Okay, I'm back at work, and have cable internet here, so that I actually did
some debugging and checking up on the problem just now. I think I narrowed
the interrupt storm down to the end of scanning with the card. First of all a
vmstat -i in three seconds interval while I was simply inserting t
Hey all!
While trying to upload some music to my mobile phone, I stumbled across the
following odd behaviour when uploading files to an SD-card (inserted into my
Sony Ericsson M600i) which is connected via USB as a mass-storage device:
-
...
umass0: on uhub0
...
da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 tar
Colin Percival wrote:
Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
I tried to rollback the freebsd-update 6.2-R -> 6.3-B1.
To confirm that I understand what you're saying here: You upgraded
from FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-BETA1, then you ran "freebsd-update
rollback" to move back to FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, right
Norberto Meijome wrote:
> Any issues with ZFS on a single HD ?
I think it's currently not recommended to use swapfiles
on ZFS. Other than that, I'm not aware of any issues.
> any point doing that?
Sure! Getting rid of static partition sizes, checksums
for everything (preventing silent corru
> It's good to know that ZFS is compatible between the two operating
> systems :)
With some issues.
Some time ago I made an experiment to install on the same ZFS both
FreeBSD and Solaris, and, if you set up FreeBSD with ZFS root, you will
be unable to boot it after using ZFS volume in Sola
Looking at the Overview of FreeBSD-7.0, I would use it as my
production, as long as my fail over servers are standby (e.g. postgres
with PITR, MySQL-5.0 with replication).
But if you are using 1 server for production use FreeBSD-6.3-R.
My 2 cents for FreeBSD-7.0-R.
br,
On Nov 14, 2007 7:23 PM,
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:04:48PM +, Pete French wrote:
> > int
> > main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > {
> > if(atof("3.2") =3D=3D atof("3.200"))
> > puts("They are equal");
> > else
> > puts("They are NOT equal!");
>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:52:34AM +0100, Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
> Hey all!
>
> While trying to upload some music to my mobile phone, I stumbled across the
> following odd behaviour when uploading files to an SD-card (inserted into my
> Sony Ericsson M600i) which is connected via USB as a
On Saturday 13 October 2007 11:59:40 am Alson van der Meulen wrote:
> * Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-13 05:19]:
> > A suggestion, take the relevant files from my em driver and put
> > them back into the kernel tree that was working on 10/1, it should
> > be compatible. Then see if it bre
On Monday 21 May 2007 09:49:19 am Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
> Bob Bishop wrote:
> >
> > On 21 May 2007, at 12:52, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
> >
> >> Bob Bishop wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 21 May 2007, at 10:07, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
> >>>
> Hello,
>
> I have problems rebuildi
"Jimmy Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But if you are using 1 server for production use FreeBSD-6.3-R.
>
> My 2 cents for FreeBSD-7.0-R.
For my personal servers I'll jump to 7.0-R, but for some customers,
will wait for 7.1-R.
TNX
--
One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 04:58:17 am Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 February 2007 19:23, Artem Kuchin wrote:
> > FreeBSD/amd64 is a very young platform on FreeBSD. While the core FreeBSD
> > kernel and base system components are generally fairly robust, there are
> > likely to still
Hi,
my server paniced with the string
"panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: dadb1000".
I've attached the backtrace. The backtrace looks similar to the backtrace in
kern/115374.
Is this a known problem? Is there a patch available?
I can provide the kernel config and dmesg output, if nee
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 04:58:17 am Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 19:23, Artem Kuchin wrote:
FreeBSD/amd64 is a very young platform on FreeBSD. While the core FreeBSD
kernel and base system components are generally fairly robust, there are
likely
On Nov 15, 2007 7:17 AM, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 13 October 2007 11:59:40 am Alson van der Meulen wrote:
> > * Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-13 05:19]:
> > > A suggestion, take the relevant files from my em driver and put
> > > them back into the kernel tree
On Thursday 12 April 2007 08:36:02 am Danny Braniss wrote:
> hi,
> The if_msk works fine under -current, but under -stable it
> does not use the MSI capability, and since it's a shared IRQ, it works
> less than optimal under heavy cpu load.
> Pyun YongHyeon suggested to search for help
On Thursday 08 February 2007 05:24:08 am KAWAGUTI Ginga wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm using [6.2-STABLE of Tue Feb 6 16:17:03 JST 2007],
> and HP xw8400 PC with 4GB memory, 2.0GHz Xeon x1.
> Other configuration is SAS(on-board), SCSI(see below).
>
>
> When FreeBSD-6-stable boots with this PC, it always
Hello, freebsd-stable.
Upgrading my netwrok from 100Mbit to 1Gbit.
I've replaced one of two fxp's with em (desktop varinat), and rebuild system.
Right after booting TONS of messages about interrupt storm (without
device name). irq11 is occuped by em0.
uname -a
FreeBSD xxx.xxx.xxx 6.3-PREREL
I've Cc'd bde@ because this relates to the FPU initialisation - which
he is the expert on.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 12:54:29PM +, Pete French wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:04:48PM +, Pete French wrote:
>> >int
>> >main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> >{
>> >if(atof
I was curious, is there any organized method to funnel new IDs into
the code or is it just willy nilly as a driver owner notices it?
I will be having some patches to add IDs from this bringup I've
been working on and wondered if there was a 'canonical' way to
make this stuff happen?
Cheers,
Jack
Jack Vogel wrote:
I was curious, is there any organized method to funnel new IDs into
the code or is it just willy nilly as a driver owner notices it?
I will be having some patches to add IDs from this bringup I've
been working on and wondered if there was a 'canonical' way to
make this stuff ha
vmstat -i
Disconnect the cable from it when you boot, also pciconf -l
to see what type adapter it is.
This is storming before you assign it an address?
On Nov 15, 2007 11:18 AM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, freebsd-stable.
>
> Upgrading my netwrok from 100Mbit to 1Gbit.
>
Hello, Jack.
You wrote 15 ?? 2007 ?., 22:46:59:
(after loading drivers for my X100P Zaptel voice card, but it doesn't
change anything).
> vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq0: clk2956764999
irq6: wcfxo0 85000
You need to check is it FAT12 or FAT16 on a card. AFAIR fdisk can show
this info.
Had the same problem with SE 64Mb card in K750i. It turned out that SE
creates FAT12 on a 32+Mb disk, which is not supposed to be an option.
Some time ago this was discussed, but I was unable to provide a dump
from
Hello, Jack.
You wrote 15 ?? 2007 ?., 23:03:46:
> sysctl hw.intr_storm_threshold
If I set this onw to 1, em0 generate 1001-1002 irq per second
(accroding to vmstat -i) without any storm messages :)
> In this old of an adapter though seems more likely something is
> wrong.
Yep... 1
On Nov 15, 2007 11:52 AM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Jack.
> You wrote 15 ?? 2007 ?., 22:46:59:
>
> (after loading drivers for my X100P Zaptel voice card, but it doesn't
> change anything).
>
> > vmstat -i
> interrupt total rate
> irq0: cl
- Forwarded message from Dan Epure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:11:43 +0200
From: Dan Epure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7
The /etc/defaults/devfs.rules version is:
# $FreeBSD: s
On Nov 15, 2007 12:45 PM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Jack.
> You wrote 15 ?? 2007 ?., 23:03:46:
>
>
> > sysctl hw.intr_storm_threshold
>If I set this onw to 1, em0 generate 1001-1002 irq per second
> (accroding to vmstat -i) without any storm messages :)
>
>
>
On Nov 15, 2007 12:54 PM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Jack.
> You wrote 15 ?? 2007 ?., 23:52:36:
>
> > Have you tried this NIC on anything previously, an older release?
> No... And I don't have spare computer for such test :(
OK, then we really have no control in the e
Hello, Jack.
You wrote 15 ?? 2007 ?., 23:52:36:
> Have you tried this NIC on anything previously, an older release?
No... And I don't have spare computer for such test :(
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
freebsd-stable
Dear 6.x users:
In preparation for FreeBSD 6.3, Christian and I have been merging a moderate
number of OpenBSM and audit-related changes from HEAD to RELENG_6. I believe
we're now about done in time for the next 6.3 BETA, so if I could ask all
users of audit in 6-STABLE to slide forward and
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Ivan Voras wrote:
Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for my
servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable or
production release?
For low-loaded machines, 7.0 is stable enough even with all the new goodies
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
7.0 is a .0 release, but I think it's also a really strong .0 release.
While I might hesitate to recommend ZFS in less experimental settings, I
feel that the 7.0 kernel will prove to be one of our most stable, not to
mention most performant, .0 releas
33 matches
Mail list logo
