Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 02:49:15PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 12/11/2008 14:33 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 12/11/2008 14:14 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:58:58PM +0200, Andriy Gapon

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/11/2008 13:53 Nate Eldredge said the following: On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 05/11/2008 17:24 Andriy Gapon said the following: [...] I have a legacy-free system (no PS/2 ports, only USB) and I wanted to try a kernel without atkbd and psm (with ums, ukbd, kbdmux), but

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/11/2008 15:21 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: I don't know what to say to ***ANY*** of the above, other than this: No one is doing anything about this problem because there does not appear to be a 100% reproducible always-screws-up-when-I-do-this scenario that happens to *every

Cannot see disks attached to Marvell controller

2008-11-12 Thread Lawrence Farr
I've got an Asus P5E3WSPro with 8 SATA ports and 8 disks attached. 6 disks are on one controller (and work perfectly) and 2 are on a second Marvell controller. FreeBSD sees the controller, but not the disks. If I move a working disk to the Marvell controller I can boot off it up to the stage of

Re: usb keyboard dying at loader prompt

2008-11-12 Thread Martin
Am Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:36:19 +0300 schrieb pluknet [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have the same problem with my ukbdums: they are power off'ed during the boot and I should to re-attach them . MB: Asus p5k. Hi, I've noticed one thing today. I can switch off USB-Keyboard support in my BIOS. In this

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 12/11/2008 14:14 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:58:58PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: [snip] 2. if ukbd driver is not attached then I don't see any way USB keyboard would work in non-legacy way

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/11/2008 14:14 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:58:58PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: [snip] 2. if ukbd driver is not attached then I don't see any way USB keyboard would work in non-legacy way Regarding #2: at which stage? boot0/boot2/loader require an AT or

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Martin
Am Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:21:24 -0800 schrieb Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Until we settle down, stop replying to Emails with one-liner injections, and compile a list of test scenarios/cases that people can perform, and get these people to provide both 1) full hardware details, 2) full

Re: Replication system

2008-11-12 Thread jbondc
Michael Grant-3 wrote: GlusterFS http://www.gluster.org seems promising. It is a replication layer that sits on top of FUSE (Filesystem in Userspace http://fuse.sf.net). You can replicate pretty much any type of file system, ufs, zfs, dos...etc. In other words, you don't need to

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Sergey Babkin
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: What really needs to happen here should be obvious: we need some form of inexpensive keyboard-only USB support in boot2/loader. I would *love* to know how Linux and Windows solve this problem. If I remember right, UnixWare used(s) the BIOS calls in the loader. -SB

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Nate Eldredge
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 05/11/2008 17:24 Andriy Gapon said the following: [...] I have a legacy-free system (no PS/2 ports, only USB) and I wanted to try a kernel without atkbd and psm (with ums, ukbd, kbdmux), but was bitten hard when I made a mistake and kernel could not

Re: usb keyboard dying at loader prompt

2008-11-12 Thread pluknet
2008/11/11 Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:55:45 -0800 schrieb Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Some bioses have a list of MBR partition id's and use that to determine what to do with the USB keyboard. One of my ol older amd64 motherboards worked but would always disable the

System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Tim Bishop
I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64: FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10 20:49:51 GMT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALADIN amd64 I run the mksnap_ffs command to take

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 05/11/2008 17:24 Andriy Gapon said the following: System is FreeBSD 7.1-BETA2 amd64. Looking through my dmesg I see that relative order of ukbd attachment and root mounting is not deterministic. Sometime keyboard is attached first, sometimes root filesystem is mounted first. Quite more

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What really needs to happen here should be obvious: we need some form of inexpensive keyboard-only USB support in boot2/loader. If I remember right, UnixWare used(s) the BIOS calls in the loader. So does

Re: usb keyboard dying at loader prompt

2008-11-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 11/11/2008 20:55 Peter Wemm said the following: Some bioses have a list of MBR partition id's and use that to determine what to do with the USB keyboard. One of my ol older amd64 motherboards worked but would always disable the usb keyboard right as loader started. I discovered the

RE: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread David Peall
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Bishop Sent: 12 November 2008 07:58 PM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD

dlopen-ing a library with OpenMP by a non-OpenMP process

2008-11-12 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Hello! Currently, when a program built without OpenMP (-fopenmp) is trying to dlopen a library, built with the feature, the result is a crash from bad system call: #0 0x0008009a223c in ksem_init () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1 0x000800998a8f in sem_init () from /lib/libc.so.7 #2

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 06:22:35PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:10:50PM +0200, David Peall wrote: FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10 20:49:51 GMT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALADIN amd64 I run the mksnap_ffs

Re: dlopen-ing a library with OpenMP by a non-OpenMP process

2008-11-12 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Sent by Kostik Belousov: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hello! Currently, when a program built without OpenMP (-fopenmp) is trying to dlopen a library, built with the feature, the result is a crash from bad system call: #0 0x0008009a223c in

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64: FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10 20:49:51 GMT 2008 [EMAIL

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Tim Bishop
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later the system completely freezes up: paladin# cd /u2/.snap/ paladin# mksnap_ffs /u2 test.1 Someone (not named because they choose not to reply to the list) gave me

Re: Disk top usage PIDs

2008-11-12 Thread Brent Jones
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Adam McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eduardo Meyer wrote: Hello, I have some serious issue. Sometimes something happens and my disk usage performance find its limit quickly. I follow with gstat and iostat -xw1, and everything usually happens just fine,

Re: dlopen-ing a library with OpenMP by a non-OpenMP process

2008-11-12 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Sent by Daniel Eischen: On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Sent by Kostik Belousov: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hello! Currently, when a program built without OpenMP (-fopenmp) is trying to dlopen a library, built with the feature, the result

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/11/2008 14:33 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 12/11/2008 14:14 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:58:58PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: [snip] 2. if ukbd driver is not attached then I don't see

Re: dlopen-ing a library with OpenMP by a non-OpenMP process

2008-11-12 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Sent by Daniel Eischen: No, I simply meant that you saw it was returning bad system call from sem_init/ksem_init. Instead, I suspected, that it is the OpenMP, that's at fault. I'm sorry for failing to live up to your expectations of a true FreeBSD user. A little investigation would have turned

Re: dlopen-ing a library with OpenMP by a non-OpenMP process

2008-11-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hello! Currently, when a program built without OpenMP (-fopenmp) is trying to dlopen a library, built with the feature, the result is a crash from bad system call: #0 0x0008009a223c in ksem_init () from

Re: ukbd attachment and root mount

2008-11-12 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:58:58PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 12/11/2008 13:53 Nate Eldredge said the following: On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 05/11/2008 17:24 Andriy Gapon said the following: [...] I have a legacy-free system (no PS/2 ports, only USB) and I wanted to

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 07:49:28PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later the system completely freezes up: paladin# cd /u2/.snap/ paladin# mksnap_ffs /u2 test.1

Re: 3Ware 9000 series hangs under load

2008-11-12 Thread Philip Murray
On 13/11/2008, at 8:43 AM, Oliver Lehmann wrote: Philip Murray wrote: I used to get this (FreeBSD 6.1 days) all the time, the controller would just lock up almost on a daily basis (and have to wait for the fsck 4 out of 24 hours in the day). Anyway, I stopped running 3dmd (or 3dm2 I think

Re: 3Ware 9000 series hangs under load

2008-11-12 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Philip Murray wrote: I used to get this (FreeBSD 6.1 days) all the time, the controller would just lock up almost on a daily basis (and have to wait for the fsck 4 out of 24 hours in the day). Anyway, I stopped running 3dmd (or 3dm2 I think it's called now) to monitor it, and the

Re: dlopen-ing a library with OpenMP by a non-OpenMP process

2008-11-12 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Sent by Kostik Belousov: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hello! Currently, when a program built without OpenMP (-fopenmp) is trying to dlopen a library, built with the feature, the result is a crash from bad

Re: dlopen-ing a library with OpenMP by a non-OpenMP process

2008-11-12 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Sent by Daniel Eischen: On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Sent by Kostik Belousov: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hello! Currently, when a program built without OpenMP (-fopenmp) is trying to dlopen

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Tim Bishop
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:10:50PM +0200, David Peall wrote: FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10 20:49:51 GMT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALADIN amd64 I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later the system

RELENG_7 build failure in rescue/ (iconv?)

2008-11-12 Thread Doug Barton
I'm getting the following with clean, up to date sources (with the BIND 9.4.2-P2 update, but that doesn't touch this area): cc -static -o rescue rescue.o cat.lo chflags.lo chio.lo chmod.lo cp.lo date.lo dd.lo df.lo echo.lo ed.lo expr.lo getfacl.lo hostname.lo kenv.lo kill.lo ln.lo ls.lo mkdir.lo

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Tim Bishop
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64: FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on one of my servers running

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Jeremy Chadwick writes: [snip] | The rest of the below information is good -- but I'm confused about | something: is there anyone out there who can use mksnap_ffs on a | filesystem (/usr is a good test source) and NOT experience this | deadlocking problem? Literally *every* FreeBSD box I

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread David Wolfskill
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: ... On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64: FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Kostik Belousov writes: | On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 07:49:28PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: | On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: | I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later | the system completely freezes up: | | paladin# cd /u2/.snap/ |

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:02:50PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: ... On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on one of

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Wilko Bulte
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick, who wrote on Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800 .. On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote: I've been playing around

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2008-Nov-12 20:47:37 -0800, Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I plan to commit it tomorrow since I sent it to Tim to test. The 10 can be tuned but it has kept a bunch of machines at work up. Glad people don't think it is that it is to wrong :-) It probably could be made a little more

Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs

2008-11-12 Thread Kevin Day
(moving my thread from -fs to -stable) Before touching anything, here's a description of the symptoms I see... Rather busy system, with quite a bit of filesystem activity occurring while the snapshot is being made. Quad CPU amd64 box with 16GB of ram, 6x10Krpm RAID array. Should be