On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Mike Meyer wrote:
> I'm trying to install 5.4-RELEASE off of CDROM on an ASUS P5S800 motherboard
> with a SATA drive in it. The SATA drive shows up as ad4 during the install
> process, and the install goes just fine.
>
> But the resulting system fails to boot. It goes through
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> >
> > I find even disconnecting the drives so no RAID is detected works - ie it's
> > not the presence of the card per se that is a problem.
> >
>
> Good test - I had not tried that.
>
> In addition, I can confirm your observat
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Mitch Parks wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> >> there is a PR for it : kern/74319
> >
> > This sounds very similar to a serial console related tty bug I was
> > experiencing on -STABLE a few months ago, and that is believed may have been
> > worked around
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:47:03AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> No, it's not that. It's just that when we decided to upgrade gcc/g++
> in the 5.2.1 era someone didn't bump the library version for
> libstdc++.
>
> It would have been a two second change, but instead it appears that
> it was dec
How could I fix this error?
Thanks
--
«†£(r)(r)Ø(r)
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used by
the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mist
speaking of noise how about I include a URL
http://www.segr.ca/index.php/FreeBSD/MySQL
sheesh... sorry to all.
Stephane
On 28-Jun-05, at 8:55 PM, Stephane Raimbault wrote:
I also quickly put a wiki together to help me document any kind of
testing or patching we can try. Feel free to co
I also quickly put a wiki together to help me document any kind of
testing or patching we can try. Feel free to contribute. My hope is
we can refer others to this document, and not create too much noise
on this list as others have suggested is being created (the noise
that is).
I hope t
Having just read this thread, I'd like to say that all messages are
making valid points, and all participants agree with each other.
However, the argumentative discussion is creating a lot of noise.
Meanwhile, there are people doing meaningful work on this.
A good standby would be to patch your 5
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maxim Kizik
> Sent: 28. juni 2005 20:35
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: smbfs
>
> Good Afternoon.
>
>
> After upgrading my system from FreeBSD 4.10 to FreeBSD 5.3, I
> found "mount_smbfs -N" br
On 27 Jun, Artem Kuchin wrote:
> For the last 6 month i really think that if you don't need something
> high-end scsi then you should go for SATA. There are test on sites
> such as Tom's hardware guide and ixbt.com. They show then on
> sequrncial read there is no difference between scsi and sata.
On 28-Jun-05, at 1:01 PM, Xin LI wrote:
We care about why MySQL appears to be slower, how to improve the
situation,
and not numbers from poorly done benchmarks which ignored the
effect of
debugging options, version, disk mount options, etc., which is IMHO
meaningless.
Maybe a key feat
Is upgrading a i386 system to amd64 supported?
Can I just build an amd64 kernel and keep the userland?
--
Every sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology
- Arthur C Anticlarke
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
Hi,
I would like to hotswap hard disks (for backups) with a Promise PDC40518
SATA150 (a.k.a. S-ATA II 150 TX4). Both SATA hard disks on this
controller are found while booting. I can mount and use the drives. And
this works very nicely and fast.
But if I detach a drive via atacontrol or via the
Yes, SMP is enabled, as is implied by the kernel config tag.
(Very busy compilation, web and database server)
Are you using PF?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
Hello,
I'm trying to debug a FreeBSD 4.11 kernel that has been compiled with
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
options DDB
The remote machine is running FreeBSD 5.4 and I'm using devel/gdb6. I
have no problems as long as I escape to the debugger after the kernel
was loaded, but I like to trace
Alexander S. Usov wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:44:02PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 18:21, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>>>
>>> > Are you sure that the problem is with libstdc++ and not the above
>>> > libraries?
>>>
>>> Yes, it's a well
FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #11: Fri Apr 8 09:48:24 CDT 2005 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KSD-SMP
5:02PM up 80 days, 21:08, 1 user, load averages: 4.04, 3.33, 3.01
Yes, SMP is enabled, as is implied by the kernel config tag.
(Very busy compilation, web and database server)
--
--
Karl
Some people suggested so - pf is supposed to be faster then IPFILTER.
However if you are experiencing machine freezing like I did on 5.4-STABLE
I'm not sure this will help - if nothing else helps try 6.0-CURRENT. I've
also noticed that it is running much faster with all debuging enabled then
reg
Some people suggested so - pf is supposed to be faster then IPFILTER.
However if you are experiencing machine freezing like I did on 5.4-STABLE
I'm not sure this will help - if nothing else helps try 6.0-CURRENT. I've
also noticed that it is running much faster with all debuging enabled
then r
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:44:02PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 18:21, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>>
>> > Are you sure that the problem is with libstdc++ and not the above
>> > libraries?
>>
>> Yes, it's a well known-fact. In fact there might have
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 18:21, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>
>> Are you sure that the problem is with libstdc++ and not the above
>> libraries?
>
> Yes, it's a well known-fact. In fact there might have been a break of ABI
> backwards-compatibility between gcc 3.3 and 3.4, to
Hi,
I have something like 20 boxes (Dell Power Edge 370, Fujitsu-Siemens PRIMERGY
200 and couple of dual AMD64 Fujitsu-Siemens) servers running 5.4-STABLE. So
far, only machine that I have experienced freezing and was unable to get
droped into KDB or to get any sort of vmcore was Dell Power E
Hi,
I have something like 20 boxes (Dell Power Edge 370, Fujitsu-Siemens
PRIMERGY 200 and couple of dual AMD64 Fujitsu-Siemens) servers running
5.4-STABLE. So far, only machine that I have experienced freezing and was
unable to get droped into KDB or to get any sort of vmcore was Dell Power
On 26 Jun, David Magda wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2005, at 22:34, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> In fact, looking at the SATA 2.x specs, each chanell there is rated at
>> 300MB/s, which, again, if I could 'max out evenly', could seriously
>> blow away the SCSI bus itself ...
>>
>> *If* I'm reading thi
Only way to find out is to try. You could build and install the non-SMP
kernel and reboot when you can, or let it boot the new kernel next time
the system(s) crash.
A lot of the issues seem to be SMP-related. I really loaded up a GENERIC
5.4 kernel and wasn't able to get it to panic. What do you
Gary,
Do you know what the chances are that this problem I'm experiencing
is SMP related? I don't mind turning off SMP, and I guess I could
for now to see if that runs stable. Otherwise, I think we're going
to switch to OpenBSD, because these crashes are occuring so
frequently (twice a day)...
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 07:17:39PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-28 13:03:04 -0400:
> > On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 18:39 +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >
> > My apologies if it wasn't clear, but I was responding to your apparent
> > assertion that location does not matte
* David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050628 11:27] wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:46:27AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > I just got bitten by an upgrade from 5.2.1 to 5.4 where my apps
> > linked with c++ stopped working. The solution I had to do was to
> > copy an old 5.2.1 libstdc++ ove
Matt,
Sadly the FreeBSD guys will need more info before a fix is possible. I would
suggest you revert back to FreeBSD 5.3, if you can. Even if you get a patch
you'd want to do a whole lot of regression testing before putting it in
production as it might break something else.
Gary,
Do you kn
Good Afternoon.
After upgrading my system from FreeBSD 4.10 to FreeBSD 5.3, I found
"mount_smbfs -N" broken. The error message is "mount_smbfs: unable to
open connection: syserr = Authentication error".
However, the keyboard interactive password works normally.
The problem still persists in 5.
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 19:17 +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-28 13:03:04 -0400:
> > What you see as being defensive I see as being rigorous. If someone is
> > making a claim based upon a performance benchmark, people will quiz the
> > person conducting the benchmark t
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:44:02PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 18:21, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>
> > Are you sure that the problem is with libstdc++ and not the above
> > libraries?
>
> Yes, it's a well known-fact. In fact there might have been a break of ABI
> backwar
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:46:27AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> I just got bitten by an upgrade from 5.2.1 to 5.4 where my apps
> linked with c++ stopped working. The solution I had to do was to
> copy an old 5.2.1 libstdc++ over my 5.4 one. My question is, why
> wasn't the library version bu
Please try out this patch to aid the above problem with hang instead of
dump:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c.diff?r1=1.275&r2=1.276
This box is now crashing once every 12 hours. I can't apply this patch
:-(. Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can work a
Please try out this patch to aid the above problem with hang instead of
dump:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c.diff?r1=1.275&r2=1.276
This patch wouldn't go through
I tried patching against:
__FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c,v 1.267.2.3 2005/05/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Vivek Khera wrote:
If you have a spare server you don't mind crashing, can you try
running 20-60 instances of the following script:
#!/bin/sh
while :
do
arp -d >/dev/null 2>&1
ping -c 1 -t 1 >/dev/null 2>&1
done
all copies pinging the same remote IP or different remote I
On Jun 28, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Gary Mu1der wrote:
If you have a spare server you don't mind crashing, can you try
running 20-60 instances of the following script:
#!/bin/sh
while :
do
arp -d >/dev/null 2>&1
ping -c 1 -t 1 >/dev/null 2>&1
done
all copies pinging the same
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-28 13:03:04 -0400:
> On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 18:39 +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>
> My apologies if it wasn't clear, but I was responding to your apparent
> assertion that location does not matter in disk performance benchmarks.
We seem to have a misunderstaning, I
> > (Note that however good or bad it may be, the "location selection
> > strategy in the driver" can only lay out data within the confines of
> > the partition.) Now, I do a "dd" test and find that the "outside" OS
> > is almost twice as fast as the other. Would it be wise to conclude
> > that t
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 18:39 +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-28 11:38:44 -0400:
> > Note how the transfer rate for the "outside" is almost twice that of the
> > "inside." Suppose I run tests on two different operating systems, one
> > of which resides in a partition on
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-28 18:29:59 +0200:
> 2005/6/28, Paul Mather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 11:21 +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-21 16:51:10 +0200:
> > > > For accurate measurements and comparisons, you have to make
> > > > sure to use
No, it's not that. It's just that when we decided to upgrade gcc/g++
in the 5.2.1 era someone didn't bump the library version for
libstdc++.
It would have been a two second change, but instead it appears that
it was decided that early adopters REALLY needed to be put in their
place for being stup
On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 18:21, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> Are you sure that the problem is with libstdc++ and not the above
> libraries?
Yes, it's a well known-fact. In fact there might have been a break of ABI
backwards-compatibility between gcc 3.3 and 3.4, too, but I'm not sure.
> Was there any
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-28 11:38:44 -0400:
> Note how the transfer rate for the "outside" is almost twice that of the
> "inside." Suppose I run tests on two different operating systems, one
> of which resides in a partition on the "inside" portion and the other in
> one on the "outside" port
Chris Phillips wrote:
Matt Juszczak wrote:
Chris Phillips wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 5:20 AM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Can anyone enlighten me, if recent crashes are on STABLE only or
5.4-RELEASE is affected as well?
I have three boxes running 5.4-RELEASE. one is a m
Yes, i know that and i agree with them.
that was the reason, why my disk is tiled on first physical Gigabyte for Swap,
and the rest for the system
my target was to compare 2 Versions not 2 Os-Types like FreeBSD and Linux,
but FreeBSD and FreeBSD, in cases RELENG_4 with RELENG_5.
so that the l
This note in the 5-CURRENT UPDATING file (when -CURRENT was 5.x),
indicates you'll need to rebuild all 5.x executables made after this
change (20041001 entry).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/UPDATING.diff?r1=1.366&r2=1.367&f=h
/lib/libm.so.2 -> libm.so.3
Matt Juszczak wrote:
Chris Phillips wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 5:20 AM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Can anyone enlighten me, if recent crashes are on STABLE only or
5.4-RELEASE is affected as well?
I have three boxes running 5.4-RELEASE. one is a mediumly-loaded
web ser
Chris Phillips wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 5:20 AM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Can anyone enlighten me, if recent crashes are on STABLE only or
5.4-RELEASE is affected as well?
I have three boxes running 5.4-RELEASE. one is a mediumly-loaded
web server, and two are very
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 5:20 AM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Can anyone enlighten me, if recent crashes are on STABLE only or
5.4-RELEASE is affected as well?
I have three boxes running 5.4-RELEASE. one is a mediumly-loaded web
server, and two are very heavily loaded database
On Jun 28, 2005, at 11:50 AM, Matt Juszczak wrote:
I have three boxes running 5.4-RELEASE. one is a mediumly-loaded
web server, and two are very heavily loaded database servers.
none of them ever crash.
Other people I've seen complain seem to be running SMP Not sure
if that ha
Vivek,
When stress testing I never had any issues with the bge NIC on our AMD64
Tyan S2882 system.
Of course within a day of putting it in production it crashed. Switching
to the fxp NIC did not fix the crash, although it crashed differently.
If you have a spare server you don't mind crashi
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 5:20 AM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Can anyone enlighten me, if recent crashes are on STABLE only or
5.4-RELEASE is affected as well?
I have three boxes running 5.4-RELEASE. one is a mediumly-loaded web
server, and two are very heavily loaded database
fsck -y# or fsck and read every question, if you're paranoid
mount -f /# remounts root read/write
mount /var
savecore /var/crash
exit
Gary
Gary:
After it crashes, it locks up and hangs, no keyboard response, etc.
When I reboot, I go into single user mode and do:
fsck -p
moun
I just got bitten by an upgrade from 5.2.1 to 5.4 where my apps
linked with c++ stopped working. The solution I had to do was to
copy an old 5.2.1 libstdc++ over my 5.4 one. My question is, why
wasn't the library version bumped for this incompatible change?
Can we bump it?
How can we bump it?
On Jun 28, 2005, at 5:20 AM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Can anyone enlighten me, if recent crashes are on STABLE only or
5.4-RELEASE is affected as well?
I have three boxes running 5.4-RELEASE. one is a mediumly-loaded web
server, and two are very heavily loaded database servers. none of
t
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 11:21 +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-21 16:51:10 +0200:
> > For accurate measurements and comparisons, you have to make
> > sure to use _exactly_ the same physical location on the
> > disk.
>
> No you don't. You want to make a side-by-side c
Matt Juszczak wrote:
Ever since I setup the debug kernel the machine is now crashing every 12
hours. I think I have to switch to OpenBSD or 4.11 FreeBSD because this
box can't keep crashing. It refuses to do a crash dump.
-Matt
Matt,
Does it refuse to crash dump or is it that you can't g
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 10:49 -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:01:09AM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
M> About three weeks ago, I upgraded my 5.3-RELEASE boxes to 5.4-RELEASE.
M> I also turned on procmail globally on our ma
Gleb,
Thank you very much for your reply.
I spent the day yesterday trying to reproduce the crash that I posted
last week and you kindly replied to. This is due to the fact that I
stupidly managed to overwrite the kernel.debug that I used to generate
the stack trace. Sadly I could not cause t
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 10:49 -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:01:09AM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
> >M> About three weeks ago, I upgraded my 5.3-RELEASE boxes to 5.4-RELEASE.
> >M> I also turned on procmail globally on our mail server. Here is ou
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:37:29AM +0200, Eirik Øverby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have, since upgrading to 5.x and updating my management tools, seen
> a number of problems relating to stopping jails.
>
> I'm maintaining several hosts with a number of full-featured jails
> (i.e. full virtual FreeBSD
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:01:09AM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
M> About three weeks ago, I upgraded my 5.3-RELEASE boxes to 5.4-RELEASE.
M> I also turned on procmail globally on our mail server. Here is our
M> current FreeBSD server setup:
M>
M> URANUS - primary ldap
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 06:43, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > I can't reproduce it in -current.
> >
> > -bash-2.05b$ uname -a
> > FreeBSD orion 6.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #0: Thu May 5 13:29:41 EDT
> > 2005
>
> Yeah, you already said that befor
On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 06:43, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> I can't reproduce it in -current.
>
> -bash-2.05b$ uname -a
> FreeBSD orion 6.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #0: Thu May 5 13:29:41 EDT
> 2005
Yeah, you already said that before. So where do we go from here? Should I try
to get a backtrace
Michael Schuh wrote:
# cd /; /usr/bin/time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024 count=1024k of=zerofile;
I would only compare the performace from 2 Versions of FreeBSD, while
i mean that the performance from RELENG_5 is more slower than under
GENTOO and it is double as slow as under RELENG_4.
Let me guess:
I haven't finished all the suggested tests, but since I'm taking so long
to do so, I thought I should send what I have so far.
On Saturday, 25th June 2005, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>On Fri, 2005-Jun-24 22:31:06 +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
>>I'm experiencing data corruption when reading CDs and DVDs on
Hi,
i wouldn't start a principal discussion, but i have too?
I have one Machine! and on this machine with identical Hardware,
identical real! not same not side by side, real the same disk,
processor, ram, board..
--> read my other postings, it's recommendet.
on this machine i have made 4
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:43, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-28 19:04:18 +0930:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:51, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > No you don't. You want to make a side-by-side comparison
> > > of two products, and if one of them underperforms, it just
> > >
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
In all honesty, I'm getting somewhat irritated by all the
"dd is meaningless performance measurement tool, use something
real" and similar arguments: dd is a real command for real
work, and if it shows abysmal performance of sequential writes,
then there
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-26 19:29:27 +0100:
> On Sunday 26 June 2005 19:12, Maher Mohamed wrote:
> > can some tell me what is the difference bitween portinstall and make
> > install clean, and in which way should one portupgrade its ports?
>
> portinstall is a ruby program which comes with po
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-28 19:04:18 +0930:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:51, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > No you don't. You want to make a side-by-side comparison
> > of two products, and if one of them underperforms, it just
> > underperforms. You cannot use a poor location selection
>
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
Can anyone enlighten me, if recent crashes are on STABLE only or
5.4-RELEASE is affected as well?
I'm going to upgrade SMP Intel box (PIIIs) and it can make hard time if
it will become unstable.
I have Dual PIII on Intel ServerWorks motherboard with 3Ware 8608
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
Can anyone enlighten me, if recent crashes are on STABLE only or
5.4-RELEASE is affected as well?
What crashes? ;)
I'm going to upgrade SMP Intel box (PIIIs) and it can make hard time if
it will become unstable.
___
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:51, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> No you don't. You want to make a side-by-side comparison
> of two products, and if one of them underperforms, it just
> underperforms. You cannot use a poor location selection
> strategy in the driver as an excuse for poor operatio
Hello!
Can anyone enlighten me, if recent crashes are on STABLE only or
5.4-RELEASE is affected as well?
I'm going to upgrade SMP Intel box (PIIIs) and it can make hard time if
it will become unstable.
--
Alex Povolotsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
free
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-21 16:51:10 +0200:
> For accurate measurements and comparisons, you have to make
> sure to use _exactly_ the same physical location on the
> disk.
No you don't. You want to make a side-by-side comparison
of two products, and if one of them underperforms, it ju
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 07:58:18PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
M> >Can you please build kernel with debugging and obtain a crashdump?
M>
M> High activity on the box today caused us to be able to crash it again
M> within 9 hours. I configured all steps per the developers handbook, but
M> when I
Hi,
I have, since upgrading to 5.x and updating my management tools, seen
a number of problems relating to stopping jails.
I'm maintaining several hosts with a number of full-featured jails
(i.e. full virtual FreeBSD installations in each jail), and in
general this works fine. However, wh
> from /boot/loader.conf:
>
> userconfig_script_load="YES"
>
> from /boot/kernel.conf:
>
> flags atkbd0 0
> quit
That works, many thanks!
(I haven't used FreeBSD 4 for a while, but the place I'm currently working
hasn't yet decided to move to 5 or 6...)
Regards,
Brian.
_
81 matches
Mail list logo
