I updated a machine today to 5.3-STABLE and almost instantly it crashed
when a heavily threaded program ran. (The machine was previously running
5.2-release).
This crash is reproducible under heavy load with four threads using
libthr -- I haven't tested any other variances on this scheme, and I
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 12:24:49PM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When trying to run my application, which was compiled on FreeBSD4.8,
> on FreeBSD 5.3, It does not work and appears
>'Shared object "libc.so.4" not found.'
>
> After make an symbolic link as follows,
> # l
I've uploaded a new package set for 5.x built against the new x.org
6.8.1 X Windows version. It will make its' way to the ftp servers
when they next update.
Kris
pgpZnajsvEnjt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 12:24:49PM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
> When trying to run my application, which was compiled on FreeBSD4.8,
> on FreeBSD 5.3, It does not work and appears
>'Shared object "libc.so.4" not found.'
>
> After make an symbolic link as follows,
> # ln -s /usr/li
After updating my 5.3-STABLE/alpha from Dec 4 to Dec 22 on RELENG_5,
network _receiving_ throughput on its re(4) interface has collapsed
to a maximum of 0.5-1.0 MB/s. (Figures from scp. Yes, I realize
this is not the most suitable test, but the box is not CPU starved
and used to receive data at s
Hi,
When trying to run my application, which was compiled on FreeBSD4.8,
on FreeBSD 5.3, It does not work and appears
'Shared object "libc.so.4" not found.'
After make an symbolic link as follows,
# ln -s /usr/lib/libc.so /usr/lib/libc.so.4
it works well.
Is this link is correct f
Hello,
I'm having a Problem with FreeBSD 5.3 here. The system slowly freezes.
It starts with one application that just locks up. Other applications
still work, but when I switch to them and do stuff in them, they usually
lock up after a few seconds as well. Starting new processes or logging in
Apparently, the CPU type changes have some unintended side effects. For
me, they render the system unbootable. I have been investigating what
broke my system between a 10th December cvsup and a 20th December one
and it boils down to bsd.cpu.mk. I am on a Centrino laptop, which uses a
Pentium M
Federico Galvez-Durand Besnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, just compiled new kernel with lattest acpi.
> I am getting boot error messages.
> I set hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" in device.hints.
> With acpi disabled I get this:
>
> ( partial dmesg )
> ...
> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa000
Moin,
am Sonntag, 21. November 2004 01:32 schrieb Frank J. Beckmann:
> a few days ago a did an upgrade from something pre 5.3-rc7 to the latest
> 5.3-stable. Since then I have only trouble with ppp. My computer is
> connectet to the internet via pppoe (FreeNet in Germany). My provider
> closes the
Hello again,
It works ok with ACPI enabled! Thanks for fixing that!
Today I've tryed to install OSS with and without ACPI without success
because of intermitent noise, but this issue has nothing to to with this
lists.
Thanks again,
NUno Teixeira
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:57:23PM -0800
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:51:51PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> I have in the past used
> CPUTYPE=i686
>
> in /etc/make.conf
>
>
>
> But today, I am getting
>
>
>
> # make buildworld
> "Makefile.inc1", line 117: CPUTYPE global should be set with ?=.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop i
Hi, just compiled new kernel with lattest acpi.
I am getting boot error messages.
I set hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" in device.hints.
With acpi disabled I get this:
( partial dmesg )
...
vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0
unknown: can't assign resources (memory)
unknown: can't a
Hello,
I have a 4.9-STABLE box that I'm willing to upgrade to a newer version
(but still on 4.x branch). I tried the usual, cvsup'ed to RELENG_4,
went to /usr/src and proceeded with a make buildworld. It failed with
these messages:
cc -O -pipe -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPREFIX=\"/usr/o
I two have been seeing this same issue with both 4.9 and 5.3 different
messages though and i have yet to find a solution to it here are my
messages that im getting
from 5.3
ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=6707519
ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:51:51PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> I have in the past used
> CPUTYPE=i686
>
> in /etc/make.conf
>
>
>
> But today, I am getting
>
>
>
> # make buildworld
> "Makefile.inc1", line 117: CPUTYPE global should be set with ?=.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src
from /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf
# Currently the following CPU types are recognized:
# Intel x86 architecture:
# (AMD CPUs) athlon-mp athlon-xp athlon-4 athlon-tbird athlon
# k6-3
# k6-2 k6 k5
# (Intel CPUs)p4 p3 p2 i686 i586/mmx i586 i
Hi all,
As a new FreeBSD user I missed manpages for devfs.conf and
devfs.rules. This is also listed in GNATS as docs/63808. So I tried my
hand at writing them. I've posted them on my website at
http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/freebsd/
About two weeks ago I sent a message to the freebsd-doc mailing l
I have in the past used
CPUTYPE=i686
in /etc/make.conf
But today, I am getting
# make buildworld
"Makefile.inc1", line 117: CPUTYPE global should be set with ?=.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
#
This no longer seems to work. What is the correct syntax for this ?
The rest is fairly generic
CPU
Hi Steve,
As far as I know this is not a hardware problem.
Probably there is such DMA problem in 5.3.
Read freebsd-stable mail archive. And I think the problem is not only
with
SATA driver.
So, probably we should wait for a fix :)
Regards,
Alexei
"Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
ne
Hello all,
I have a 2*PentiumPro200 PC with FreeBSD 5.3 acting as a firewall in a
department network.
The PC has both IDE and SCSI hard drives.
(Quite strange system for a firewall, isn't it? However, it was the most
suitable box I was able to find).
It has 3 NICs xl0,fxp0 and fxp1.
>From time
--- Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:01:51AM +, Robert
> Watson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> >
> > > I have a desire to fix posix semaphores in at
> least 5.3. The current
> > > implementation doesn't actually follow the
> "s
[just for a record]
Hi all,
It seems ips(4) doesn't support ServeRAID 7k, however I just
installed 5.3-RELEASE/i386 on IBM x236 which has ServeRAID
7k installed. Everything looks fine here (I'm running RAID-5 over
4 HDDs).
A little problem is that once a HDD fails, FreeBSD doesn't
know that unle
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 02:25:14PM +, Pete French wrote:
> > The type of a decimal integer constant without any suffix is the first
> > of 'int', 'long', 'long long' in which the constant can be represented.
>
> It is ? Well, you learn something new every day I guess! I stand
> corrected in th
Mark Andrews said:
>> Thanks a lot for your reply. If I understand things correctly, I need to
>> maintain two cvsup files - one that tracks security issues in the base
>> FreeBSD 5.3 system (tag=RELENG_5_3, src-all) and one for the ports
>> collection (tag=. , ports-all). Then every time I recei
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:25:14 +
Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The type of a decimal integer constant without any suffix is the first
> > of 'int', 'long', 'long long' in which the constant can be represented.
>
> It is ? Well, you learn something new every day I guess! I stand
> c
Hello,
when I export NTFS volume mounted on FreeBSD-STABLE (FreeBSD sysadm.stc
5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Fri Dec 17 18:49:45 MSK 2004) via
Samba, then I get strange effect:
When accessing share (from Windows or from localhost via smbclient)
all directories appear as files with 0 size,
> The type of a decimal integer constant without any suffix is the first
> of 'int', 'long', 'long long' in which the constant can be represented.
It is ? Well, you learn something new every day I guess! I stand
corrected in that case. Appologies.
> (For C89 it was the first of 'int', 'long', 'un
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:26:03PM +, Pete French wrote:
> > Buggy compilers are indefensible, yes, but why try to apologise for it?
>
> I dont see it as a bug. Without an 'L' the right hand side of that
> expression is a 16 bit int. For which 65536 is out of range. If I
> wrote 'int y = 65535
Hi,
maybe it ist a faq, but I didn't find it in the list archive. How do I enable
ACLs on / in FreeBSD 5.3? I tried to boot into single user mode and did
tunefs -a enable /dev/ad4s2a and ACLs are enabled. But they are not enabled
anymore as soon as I mount /. But as long as / is not mounted, th
> Buggy compilers are indefensible, yes, but why try to apologise for it?
I dont see it as a bug. Without an 'L' the right hand side of that
expression is a 16 bit int. For which 65536 is out of range. If I
wrote 'int y = 65535; long x = y;' then I would get the same result for
the same reason.
T
Hello.
I'm running a HP Compaq DC7100 with two S-ATA harddrives.
It's a bit difficult for me to say what goes wrong, because I'm not told.
I've installed FreeBSD, and when I turn on the computer it passes on to the
bootloader part. This is where, when I select F1 for FreeBSD (F5 is Drive1
and us
hello,
i use 5.3-STABLE, and have noticed, that if i run acpiconf -s3 (hard
sleep ?) on my laptop, all is fine, but the current time "freezes", so
if i power my laptop later on, i have the same time as before sleep
it is very ..er..unpleasant to set up time after each sleep again
i am not sure, but
33 matches
Mail list logo
