Re: State of gvinum RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_4 ?!

2005-05-11 Thread Peter Orlowski
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:42:02AM -0600, secmgr wrote: > > > >I had to erase the gmirror metadata on the intact disk to get it > >to work again. > > > What steps did you take to the gmirror the disk so you could get your > data back? I took the physically intact disk and did a gmirror clear /d

Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Steven Jurczyk
Chris wrote: Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4 onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month. Have you guys tried this without SMP? Yes. pthreads applications under SCHED_ULE but without SM

Re: twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x000c): Background initialize started: unit=0

2005-05-11 Thread Doug White
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Ya, this looks like it might be a problem ... server just crashed, and > fsck is once more dog slow, and I suspect its in the 'initialization mode' > again ... > > Looking at the following that I've also found, things appear to be > pointing to ACPI

Re: Experimental ttwwakeup() panic patch

2005-05-11 Thread Doug White
Sorry for the late reply on this. On Fri, 6 May 2005, Ed Maste wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 08:54:23PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~dwhite/tty.c.20050503.patch > > > > This patch has been committed and exists as rev 1.228.2.4 of > > src/sys/kern/tty.c. Please l

Re: PTHREAD_INVARIANTS in 5.x

2005-05-11 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 05/11/05 21:53, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Wed, 11 May 2005, Jonathan Noack wrote: I checked out _PTHREADS_INVARIANTS for libthr and libpthread on CURRENT. As far as I can tell, all but one of the defines under _PTHREADS_INVARIANTS are ASSERTs; they check for a condition and if it is false result

Re: PTHREAD_INVARIANTS in 5.x

2005-05-11 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Jonathan Noack wrote: > > I checked out _PTHREADS_INVARIANTS for libthr and libpthread on CURRENT. > As far as I can tell, all but one of the defines under > _PTHREADS_INVARIANTS are ASSERTs; they check for a condition and if it > is false result in a fatal error. These shou

Re: PTHREAD_INVARIANTS in 5.x

2005-05-11 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 05/11/05 09:55, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Tue, 10 May 2005, Mikhail Teterin wrote: = > As we were counting down to 5.3-RELEASE, I noticed, that all = > threading libraries still compile with PTHREAD_INVARIANTS. My = > suggestion to have this = > fixed was shutdown as not enough time = > was left

only Swiss Rolex please.

2005-05-11 Thread Ernest
Daily News - Rolex watches online http://honeysuckle.q67.net/replica/vron/envelopes.html Wishlist : Rolex or Cartier or Breitling ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send a

Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:28:14AM +0100, Chris wrote: > Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4 > onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning > on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month. > > Have you guys tried this without SMP? Guys..

Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 05/11/05 18:28, Chris wrote: On 5/11/05, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mi, 11.05.2005, 14:34, Steven Jurczyk sagte: **Using SCHED_ULE on SMP/HT machine broke applications which use libpthread/libthr, probably at context switching between threads... The applications simply hang and

IPF 4.1.8

2005-05-11 Thread sebosik
Hi I`ve tried to import IPF 4.1.8 into freebsd-stable (5.4). It's first time I tried something similar. Problem is, that the kernel fails to compile (it needs somewhere 3 parameters, but gets only 2... or what). I followed the readme for freebsd-5. Any help ? Jan Sebosik __

Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Chris
Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4 onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month. Have you guys tried this without SMP? Chris On 5/11/05, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mi, 1

Re: PostgreSQL in FreeBSD jails

2005-05-11 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Marton Kenyeres wrote: Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: 'k, I've been doing multiple since 7.2 on the same machine, all on the same port, all different IPs, all on 4.x servers ... have never had an issue with crashes (its pretty much my

Re: Creating a mini install disk, for particular needs

2005-05-11 Thread Chris Phillips
Many thanks to all who have responded! I have plenty to investigate now. Kind Regards, Chris Phillips Nora Etukudo wrote: Am 11. Mai 2005 um 00:56:07 +0100 schrieb Chris Phillips: We need a fairly painless way, to roll out a fresh install onto some random i386 hardware we have lying around (there

Re: State of gvinum RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_4 ?!

2005-05-11 Thread secmgr
Peter Orlowski wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:24:12AM -0600, secmgr wrote: Gabor Esperon wrote: How reliable is the gmirror subsystem? gmirror seems fine as best as I can tell. I've been running it for a few months on sata drives. I had gmirror running on two IDE drives for

Re: kernel build problem

2005-05-11 Thread Freddie Cash
On May 11, 2005 07:28 am, Ananth.G wrote: > i have attached my config file. Read the comments in your config file. You'll quickly notice that you have removed the isa device (which is needed for PS/2, serial, parallel ports, etc), and that you have umass enabled, but disabled the needed scbus a

Re: xl(4) & polling

2005-05-11 Thread Subhro
On 5/11/2005 13:57, Tuomo Latto wrote: Subhro wrote: ... In Device Polled systems, the NIC does not generate any interrupt at all. Instead whenever the packets arrive at a Network interface, they are captured and put into a queue. The kernel scheduler checks the quese at regular intervals and pr

Re: PTHREAD_INVARIANTS in 5.x

2005-05-11 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > = > As we were counting down to 5.3-RELEASE, I noticed, that all > = > threading libraries still compile with PTHREAD_INVARIANTS. My > = > suggestion to have this = > fixed was shutdown as not enough time > = > was left for testing the 5.3. > > = > Can

Re: Use PCMCIA instead of CardBus?

2005-05-11 Thread Kirk Strauser
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 09:28, Joerg Pulz wrote: > You should take a look into src/sys/i386/conf/OLDCARD > change the appropriate lines in you kernel configuration and rebuild your > kernel. I appreciate the suggestion, but pcic(4) includes this less-than-promising statement: BUGS

Re: save-entropy errors on jail after update to 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Alexander Rusinov
Renato Botelho wrote: I updated my box and a jail that runs inside this box to 5.4-RELEASE yesterday. After it, I'm receiving emails from this jail with error messages about /usr/libexec/save-entropy I'm receiving messages like this: mv: /var/db/entropy/saved-entropy.7: No such file or directory mv

RE: kernel build problem

2005-05-11 Thread Zimmerman, Eric
>i have attached my config file. > >regrds, >ananth.g this looks like an issue (cut/pasted from kernel config file). Isa is required, no? # Bus support. Do not remove isa, even if you have no isa slots #device isa #device eisa device pci ___

em and bge driver MPSAFE?

2005-05-11 Thread Mipam
Hi, Perhaps lame to ask, But are the em and bge driver MPSAFE? I couldn't find notes about being mpsafe in the man pages of these drivers? Bye, Mipam. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

Re: kernel build problem

2005-05-11 Thread Paig Chong Woo
Le 11 mai 2005 à 16:28, Ananth.G a écrit : i have attached my config file. regrds, ananth.g Sergey S. Ropchan wrote: Content of kernel config please ? It's look like wrong option in config. dear all, im having trouble compiling kernel on 5.3 , i did a `make depend` and `make`. The followi

Re: Creating a mini install disk, for particular needs

2005-05-11 Thread Nora Etukudo
Am 11. Mai 2005 um 00:56:07 +0100 schrieb Chris Phillips: > We need a fairly painless way, to roll out a fresh install onto some > random i386 hardware we have lying around (there's a plentiful supply), > for any new users, who require a basic functioning GUI, with access to > graphical email c

Re: xl(4) & polling

2005-05-11 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:30:05AM -0700, Rob wrote: > Argh, just found out that it is not the polling. > Even without the polling, the ssh-tunnel connection > gets disrupted, although not as frequent as with > the polling. Possibly, the polling makes the problem > more visible, but it not the culp

Re: PostgreSQL in FreeBSD jails

2005-05-11 Thread Marton Kenyeres
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: 'k, I've been doing multiple since 7.2 on the same machine, all on the same port, all different IPs, all on 4.x servers ... have never had an issue with crashes (its pretty much my most stable 4.x server) ... It was never po

Re: xl(4) & polling

2005-05-11 Thread Rob
--- Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:43:09AM -0700, Rob wrote: > > I actually doubt whether the default values of > > these sysctl variables would cause the problem. > > > No. Can you observe the broken IP/TCP/UDP > checksums? > > netstat -ss -f inet |grep

Re: kernel build problem

2005-05-11 Thread Ananth.G
i have attached my config file. regrds, ananth.g Sergey S. Ropchan wrote: Content of kernel config please ? It's look like wrong option in config. dear all, im having trouble compiling kernel on 5.3 , i did a `make depend` and `make`. The following is the error that i got, i might have missed

Re: Use PCMCIA instead of CardBus?

2005-05-11 Thread Joerg Pulz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 May 2005, Kirk Strauser wrote: On Tuesday 10 May 2005 16:15, Warner Losh wrote: I have no idea what you are asking for. Let me restate my original dilemma. My laptop can only use my WLAN card when it's configured as a 16-bit PCMCIA device an

Re: kernel build problem

2005-05-11 Thread Sergey S. Ropchan
Content of kernel config please ? It's look like wrong option in config. > dear all, >im having trouble compiling kernel on 5.3 , i did a `make depend` and > `make`. > The following is the error that i got, i might have missed a module > i guess... > > cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro

Re: Use PCMCIA instead of CardBus?

2005-05-11 Thread Kirk Strauser
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 16:15, Warner Losh wrote: > I have no idea what you are asking for. Let me restate my original dilemma. My laptop can only use my WLAN card when it's configured as a 16-bit PCMCIA device and not as a 32-bit CardBus device. In NetBSD, this can be accomplished by typing "

kernel build problem

2005-05-11 Thread Ananth.G
dear all, im having trouble compiling kernel on 5.3 , i did a `make depend` and `make`. The following is the error that i got, i might have missed a module i guess... cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpo

save-entropy errors on jail after update to 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Renato Botelho
I updated my box and a jail that runs inside this box to 5.4-RELEASE yesterday. After it, I'm receiving emails from this jail with error messages about /usr/libexec/save-entropy I'm receiving messages like this: mv: /var/db/entropy/saved-entropy.7: No such file or directory mv: /var/db/entropy/s

Re: xl(4) & polling

2005-05-11 Thread Michael Schuh
Sorry for my wrong posting Hi, i think the setting of HZ has nothing to do with DEVICE_POLLING at once. So the Documentation say's DEVICE_POLLING is an Other way to get the Packets from the Ethernet. I have setted HZ=2000 on all my machines, equal if the Processor is an PI 200MHz or an PIII 8

Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Marian Hettwer
On Mi, 11.05.2005, 14:34, Steven Jurczyk sagte: > **Using SCHED_ULE on SMP/HT machine broke applications which use > libpthread/libthr, probably at context switching between threads... The > applications simply hang and they aren't killable (kill -9 don't > work).. Usually this also break kernel s

Re: Strange top(1) output

2005-05-11 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 18:26 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-05-10 10:41, Andre Guibert de Bruet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 May 2005, Skip Ford wrote: > > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU > > > COMM > > >AND > > >1352 skip

SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Steven Jurczyk
**Using SCHED_ULE on SMP/HT machine broke applications which use libpthread/libthr, probably at context switching between threads... The applications simply hang and they aren't killable (kill -9 don't work).. Usually this also break kernel shutdown (can't flush some inodes or blocks)... This

FW: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE is now available

2005-05-11 Thread sergei
I'm sorry... But where is miniinst.iso? ;) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 109, Issue 6

2005-05-11 Thread Michael Schuh
Hi, i think the setting of HZ has nothing to do with DEVICE_POLLING at once. So the Documentation say's DEVICE_POLLING is an Other way to get the Packets from the Ethernet. I have setted HZ=2000 on all my machines, equal if the Processor is an PI 200MHz or an PIII 866MHz In fact this setting gav

Re: xl(4) & polling

2005-05-11 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:43:09AM -0700, Rob wrote: > I actually doubt whether the default values of > these sysctl variables would cause the problem. > No. Can you observe the broken IP/TCP/UDP checksums? netstat -ss -f inet |grep -w bad Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD c

Re: State of gvinum RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_4 ?!

2005-05-11 Thread Peter Orlowski
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:24:12AM -0600, secmgr wrote: > Gabor Esperon wrote: > > > >How reliable is the gmirror subsystem? > > gmirror seems fine as best as I can tell. I've been running it for a > few months on sata drives. I had gmirror running on two IDE drives for system and two SATA driv

Re: Creating a mini install disk, for particular needs

2005-05-11 Thread David Adam
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Chris Phillips wrote: > We need a fairly painless way, to roll out a fresh install onto some > random i386 hardware we have lying around (there's a plentiful supply), > for any new users, who require a basic functioning GUI, with access to > graphical email client, web browser

Re: RAID 1 with Adaptec SATA 1210SA + FreeBSD 5.4 + ata mkIII OK

2005-05-11 Thread Søren Schmidt
Gheorghe Ardelean wrote: Hi Soeren, I have to thank you for the work you put in the ata driver. Thanks! After patching the 5.4 sources with the new ata mkIII (http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ATA) I am able to use the RAID 1 with my Adaptec SATA 1210SA. Good :) let me know if you run into problems wi

Re: xl(4) & polling

2005-05-11 Thread Tuomo Latto
Subhro wrote: ... In Device Polled systems, the NIC does not generate any interrupt at all. Instead whenever the packets arrive at a Network interface, they are captured and put into a queue. The kernel scheduler checks the quese at regular intervals and processes the packets which are waiting.

Re: xl(4) & polling

2005-05-11 Thread Rob
--- Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/11/2005 13:13, Rob wrote: > > >--- Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>On 5/11/2005 8:04, Rob wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>All computers are running 5-Stable, as of May 10. > >>>All, but PC1 with fxp, use polling, with: > >>> option

Re: xl(4) & polling

2005-05-11 Thread Subhro
On 5/11/2005 13:13, Rob wrote: --- Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/11/2005 8:04, Rob wrote: All computers are running 5-Stable, as of May 10. All, but PC1 with fxp, use polling, with: options DEVICE_POLLING options HZ=1000 1000 IMHO seems a bit too heavy. Try something lower

Re: xl(4) & polling

2005-05-11 Thread Rob
--- Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/11/2005 8:04, Rob wrote: > > >All computers are running 5-Stable, as of May 10. > >All, but PC1 with fxp, use polling, with: > > options DEVICE_POLLING > > options HZ=1000 > > > > > 1000 IMHO seems a bit too heavy. Try something > lower. Same p

Re: Creating a mini install disk, for particular needs

2005-05-11 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:56:07AM +0100, Chris Phillips wrote: > > I am trying to find a suitable alternative to our crappy, solid-state, > thin client boxes (because they are so awfully unreliable & the > manufacturer has also gone down the tubes). > > We need a fairly painless way, to roll o