Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I realize that the answer to this question is subject to many
possible variables. But I would greatly apreciate a ventured guess
from anyone willing to do so.
Question being: Is ULE considered the best sceduler in 7-CURRENT?
If not, what might be considered the best?
Quoting Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Sat, 29 Dec 2007
22:26:02 -0600):
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007
12:04:15 -0600):
- The creation of a weekly posting bugs the bugmeister team
Kip Macy wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007 9:53 AM, Anish Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Anish Mistry wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2007, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 05:53:47PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Anish Mistry wrote:
On
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I realize that the answer to this question is subject to many
possible variables. But I would greatly apreciate a ventured guess
from anyone willing to do so.
Question being: Is ULE considered the best sceduler in 7-CURRENT?
On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 11:28 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
This is on a very recent -stable (like, as of just a couple of days
ago). Doing nothing in particular, ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS _not_ specified in
the config. This has happened twice this morning; if it happens again
I'll drop back to my older
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 11:28 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
This is on a very recent -stable (like, as of just a couple of days
ago). Doing nothing in particular, ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS _not_ specified in
the config. This has happened twice this morning; if it happens again
I'll
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Johan Ström wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007, at 13:41 , Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 01:15:38PM +0100, Johan Str?m wrote:
Thats my home dir on core!.. That should very much not be visible there! I
have full access now (from the wrong jail!)
Known bug or did I
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:50:30PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
There is an ithread priority inversion bug that might be causing this.
The fix for that should be going in shortly.
Anish,
Can you confirm that this fix helped for you? i.e. do you still see the
problem?
FWIW, the problem
David E. Thiel wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:50:30PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
There is an ithread priority inversion bug that might be causing this.
The fix for that should be going in shortly.
Anish,
Can you confirm that this fix helped for you? i.e. do you still see the
problem?
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 11:12:26PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
FWIW, the problem remains for me. Still terrible performance
during compiles.
OK. Instead of going over all of the usual questions again, can you point
me to a previous mail in which you explain your observations and test
10 matches
Mail list logo
