There is code to start sshd in both /etc/rc and
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/sshd.sh.
I had this when I forgot that 4.4 installs sshd as a default and reinstalled
it from /usr/ports. I just removed the /usr/local/etc/ entry, since I'm
going to rerun buildworld, etc., after 4.5-RELEASE.
(I'm running
OK, a quick update. I tried building another machine with the same hardware
(minus the realtek) and it works just fine. Its not nearly as busy as the
one that failed. However, I did notice that the quota.users files on the
two partitions had strange time stamps of the last access. Is it
Hey,
What is status on the NTP-deamon included?
What are the reasons not to go all the way and upgrade to BIND 9?
/Kristian
snip
alot of sites still use bind 8 for one reason or another. im guessing
it will probably stay in until isc stop's maintaining 8.x in favor
of 9.
there is
From: Mike Squires [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:09:36 -0500 (EST)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is code to start sshd in both /etc/rc and
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/sshd.sh.
I had this when I forgot that 4.4 installs sshd as a default and reinstalled
it from /usr/ports. I
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:14:35AM -0600, Joe Halpin wrote:
There is code to start sshd in both /etc/rc and
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/sshd.sh.
This should only be the case if you installed a local copy of
sshd (from ports or something). The base system doesn't have
*any* startup scripts in
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:51:20AM -0600, Joe Halpin wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Joe Halpin wrote:
There is code to start sshd in both /etc/rc and
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/sshd.sh.
Did you install an upgrade to sshd from a port or something?
I don't recall doing that, but I must have.
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:13:55AM -0600, Joe Halpin wrote:
supplied executables. Guess I should have also modified /etc/rc.conf at
the same time.
You basically have two options here. Since the port installed it's own
startup script, you could have simply set sshd_enable=NO in rc.conf,
and
Hi!
I was wondering if somebody could explain to me why busmastering DMA
is not supported in my setup (RELENG_4_4):
# dmesg | grep ata
atapci0: Intel PIIX ATA controller port 0xfcf0-0xfcff at device 1.1 on pci0
atapci0: Busmastering DMA not supported
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at
I have been having a very hard time updating to the latest -stable code.
It took four days to get through a 'make world' because the compiler
kept segfaulting. Now, I cannot get a new kernel to compile. I get past
'make depend', but then I get the following:
# make
cc -c -x
++ 02/01/02 17:46 -0600 - Patrick L Hartling:
| I have been having a very hard time updating to the latest -stable code.
| It took four days to get through a 'make world' because the compiler
| kept segfaulting. Now, I cannot get a new kernel to compile. I get past
| 'make depend', but
Hey Søren,
Do you have any idea what to do with the problems I am experiencing with the
Intel-series chipset?
Regards
Kristian
- Original Message -
From: SXren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nils Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mike Silbersack
[EMAIL
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Thilo Mezger wrote:
I was wondering if somebody could explain to me why busmastering DMA
is not supported in my setup (RELENG_4_4):
# dmesg | grep ata
atapci0: Intel PIIX ATA controller port 0xfcf0-0xfcff at device 1.1 on pci0
atapci0: Busmastering DMA not supported
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 07:39:48PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Finally, many programs should respect the locale settings
of your environment. The environment variable LC_CTYPE
is responsible for declaring your character set to
programs and applications that are l10n/i18n compliant.
You can
13 matches
Mail list logo
