Fwd: Problem with modern Postfix on 4.7

Begin forwarded message: From: Scott Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: May 23, 2006 4:31:46 GMT+02:00 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Problem with modern Postfix on 4.7 Hello, I am not sure if this is the proper place to ask. Please redirect as necessary. I have a FreeBSD 4.7 b

Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote: > On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote: > >> > >>Hello All, > >> > >> I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the > >5.x > >

Re: Fwd: Problem with modern Postfix on 4.7

Scott Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There was a suggestion on the web indicating that binutils is > the problem and that that should be updated. However, I do not know the > proper way to go about updating binutils. Can someone please tell me > how to do it or point me to a resour

Re: Fwd: Problem with modern Postfix on 4.7

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:02:38AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Scott Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There was a suggestion on the web indicating that binutils is > > the problem and that that should be updated. However, I do not know the > > proper way to go about updating bin

Re: Odd RS232 problem

On Saturday 13 May 2006 22:00, Holger Kipp wrote: > First, make sure you have a dedicated IRQ for the card. > Then, add options PUC_FASTINTR to your kernel config. This is impossible :( I can't change what the BIOS does, and rearranging the cards is not possible remotely :) I would hope that 960

Re: Odd RS232 problem

On Tue, 2006-May-23 19:23:20 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >I would hope that 9600 baud wouldn't be *too* fast for a 2GHz CPU :( That depends on what else is sharing the IRQ. PLIP can give you 10's of msec of latency. PIO disks can also destroy latency as can NE2000-style NICs. -- Peter Jeremy

Re: FreeBSD Security Survey

Quoting Paul Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: From Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:44:27PM -0600: I share this frustration with you. I was once told that the pain in upgrading is due largely to a somewhat invisible difference between installing a pre-compiled package, and buil

Re: FreeBSD Security Survey

Quoting Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Mon, 22 May 2006 11:40:16 +0200 Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ports tree in the process, the end result is a bit more undefined. One > thing that I wish for is that the ports tree would branch for releases, > and that those b

Loading geom_eli in loader.conf disables psm0

To encrypt my home slice with geli I followed "17.16.2 Disk Encryption with geli": As I prefer to have my home directory available after boot, I additionally added: geli_devices="ad0s1" geli_ad0s1_flags="-k

Re: Odd RS232 problem

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 19:45, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Tue, 2006-May-23 19:23:20 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > >I would hope that 9600 baud wouldn't be *too* fast for a 2GHz CPU :( > > That depends on what else is sharing the IRQ. PLIP can give you > 10's of msec of latency. PIO disks can also

Re: Odd RS232 problem

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 21:18, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 19:45, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-May-23 19:23:20 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > >I would hope that 9600 baud wouldn't be *too* fast for a 2GHz CPU :( > > > > That depends on what else is sharing the IRQ. PL

Re: 6.1-stable crash

On 5/12/06, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] Just for the record, this has just happened again. -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can'

Re: FreeBSD Security Survey

Chris H. wrote: > This brings up a point I have been wanting to bring up for over a mos.; > I adopted an "orphaned" port (contacted the owner, whom then relenquished > ownership to me.). But found it _more_ than difficult to discover how > to inform the fBSD port(s) system of it's new, *un*orphaned

Re: generic_bcopy() corrupts backtrace?

On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 03:36:13PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 09:04:05PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote: > > > Core and debug kernel are available, but the trace appears to be > > corrupted. > > Sorry to hijack your thread, but I'm also seeing corrupted backtraces > fr

Re: FreeBSD Security Survey

Quoting Frank Steinborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Chris H. wrote: This brings up a point I have been wanting to bring up for over a mos.; I adopted an "orphaned" port (contacted the owner, whom then relenquished ownership to me.). But found it _more_ than difficult to discover how to inform the fBSD

Re: Odd RS232 problem

At 05:53 AM 23/05/2006, Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Saturday 13 May 2006 22:00, Holger Kipp wrote: > If you encounter silo overflows, you might need to increase > cp4ticks in sio.c, eg > - cp4ticks = speed / 10 / hz * 4; > + cp4ticks = speed / 10 / hz * 40; > and/or you might want to change hz fro

RE: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

> > > If there are any thing I can provide to help tracking this down. > > > Please let me know. By the way, I tried with truss/kdump > to see what > > > happens when nfsd eats lot of CPUs, but in vain. They do > not return anything. > > > > > I tried your recipe on 7-CURRENT with locally exp

Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

On 5/23/06, Konstantin Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote: > On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote: > >> > >>Hello All, > >> > >> I have been running

Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

On 5/23/06, Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If there are any thing I can provide to help tracking this down. > > > Please let me know. By the way, I tried with truss/kdump > to see what > > > happens when nfsd eats lot of CPUs, but in vain. They do > not return anything. > > > >

Re: FreeBSD Security Survey

On May 22, 2006, at 12:38 AM, Brent Casavant wrote: So, in short, that's why *I* rarely update ports for security reasons. Another valid reason is configuration management. We run web services, and in order to ensure nothing breaks, we have to use a fixed set of code. Upgrading any piec

Re: FreeBSD Security Survey

On May 22, 2006, at 6:45 AM, Steven Hartland wrote: On good example of portupgrade "going off on one" is a simple upgrade of mtr we dont install any X on our machines so mtr-nox11 is installed. Whenever I've tried portupgrade in the past its always trolled of and started downloading and build t

mount_mfs

Hello, How create memory disk from /etc/fstab in FreeBSD 6 without soft-updates? As I can see it impossible. flag -S not allowed in compatibility mode, but by default disk created with soft-updates turned on. I see to ways to fix this problem: 1. In compatibility mode turn off soft-updates ---

quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

Hi, list. Some time ago quota and, AFAIR, snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE has deadlock problems. What the current situation with this? I'm ready to test patches, if needed. WBR -- Dmitriy Kirhlarov OILspace, 26 Leninskaya sloboda, bld. 2, 2nd floor, 115280 Moscow, Russia P:+7 495 105 7247 ext.203 F:+7

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

On 5/23/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, list. Some time ago quota and, AFAIR, snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE has deadlock problems. What the current situation with this? I'm ready to test patches, if needed. WBR IIRC, there are some quota and snapshots changes merged in 6.1-STA

RE: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

Hello Rong-en, Thanks for the info on getting the debugger configured, and on the serial console. I will have to try and play with the serial console thing more, I just tried putting in the flags and the damn thing hung, I had to boot from CD and take the stuff back out. One thing you men

Re: Difference in slice numbering FreeBSD 4.x vs. 6.x?

It has been a long time, but today was a rainy day without plans, so now I'm following up on an old thread. On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:02:23 -0300 "Giovanni P. Tirloni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've moved hard disks around many times and this has never > happened. Can you send us `fdisk /dev/ad

Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

On 5/23/06, Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Rong-en, Thanks for the info on getting the debugger configured, and on the serial console. I will have to try and play with the serial console thing more, I just tried putting in the flags and the damn thing hung, I had to boot

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

Rong-en Fan wrote: On 5/23/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, list. Some time ago quota and, AFAIR, snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE has deadlock problems. What the current situation with this? I'm ready to test patches, if needed. WBR IIRC, there are some quota and snapshots chang

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

Quoting Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: IIRC, there are some quota and snapshots changes merged in 6.1-STABLE after 6.1-RELEASE is releases. So I think you may want to try that. Thats correct. I have been meaning to test these, but not had the time to do so yet. If you can, update to -STABLE

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

Mike Jakubik wrote: Rong-en Fan wrote: On 5/23/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, list. Some time ago quota and, AFAIR, snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE has deadlock problems. What the current situation with this? I'm ready to test patches, if needed. WBR IIRC, there are some quot

PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

I just upgraded from 6-STABLE as of 2006-02-18 to 6-STABLE as of 2006-05-21, and was surprised to find that PostgreSQL wouldn't start because it couldn't allocate enough shared memory. Thing is, I didn't make a single hardware change during the reboot and didn't upgrade any ports on the machin

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 03:18:25PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote: > Mike Jakubik wrote: > >Rong-en Fan wrote: > >>On 5/23/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>Hi, list. > >>> > >>>Some time ago quota and, AFAIR, snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE has deadlock > >>>problems. What the current situati

Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

On May 23, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Kirk Strauser wrote: I just upgraded from 6-STABLE as of 2006-02-18 to 6-STABLE as of 2006-05-21, and was surprised to find that PostgreSQL wouldn't start because it couldn't allocate enough shared memory. Thing is, I didn't make a single hardware change during

Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 15:37, Marshall Pierce wrote: > You need to adjust the shared memory segments allowed by the kernel; see > /usr/ports/databases/postgresql-server/pkg-message-server > for what to add to your kernel config. Most likely, you forgot to move > over your kernel customizations to

Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

> You need to adjust the shared memory segments allowed by the kernel; see > /usr/ports/databases/postgresql-server/pkg-message-server > for what to add to your kernel config. Most likely, you forgot to move > over your kernel customizations to your new kernel...? Nope, I took care of that: /etc

Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 04:58 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 15:37, Marshall Pierce wrote: > > You need to adjust the shared memory segments allowed by the > > kernel; see > > /usr/ports/databases/postgresql-server/pkg-message- > >server for what to add to your kernel config. Most

Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 16:05, Claus Guttesen wrote: > He probably meant the following kernel-settings: > > options SHMMAXPGS=393216 > options SEMMNI=240 > options SEMMNS=1440 > options SEMUME=240 > options SEMMNU=720 > > Those are for my quad-opteron server

Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 05:13 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 04:58 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 15:37, Marshall Pierce wrote: > > > You need to adjust the shared memory segments allowed by the > > > kernel; see > > > /usr/ports/databases/postgresql-server/pkg-

Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 05:19 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 05:13 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 04:58 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 15:37, Marshall Pierce wrote: > > > > You need to adjust the shared memory segments allowed by the > > > >

Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 16:19, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I meant 'kern.ipc.shmall', which used to be 'kern.ipc.shmmaxpgs'. :-( That did it! Bumping kern.ipc.shmall to 65536 got me back up and running with enough shared_memory to get my jobs done. -- Kirk Strauser

Re: 6.1-stable crash

Am I the only one who sees the oxymoronity in "6.1-stable crash"? On 23 May 2006, at 11:53 AM, Vlad GALU wrote: On 5/12/06, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] Just for the record, this has just happened again. -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, an

Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

Kirk Strauser wrote: On Tuesday 23 May 2006 16:19, Jung-uk Kim wrote: I meant 'kern.ipc.shmall', which used to be 'kern.ipc.shmmaxpgs'. :-( That did it! Bumping kern.ipc.shmall to 65536 got me back up and running with enough shared_memory to get my jobs done. Having not so long ago been c

internal compiler error: segmentation fault: 11

Hello, I'm trying to compile 6.0-stable on a release box, prior to upgrade. I've tried several times and all end with an internal compiler error: segmentation fault: 11. And then i'm told to submit a bug report. My problem is when this occurs it's not always at the same spot or the same file

Re: internal compiler error: segmentation fault: 11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:03:06PM -0400, Dave wrote: > Hello, >I'm trying to compile 6.0-stable on a release box, prior to upgrade. I've > tried several times and all end with an internal compiler error: segmentation > fault: 11. And then i'm to

Re: internal compiler error: segmentation fault: 11

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:03:06PM -0400, Dave wrote: > Hello, >I'm trying to compile 6.0-stable on a release box, prior to upgrade. > I've tried several times and all end with an internal compiler error: > segmentation fault: 11. And then i'm told to submit a bug report. My > problem is whe

amd64/97019: Cannot load the kernel after installation on Supermicro H8DAR-T

To whom it may concern: I was informed to make a post regarding problem report 97019 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=97019.) According to my experiences, both i386 and am64 installations produce the same result. Although the workaround works perfectly, I suppose this post needs to

Re: internal compiler error: segmentation fault: 11

Jonathan Chen wrote: On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:03:06PM -0400, Dave wrote: Hello, I'm trying to compile 6.0-stable on a release box, prior to upgrade. I've tried several times and all end with an internal compiler error: segmentation fault: 11. And then i'm told to submit a bug report. My

Increase in panics under 6.1

hi all, I've seen an increase in panics since upgrading to 6.1 (I'm tracking RELENG_6). 6.1-Release seemed ok, but since updating kernel/world to more recent updates, I've been having lockups on resume. I'm using a Thinkpad z60M with ACPI enabled. Info on the machine can be found here: http://www

Re: internal compiler error: segmentation fault: 11

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:03:06PM -0400, Dave wrote: > Hello, >I'm trying to compile 6.0-stable on a release box, prior to upgrade. > I've tried several times and all end with an internal compiler error: > segmentation fault: 11. And then i'm told to submit a bug report. My > problem is whe

Re: Increase in panics under 6.1

On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:56:59AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: > hi all, > I've seen an increase in panics since upgrading to 6.1 (I'm tracking > RELENG_6). > 6.1-Release seemed ok, but since updating kernel/world to more recent updates, > I've been having lockups on resume. > > I'm using a Th

sendmail-sasl port not work

Dear all: I find the sendmail-sasl port will not compile with the option "SASLv2" and I can not get SMTP Auth. The port will install "TLS and Cyrus-SASL" but as I use the command --sendmail -d0.1 -bv root | grep SASL-- I can not find it compiled with SASL. Any solution to fix it. THX.

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

Hi! On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:35:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >>6.1-STABLE after 6.1-RELEASE is releases. So I think you may want > > If you use snapshots with your quotas, update to 6.1-STABLE. If you Sorry, guys. You are mean RELENG_6_1 or RELENG_6? WBR -- Dmitriy Kirhlarov OILspa

Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?

> That did it! Bumping kern.ipc.shmall to 65536 got me back up and running > with enough shared_memory to get my jobs done. Having not so long ago been caught by this myself, I think the relationship between shmmax and shmall is worth clarifying: $ sysctl -d kern.ipc.shmall kern.ipc.shmall: Max

Re: internal compiler error: segmentation fault: 11

On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:51:19PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote.. > Jonathan Chen wrote: > >On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:03:06PM -0400, Dave wrote: > >>Hello, > >> I'm trying to compile 6.0-stable on a release box, prior to upgrade. > >>I've tried several times and all end with an internal compiler

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: Hi! On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:35:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: 6.1-STABLE after 6.1-RELEASE is releases. So I think you may want If you use snapshots with your quotas, update to 6.1-STABLE. If you Sorry, guys. You are mean RELENG_6_1 or RELENG_6? WBR REL