Re: Regression in vr - not receiveing multicast

--On December 10, 2008 16:19:33 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:06:16AM +0100, Goran Lowkrantz wrote: > --On December 9, 2008 12:53:05 +0100 Goran Lowkrantz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >--On December 9, 2008 20:47:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMA

Re: Regression in vr - not receiveing multicast

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:06:16AM +0100, Goran Lowkrantz wrote: > --On December 9, 2008 12:53:05 +0100 Goran Lowkrantz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >--On December 9, 2008 20:47:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > > > >>On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:40:17AM +0100, Gora

Re: Regression in vr - not receiveing multicast

--On December 9, 2008 12:53:05 +0100 Goran Lowkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On December 9, 2008 20:47:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:40:17AM +0100, Goran Lowkrantz wrote: > Hi, > > in July, vr had this problem and was fixed: >

Re: [ATA] and re(4) stability issues

On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > Hello, > > I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems > with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've > been trying to narrow the problem so someone more knowledgeable t

Re: FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 Available...

Sigh. Sorry, did it again... Note the checksum for the dvd1 images is for them in their ungzip-ed form so uncompress them before trying to verify the checksums. Checksums: MD5 (7.1-RC1-amd64-bootonly.iso) = de6338599df1be6915dd01001c1ef4e5 MD5 (7.1-RC1-amd64-disc1.iso) = 116d0dbff53871778fb0e1

FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 Available...

So... Two show-stoppers, one Security Advisory, and one "Gee. Did we really implement that new interface that way? That needs a bit more work." later... FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 is now available, the first of the Release Candidates. There will be at least one more Release Candidate before the release s

Please confirm your request to join SKATINGEXTREME

Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], We have received your request to join the SKATINGEXTREME group hosted by Yahoo! Groups, a free, easy-to-use community service. This request will expire in 7 days. TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE GROUP: 1) Go to the Yahoo! Groups site by clicking on this link: http://gr

Re: visibility of release process

On Dec 8, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Ken Smith wrote: Bottom line is my communication skills suck and of the bazillion other things I could do with my time these sorts of housekeeping chores wind up at a low enough priority they don't get done. But as you and others have made clear the priority need

Re: visibility of release process

Le Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:16:57 +0100, Ruben van Staveren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > Sure, but show me how to go to http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/ > > and see commit log per branch or any other way to see what is > > going on in a branch. Fisheye gives you that in a really clear way > >

[ATA] and re(4) stability issues

Hello, I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've been trying to narrow the problem so someone more knowledgeable than me is able to fix it. This mail is an other attempt to ask a question with rega

Re: confirming bugs is bad behavior, etc.

Jo, I'm trying to get FreeBSD to consider not supporting another "6.4" or "5.5" as both seems to have some of the problems you're describing due to a the next gen -stable being out for so long sucking away developer time. As a user, what do you think about this? I hate to force users to upgrade,

update release schedule information?

Hi, the release schedule information available in http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.1R/schedule.html is outdated. You probably already know about this ... and I also know 7.1-RELEASE is delayed, but the schedule page does not provide any useful information on what's going to happen next. BETA2 ha

Re: sio vs uart vs ucomm problems / differences

At 09:19 PM 11/25/2008, Mike Tancsa wrote: We are in the process of migrating one of our embedded apps to use uart by default instead of sio in RELENG_7 in prep for the day when sio eventually disappears. Unfortunately, the application doesnt want to work with uart with puc backed devices, bu

Re: lagg(4) and failover

On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 23:58 -0800, Tom Samplonius wrote: > I don't know if that is such a great idea, as that would only test > the switch that you are connected to. Heatbeats (STP,CARP) and active sanity checking (Nagios, ifwatchd(8)) are the two main options. Results may vary in every system/

Re: ext2fuse: user-space ext2 implementation

On 12/8/08, Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have rolled a port for ext2fuse: > http://people.freebsd.org/~bms/dump/fusefs-ext2fs.tar Ignoring fact that is buggy, slooow and port doesnt have any cache implemented and port leaves files behind in share/doc/ext2fuse when package de

Re: Regression in vr - not receiveing multicast

On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:40:17AM +0100, Goran Lowkrantz wrote: > Hi, > > in July, vr had this problem and was fixed: > > > > but now it's back again! > There was just one bug fix si

Re: Regression in vr - not receiveing multicast

--On December 9, 2008 20:47:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:40:17AM +0100, Goran Lowkrantz wrote: > Hi, > > in July, vr had this problem and was fixed: > >

Re: visibility of release process

On 9 Dec 2008, at 10:56, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: Sure, but show me how to go to http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/ and see commit log per branch or any other way to see what is going on in a branch. Fisheye gives you that in a really clear way and it costs nothing to add another option

Regression in vr - not receiveing multicast

Hi, in July, vr had this problem and was fixed: but now it's back again! On a system with the following: 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #3: Thu Oct 16 12:31:04 UTC 2008 I have to set

Re: visibility of release process

On 09/12/2008, at 5:21 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: What do you mean as "news source"? Commits are inherently low level and it's difficult to see how a commit could be massaged into some sort of press release without a fair amount of meta information in the commit log. Well, I use this as a way o

Re: lagg(4) and failover

lagg is ultimately a problem as a high-availability solution since most switches do not support multi-switch 802.3ad yet, and most probably never well. So you are limited to a single switch. So 802.3ad is good only for aggregation, and not for high availability. What about using STP or RS

Regression in vr - not receiveing multicast

Hi, in July, vr had this problem and was fixed: but now it's back again! On a system with the following: 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #3: Thu Oct 16 12:31:04 UTC 2008 I have to set

Re: lagg(4) and failover

Please wrap your mail before 80 columns. On 2008-Dec-08 23:58:00 -0800, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Linux bonding driver supports probing the default gateway. This is the same brokenness as Solaris IPMP. I agree that probing an external IP address (probably, but not necessari

Re: lagg(4) and failover

- "Brian A. Seklecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 08:03 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On 2008-Dec-05 07:34:21 -0500, "Brian A. Seklecki" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Well ... name a price for the development; HA L1/L2 is a feature > the > > >community would gladl