Re: Status, USB/Olympus E-10

2002-04-11 Thread Nick Hibma
Compile a kernel with UMASS_DEBUG (or load the module compile with CFLAGS+=-DUMASS_DEBUG) and send me the output of an attach. It should be possible to make it work. The fact that it reboots without reason is very very strange indeed. If that is the case, check that your machine is grounded

Re: Status, USB/Olympus E-10

2002-04-11 Thread Nick Hibma
Then a panic reboot. I guess it's better than before - previously I got no message whatsoever; the OS just froze rebooted. At the same time I'd think a panic/reboot is Very Very Bad; at least if something is wrong shouldn't the OS just say no? Well, perhaps you could consider a panic an

Re: vinum raid0 == system crash

2002-04-11 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Thursday, 11 April 2002 at 10:43:46 +0400, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote: Hi I have 2 raid0 volumes on my server. Some time ago one hard disk died and I removed it from the server. Now the system reboots suddenly every 1..5 days. I recompiled kernel with debuging info and located the place of

Re: steps to rebuild a dead RAID1 array ?

2002-04-11 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Mike Tancsa wrote: Yet, when I go to do a rebuild, raidtest3# atacontrol rebuild ar0 atacontrol: ioctl(ATARAIDREBUILD): Operation not supported by device raidtest3# I guess there needs to be some way to tell the controller to use ad6 as part of the rebuild no ? You need to do

Re: very old bug

2002-04-11 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, At 01:55 11/04/02 +0100, Ian Dowse wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vladislav V. Zhuk writes: After attempt to write data to write-protected floppy (or diskette with bad blocks) FreeBSD die. It's VERY VERY annoying... :( Who can fix this bug?? Unfortunately, this is believed to

HEADS UP: DHCP upgraded to 3.0.1 RC8 (was: Please test DHCP 3.0.1 RC8)

2002-04-11 Thread Murray Stokely
I received lots of positive feedback about the DHCP 3.0.1 tarball, so I've gone ahead with the MFC. DHCP 3.x has been in -CURRENT for a couple of months without incident and it fixes a number of known issues. Please let me know if you experience any problems. Thanks, -

Re: very old bug

2002-04-11 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Ian Dowse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vladislav V. Zhuk writes: After attempt to write data to write-protected floppy (or diskette with bad blocks) FreeBSD die. It's VERY VERY annoying... :( Who can fix this bug?? Unfortunately, this is believed to be

Re: KERNCONF question about multiple kernels

2002-04-11 Thread Claude Buisson
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Eric S wrote: According to the manual, if I'm NFS mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj, using one machine to build everything, and installing across NFS on all the other FreeBSD boxes on our net, I need to set KERNCONF to all of the kernel names, with the build box first.

Re: steps to rebuild a dead RAID1 array ?

2002-04-11 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 10:57 AM 4/11/2002 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: It seems Mike Tancsa wrote: Yet, when I go to do a rebuild, raidtest3# atacontrol rebuild ar0 atacontrol: ioctl(ATARAIDREBUILD): Operation not supported by device raidtest3# I guess there needs to be some way to tell the controller

Re: steps to rebuild a dead RAID1 array ?

2002-04-11 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Mike Tancsa wrote: I guess there needs to be some way to tell the controller to use ad6 as part of the rebuild no ? You need to do a atacontrol detach on the failed device, then an atacontrol attach on the new disk. BTW you dont need to boot inbetween :) atacontrol:

m_clalloc failed... (network problem)

2002-04-11 Thread yura
Hi hi. A while back my freebsd4.5-release-p2 has started to give these errors when working with nfs (client): Apr 11 11:32:18 flash /kernel: m_clalloc failed, consider increase NMBCLUSTERS value Apr 11 11:32:18 flash /kernel: fxp0: cluster allocation failed, packet dropped! Apr 11 11:32:19

Re: who's been smoking crack in freebsd land now ?

2002-04-11 Thread Brian T . Schellenberger
Geez, calm down. You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. Also, isn't the warning pretty self-explanatory? man ioctl shows that sys/ioctl.h is expected to be used in userland. And, unlike userland, it's not like the kernel has any obligation to be the same across Unices, so I'm

who's been smoking crack in freebsd land now ?

2002-04-11 Thread Darren Reed
Ok, why on earth is there a #warning for including sys/ioctl.h for kernel stuff ? By definition, /usr/include/sys _IS_ kernel include files. Has some crack monkey been playing with include files again ? If the current sys/ioctl.h isn't for use in the kernel, will someone please replace it