On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
I've been searching around and have come up with no current discussions on
this issue. I'll keep it brief:
In 7.0 or 7.1 is there any provision to have multiple IP addresses in a jail?
Subscribe to the freebsd-jail mailinglist and c
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:31:29PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On RELENG_7 (various versions between june and a few days ago) i
> noticed that sometimes ld.so starts using huge amounts of memory
> and CPU, both in terms of SIZE and RES.
>
> I saw it first on 3 different machines doing a portupgrad
Charles Sprickman wrote:
> [...]
> Is there any firewall hackery to be had that can at least let me do IP
> based virtual hosts for web hosting?
A common solution is to put the jail on a localhost IP
(e.g. 127.0.0.2, whatever). The apache inside is bound
to several arbitrary port numbers. Fo
On Monday 27 October 2008 20:03:21 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I had no idea users were blindly uncommenting examples in
well seems you're new in support business then :)
the issue might be the reason why weapons are not delivered with roles in the
chambers ... so developers probably should take ca
Sorry Just donot understand what you are saying.
On 10/28/08, Jose Amengual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys.
>
> I will describe de steps that I did to solve this problem that I still don't
> understand.
>
> Like my first post, I installed FreeBSD with the install cd
> 7.0-STABLE-200807-i386-
on 27/10/2008 21:59 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
>> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there any
Sorry for my ESL :).
On 28-Oct-08, at 9:03 AM, Sujit Karataparambil wrote:
Sorry Just donot understand what you are saying.
On 10/28/08, Jose Amengual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Guys.
I will describe de steps that I did to solve this problem that I
still don't
understand.
Like my fi
Thanks for the answer.
But as you can see in my post one of the steps was to downgrade to 7.0-
p5 and the problem was still there.
That's why I'm so confuse.
On 27-Oct-08, at 11:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:53:17PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27,
I just built world from RELENG_7 sources csup'd this morning, and it
appears the change to src/lib/libc/stdlib/grantpt.c has broken sshd.
I see the following when I attempt to login:
Oct 28 12:32:34 pflog sshd[78236]: fatal: openpty returns device for
which ttyname fails.
Oct 28 12:32:34 pflog ss
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Josh Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just built world from RELENG_7 sources csup'd this morning, and it
> appears the change to src/lib/libc/stdlib/grantpt.c has broken sshd.
>
> I see the following when I attempt to login:
>
> Oct 28 12:32:34 pflog sshd[782
Hello Josh,
The commits I made two days ago were a little tricky. I made some
modifications to libc and libutil at the same time. Unfortunately, due
to a small case of API misuse in libutil, I couldn't keep older versions
of libutil compatible with the new version of libc.
Below is a small table
> I suspect you are running a new libc, but forgot to update libutil to
> the latest version as well. Keep in mind that such a setup is not really
> supported.
Yes, exactly my problem. The mystery on my end is now how I managed to
build libc but not libutil. :)
> Ah, right after I finished typing
Hi Josh,
I forgot to reply to your second question: there is no real need to
enable COMPAT_43TTY. It is possible that applications use this (by
including ), but if you make sure your ports are up to date,
they should not. is not present on FreeBSD -CURRENT, so I (and
others) already made sure alm
Hi, there's a patch by Bjoern A.Zeeb, available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080920-01-at150161.diff
which succeeds and works well with 7.1-PRERELEASE currently.
I had similar issues to solve and patched several hosts
with it, so far with success.
Bjoern has made an excellent wo
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
> Hi, there's a patch by Bjoern A.Zeeb, available at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080920-01-at150161.diff
>
> which succeeds and works well with 7.1-PRERELEASE currently.
> I had similar issues to solve and patched several hosts
> with it, so far with success.
>
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Michael Butler wrote:
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hi, there's a patch by Bjoern A.Zeeb, available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080920-01-at150161.diff
which succeeds and works well with 7.1-PRERELEASE currently.
I had similar issues to solve and patched several ho
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> This seems to imply that, at last, IPv6 addresses can be used in jails -
>> is that true?
> yes
Woohoo! THANKS! :-)
Michael
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stabl
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hi, there's a patch by Bjoern A.Zeeb, available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080920-01-at150161.diff
which succeeds and works well with 7.1-PRERELEASE currently.
I had similar issues to solve and patched several hosts
with it, so far with success.
Bjoern h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried the
exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it all
works perfectly, but as soon as I do this on another machine on a public IP,
I'm not getti
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried
> the
> exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it
> all
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 22:08:18 -0400 Michael Proto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I'm trying to ru
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:35:35 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> netstat -nr on the 192 server shows the IP to be at:
>
> > netstat -nr | grep 168.1.100
> 192.168.1.100 52:54:00:12:34:56 UHLW11 fxp0 1128
>
> which is very odd, as that MAC address is n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I only have one VM running on one server ...
- --On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 21:14:28 -0700 Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:35:35 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> netstat -nr on the 192 server
23 matches
Mail list logo
