is woefully incomplete. A > person upgrading from 3.x to 4.0-release shouldn't have to subscribe to a > mailing lis

Re: make world failed

2000-04-03 Thread Nik Clayton
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 09:26:27PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 11:54 AM -0700 2000/4/3, Doug Barton wrote: > > I realize that you don't want to accept responsibility for your > > actions, but please stop posting hear trying to convince us that there is > > some way we could have unloaded

Re: make world failed

2000-04-03 Thread Walter Brameld
On Mon, 03 Apr 2000, you wrote: > Thanks for getting that updated. I am sure it will help many people. > > As for improving documentation I may just make a bsd search site. I think > I can configure htdig to search multiple sites and hope to point them to > several bsd sites which carry article

Re: dufus.[...] daily run output -- summer time

2000-04-03 Thread Colin
Had you booted the Win side first, then the FreeBSD side, you would have seen FreeBSD trying to move the clock ahead "2" hours. It knows it hasn't moved the time ahead yet so it adds 1 hour to the current BIOS time, which had already been moved ahead by the previous OS boot. You'll see

Re: make world failed

2000-04-03 Thread Nik Clayton
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 04:42:34PM -0500, Brennan W Stehling wrote: > How about having an UPDATING and an UPGRADING file? Lack of people to update them. Then people complain when they get out of sync. If you (or anyone else reading this) wants to step forward and maintain either of these files,

Re: make world failed

2000-04-03 Thread Nik Clayton
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 03:03:33PM -0500, Brennan W Stehling wrote: > As for improving documentation I may just make a bsd search site. http://www.google.com/bsd N -- Internet connection, $19.95 a month. Computer, $799.95. Modem, $149.95. Telephone line, $24.95 a month. Software, free.

Re: Package creation

2000-04-03 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> How do I create my own packages? I read pkg_create(1) and it stated that > one should use a frontend for package creation. Which one, where to find > it? "One should use one as soon as someone writes such a thing" is probably what the man page should actually say. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe:

indxbib, or how make buildworld failed

2000-04-03 Thread R Joseph Wright
I continue to get this error message on make buildworld, even after cvsupping three times: indxbib -c /usr/src/share/doc/papers/memfs/../../../../contrib/groff/indxbib/eign -o ref.bib /usr/src/share/doc/papers/memfs/ref.bib indxbib:No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sh

Re: make world failed

2000-04-03 Thread Doug Barton
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Brennan W Stehling wrote: > > The problem was that the makeworld.html page did not warn that moving from > 3.x to 4.0 needed to be done differently. The actual problem was that you stuck to that web page as your only source of information. Right at the very top of t

better documentation

2000-04-03 Thread Brennan W Stehling
I seem to have touched a nerve after I had problems with upgrading my home box ot 4.0. The confusion was that I was relying heavily on my experience with FreeBSD 3.x in the last year along with any documentation that I can find on freebsd.org. I also read other sites like daemonnews.org and rela

Re: 3.4-STABLE buildworld fails.

2000-04-03 Thread Alexander Frolkin
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 12:32:18PM -0400, Jason J. Horton wrote: > I have been getting some weird failures on buildworld these days. > On most servers, I cannot get a make -j 4 buildworld to go all the > way through, have to do make buildworld. Now on one server that > was cvsupped this weekend, w

Re: make world failed

2000-04-03 Thread Jim Weeks
Which much venom, Brennan W Stehling wrote: > I am not a moron that does not read any documentation. So let me lash > back a bit here, maybe you should read someones full email and the rest of > the thread before flaming them. > > You only come off as a prick and discourage people from using

Re: dufus.[...] daily run output -- summer time

2000-04-03 Thread Soren Dayton
Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "DRT" == Donald R Tyson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DRT> At least the 4.0-STABLE side, despite the error reported by > DRT> several on this list, managed to get the time right. > > The error is in the date program's ability to tell you the tim

Re: 4.0-Stable and PCMCIA Networking

2000-04-03 Thread Alexander Frolkin
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 09:14:41AM -0400, James Housley wrote: > I just installed 4.0-RELEASE and then did a build world 4.0-STABLE > (cvsup'd 4/1) on a old laptop (Toshiba Satalilite 110CT). The OS is > working fine, no ATA problems, too old I guess. I am using a D-Link > DE-660CT PCMCIA card (

Re: dufus.[...] daily run output -- summer time

2000-04-03 Thread Brian Somers
> > "DRT" == Donald R Tyson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DRT> At least the 4.0-STABLE side, despite the error reported by > DRT> several on this list, managed to get the time right. > > The error is in the date program's ability to tell you the time X > hours ago, when that X is during th

3.4-STABLE buildworld fails.

2000-04-03 Thread Jason J. Horton
I have been getting some weird failures on buildworld these days. On most servers, I cannot get a make -j 4 buildworld to go all the way through, have to do make buildworld. Now on one server that was cvsupped this weekend, with a make buildworld, it dies on cpp: /usr/src/usr.bin/more/help.c: Dev

using make buildworld

2000-04-03 Thread Brennan W Stehling
I have a 3.4 STABLE box and want to give it a fresh upgrade with the latest cvs sync, but the buildworld fails. I have deleted the contents of /usr/obj and have done a "make clean" in /usr/src and have a fully synced source tree. What could be preventing the build from working and what can I do

Re: FIXED --> Thanks! Re: ep0 eeprom failed to come ready...

2000-04-03 Thread Carroll Kong
>At 11:11 AM 4/3/00 +0200, you wrote: >Moral of the story. It is plain untrue that Windows sees all hardware in >a straightfoward way. One may need to fiddle very much with BIOS settings >and it is very long and guesswork, involving a lot of reboots. It is much >easier to use tools such as pnpdum

Re: dufus.[...] daily run output -- summer time

2000-04-03 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
> If you run a FreeBSD box with local time in the system clock (which of > course you have to to make doze have the correct time), it does the > same thing. > > Boot both after a timechange, you get 2 hours difference, 1 from each. > > On my dualboot boxes I turn off automatic time changes in doz

Re: dufus.[...] daily run output -- summer time

2000-04-03 Thread Vivek Khera
> "DRT" == Donald R Tyson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DRT> At least the 4.0-STABLE side, despite the error reported by DRT> several on this list, managed to get the time right. The error is in the date program's ability to tell you the time X hours ago, when that X is during the leap-ahead h

Re: dufus.[...] daily run output -- summer time

2000-04-03 Thread Peter Radcliffe
"Donald R. Tyson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said: > As a moderately humorous aside, when I booted the Windows > side of my home machine on Sunday afternoon, it proudly > informed me that it had adjusted for the time change, and > then displayed a **2-hour** leap ahead. > > At least the 4.0-ST