On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 08:58:14AM +0100, Jose Luis Arbona Orovay wrote:
Is this documented ?
If you kept up with this mailing list, you would have known this problem.
That is why I just gave the "what to do" rather than give an explanation.
Please review the recent archives when you have a
Hi David.
David O'Brien wrote:
If you kept up with this mailing list, you would have known this problem.
That is why I just gave the "what to do" rather than give an explanation.
Please review the recent archives when you have a problem.
You're right, next time I will review the mailing
Hi Chad,
good summary. Only one remark and two additions:
To summarize the summary: The problem comes from the fact that a
PC-BIOS is permitted to insist on an MBR on each drive, and that the
slices in that MBR align on certain boundries whereas FreeBSD
doesn't care about such sillyness
Dear Sirs,
I am using 4.2-STABLE:
FreeBSD bofh.lasting.ro 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Tue Nov 21
11:39:07 EET 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/OOPS
i386
cvsup'd last night.
acd0: CDROM TOSHIBA CD-ROM XM-6702B at ata1-master using UDMA33
# mount /cdrom
cd9660:
Hello,
Excuse this if it's off-topic... I couldn't think of the best place to
ask this, and I am running STABLE on all production machines, so...
We have a lot of proprietary code written in Java running on Wintel
boxes. There's been talk of migrating to Linux, and our initial tests
show
Mike Hoskins wrote:
Hello,
Excuse this if it's off-topic... I couldn't think of the best place to
ask this, and I am running STABLE on all production machines, so...
We have a lot of proprietary code written in Java running on Wintel
boxes. There's been talk of migrating to Linux,
Hello, Chris Byrnes!
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 06:33:21PM -0600, you wrote:
I recently went 4.1.1-stable to 4.2-release and now lots of
passwords...don't work.
Any ideas?
The same thing...
Mabe the point is in DES/md5 passwords?
--
Alexandr P. Kovalenko http://nevermind.kiev.ua/
NEVE-RIPE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Nevermind wrote:
...
: The same thing...
: Mabe the point is in DES/md5 passwords?
FreeBSD has actually defaulted to MD5 passwords for quite a long time to
those of us not within the US. However, installing the US crypto has
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Chad R. Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001120 23:44]:
Our Pyramids, running DC/OSx 1.1 have 16 partitions per hard drive.
DC/OSx is/was the reference port of SysVr4 to the MIPS chipset, done
under contract by Pyramid for Unix System Labs.
UnixWare
Cyrille Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
the symptom is :
cc -c -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
-fformat-extensions -ansi -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../..
Hello, Matt Heckaman!
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 07:09:57AM -0500, you wrote:
FreeBSD has actually defaulted to MD5 passwords for quite a long time to
those of us not within the US. However, installing the US crypto has
always forced the usage of DES passwords by default. In order to switch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Nevermind wrote:
...
: And if I wanna manage both -- DES MD5? For example I have about 200
: users on one machine and I have no physical ability to make them
: change their passwords. It seems to me it worked fine somewhere
:
Sometime between 4.1.1-STABLE and 4.2-BETA we started having
difficulities with using pam_ssh and wdm. Here is a piece of our
/etc/pam.conf:
wdm authsufficient pam_ssh.so
wdm authrequiredpam_unix.so
wdm account requiredpam_unix.so
On 20 Nov, Mike Smith wrote:
"DO" == David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DO Why did you choose a "dangerously dedicated" install? "dangerously
DO dedicated" might go away in the future (as it doesn't leave space enough
DO space for boot0). Unless the normal slice configuration won't
Chad R. Larson:
I think earlier in this thread was a reference to a document somewhat
later than the BIOS code shipped with an AT.
Which probably makes some sense as FreeBSD won't run on a plain IBM AT
box anyway...
Do we want to start a new thread on what exactly =is= the authoritative
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:33:11PM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
I'm on tangent mode this afternoon, so this is not a direct reply.
[excellent explanation that makes perfect sense snipped for brevity]
Even if there's nothing else gained by this discussion, can this
Hello All,
When does the release information on the website usually get updated
(http://www.freebsd.org/releases/index.html)? I've been slightly following
the list, but I was just looking for a summary of changes and enhancements
from 4.1.1 to 4.2.
Jon
On 20 Nov, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
The 4.2 RELEASE has been rolled and you may now go back to your usual
restrained hacking on -stable. That is all.
Jordan,
Sorry to bother, but when will the new Release be online.
I'm not familiar with your procedure.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
I installed 4.1-release from a .ISO from ftp.freebsd.org
I see that my locale is note set when ever I attempt to run my perl
scripts...
I keep getting ...
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LC_ALL = (unset),
LC_CTYPE =
On 20 Nov, Chad R. Larson wrote:
As I recall, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
The original IBM AT spec could give a rats ass about a partition
table, all that it cares about is the boot block signature (magic
0xAA55). It is the MBR that knows what a partition table is and how
to deal with it.
On 20 Nov, Mike Smith wrote:
Let me state this one more time loudly for those calling themselves boot
code experts. THE PARTITION TABLE IN THE MBR IS NOT DEALT WITH BY THE BIOS,
BIOSES THAT TRY TO MAKE HEADS OR TALES OF PARTITION TABLES ARE TECHNICALLY
BROKEN AND VIOLATE IBM AT
Hello.
What is
ftp://releng4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/4.2-20001121-BETA
(from Nov 21 13:49 GMT)
related to
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.2-RELEASE
(from Nov 20 17:49 GMT)
The RELEASE seems older than the BETA.
Liebe Grüße, Nora.
--
[EMAIL
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 18:52 -0600, Gerd Knops wrote:
KVM users heads up: In order to support USB keyboards
the generic kernel does not install an atkbd0 driver
if no keyboard is detected. Some KVMs fail to sufficiently
emulate a keyboard, causing the system to fail
24 matches
Mail list logo
