Re: umass media size off-by-one?

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:37:33PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Fixed in 7-CURRENT. Contact Warner Losh to make sure that your device > is quirked appropriately. Ah, thanks! I see the commit now. Looks like it should be simple to backport to RELENG_6. Fortunately all 3 of the machines I intend t

Re: umass media size off-by-one?

Craig Boston wrote: Hi all, I ran into this while trying to use geli to encrypt an external usb-2 hard drive. It appears that sometimes the media size reported by umass is one sector too big. For example: umass0: Prolific Technology Inc. Mass Storage Device, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 da0 at umass-

Re: fork wedging (I think)

On Tuesday 06 March 2007 05:04, Peter Jeremy wrote: > How difficult would it be to build a test system somewhere where the > console was accessible? I don't think you are going to make progress > without console access. Not possible, I can't move the system as it is very remote and there are no

Re: Portaudit

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Stephane Thomas wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of > three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if > there are knows vulnerabilities ? I guess I can add some portaudi

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:15:04AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: The othe question, is there such technology for Supermicro mainboards? Yes, Supermicro makes IPMI add-on cards (they require IPMI capability on the mainboard, however). Be warned about th

Re: PATCH : ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:13:36PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: [...snip...] > >> > >> Don't bother installing CURRENT, just got out of my meeting and I found > >> out what the problem is. There is indeed an issue with management, and > >> its something our test group isnt set up to test. I will send a

umass media size off-by-one?

Hi all, I ran into this while trying to use geli to encrypt an external usb-2 hard drive. It appears that sometimes the media size reported by umass is one sector too big. For example: umass0: Prolific Technology Inc. Mass Storage Device, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lu

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:15:04AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: > The othe question, is there such technology for Supermicro mainboards? Yes, Supermicro makes IPMI add-on cards (they require IPMI capability on the mainboard, however). Be warned about these cards, however. A friend of mine at Yahoo

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

Artem Kuchin wrote: I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. ... The othe question, is there such technology for Supermicro mainboards? You might want to checkout the IPMI modules from Supermicr

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

On 3/5/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello! I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really 'OVER IP'?) allows to

PATCH : ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver

On 3/5/07, Mark Costlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:02:26AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > On 3/5/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 3/5/07, Mark Costlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:41:01AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > >> > > > >> >

Boot prompt for Intel AMT

Hello! I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine and even, as see

Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up

Kostik Belousov wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: = > How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is = > memory pressure, i.e.

Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:30:22PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > = > How will it break them?  swap backing

Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > = > How will it break them?  swap backing only touches swap if there is > > = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the

Re: 'panic: bad pte' error on 6.2-RELEASE (amd64)

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:28:30PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > >On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:05:32AM -0800, Peter Losher wrote: > >>We recently updated one of our dual Opteron systems (w/ 4GB RAM) from > >>5.5 to 6.2 (amd64 wipe and reinstalled) and

Re: Very slow umass in 6.2-RC2

> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:45:03 +0100 (CET) > From: Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Alexander Shikoff wrote: > > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > Alexander Shikoff wrote: > > > > Wang Yi wrote: > > > > > Alexander Shikoff wrote: > > > > > > I have Apacer Flash: >

Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > = > How will it break them?  swap backing only touches swap if there is > = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing > = > will panic. > = > = I forg

Re: 'panic: bad pte' error on 6.2-RELEASE (amd64)

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:05:32AM -0800, Peter Losher wrote: We recently updated one of our dual Opteron systems (w/ 4GB RAM) from 5.5 to 6.2 (amd64 wipe and reinstalled) and about once a week, it panics with the below message: -=- TPTE at 0x8000

Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:02:26AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > On 3/5/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 3/5/07, Mark Costlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:41:01AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > >> > > > >> > >Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show

Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up

On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: = > How will it break them?  swap backing only touches swap if there is = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing = > will panic. = = I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its = consumers.  The

Re: fork wedging (I think)

On 2007-Mar-05 11:36:41 +1030, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I was incrementally dumping sysctl trees and when I got to vm it hung.. > >eureka:~>sysctl vm >load: 0.07 cmd: sysctl 72864 [user map] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 852k >load: 0.07 cmd: sysctl 72864 [user map] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 852k >load:

Re: Can't get sound to work!

Karl Denninger wrote: > Tried to apply that, and got a mess. > > Did you put that on RELENG_6 cleanly? It drops a bunch of files in the top > level SRC directory (NOT under /sys!) if applied against /usr/src; it > appears to apply cleanly but a kernel build subsequent to that fails. > > -- Actua

Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver

On 3/5/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/5/07, Mark Costlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:41:01AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > > > >Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues > > >that perhaps others could help diagnose > > > >

Re: Can't get sound to work!

Well, here's what I did: I got the files: - sndkld_releng6_amd64_lowlatency.tar.gz (since I use FreeBSD amd64) - soundcard.h - README from http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/lowlatency/ . Then just follow the README! =) frzburn On 3/5/07, K

Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver

On 3/5/07, Mark Costlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:41:01AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > >Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues > >that perhaps others could help diagnose > > Yes, agreed, this might be revealing. Here's the full dmesg.

Re: Can't get sound to work!

Tried to apply that, and got a mess. Did you put that on RELENG_6 cleanly? It drops a bunch of files in the top level SRC directory (NOT under /sys!) if applied against /usr/src; it appears to apply cleanly but a kernel build subsequent to that fails. -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) In

Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:41:01AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > >Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues > >that perhaps others could help diagnose > > Yes, agreed, this might be revealing. Here's the full dmesg. Thanks for looking at this. -

Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver

On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:37:01PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > These are one of our latest NICs, I have had no trouble with these > but I'm used to using them on an Intel design, not SuperMicro. > > First question, do you get the same behavior on both ports? > My first guess is that this is a BI

Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver

On 3/4/07, Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:30:07PM -0700, Mark Costlow wrote: > The Machine: > > I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with > the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg: > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 6

Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 (fwd)

After further analyzing I think that pthread_cond_timedwait() in libpthread.so.2 has some issues. While the default clamd worker timeout of 30 seconds is reached with libc_r.so.6 and libthr.so.2 and pthread_cond_timedwait() returns ETIMEDOUT there, libpthread.so doesn't get any ETIMEDOUT error

Re: Portaudit

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:55:50 +0100 "Stephane Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of > three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if > there are knows vulnerabilities ? I guess I can ad

Re: Portaudit

Stephane Thomas wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore > because of > three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if > there are knows vulnerabilities ? After 'man 7 ports': % ENVIRONMENT % [...] % DISABLE_VULNERABILI

panic on FreeBSD 6.2 (dump included)

Hi, folks. I have a panic on FreeBSD 6.2: kgdb /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/kernel.debug vmcore.3 kgdb: kvm_nlist(_stopped_cpus): kgdb: kvm_nlist(_stoppcbs): [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"] GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Co

Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up

On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote: > > > = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md a

Portaudit

Hello, I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if there are knows vulnerabilities ? I guess I can add some portaudit_fixed= lines in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf but as the vulnerabilities

Re: Can't get sound to work!

Karl Denninger wrote: > Is there any intent to backport that into -STABLE? > > How ugly would that be to do? > > -- Almost certainly I hope :) if not the patch is available at http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/snd_RELENG_6_20070305_148_lowlatency.diff.gz doesnt look too ugly for me, and worked wel

Re: 'panic: bad pte' error on 6.2-RELEASE (amd64)

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:05:32AM -0800, Peter Losher wrote: > We recently updated one of our dual Opteron systems (w/ 4GB RAM) from > 5.5 to 6.2 (amd64 wipe and reinstalled) and about once a week, it panics > with the below message: > > -=- > TPTE at 0x840028a0 IS ZERO @ VA 800514000 >

Sata controller Sil 3512 - Kernel Panic.

Hi, I've recently installed a new sata-controller on a fresh installed FreeBSD 6.2. I gave the manual ata(4) a quick look before I bought the controller and it tells me this chip should be supported. But the machine panics every few minutes when I have a disk connected to it. Is there a way t

'panic: bad pte' error on 6.2-RELEASE (amd64)

We recently updated one of our dual Opteron systems (w/ 4GB RAM) from 5.5 to 6.2 (amd64 wipe and reinstalled) and about once a week, it panics with the below message: -=- TPTE at 0x840028a0 IS ZERO @ VA 800514000 panic: bad pte cpuid = 2 KDB: stack backtrace: panic() at 0x803fdd03

Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em driver

On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:30:07PM -0700, Mark Costlow wrote: > The Machine: > > I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with > the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg: > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class > CPU) > cpu0: on acpi0 > em0: port >