Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64

2006-05-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-05-01 16:04, Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I direct someone's attention to the annoying but easy to fix bug: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=gnu/96570 There are still a few days left to make sure, FreeBSD-6.1 is shipped with amd64 being able to link

Which RC?

2006-05-02 Thread Pietro Cerutti
Hi list, just updated my RELENG_6 as Tue May 2 08:25:55 CEST 2006 There are some things that are not clear about the version: - uname says FreeBSD 6.1-RC #0 - on the FreeBSD FTP site the RC directory is now RC2 (pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.1-RC2) - on the FreeBSD web site the schedule for 6.1

Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64

2006-05-02 Thread Danny Braniss
I tend to get snippy towards the end of release cycles, and I apologize to those I've offended or have been needlessly rude to. But please hear me out on what I have to say here ... The release process is about balancing the need to get it done with the need to get it as good as

Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64

2006-05-02 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Tue, 2006-May-02 00:04:14 +0200, Roland Smith wrote: On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 05:39:02PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: ... create 32-bit executables. Thus created lame, for example (from the audio/lame port) works and happily converts mp3 files (using assembler-optimized routines available

Problems with AVM B1 PCMCIA (2nd try)

2006-05-02 Thread Martin Loschwitz
Hi folks, the current FreeBSD STABLE version still has massive problems detecting my AVM PCMCIA B1 active ISDN card. I am currently running 6.0-RELEASE-p5 and all that it tells me is that the card it found has no functions. I booted in verbose- mode and enabled multiple debugging mechanisms and

(some?) startup scripts being run twice..?

2006-05-02 Thread Jan Grant
I'm running a stock freebsd-stable as a workstation. I'm seeing something unusual: it looks like some startup scripts are being run twice when the machine boots. Originally I caught this because an old-fashioned /usr/local/etc/rc.d script was being called twice. However, on looking closer it

Re: Broadcom BCM5714 ethernet not recognized by 6.0-RELEASE

2006-05-02 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 28.02.2006 um 21:59 schrieb Vivek Khera: I have an IBM e326m Opteron system for evaluation. Everything seems to be working ok except the ethernet is not recognized. According to the system specs and product literature, it has two Broadcom BCM5714 controllers in it, which the

Re: 5.4-STABLE hangs every few days

2006-05-02 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 25.02.2006 um 02:47 schrieb Brad Waite: Been having problems with my Tyan Thunder i7500 (S2720) dual Xeon running -STABLE: it's hanging every couple of days. Have you had any luck getting to diagnose the issue? I've been plagued by instability with a S2721-533 (Thunder i7501 Pro), also

Re: 5.4-STABLE hangs every few days

2006-05-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! Been having problems with my Tyan Thunder i7500 (S2720) dual Xeon running -STABLE: it's hanging every couple of days. Have you had any luck getting to diagnose the issue? I've been plagued by instability with a S2721-533 (Thunder i7501 Pro), also on 5-stable, and didn't have much

6.1-RC bge RX CPU self-diagnostic failed

2006-05-02 Thread Robert Wojciechowski
I'm running into a problem with some new dual Opteron servers we just received yesterday on 6.1-STABLE (-RC now I suppose) amd64 updated as of today. When booting, it sometimes fails to initialize the onboard Broadcom gigabit Ethernet: bge0: Broadcom BCM5704C Dual Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev.

Re: 6.1-RC bge RX CPU self-diagnostic failed

2006-05-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! I'm running into a problem with some new dual Opteron servers we just received yesterday on 6.1-STABLE (-RC now I suppose) amd64 updated as of today. When booting, it sometimes fails to initialize the onboard Broadcom gigabit Ethernet: Aha, similar to my problem (also broadcom, but 5.4p8

PAE doesn't compile on 6[.1] because of bce

2006-05-02 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
[re@ CC'ed as they are probably interested in this for 6.1 release ] Hi, With today sources and KERNCONF=PAE on 6-STABLE : cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual

libnetgraph doesn't build fine on RELENG_6

2006-05-02 Thread Renato Botelho
I've updated my src today using RELENG_6, when i'm running a buildworld, i got this problem on libnetgraph === lib/libnetgraph (depend,all,install) rm -f .depend CC='/usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc' mkdep -f .depend -a /usr/src/lib/libnetgraph/sock.c /usr/src/lib/libnetgraph/msg.c

Re: libnetgraph doesn't build fine on RELENG_6

2006-05-02 Thread Marcus Alves Grando
Maybe this should fix? --- libnetgraph/Makefile.orig Tue May 2 11:05:22 2006 +++ libnetgraph/MakefileTue May 2 11:08:48 2006 @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ SHLIB_MAJOR= 2 +CFLAGS+= -I${.CURDIR}/../../sys + SRCS= sock.c msg.c debug.c INCS= netgraph.h Regards Renato

Re: ath0: ath_chan_set: unable to reset channel 5 (2432 Mhz, flags 0x3e0 hal flags 0x140)

2006-05-02 Thread JoaoBR
On Saturday 29 April 2006 20:00, Sam Leffler wrote: JoaoBR wrote: the 5,3 and 5.8Ghz range is gone this card should show the 2.4b/g range as usual, the 4.9, the 5.3 and the 5.8 range regdomain 18 gives you b/g channels 1-11 and public safety channels in the range 4942-4985. What

Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64

2006-05-02 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 02:22, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: = cc can build binaries just fine if you also use the -B option: = =         % cc -m32 -B/usr/lib32 ... Yes, this is a work-around. It is not a solution... /usr/lib32 should be there automatically. = I know it does because I've used it on

Re: PAE doesn't compile on 6[.1] because of bce

2006-05-02 Thread Scott Long
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: [re@ CC'ed as they are probably interested in this for 6.1 release ] Hi, With today sources and KERNCONF=PAE on 6-STABLE : cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline

Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64

2006-05-02 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:59, Peter Jeremy wrote: = But probably not as fast since it's using a generic 'C' core instead = of a hand-tweaked assembler core.  I read Mikhail's comment as meaning = that it is possible to build non-trivial 32-bit executables on amd64, = there's just work still needed

Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64

2006-05-02 Thread Alexey Karagodov
workaround i use: 32-bit jail on amd64 system ... not so bad ... 2006/5/2, Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:59, Peter Jeremy wrote: = But probably not as fast since it's using a generic 'C' core instead = of a hand-tweaked assembler core. I read Mikhail's comment as

Solved (pilot error) Re: (some?) startup scripts being run twice..?

2006-05-02 Thread Jan Grant
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Jan Grant wrote: I'm running a stock freebsd-stable as a workstation. I'm seeing something unusual: it looks like some startup scripts are being run twice when the machine boots. Originally I caught this because an old-fashioned /usr/local/etc/rc.d script was being

Re: (some?) startup scripts being run twice..?

2006-05-02 Thread Jan Grant
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Alexey Karagodov wrote: where ntpd script located? in /etc/rc.d or /usr/local/etc/rc.d or both? I've already checked this: it's solely in /etc/rc.d. There's other evidence of dual initialisation, too: [[[ Apr 27 08:51:01 xxx sshd[1296]: error: Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0

Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64

2006-05-02 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:04:32PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: While it's always unfortunate and undesirable to have bugs in releases or have missing features, it's even more undesirable to hold releases indefinitely until all the problems are solved. Even the most cursory review of GNATS will

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-02 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT In FreeBSD 5.x and FreeBSD 6.x, the INVARIANTS option has been significantly expanded to test a much larger set of invariants, and also incorporate kernel use-after-free checking,

quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Dmitriy Kirhlarov
Hi, list I install FreeBSD 6.1-RC1 (from 11 Apr). I use gstripe for /home volume. Also, I use quota on this volume. After 6-8 hours without activities I can't read any data from filesystem -- ls, pwd and any other commands hanging. But, when I run cat /dev/stripe/st0 /dev/null I can see disk

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:18:53PM +0400, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: Hi, list I install FreeBSD 6.1-RC1 (from 11 Apr). I use gstripe for /home volume. Also, I use quota on this volume. After 6-8 hours without activities I can't read any data from filesystem -- ls, pwd and any other commands

geom_eli and kbdmux, enemies?

2006-05-02 Thread Anders Nordby
Hi, Just upgraded 6.1-RC2 on my laptop. Having kbdmux now enabled by default, I was completely unable to boot due to having a geom eli encrypted filesystem. My encrypted filesystem was initialized with the geli -b option, to have the kernel ask for passphrase upon boot. I have tried using

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Dmitriy Kirhlarov
Hi! On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: I think it's same problem as in thread fsck_ufs locked in snaplk. Is this problem fixed in fresh 6.1-PRE? I think we've reproduced the problem, but it probably won't be fixed before the release. Sorry, the bug reports

Re: geom_eli and kbdmux, enemies?

2006-05-02 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Anders, Just upgraded 6.1-RC2 on my laptop. Having kbdmux now enabled by default, I was completely unable to boot due to having a geom eli encrypted filesystem. My encrypted filesystem was initialized with the geli -b option, to have the kernel ask for passphrase upon boot. I have tried using

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:44:29PM +0400, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: Hi! On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: I think it's same problem as in thread fsck_ufs locked in snaplk. Is this problem fixed in fresh 6.1-PRE? I think we've reproduced the problem, but

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Mike Jakubik
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: Hi! On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: I think it's same problem as in thread fsck_ufs locked in snaplk. Is this problem fixed in fresh 6.1-PRE? I think we've reproduced the problem, but it probably won't be fixed before the

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:03:13PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: Hi! On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: I think it's same problem as in thread fsck_ufs locked in snaplk. Is this problem fixed in fresh 6.1-PRE? I think we've

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Mike Jakubik
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:03:13PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Ditto, same thing with the recent nve fixes. Why release known broken code when there are tested patches available? Whats the worst that will happen? It wont work? Thats already the case... What

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Dmitriy Kirhlarov
Hi! On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:58:59PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: Well, sorry folks, you should have told me in February. Or if you only found out about the problem a week ago, you need to recognize I find it several days ago, when start quota on this server. Another server with older RC1

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:08:44PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:03:13PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Ditto, same thing with the recent nve fixes. Why release known broken code when there are tested patches available? Whats the worst that will

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:16:28PM +0400, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: Hi! On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:58:59PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: Well, sorry folks, you should have told me in February. Or if you only found out about the problem a week ago, you need to recognize I find it several

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Chris Dillon
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On February 21 -- that is over 2 months ago -- I sent email to this list containing a fix for the quota deadlocks that were known at the time. I got minimal response from users, but it was uniformly positive. The fix was committed, and the status of

ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody?

2006-05-02 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
Good day, since the ipw(4) driver can't do WPA, I wanted to give ndis(4) a try. This *used* to work back on 5.3 (memory is a bit vague) but it ain't happening on 6.1-RC. I'm using the same driver as last time, which is the version 1.2.2.8 from Intel. I also downloaded the newest one, version

Re: ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody?

2006-05-02 Thread John Nielsen
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 13:18, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Good day, since the ipw(4) driver can't do WPA, I wanted to give ndis(4) a try. This *used* to work back on 5.3 (memory is a bit vague) but it ain't happening on 6.1-RC. I'm using the same driver as last time, which is the version

Re: ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody?

2006-05-02 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 5/2/06, Ulrich Spoerlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good day, since the ipw(4) driver can't do WPA, I wanted to give ndis(4) a try. This *used* to work back on 5.3 (memory is a bit vague) but it ain't happening on 6.1-RC. I'm using the same driver as last time, which is the version 1.2.2.8

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-02 Thread Scott Long
Mike Jakubik wrote: Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: Hi! On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: I think it's same problem as in thread fsck_ufs locked in snaplk. Is this problem fixed in fresh 6.1-PRE? I think we've reproduced the problem, but it probably won't be

Re: PCI Radeon 7000/VE (RV100) on AMD64

2006-05-02 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 3/27/06, Alastair G. Hogge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'day Having some problem with Xorg-6.9.0 and the radeon or ati driver on mad64 system. X seems to look up at a black screen after setting the resolution and then resets the computer. I have drm and radeon defined in my kernel config and

FreeBSD 6.1-RC2 available

2006-05-02 Thread Scott Long
All, I'm foregoing the formal pretty announcement for 6.1-RC2 because the message needs to get out and I don't have an hour to spend on making it look nice. FreeBSD 6.1-RC2 is available for download. This is the last RC before the release. Please test it to make sure that there have been no

Re: ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody?

2006-05-02 Thread Sean Bryant
ndisgen is broken on 6.1 RC1 if I remember correctly. On 5/2/06, Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/2/06, Ulrich Spoerlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good day, since the ipw(4) driver can't do WPA, I wanted to give ndis(4) a try. This *used* to work back on 5.3 (memory is a bit vague)

Re: 'camcontrol rescan all' does not find the attached tape drive

2006-05-02 Thread Scott Long
This is a problem with the RAID controller that you've hooked the tape drive to, it has nothing to do with FreeBSD. If this is a configuration that you much use, and there is absolutely no way that you can find a simple SCSI controller to hook the tape drive up to, then you'll need to

Re: Which RC?

2006-05-02 Thread David Nugent
Pietro Cerutti wrote: just updated my RELENG_6 as Tue May 2 08:25:55 CEST 2006 There are some things that are not clear about the version: - uname says FreeBSD 6.1-RC #0 - on the FreeBSD FTP site the RC directory is now RC2 (pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.1-RC2) - on the FreeBSD web site the

Re: 'Max recursion level (500) exceeded' error

2006-05-02 Thread MANTANI Nobutaka
At Mon, 1 May 2006 13:53:38 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 06:31:41PM +0800, plasma wrote: On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 04:50:29PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: On Mon, 1 May 2006 17:14:06 +0930 Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: doconnor On Monday 01 May

Re: 'Max recursion level (500) exceeded' error

2006-05-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:54:38AM +0900, MANTANI Nobutaka wrote: At Mon, 1 May 2006 13:53:38 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 06:31:41PM +0800, plasma wrote: On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 04:50:29PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: On Mon, 1 May 2006 17:14:06 +0930

RC2 binary upgrade: var/empty: no chmod allowed

2006-05-02 Thread Martin Jackson
Hello everyone, When BETA4 was released, I installed it on a very old machine of mine, and tried doing a binary upgrade from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.1-BETA4. I got an error almost immediately that it failed to write because it couldn't chmod var/empty (due to the schg flag being set). I also had

Bank of America Alert: Update your account information

2006-05-02 Thread Bank of America
[mhd_reg_logo.gif] Security Update Notification Dear Valued Customer : As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in the Bank of America Online Bank system. We recently contacted you after noticing an issue on your account.We requested information