Re: FBSD 7.1 XEON Quad Core

2009-02-11 Thread Dean Strik
SDH Support wrote: > > Yes, if you have (or plan to have) more than 3 GB of memory. > > FYI I have had a lot of problems with FBSD7.x and HP DL-series hardware + > amd64. There is a bug IIRC in the loader. I have 7.x/amd64 working without problems on DL360/DL380 generations 4 and 5. Can you elab

Re: CFT: ath hal src switchover

2009-02-11 Thread Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:09 -0800, Sam Leffler wrote: > Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > > Uwe Laverenz writes: > > > > > >> Sam Leffler schrieb: > >> > >> > >>> those changes. To do this you must have an up to date RELENG_7 code > >>> base and then apply this patch: > >>> > >>> http://people.freeb

Re: Driver for Intel 10GbE adapter

2009-02-11 Thread Greg Rivers
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Jack Vogel wrote: Somehow that error was corrected but just AFTER the release. Its a simple fix, look at ixgbe.h in CVS to see it, you just get rid of the "tcp_lro.h" and change it to There will be a new code drop soon also. That worked perfectly. Now I see: pci23:

RE: FBSD 7.1 XEON Quad Core

2009-02-11 Thread SDH Support
> Yes, if you have (or plan to have) more than 3 GB of memory. FYI I have had a lot of problems with FBSD7.x and HP DL-series hardware + amd64. There is a bug IIRC in the loader. --- Kevin K. Systems Administrator www.stardothosting.com/managed-hosting ___

Re: Driver for Intel 10GbE adapter

2009-02-11 Thread Jack Vogel
Somehow that error was corrected but just AFTER the release. Its a simple fix, look at ixgbe.h in CVS to see it, you just get rid of the "tcp_lro.h" and change it to There will be a new code drop soon also. Jack On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Greg Rivers > wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, pl

Re: Driver for Intel 10GbE adapter

2009-02-11 Thread Greg Rivers
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, pluknet wrote: You probably want to load ixgbe(4), not ixgb(4) (latter is afaik an older PCI-X version driver). The labels on the card are close to the description of ixgbe. Note, it's not in GENERIC. On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Jack Vogel wrote: Yes, its an Oplin, 82598, it

Re: Driver for Intel 10GbE adapter

2009-02-11 Thread pluknet
2009/2/12 Kip Macy : > see ixgbe(4) BTW I'm afraid ixgbe manpage still to be merged to 7. > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Greg Rivers > wrote: >> I'm trying to light an Intel 10GbE adapter in an HP DL380 G5 using very >> recent 7.1-STABLE amd64 with GENERIC kernel. I expected the ixbg(4) d

Re: Driver for Intel 10GbE adapter

2009-02-11 Thread Kip Macy
see ixgbe(4) On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Greg Rivers wrote: > I'm trying to light an Intel 10GbE adapter in an HP DL380 G5 using very > recent 7.1-STABLE amd64 with GENERIC kernel. I expected the ixbg(4) driver > to attach, but it does not. > > The labels on the card show: >INTEL(R)

Re: Driver for Intel 10GbE adapter

2009-02-11 Thread Jack Vogel
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:21 PM, pluknet wrote: > Hi. > > 2009/2/12 Greg Rivers > > >: > > I'm trying to light an Intel 10GbE adapter in an HP DL380 G5 using very > > recent 7.1-STABLE amd64 with GENERIC kernel. I expected the ixbg(4) > driver > > to attach, but it does not. > > > > The labels

Re: Driver for Intel 10GbE adapter

2009-02-11 Thread pluknet
Hi. 2009/2/12 Greg Rivers : > I'm trying to light an Intel 10GbE adapter in an HP DL380 G5 using very > recent 7.1-STABLE amd64 with GENERIC kernel. I expected the ixbg(4) driver > to attach, but it does not. > > The labels on the card show: >INTEL(R) 10GbE XF SR 2 PORT SERVER ADAPTER >

Re: CFT: ath hal src switchover

2009-02-11 Thread Sam Leffler
Bengt Ahlgren wrote: Uwe Laverenz writes: Sam Leffler schrieb: those changes. To do this you must have an up to date RELENG_7 code base and then apply this patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/ath_hal-releng7.patch Then rebuild your kernel. There should be no changes to user app

Re: CFT: ath hal src switchover

2009-02-11 Thread Bengt Ahlgren
Uwe Laverenz writes: > Sam Leffler schrieb: > >> those changes. To do this you must have an up to date RELENG_7 code >> base and then apply this patch: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/ath_hal-releng7.patch >> >> Then rebuild your kernel. There should be no changes to user apps. > > I tes

Driver for Intel 10GbE adapter

2009-02-11 Thread Greg Rivers
I'm trying to light an Intel 10GbE adapter in an HP DL380 G5 using very recent 7.1-STABLE amd64 with GENERIC kernel. I expected the ixbg(4) driver to attach, but it does not. The labels on the card show: INTEL(R) 10GbE XF SR 2 PORT SERVER ADAPTER 893135 EXPX9502FXSRGP5

Re: Interval timers firing early

2009-02-11 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 31 December 2008 9:42:28 pm Peter Jeremy wrote: > I have some code that uses setitimer() to generate one-shot timers of > ~60s (the intent is to fire ~10msec before the minute boundary). > > On my amd64 laptop running 7.0-stable from mid-March the SIGALRM > arrives at the expected tim

Re: floppy disk controller broken

2009-02-11 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday 18 September 2008 3:53:06 am Michel Talon wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 05:13:39PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 11:04:33 am Michel Talon wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > when testing FreeBSD-7.1-BETA i discovered that the floppy disk > > > controller

Re: kld regression

2009-02-11 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday 31 January 2008 1:00:43 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 31/01/2008 18:52 John Baldwin said the following: > > On Thursday 31 January 2008 10:05:57 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 31/01/2008 14:39 Andriy Gapon said the following: > >>> on 31/01/2008 13:07 John Baldwin said the following: > >>

Re: CFT: ath hal src switchover

2009-02-11 Thread Uwe Laverenz
Sam Leffler schrieb: those changes. To do this you must have an up to date RELENG_7 code base and then apply this patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/ath_hal-releng7.patch Then rebuild your kernel. There should be no changes to user apps. I tested this on a Thinkpad R51 / RELENG_7 / A

Re: x48 display messed up with Xorg 7.4

2009-02-11 Thread Esa Karkkainen
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:16:28PM -0700, Dan Allen wrote: > In the recent upgrade to Xorg 7.4 the screen on the calculator is > completely screwed up - nothing appears as it should. I get a garbled x48 "LCD" output and calculator will not turn on. > I am on a Toshiba Satellite U205 with Intel

Re: zfs crashes with nfs and snapshots

2009-02-11 Thread Jaakko Heinonen
On 2009-02-11, Gerrit Kühn wrote: > I just saw one of my FreeBSD servers (7.0-stable of June 2008) crash while > trying to access the .zfs snapshot directory via a nfs client machine. This is likely the issue described in this message: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2008-October/00

zfs crashes with nfs and snapshots

2009-02-11 Thread Gerrit Kühn
Hi folks, I just saw one of my FreeBSD servers (7.0-stable of June 2008) crash while trying to access the .zfs snapshot directory via a nfs client machine. The server got a page fault caused by the nfsd process. It wasn't even able to dump the kernel image anymore. Resetting the machine it first a

Re: poweredge 1850 won't boot 7.1? maybe LSI-related : amr0: adapter is busy

2009-02-11 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:51 +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote: > Hello, > This afternoon I wanted to upgrade to 7.1 two good old dell PowerEdge > servers which were running FreeBSD 6.x. It went fine and quickly on the There's already discussion about this in the archives. We're aware and working on

poweredge 1850 won't boot 7.1? maybe LSI-related : amr0: adapter is busy

2009-02-11 Thread Olivier Mueller
Hello, This afternoon I wanted to upgrade to 7.1 two good old dell PowerEdge servers which were running FreeBSD 6.x. It went fine and quickly on the poweredge 1950, but it failed completely on the poweredge 1850. Facts: - boot cd and setup / operation of freebsd 6.x or 7.0 is fine Message l

Page fault while in kernel mode

2009-02-11 Thread Tom Evans
Hi all. I got this panic when our SMB server moved hostname. I still had the drives mounted, so I wondered what would happen if I ls'ed the mount point ('Doctor it hurts when I do this' 'Dont do that then..'). I'm running i386 RELENG_7 from mid October, so it is more than possible that this has a