At 08.54 11/11/2004, Phil Kernick wrote:
/usr/sbin/pw useradd -ntest [EMAIL PROTECTED] -d/home/test -g1000 -s/bin/sh
-u1000
pw: invalid character `@' at position 4 in gecos field
Who is right of both the program ? :-)
IMHO I find usefull to have the @ in the gecos field because it is an
Hi,
I'm running
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Tue Nov 9 04:08:35 CET 2004
root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RENE
which was cvsupped at Monday, 16:00 UTC
and got this panic after doing
# kldload fdc
# kldload msdosfs_iconv
# kldunload msdosfs_iconv
# kldunload fdc
(all handwritten) :
kernel trap 12:
Ken Menzel wrote:
I need perl 5.8 to use xerces xml parser (xml.apache.org) on Freebsd5.3
perl5.8 the t/op/crypt test passes fine but not on 4.10 is this OK or
normal? Any ideas or comments?
t/op/cproto...ok
t/op/crypt# Failed at
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 20:13, Christian Meutes wrote:
I recognized a strange behavior of PAM. My Plan was to do Authorization
through pam_unix.so and pam_ldap.so
I have the following configuration for this:
---
account requiredpam_login_access.so
account
Thanks for the reply Robert!
cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
make install clean
Sorry, I should have said I was using ports. I cvsuped the ports
yesterday.
But did you run: make test?
This runs the tests, you would need to do this before the make
clean
With perl which includes excellent self
This host has 192 MB of RAM and 512 MB of swap.
/sbin/mdmfs -i 4096 -s $1md $2 (*)
You don't have enough RAM in your system to do that.
I'm running mdmfs WITHOUT -M flag.
Ronald Klop wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but tmpmfs works malloc-based by
Hi,
on 2 different machines (same hardware) with FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE, named
is reporting 0.00% cpu usage in top. But on the cpu states, there is
always activity and named is the only process that consumes much cpu
time. Other processes show cpu usage well in top. Is that a
common/known
I believe this has to do with named being a threaded process (try
hitting the capital 'H' in top and you will see more then one named).
You could search ther archives on freebsd-current for the discussion,
but it has to do with no way show it properly so it was turned off for
now. Non thread
I am using a Toshiba Tecra 730XCDT, a 150MHz Pentium laptop.
It has a ToPIC 95B Cardbus controller. The BIOS can place the
controller into PCIC-compatible or Cardbus/16-bit modes.
In Cardbus mode, my 3com 3c3FE575CT 100mbit card works fine.
However my two wireless cards, an Orinoco Gold and an SMC
Mark Jacobs said:
I downloaded the 5.3 release cd and successfully used it to install on my IBM
T42 laptop.
Today I attempted to upgrade the machine that was running 4.10 stable to 5.3
using the same cd. The install is hanging during the probe of devices right
after it announces ACD1: DVDR
I just read in the release notes that 5.3-RELEASE has the new ULE
scheduler available, but that 4BSD is the default scheduler. I thought
I read messages in freebsd-current indicating that the option to use ULE
was completely removed from the 5.3 or even the RELENG_5 branch? So, is
ULE really
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:29:08AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
I just read in the release notes that 5.3-RELEASE has the new ULE
scheduler available, but that 4BSD is the default scheduler. I thought
I read messages in freebsd-current indicating that the option to use ULE
was
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:29:08AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
I just read in the release notes that 5.3-RELEASE has the new ULE
scheduler available, but that 4BSD is the default scheduler. I thought
I read messages in freebsd-current indicating that the option to
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:56:09 -0700 (MST), M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I posted the same text as below to current@ on 20 Oct, but got no
answer.
: Is there somebody here who knows more about this or
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:29:08 -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just read in the release notes that 5.3-RELEASE has the new ULE
scheduler available, but that 4BSD is the default scheduler. I thought
I read messages in freebsd-current indicating that the option to use ULE
was
On Thursday 11 November 2004 10:17 am, Charles Ulrich wrote:
Mark Jacobs said:
I downloaded the 5.3 release cd and successfully used it to install on my
IBM
T42 laptop.
Today I attempted to upgrade the machine that was running 4.10 stable to
5.3
using the same cd. The install is
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Uwe Doering wrote:
Igor Sysoev wrote:
[...]
I've tried your patch from second email (it requires to include
sys/conf.h for devsw and D_DISK): the system also became unresponsible.
The main problem is that I could not kill the offending process - it
stuck in biowr
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:37:11PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
Why is the version of Heimdal in the base system 0.5.1?
The port has 0.6.1 in /usr/ports/security/heimdal.
How are we supposed to do any useful work when the system version of a
product is in direct conflict with a port version?
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Uwe Doering wrote:
Igor Sysoev wrote:
[...]
I've tried your patch from second email (it requires to include
sys/conf.h for devsw and D_DISK): the system also became unresponsible.
The main problem is that I could not
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Igor Sysoev wrote:
I've attached an updated version of the patch for 'vnode_pager.c'. On
my test system it resolved the issue. Please let us know whether it
works for you as well.
Sorry for the late response: I was ill and have no access to the test
machine.
Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Igor Sysoev wrote:
I've attached an updated version of the patch for 'vnode_pager.c'. On
my test system it resolved the issue. Please let us know whether it
works for you as well.
Sorry for the late response: I was ill and have no access to the test
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 10. November 2004 22:31 schrieben Sie:
ok, your instructions worked like a charm. So i'm running my nice 4
member SCSI gvinum raid5 array (with softupdates turned on), and it's
zipping along.
Fine! :-)
Now I need to test just how robust this is.
Ouhh... ;-)
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a problem of (g)vinum or if FreeBSD has other
problems in this area.
just logged a kern bug on this
And we all have to consider that gvinum is in a relatively early
development phase (IMHO) - it is basically working, that is, it's
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:29:08AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
I just read in the release notes that 5.3-RELEASE has the new ULE
scheduler available, but that 4BSD is the default scheduler. I thought
I read messages in freebsd-current indicating that the option to
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:56:09 -0700 (MST), M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: wrote:
:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : I posted the same text as below to
I rebooted again tonight with verbose logging and the last messages on the
console were;
(probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): error 22
(probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): Unretryable Error
Probe1-6 are listed after this, all with the same error 22
After the probe6 message the machine hangs.
Mark Jacobs
On Thursday, 11. November 2004 16:42, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:29:08 -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just read in the release notes that 5.3-RELEASE has the new ULE
scheduler available, but that 4BSD is the default scheduler. I thought
I read
Howdy...
After a long and happy time with vinum under 4.8 - 4.10, I'm finding
things very broken in 5.3. The config I'm trying to accomplish is
relatively simple, just a root mirrored volume configuration which worked
under 4.x.
drive M1 device /dev/ad0s1e
drive M2 device /dev/ad2s1e
volume
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 06:40:47PM -0500, Mark Jacobs wrote:
Probe1-6 are listed after this, all with the same error 22
After the probe6 message the machine hangs.
I had something similar - 5.3 probe time kernel freezes on a machine
which had been running 4.10 quite happily.
Resolved it by
I also had something similar on a hp machine (single proc)
right after the [giant-lock] message.. I haven't look into it yet.
On 11/12/04 5:18 AM, Adrian Wontroba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 06:40:47PM -0500, Mark Jacobs wrote:
Probe1-6 are listed after this, all with the
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:44:10PM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote:
After a long and happy time with vinum under 4.8 - 4.10, I'm finding
things very broken in 5.3. The config I'm trying to accomplish is
relatively simple, just a root mirrored volume configuration which worked
under 4.x.
A
31 matches
Mail list logo
