Hi,
I try to use pptp (pptpclient) and ppp connection to my ISP with FreeBSD
6-STABLE.
If I compile pptp from ports after installation it works in user land and
consume 50-60% from my CPU time (for 200 KB/sec).
Before 6-STABLE with 6-TESTx and RCx my pptp, compiled to use kernel level ppp
work
On Mon, 2005-Nov-14 22:38:59 -0800, Rob wrote:
>--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Since you can compile a kernel without it, add DDB,
>> WITNESS and INVARIANTS support, then trigger the
>> deadlock with the swapfile, break to DDB and
>> examine the state of the machine. See the chapt
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:08:27PM -0800, Rob wrote:
>
> > I left it overnight twice for performing this
> > 'kernel linking' stage. In both cases the machine
> > remained dead.
> > Without the swapfile, this 'kernel linking' stage
> > completes in j
We see, not too often, that a Java process hangs and can't be killed
even by SIGKILL.
Apparently, one of the process threads forks. fork1() in kernel attempts
to enter a single-threaded mode, but thread_single() fails to complete
and hangs waiting until all threads but proc-> p_singlethread ar
Hey folks,
I accidentally mounted a CDROM over itself when installing X. OK, no
problem, umounted it and then started browsing the CD. Panic.
The panic output:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
Thanks for answerring.
(And thanks to Bakul too)
From: "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I've got a strange problem with my IBM T42 / Radeon M10 setup.
> >
> > When using the 6.0-RELEASE kernel (including GENERIC), I cannot go to
> > slee
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:08:27PM -0800, Rob wrote:
> I left it overnight twice for performing this
> 'kernel linking' stage. In both cases the machine
> remained dead.
> Without the swapfile, this 'kernel linking' stage
> completes in just about less than a minute.
>
> So I think it's not my im
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:52:42PM -0800, Rob wrote:
> >
> > Problem kind of solved:
> >
> > As this PC has only 32 MB Ram, I add a swapfile.
> > However, when I compile the new kernel without the
> > swapfile, all goes well.
> >
> > Since the freez
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:52:42PM -0800, Rob wrote:
> --- Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have upgraded a Pentium-1 PC from 5 to 6-Stable,
> > which went smoothly.
> >
> > Now I'm running 6 with GENERIC kernel, and I want
> > to compile a new kernel. When I start a new kern
--- Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have upgraded a Pentium-1 PC from 5 to 6-Stable,
> which went smoothly.
>
> Now I'm running 6 with GENERIC kernel, and I want
> to compile a new kernel. When I start a new kernel
> compilation, this process *always* freezes the PC
> (no crash) whe
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > That "reboot after panic" message is strange, because the box is running
> > normally.
> > Can someone plese tell me why I'm geting those messages.
>
> Your system panicked at some point in the past, but it can't save the
> dump for the reason specifie
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Robert Watson wrote:
> > I think you got it. After rebooting under a fresh 6.0-STABLE (build on
> > Mon Nov 14 05:39:01 CET 2005), the problem didn't appear again... no
> > more need for a serial console on this machine, i think :)
>
> Sounds like a good MFC candidate, assum
One of the things I would like to do in my role as one of the bugmeisters
is to try to flag the PRs in GNATS that are regressions in the base system
between 5.X and 6.X. There are a few already in there, to which I have
tried to add the text '(regression)' into the Synopsis.
If you feel that you
Sweet, thanks ... just had to use that, and works like a charm ... :)
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Jon Simola wrote:
On 11/14/05, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a problem with the latest 4-STABLE where when you move an IP from
one server on the network to a new one, a proper
Hi,
I have upgraded a Pentium-1 PC from 5 to 6-Stable,
which went smoothly.
Now I'm running 6 with GENERIC kernel, and I want
to compile a new kernel. When I start a new kernel
compilation, this process *always* freezes the PC
(no crash) when reaching the point of "linking
kernel"; this is 100 p
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:51:36 +0100, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 6:31 AM, Johan Kooijman wrote:
After ordering a stack of Dell PE 850 boxes I found out, by experience,
that
6.0-RELEASE doesn't work with it. It does recognize the S-ATA
controller,
but install
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Watson writes:
>
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Julien Gabel wrote:
>
> >>> Running the Citrix ICA wfcmgr (from ports) to change settings, e.g.
> >>> password, for connection to a Windows terminal server hangs FreeBSD 6.0
> >>> (as of Nov 4) quite consistently. I've
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:48:09AM -0800, Mark Space wrote:
> Thanks to Sebastian and Brooks for their quick replies. I took the easy
> way out and installed the ISC client which works just fine.
>
> The problem is my DHCP server is a DSL modem. I don't see any way to
> set the domain field.
>
> --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:14:00PM -0800, Mark Space wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >=20
> > I just set up the latest 6.0 release, and I'm getting errors with
Timm Florian Gloger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * On 11/14/2005 10:15 AM Alex Popa wrote:
>
> > The solution (as suggested in the Undernet #FreeBSD channel) was to
> > boot
> > with ACPI disabled. The system works now with no problems (ACPI still
> > disabled).
> >
>
> I tried that, this eve
* On 11/14/2005 10:15 AM Alex Popa wrote:
The solution (as suggested in the Undernet #FreeBSD channel) was to boot
with ACPI disabled. The system works now with no problems (ACPI still
disabled).
I tried that, this evening and the machine runs fine for now.
Thanks so far.
But this is not n
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:40:36PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
acpiconf -i loop reproduces the problem for me too. So it looks like
I forgot to add this isn't specific to the em driver, as I use the lnc.
Also, it's not a problem all the time, only sometimes the boxes fail to
send out Gratuitous ARP packets. I have verified by capturing packets and
trying to readd an alias a short period after the failure.
Colin
- Forward
I have this same problem on some production servers running
4.10-RELEASE-p16. My work around is to set the arp cache timeout on our
2811 router to 10 seconds.
Colin
David Kirchner
On 11/14/05, David Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've had this problem too. Some have suggested turning on "portfast"
> on the Cisco switches, but that doesn't resolve it. It causes severely
> long delays when doing net installs (sysinstall has a very long retry
> time for DNS lookups, mea
On 11/14/05, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a problem with the latest 4-STABLE where when you move an IP from
> one server on the network to a new one, a proper arp packet isn't being
> sent upstream, so the router isn't getting the change ...
> Does anyone have a 'work ar
On 11/14/05, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is a problem with the latest 4-STABLE where when you move an IP from
> one server on the network to a new one, a proper arp packet isn't being
> sent upstream, so the router isn't getting the change ...
>
> It only appears to affect
There is a problem with the latest 4-STABLE where when you move an IP from
one server on the network to a new one, a proper arp packet isn't being
sent upstream, so the router isn't getting the change ...
It only appears to affect the new em driver, as I have other servers on
the network run
Can someone confirm what more information I should follow up with?
I haven't seen any traffic except my own on this thread - wondering if I'm
missing something or doing something wrong... please advise?
I'm trying to figure out how to capture a crash dump from the kernel while
booting, or how to
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:40:36PM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The performance of my
> laptop is back to normal when I remove the xfce4-battery-plugin.
> acpiconf -i loop reproduces the problem for me too. So it looks like
> there is something
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:45:15PM +0100, Ales wrote:
> During boot process under 6.0-STABLE I spoted some strange messages.
>
> ...
> ...
> Nov 14 18:18:45 romcek kernel: cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
> Nov 14 18:18:45 romcek kernel: cd0: Removable
> CD-ROM SCSI-0 device
> Nov 14 18:18:45 ro
On Nov 14, 2005, at 6:31 AM, Johan Kooijman wrote:
After ordering a stack of Dell PE 850 boxes I found out, by
experience, that
6.0-RELEASE doesn't work with it. It does recognize the S-ATA
controller,
but install says it can't find any disks.
there was some discussion about this on the p
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 09:31:38PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote..
>
> The November Monthly Snapshots except for sparc64 (still building) are
> posted to ftp-master and should appear on the mirror sites soon.
>
> This month we've got RELENG_5 and HEAD snapshots. Since 6.0 just came
> out it didn't make
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:50:31 +0900 (JST)
> From: Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I've got a strange problem with my IBM T42 / Radeon M10 setup.
>
> When using the 6.0-RELEASE kernel (including GENERIC), I cannot go to
> sleep when X11 is running: the mach
Thanks to Sebastian and Brooks for their quick replies. I took the easy
way out and installed the ISC client which works just fine.
The problem is my DHCP server is a DSL modem. I don't see any way to
set the domain field. In addition, this interface is really not on a
network but a connect
During boot process under 6.0-STABLE I spoted some strange messages.
...
...
Nov 14 18:18:45 romcek kernel: cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
Nov 14 18:18:45 romcek kernel: cd0: Removable
CD-ROM SCSI-0 device
Nov 14 18:18:45 romcek kernel: cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers
Nov 14 18:18:45 romcek kernel
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:14:00PM -0800, Mark Space wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just set up the latest 6.0 release, and I'm getting errors with the
> DHCP client. Trying to pull a network address during start up, I get:
>
> Bogus domain search list 15: domain_not_set.invalid
>
> This repeats sever
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Last friday I did a cvsup src/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster
on my laptop from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE and since the performance of my laptop (Dell
Precision M70 with a Pentium M 2GHz) is not good. It behaves
> Not if you're using any third party modules.
> What does 'kldstat' tell you?
kernel + acpi.ko + linux.ko, as I already mentioned in another email.
Petr
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab
> When using the 6.0-RELEASE kernel (including GENERIC), I cannot go to
> sleep when X11 is running: the machine freezes, display still on. I
> tried disabling DRI, but this does not seem to be the problem: I have
> no DRM anyway.
I upgraded my T42 to -current from the 6.0 release kernel but
from
Hello,
is there a solution at hand for the dreaded mgetty-problem on
FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE? I couldn't find anything on the net except
that some people have the same problem, and that PR i386/87208
contains some interesting insight.
It is ok for me to 'kill -HUP 1' to get mgetty running (see
below),
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Doug White wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, kama wrote:
>
> > Just upgraded from 5.4 to 6.0 and hyperthreading stoped working.
> > Everything looks ok, but it doesn't use two of the logical CPU's.
>
> This is disabled by default due to a information-leak vulnerability across
> t
I had this as well. It means that your DHCP server returns an invalid
search domain.
The easy way to solve it (if you have access) is to set the search
domain to something valid in your DHCP server (Linksys router by any
chance?). I couldn't find a flag on dhclient to tell it to ignore
invali
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> Last friday I did a cvsup
> src/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster
> on my laptop from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE and since the performance of my
> laptop (Dell
> Precision M70 with a Pentium M 2GHz) is not good. It behaves like if the bus
>
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Julien Gabel wrote:
Running the Citrix ICA wfcmgr (from ports) to change settings, e.g.
password, for connection to a Windows terminal server hangs FreeBSD 6.0
(as of Nov 4) quite consistently. I've tried this on one of my 6.0
systems at home and a 6.0 system here at work.
>> Running the Citrix ICA wfcmgr (from ports) to change settings, e.g.
>> password, for connection to a Windows terminal server hangs FreeBSD 6.0
>> (as of Nov 4) quite consistently. I've tried this on one of my 6.0
>> systems at home and a 6.0 system here at work. I suspect it may have
>> somethin
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Simon Ironside wrote:
/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC has this line uncommented - is this on purpose? I
commented it out before building a new kernel.
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
This was by accident, but actually isn't a bad idea. We discovered the
problem at the last minute, after
Morning all,
After ordering a stack of Dell PE 850 boxes I found out, by experience, that
6.0-RELEASE doesn't work with it. It does recognize the S-ATA controller,
but install says it can't find any disks.
The disk is a standard Maxtor 80GB S-ATA disk (although a Seagate didn't
work either). The
Richard Lee wrote:
I even downloaded 6.0R ISO image and booted, and there too, the second disk is
not detected. I tried disabling ATA_STATIC_ID, which causes ad4 to become
ad0, but no other effect. I have no IDE hard drives, only two SATA drives. I
don't consider this set up to be anything unu
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 10:50:29PM +0100, Timm Florian Gloger wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I get some strange freezes with my fresh 6.0 installation.
>
> After booting for a several times now i got 2 more freezes in not
> coherent periods of time after logging in.
>
> It is a complete freeze as far as
safe to leave un-commented no hindrance in performance.
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 08:53 +, Simon Ironside wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I think this is intentional. Having DEBUG=-g means that you have a
> > kernel.debug which contains debugging symbols, which is quite useful
> > if you get a kernel pani
On 11/14/05, Simon Ironside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> This has changed since 5.4 - I just wondered why and whether I would be
> best leaving it as is or commenting it out.
My personal suggestion would be that you keep it as-is, since it saves
your time when you have kernel panics and wan
Hello,
I think this is intentional. Having DEBUG=-g means that you have a
kernel.debug which contains debugging symbols, which is quite useful
if you get a kernel panic and want to report it back. On the other
hand, debugging symbols would be stripped before you install a new
kernel so it does
Hi, Simon,
On 11/14/05, Simon Ironside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC has this line uncommented - is this on purpose? I
> commented it out before building a new kernel.
>
> makeoptions DEBUG=-g
I think this is intentional. Having DEBUG=-g means that you have a
ke
I've got a strange problem with my IBM T42 / Radeon M10 setup.
When using the 6.0-RELEASE kernel (including GENERIC), I cannot go to
sleep when X11 is running: the machine freezes, display still on. I
tried disabling DRI, but this does not seem to be the problem: I have
no DRM anyway.
On the othe
Hi,
/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC has this line uncommented - is this on purpose? I
commented it out before building a new kernel.
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
Cheers,
Simon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
56 matches
Mail list logo