Re: broken re(4)

2008-06-11 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:22:28 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY> Before checking performance of network controller you had to rule PY> out other factors like disk I/O. Use one of benchmark programs in PY> ports/benchmark. I already did simple benchmarking by

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Stable and the CP2101 driver

2008-06-11 Thread pluknet
2008/6/11 Dennis Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [trim] > I tried installing the update, e.g. "freebsd-update -r 7.0-STABLE fetch", > then "freebsd-update -r 7.0-STABLE upgrade". Seemed to work. But I do not > seem to have the device driver loaded when I plug in the USB device. I get > the folowwi

Re: apachectl gracefult causes Signal 11 crash after 6.3 to 7.0 upgrade [SOLVED]

2008-06-11 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 02:45:21PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jim Pingle wrote: > > I need to see if I can improve the script any (suggestions are most > > welcome) then open a PR to see if it -- or logic like it -- can be > > included in the php-extensions meta port. > >

Re: apachectl gracefult causes Signal 11 crash after 6.3 to 7.0 upgrade [SOLVED]

2008-06-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jim Pingle wrote: > I need to see if I can improve the script any (suggestions are most > welcome) then open a PR to see if it -- or logic like it -- can be > included in the php-extensions meta port. Adding the script to the port seems like the way to go (baring an upstream

Under gnome-2.22.2, can not lock the screen

2008-06-11 Thread Pallt
Hi! The version of the freebsd is 7.0-stable(June 9 2008), and the gnome was also updated to 2.22.2. But, I can not lock the screen, when I click the "Lock Screen" button under System Menu(The acpi can works well). I can't find the right way to let it work. Thanks any way ___

Re: apachectl gracefult causes Signal 11 crash after 6.3 to 7.0 upgrade [SOLVED]

2008-06-11 Thread Jim Pingle
Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: I myself haven't ever run into extension ordering issues like those described (and we've done hosting for years), but I don't doubt those who have experienced such. I am currently experiencing this :( In the past I shuffled the

Re: broken re(4)

2008-06-11 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:24:57AM +0200, Gerrit K?hn wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:43:04 +0200 Daniele Bastianini > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): > > DB> > - copying large files (more than some 100MB) via ssh/scp drops the > DB> > connection due to "corrupted MAC on inp

Re: Areca Raid 6 ARC-1231 Raid 6 Slow LS Listing Performance on large directory

2008-06-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
2008/6/12 Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 1) When I do a ls -lh on the raid 6 array with 6 disks in the array it takes > aver 16 seconds before it starts to display anything on the screen. > 2) While running a tar command on another shell, the time goes to 28 seconds > for the same list to start showi

Re: apachectl gracefult causes Signal 11 crash after 6.3 to 7.0 upgrade [SOLVED]

2008-06-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > I myself haven't ever run into extension ordering issues like those > described (and we've done hosting for years), but I don't doubt those > who have experienced such. I am currently experiencing this :( In the past I shuffled the order until it worke

Re: Areca Raid 6 ARC-1231 Raid 6 Slow LS Listing Performance on large directory

2008-06-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 04:04 PM 6/11/2008, Paul wrote: > >Changing from compat to files fixes the problem. > > > >It is now superfast when running ls -lh. > > Hi, > Not sure, but a more "proper" fix might be to look at the > nscd caching daemon. Take a look at nscd an

Re: Vlan EVENT patch

2008-06-11 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:52:23AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:51:53AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > This is a small patch that Sam came up with for me, it will allow > > > drivers to kn

PureComponents Ultimate Suite V2008.1 - 79 .NET WinForms Components for $79

2008-06-11 Thread PureComponents Newsletter
PureComponents Ultimate Suite V2008.1 - The cheapest component suite there is! PureComponents offer you component suite for excellent price of 1 USD per component. Purchase the set of 79 components for 79 USD. Purchase 1 year subscription by June 30, and save 30%! http://www.purecomponents.com/

CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature withbuggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Andy Kosela
On Wed, Jun 11 2008, Robert Watson wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> From a security standport, backporting fixes to previous versions of ports >> creates a difficulty. It's much harder to tell, for example, if a RedHat >> "port" is vulnerable or not, because RedHat uses their ow

Re: Areca Raid 6 ARC-1231 Raid 6 Slow LS Listing Performance on large directory

2008-06-11 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 04:04 PM 6/11/2008, Paul wrote: Changing from compat to files fixes the problem. It is now superfast when running ls -lh. Hi, Not sure, but a more "proper" fix might be to look at the nscd caching daemon. Take a look at nscd and nscd.conf. I havent used it myself, but I seem to r

Re: apachectl gracefult causes Signal 11 crash after 6.3 to 7.0 upgrade [SOLVED]

2008-06-11 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: | It seems a php-extensions bug. | If you comment the mhash.so in /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini as: | | ;entension=mhash.so | | all works fine and you don't get anymore httpd crash (signal 11) if you | use 'apachectl gr

Re: Areca Raid 6 ARC-1231 Raid 6 Slow LS Listing Performance on large directory

2008-06-11 Thread Paul
At 02:11 PM 11/06/2008, Mike Tancsa wrote: Any ideas why it takes so long for this on Freebsd 7.0 stable? The partition this folder is on it /dev/da0s1f with a total size of 1.7T and a usage of 63G Any suggestions or help on this would be greatly appreciated. Couple of things to check

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Doug Barton
Gary Palmer wrote: I think a large part of the shortcomings of the ports infrastructure when it comes to security releases could be mitigated if there was a rapid building and availability of packages on FTP mirrors to prevent everyone from doing "portupgrade -P" and then having to wait for the

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature withbuggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Gary Palmer
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 07:36:28PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > >From a security standport, backporting fixes to previous versions of ports > >creates a difficulty. It's much harder to tell, for example, if a RedHat > >"port" is vulnerable or not

Re: Areca Raid 6 ARC-1231 Raid 6 Slow LS Listing Performance on large directory

2008-06-11 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 01:32 PM 6/11/2008, Paul wrote: Any ideas why it takes so long for this on Freebsd 7.0 stable? The partition this folder is on it /dev/da0s1f with a total size of 1.7T and a usage of 63G Any suggestions or help on this would be greatly appreciated. Couple of things to check In /etc/

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature withbuggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Paul Schmehl wrote: From a security standport, backporting fixes to previous versions of ports creates a difficulty. It's much harder to tell, for example, if a RedHat "port" is vulnerable or not, because RedHat uses their own proprietary versioning system to define "whe

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature withbuggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Wednesday, June 11, 2008 16:54:02 +0100 Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andy Kosela wrote: Redhat/CentOS is more reliable here as backports involves both security and bug fixes, plus even new hardware enhancements. In the FreeBSD environment, we call the

Areca Raid 6 ARC-1231 Raid 6 Slow LS Listing Performance on large directory

2008-06-11 Thread Paul
Hello, I have a RAID-6 Partition with the Areca ARC-1231 card on a S5000PAL Intel system with 6 disks as part of the raid volume. The system has been set up as Write-back cache and the raid card has a 2 GIG memory cache on it. It is installed on Freebsd 7.0 STABLE with SCHED_ULE enabled. I

Re: FreeBSD 7 and Apache 1.3.41 PROBLEM

2008-06-11 Thread Wojciech Puchar
In httpd-error.log [Wed Jun 11 17:01:04 2008] [info] mod_unique_id: using ip addr 10.10.10.10 [Wed Jun 11 17:01:05 2008] [info] (2)No such file or directory: make_sock: for port 80, setsockopt: (SO_ACCEPTFILTER) [Wed Jun 11 17:01:05 2008] [warn] pid file /var/run/httpd.pid overwritten -- Unclean

Re: Vlan EVENT patch

2008-06-11 Thread Jack Vogel
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:51:53AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > > This is a small patch that Sam came up with for me, it will allow > > drivers to know > > when a vlan attaches. > > > > It is transparent to any code th

Re: FreeBSD 7 and Apache 1.3.41 PROBLEM

2008-06-11 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 08:54:20AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > The problem in your error logs indicate some sort of issue relating to > the accept filter in FreeBSD, which Apache can use (accf_http). > > I don't think Apache 1.3.x has this functionality (rc-script-wise) It has. Eugene Grosbe

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature withbuggy6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Marian Hettwer
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:54:02 +0100 (BST), Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The place for volunteers to come in is where they see an obvious niche for > improvement -- for example, a few years ago this guy named Colin Percival > turned up with a binary update system. After a couple of

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is prematurewithbuggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Marian Hettwer
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:50:57 +0300, Anton - Valqk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the answer! > I'm glad someone answered me a human way, > because two times before, I wasn't answered that way > (well... my posts were angry and incomplete but...that's why i didn't > continued to post...my

Re: apachectl gracefult causes Signal 11 crash after 6.3 to 7.0 upgrade [SOLVED]

2008-06-11 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 05:51:20PM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: > It seems a php-extensions bug. > If you comment the mhash.so in /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini as: > > ;entension=mhash.so > > all works fine and you don't get anymore httpd crash (signal 11) if you > use 'apachectl graceful

Re: apachectl gracefult causes Signal 11 crash after 6.3 to 7.0 upgrade [SOLVED]

2008-06-11 Thread Jordi Espasa Clofent
It seems a php-extensions bug. If you comment the mhash.so in /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini as: ;entension=mhash.so all works fine and you don't get anymore httpd crash (signal 11) if you use 'apachectl graceful'. Maybe will be a good idea to open PR for this? I hope it helps someone (

Re: FreeBSD 7 and Apache 1.3.41 PROBLEM

2008-06-11 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 05:28:26PM +0200, Jack Raats wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On a server I was running FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE together with apache 1.3.41 > without any problem. > > After upgrading FreeBSD to FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE using a source upgrade, > compiling

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature withbuggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andy Kosela wrote: Redhat/CentOS is more reliable here as backports involves both security and bug fixes, plus even new hardware enhancements. In the FreeBSD environment, we call the place that gets a blend of security and bug fixes, plus new minor feature and driver enh

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature withbuggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Anton - Valqk
Thanks for the answer! I'm glad someone answered me a human way, because two times before, I wasn't answered that way (well... my posts were angry and incomplete but...that's why i didn't continued to post...my bad). now on topic: Marian Hettwer wrote: Hi there, some thoughts to your problem

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Anton - Valqk wrote: I fully agree with the lines below. As noticed below there is more attention to developing new features, than making releases rock solid stable. ... Ah, another thing, I'm waiting for virtualization networking layer for jails for quite long. I've test

FreeBSD 7 and Apache 1.3.41 PROBLEM

2008-06-11 Thread Jack Raats
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On a server I was running FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE together with apache 1.3.41 without any problem. After upgrading FreeBSD to FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE using a source upgrade, compiling, and a full recompile of all the ports apache refuses to start, or starts

Re: broken re(4)

2008-06-11 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): OF> > On the other hand, I have not been able to get more than about OF> > 10MByte/s through the interfaces of this particular system. I have OF> > 1GBit-networking equipment, and the other

Re: broken re(4)

2008-06-11 Thread Oliver Fromme
Gerrit Kühn wrote: > On the other hand, I have not been able to get more than about 10MByte/s > through the interfaces of this particular system. I have 1GBit-networking > equipment, and the other systems (which are used as router) have no > problem doing a throughput of >20MB/s. Even bonding t

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature withbuggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Andy Kosela
Robert, Thank you for your insights. I think that this agreement between users and developers does occur. The proper balance between rapid development vs long term stability is the platform through which such agreement can be achieved. It's up to the Core Team to reasonably steer the Project in suc

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature withbuggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Marian Hettwer
Hi there, some thoughts to your problem in regards to Debian administration time needed vs. FreeBSD administration time needed. I believe I can make a point there, since I have 600 debian boxes under my hood but still am a FreeBSD advocate ;-) On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:53:02 +0300, Anton - Valqk <[

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Anton - Valqk
Just my 5cents (some thoughts), I fully agree with the lines below. As noticed below there is more attention to developing new features, than making releases rock solid stable. As mentioned in reply posts the 3 branches 6.X 7.X and 8.X takes too many resources and is very hard to support. I, pe

Re: Crashes in devfs. Possibly on interface creation/destruction.

2008-06-11 Thread Alexander Motin
Kostik Belousov wrote: > Try the following patch. It is against current, there might be further > races at the device destruction, but may be not. Also, please note that > devfs in RELENG_6 and RELENG_7/CURRENT are diverged enough to make MFC > of most bugfixes to RELENG_6 nearly impossible. > > d

Re: Vlan EVENT patch

2008-06-11 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:51:53AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > This is a small patch that Sam came up with for me, it will allow > drivers to know > when a vlan attaches. > > It is transparent to any code that doesn't want to change, but this > will allow my > drivers to finally utilize the

Re: broken re(4)

2008-06-11 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:43:04 +0200 Daniele Bastianini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): DB> > - copying large files (more than some 100MB) via ssh/scp drops the DB> > connection due to "corrupted MAC on input": DB> > Disconnecting: Corrupted MAC on input. DB> > lost connection DB>