Re: Reproducable file corruption on 6-STABLE

2006-05-12 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Paul Schenkeveld wrote: Hello, When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the copy is not equal to te source file. This behaviour can be reproduced repeatedly. Hope someone can shed a light on this. I had a slot 1 board that exhibited a similar problem - changing

Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: So maybe it's time to add, say, options INVARIANTS_EXTENDED for these new and expensive checks, and leave only basic and cheap (yet effective for bug hunting) asserts enabled when only options INVARIANTS is defined? No, they are

Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: %Sys %Intr %Idl RELENG_6 + rl0 45 40 15 RELENG_6 + fxp0 45 35 20 %Sys %Intr %Idl "time md5 -t" wall clock time RELENG_6 + rl0 34 24 42 1:43 RELENG_6 + fxp0

Odd RS232 problem

2006-05-12 Thread Daniel O'Connor
Hi, I am trying to talk to a high voltage power supply unit we're using at work, it uses RS232 and you can read back current, voltage, faults, etc.. What I have seems to work fine except that occassionally I get junk read back, strangely it appears the longer my program runs the more often I see

Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:25:58PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > Hello! > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin > >I don't know, it needs to be tested in your particular case. > > I've built another kernel, adding back > > makeopt

Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:32:44PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > Hello! > > On Tue, 2 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote: > >>options INVARIANTS > >>options INVARIANT_SUPPORT > > > >In FreeBSD 5.x and FreeBSD 6.x, the INVARIANTS option has been > >significantly expanded to test a muc

Re: pagezero again

2006-05-12 Thread Suleiman Souhlal
Ivan Voras wrote: Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem seems to have

I can't use the mount_umapfs

2006-05-12 Thread Shin-ichi Yoshimoto
Hi, all I tried to use mount_umapfs with RELENG_6, but I can't like this: # mount_umapfs -u umapfile -g gmapfile /home/yosimoto /mnt mount_umapfs: No such file or directory A umapfile and a gmapfile is folllowing: # cat umapfile 1 1001 501 # cat gmapfile 1 1001 501 # ls -al total 8 drwxr-xr-x

Reproducable file corruption on 6-STABLE

2006-05-12 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
Hello, When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the copy is not equal to te source file. This behaviour can be reproduced repeatedly. Details: - FreeBSD 6-STABLE, cvsupped yesterday - Intel L440GX+ main board, dual 700 MHz Pentium 3, 1 GB RAM - 2x Promise TX3

Re: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-12 Thread Mike Jakubik
David Kirchner wrote: Here's how to reproduce the snapshot deadlock I'm seeing, with 6.1-RC2 cvsup'd as of 5 or 6 hours ago: [...] It locks up every time for me, with no further disk activity. Unfortunately, for some reason, my server console became unaccessable, so I'm not able to get to the k

Re: pagezero again

2006-05-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
Ivan Voras wrote: Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem seems to hav

Re: pagezero again

2006-05-12 Thread Ivan Voras
Vlad GALU wrote: How is the system, swapping-wise ? Good: no swapping, 100+ MB free memory. Free memory varies between ~90 and ~110 MB - maybe something is returning memory to the OS and reclaiming it too often? (looking at top, it could be php-cgi, but is there a way to precisely track i

Re: pagezero again

2006-05-12 Thread Vlad GALU
On 5/13/06, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module

pagezero again

2006-05-12 Thread Ivan Voras
Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem seems to have gotten worse - no

Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 2 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote: options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT In FreeBSD 5.x and FreeBSD 6.x, the INVARIANTS option has been significantly expanded to test a much larger set of invariants, and also incorporate kernel use-after-free checking, wh

Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin I don't know, it needs to be tested in your particular case. I've built another kernel, adding back makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin options QUOTA Results are almost the same as w/o these 2

Re: builtin openssl and debugging?

2006-05-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 12), Brandon Fosdick said: > How do I rebuild the builtin openssl with debugging symbols? I > thought I could simply edit /usr/src/crypto/openssl/Makefile and then > run make from the same directory, but that doesn't seem to work. Is > there some way to do this w/o rebuildi

builtin openssl and debugging?

2006-05-12 Thread Brandon Fosdick
How do I rebuild the builtin openssl with debugging symbols? I thought I could simply edit /usr/src/crypto/openssl/Makefile and then run make from the same directory, but that doesn't seem to work. Is there some way to do this w/o rebuilding world? Using the port isn't an option since I need to

Fasttrak TX4310 RAID controller with FreeBSD-6.1

2006-05-12 Thread Lukas Razik
Hello! I've bought a Promise FastTrak TX4310 because I thought that it will be supported by FreeBSD's ata/ar driver...: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ata&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.0-stable&format=html I've updated the controller's BIOS to the newest available v2.5.1.3116:

Re: conf/97166

2006-05-12 Thread m m
Hey lists, Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. The symptoms are: - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a jail_interface and have at least one jail configured, this one is harmless. - a

Re: Jail testers needed (rc.d/jail)

2006-05-12 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:21:41AM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: > Hey lists, > > Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD > 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. > > The symptoms are: > > - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Mike Jakubik
Scott Long wrote: Sorry, things got lost in the shuffle to get this released. For your specific snapshot deadlocks, please test the changes that have gone into 7-CURRENT and report back if they fix your problem. Only with active testing will we know if they are good to be backported in time fo

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Scott Long
Chris wrote: On 12/05/06, Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jonathan Noack wrote: >> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't >> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" >> thing. It wa

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-12 Thread Chris
On 11/05/06, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:16:42PM +0100, Chris wrote: > GNATS didnt reply so I will send the info about email address I used > and see if I can find the pr number as well. Any problems you have with GNATS not responding, please email them to

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Chris
On 12/05/06, Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jonathan Noack wrote: >> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't >> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" >> thing. It was a long release

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 05/12/06 07:56, gareth wrote: > On Fri 2006-05-12 (07:31), Jonathan Noack wrote: >> Ah, I made a mistake in my explanation. Replace INDEX-5.db with >> INDEX-5. Sorry for the confusion... >> >> "make fetchindex" downloads the INDEX-x file (where 'x' is the major >> release number of the version

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-05-12 (07:31), Jonathan Noack wrote: > Ah, I made a mistake in my explanation. Replace INDEX-5.db with > INDEX-5. Sorry for the confusion... > > "make fetchindex" downloads the INDEX-x file (where 'x' is the major > release number of the version of FreeBSD you are using -- in this ca

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 05/12/06 03:20, gareth wrote: > On Wed 2006-05-10 (11:29), Jonathan Noack wrote: >> You are probably experiencing some of the VFS limitations in 5.3 (you'll >> be pleasantly surprised by 6.1!). "portsdb -Uu" is very CPU and IO >> intensive; it takes a long time on a fast machine. "make fetchin

Re: Jail testers needed (rc.d/jail)

2006-05-12 Thread Karol Kwiatkowski
On 12/05/2006 11:21, Florent Thoumie wrote: > Hey lists, > > Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD > 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. > > The symptoms are: > > - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a jail_interface and >

Jail testers needed (rc.d/jail)

2006-05-12 Thread Florent Thoumie
Hey lists, Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. The symptoms are: - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a jail_interface and have at least one jail configured, this one is harmless. - a p

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Matthias Andree
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jonathan Noack wrote: >> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't >> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" >> thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est >> la vie. It'

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread gareth
On Wed 2006-05-10 (11:29), Jonathan Noack wrote: > You are probably experiencing some of the VFS limitations in 5.3 (you'll > be pleasantly surprised by 6.1!). "portsdb -Uu" is very CPU and IO > intensive; it takes a long time on a fast machine. "make fetchindex" is > provided as a replacement fo