Onderwerp: Samba 3.2.4 not in ports?
Hi all,
Sorry if this is a faq or something obvious, but
is there a reason why current version of samba 3.2.4
is not in ports? I only see 3.0.32 at the moment :-(
Best regards,
Holger
This has been asked before, there are some issues with samba 3.2.x
The
--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-Oct-06 06:19:34 -0700, Unga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FreeBSD stable comes with gcc-4.2.1 but the sources
are scattered
over the /usr/src, therefore, I find it difficult to
re-create the
gcc-4.2.1 to its original
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
I can confirm and
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
#zfs get all pool/lhm
zfs get all pool/lhm
[ttyp0][5:22:12pm]
NAME
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:12:59AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:30:09AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Turn compression off and retry.
Yep, that's the key!
# zfs set quota=4g storage/home
# zfs set compression=off storage
# zfs get
Bartosz Stec wrote:
My tries to tune smb.conf to achieve better performance expose very
strange bug:
Just executing:
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba reload
made my system unresponsible from network. It happens three times
until now so I'm sure that is the cause (but it happened after some
I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I
have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will
fit onto a CD or not :-)
I have created a shell script, /usr/local/bin/dirsize :
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {print j}'
Usage: dirsize
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:37:24PM +0200, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:38:01 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?:
[...]
GK However, yesterday I upgraded the system to a recent 7-stable
GK codebase, and now it locks again hard after
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 09:37:10 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:37:24PM +0200, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:38:01 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?:
[...]
GK However, yesterday I upgraded the system
You're right.
I turn off the compression,everything go well.
So this is my problem,not a ZFS of FreeBSD problme.
Tks for reply.
2008/10/7 Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
.00M -
pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x -
Turn compression off and retry.
sorry,I make a mistake.
It is a filesystem,not a volume.
2008/10/7 Holger Kipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
according to zfs manpage:
Quotas cannot be set on volumes, as the volsize property acts as
an implicit quota.
___
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:02:56 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?:
JB Do you have more details about the crash? Are you getting an actual
JB panic with messages on the console, or are you still seeing hangs?
Like it was before: system just hangs after
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 12:43:45 Pete French wrote:
Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we
limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)?
Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc.
On a related note, is
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:15:34PM +0200, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:02:56 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?:
JB Do you have more details about the crash? Are you getting an actual
JB panic with messages on the console, or are you
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
according to zfs manpage:
Quotas cannot be set on volumes, as the volsize property acts as
an implicit quota.
Aditionally, I see
My system
#uname -a
FreeBSD bxzxfreebsd.slof.com 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #4:
Mon Oct 6 15:02:42 CST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lhmwzy amd64
zfs version:
ZFS filesystem version 6
ZFS storage pool version 6
___
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
#zfs get all pool/lhm
zfs get all pool/lhm
[ttyp0][5:22:12pm]
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
pool/lhm type filesystem -
pool/lhm creation Tue Oct 7 17:14 2008
At 05:24 PM 10/6/2008, Galen Sampson wrote:
I would like to second that. The heimdal in 7.0 is quite old. It
is in fact inoperable with an mit kerberos realm when using
ssh. The byte order is incorrect such that you get MIC checksum
failures. After much googling (not documented in the
Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we
limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)?
Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc.
On a related note, is there any way to make du tell me how big files
are in actual
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:25:42 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?:
JC Like it was before: system just hangs after displaying the probing
JC messages about the CPU cores; next step for a working kernel would
JC be mounting of the file systems (and
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:16:29 +0200 Gerrit Kühn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?:
[...]
GK If someone can tell me what to do (except for putting ddb into the
GK kernel configuration) or point me at some documentation about this, I
GK can try getting some useful
Yes,this is a problem.
In my case,du -h displays 1M,but the actual size is about 24M.
2008/10/7 Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we
limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)?
Should we take space
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:38:01 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?:
[...]
GK However, yesterday I upgraded the system to a recent 7-stable
GK codebase, and now it locks again hard after probing the CPU cores. My
GK setup remained exactly the same, the new
Is there a way to get rid of all the routes in a routing table ?
This is more or less what I do:
route add 146.64.80.0/24 192.168.0.100
route add 146.141.0.0 -interface tun1
route add 146.182.0.0 -interface tun1
route add 146.230.0.0 -interface tun1
netstat -rn inet
146.64.80.0/24
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
I can confirm and reproduce what you're seeing.
Based on all of the ZFS documentation
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
#zfs get
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
#zfs get all pool/lhm
zfs get all pool/lhm
[ttyp0][5:22:12pm]
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
pool/lhm type
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 11:07:42 am Gerrit Kühn wrote:
JC John can probably help you with the commands you need to type, but the
JC FreeBSD Handbook goes over the general commands.
JC As far as getting into the debugger, it's Control-Alt-Esc from the
JC console.
Ok, I added options KDB
Hello to anyone.
I'm a FreeBSD user, i'm still a new bee but i still keep to learning.
Anyway, here is my question:
I use a FreeBSD STABLE-7 not installed by me, in this installation nslookup
works very good and the ? or help command working properly, infact the
every time i recall the command
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 06:30:23PM +0200, xer xernet wrote:
Hello to anyone.
I'm a FreeBSD user, i'm still a new bee but i still keep to learning.
Anyway, here is my question:
I use a FreeBSD STABLE-7 not installed by me, in this installation nslookup
works very good and the ? or help
Pete French wrote:
1 megabit = 106 = 1,000,000 bits which is equal to 125,000 bytes.
you are assuming eight bits per byte - but this is a serial line so
you should use ten bits per byte instead.
-pete.
That was a rule of thumb in the heyday of async serial lines, which used
a start
However, ethernet at 100Mbit is 4B5B coded at a 125mhz rate. So the raw
synchronous data rate really is 12.5Mbytes/s. Minus the sync preamble
of 8 bytes per packet and the mandatory inter-frame-gap of 12 bytes
that's a physical layer rate of (12.5M * (1500/(1500+20))) or 12.34Mbyte/s.
You
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Not to dissuade you from what you're trying to accomplish, but nslookup
has been deprecated (this has been stated a few times by the BIND folks),
and host is probably on its way out as well (though I remember somewhere,
sometime, nslookup used to
That was a rule of thumb in the heyday of async serial lines, which used
a start and stop bit per byte.
However, ethernet at 100Mbit is 4B5B coded at a 125mhz rate. So the raw
Errr, 4B5B *is* 10 bits per byte surely?
Even in the later days of modems this rule applied less and less,
Pete French wrote:
However, ethernet at 100Mbit is 4B5B coded at a 125mhz rate. So the raw
Errr, 4B5B *is* 10 bits per byte surely?
...
Gig ether is mainly 8B10, as is Firewire, SATA, FibreChannel and a
Mind you, it assumes that you know the real bit rate, which in the
case of 100baseT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did anyone who can trigger the data corruption has tried John's patch
and let us know if it worked?
Cheers,
- --
Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9
More importantly, dig(1) uses the standard resolver routines while
nslookup has its own. This has, in some cases, resulted in different
results from nslookup than for what the stub resolver returns which can
really lead one down the primrose path when troubleshooting.
I consider nslookup to be
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Unga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I need to patch the gcc original sources to suit the FreeBSD,
specially to support FreeBSD kernel compilation. I have tried it,
spent lot of time, but it still develops compilation errors.
The FreeBSD stable
--- On Wed, 10/8/08, Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you still have CVS tree available, you can do 'cvs
diff -rFSF' in
contrib/gcc and apply the patches to files gcc-4.2.1/gcc.
Hi Alexander, thanks for the reply.
I'm new to 'cvs diff -rFSF'. I need to do more home work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[...]
I have no crash of ZFS, but as I read in mailing lists, there are still
some problems, so let it be fixed and settle down before porting another
good filesystem.
Just my €0.02
For the record, pjd@'s previous ZFSv11
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 02:10:59AM -0700, Kip Macy wrote:
You sound as if you just got the machine and haven't given MacOS X a chance.
Give MacOS X a chance. Download (if its not on your MacOS X install DVD) X
Code, and Apple X11.
X11 is barely usable under Leopard.
I've heard a few
The fllow is better?
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print jM}'
2008/10/7 Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I
have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will
fit onto a CD or not :-)
43 matches
Mail list logo
