Hi Robert,
Thank you for your answer. In this case the first problem (gnu screen) does not
deserve any attention because it is related to the ptmx clonig.
My goal is to find a way to increase the number os pseudo terminal. the
traditional 256 pty is not sufficient for my needs.
Is there any way
On Tuesday 20 November 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
In the meantime there is unfortunately not a lot that can be done,
AFAICT. There is one hack that I will send you later but it is not
likely to help much. I will also think about how to track
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Dan Epure wrote:
7.0-BETA3 still has issues regarding the pts implementation . problems
found: 1. - GNU screen: starting a screen, opening a few windows and
quiting screen leaves the allocated pseudo terminal in use. 100 screen
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Dan Epure wrote:
Thank you for your answer. In this case the first problem (gnu screen) does
not deserve any attention because it is related to the ptmx clonig. My goal
is to find a way to increase the number os pseudo terminal. the traditional
256 pty is not sufficient
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
In the meantime there is unfortunately not a lot that can be done,
AFAICT. There is one hack that I will send you later but it is not
likely to help much. I will also think about how to track down the
cause of the contention further (the profiling trace only shows
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:16:15AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
All three SMP servers I recently installed with 6.2p8 from a custom
build CD rebooted within the space of 24 hours about a day ago. (One
of them is still not up; it sounds like it's requiring me to get to the
console to fix
i have searched alot for a software to:
- distribut configuration files from one master to different systems
- maintain configuration files on one machine for all systemes and then send
it out
- push the files, not download them like cvsup
- maintaining files for all systems and files only
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
On 21/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Yes, but I had to verify it anyway :)
You haven't verified anything until you look at how much work the system
is doing, before and after.
I have, and it's roughly the same (50
The ctype fix for UTF-8 locale unfortunately introduced some
new symbols to libc. Therefore, binaries built on system with
that fix can not be used on older system. For that sake, the
fix is back-out for 6-STABLE. If you see undefined symbols
'__mb_sb_limit', please rebuild the affected binary.
Hi,
For the moment this feature is only available in HEAD. I think the limit is
only 512 master/slave pairs.
Should be enough for this year. Is it going to be merged in 6.3 ?
Thanks again.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:53:36AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Dan Epure wrote:
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
In the meantime there is unfortunately not a lot that can be done,
AFAICT. There is one hack that I will send you later but it is not
likely to help much. I will also think about how to track down the
cause of the contention further (the
Ivan Voras wrote:
On 22/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, let's take a step back here. Did you obtain the lock profiling
trace and verify that you're seeing the same problem as Alexey? Can I
see the trace?
Here it is:
On Nov 22, 2007 1:01 AM, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007, at 12:45 AM, Quan Qiu wrote:
ChallengeResponseAuthentication no is also required to avoid sshd
accepting keyboard-interactive/pam.
I don't think this setting matters for PermitRootLogin without-
On 22/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like lockmgr, and the patch should definitely have helped.
Maybe you forgot to enable vfs.lookup_shared?
No, I haven't.
But the machine I tested it on is only 4-core; maybe it would help on
8-core machines.
On 22/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, let's take a step back here. Did you obtain the lock profiling
trace and verify that you're seeing the same problem as Alexey? Can I
see the trace?
Here it is:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 08:35:16AM -0800, Colin Percival wrote:
Ken Smith wrote:
The 7.0-BETA3 builds are now available. If you would like to download
an ISO image to install from they are available here:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/arch/ISO-IMAGES/7.0/
(adjust
On Nov 23, 2007 1:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ChallengeResponseAuthentication no is also required to avoid sshd
accepting keyboard-interactive/pam.
This affects all users, and not just root. This is probably not
what you want.
Yes. But without PAM, sshd just
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:38:29PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
The ctype fix for UTF-8 locale unfortunately introduced some
new symbols to libc. Therefore, binaries built on system with
that fix can not be used on older system. For that sake, the
fix is back-out for 6-STABLE. If you see
Ivan Voras wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
On 21/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Yes, but I had to verify it anyway :)
You haven't verified anything until you look at how much work the system
is doing, before and after.
I have, and it's
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:21:24AM +0800, Quan Qiu wrote:
On Nov 22, 2007 1:01 AM, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007, at 12:45 AM, Quan Qiu wrote:
ChallengeResponseAuthentication no is also required to avoid sshd
accepting keyboard-interactive/pam.
This affects
On Nov 21, 2007, at 21:51 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
i have searched alot for a software to:
- distribut configuration files from one master to different systems
- maintain configuration files on one machine for all systemes and
then send
it out
- push the files, not download them like cvsup
-
Dan Epure wrote:
Hi,
For the moment this feature is only available in HEAD. I think the limit is
only 512 master/slave pairs.
Should be enough for this year. Is it going to be merged in 6.3 ?
Thanks again.
I don't think so. Currently the FreeBSD pts implementation has some
serious
22 matches
Mail list logo
