In message 717f7a3e1001210137p7884adcbxc66a4f7fff928...@mail.gmail.com,
Marin Atanasov (dna...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello Jeremy,
Now I'm a little confused :)
I've made some tests with my machines and a couple of null modem cables, and
here's what I've got.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at
On 1/21/10 9:15 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 2:09:34 pm Florian Smeets wrote:
On 1/21/10 8:05 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 1:33:35 pm Florian Smeets wrote:
On 1/21/10 6:58 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 8:25:22 am Florian
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 08:23:23PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
First, see also my post: do I want ch0 or pass1?
I have an external tape library and an external tape drive. They are
not always powered up. My goal: always get the same devices regardless
of whether or not the tape library is
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:01:02AM +0100, Greg Byshenk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 08:23:23PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
First, see also my post: do I want ch0 or pass1?
I have an external tape library and an external tape drive. They are
not always powered up. My goal: always
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:36:51AM +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
On Thu, 21.01.2010 at 11:37:06 +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
Here's what I did:
box1 COM1/ttyd0 - box2 COM1/ttyd0 - using null modem cable
box1
Hi Folks,
I'm having a problem since I upgraded from 7.0 to the latest stable over
Christmas with quotas and exim not rebuilding.
I'm told that exim requires NIS and WITHOUT_NIS=yes was defined in
/usr/src.conf
My /usr/src.conf for that build is as follows though I've removed it
for a test
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Colin free...@southportcomputers.co.uk wrote:
Anyone got any pointers?
Could you post your /etc/make.conf?
That said, I recon you build your kernel in a rather wierd way. Delete
/usr/obj/* and run make cleandir make cleandir in /usr/src. Then
build your world
In message 4b596838.9020...@southportcomputers.co.uk,
Colin (free...@southportcomputers.co.uk) wrote:
[snip]
It goes for a while and then the buildkernel fails with this:
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DFREEBSD_NAMECACHE -DBUILDING_ZFS
-D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -std=c99 -nostdinc
Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Colin free...@southportcomputers.co.uk wrote:
Anyone got any pointers?
Could you post your /etc/make.conf?
That said, I recon you build your kernel in a rather wierd way. Delete
/usr/obj/* and run make cleandir make cleandir
N.J. Mann wrote:
In message 4b596838.9020...@southportcomputers.co.uk,
Colin (free...@southportcomputers.co.uk) wrote:
[snip]
It goes for a while and then the buildkernel fails with this:
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DFREEBSD_NAMECACHE -DBUILDING_ZFS
-D_KERNEL
Alexander Motin schrieb am 19.01.2010 17:12 (localtime):
...
Patch can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100119.patch
Feedback as always welcome.
Again, thanks a lot for your ongoing great work!
The patch doesn't cleanly apply with vpo, but I don't use vpo so I
didn't
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:40:17AM +0100, Christer Solskogen typed:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Colin free...@southportcomputers.co.uk
wrote:
Anyone got any pointers?
Could you post your /etc/make.conf?
That said, I recon you build your kernel in a rather wierd way. Delete
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:45:46AM +, N.J. Mann wrote:
In message 4b596838.9020...@southportcomputers.co.uk,
Colin (free...@southportcomputers.co.uk) wrote:
[snip]
It goes for a while and then the buildkernel fails with this:
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Ruben de Groot wrote:
RdG Could you post your /etc/make.conf?
RdG That said, I recon you build your kernel in a rather wierd way. Delete
RdG /usr/obj/* and run make cleandir make cleandir in /usr/src. Then
RdG
RdG Bit redundant ;)
RdG cleandir only effects /usr/obj,
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com (from Tue, 19 Jan
2010 09:01:01 -0800):
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:40:50AM -0500, Garrett Moore wrote:
I've been watching my memory usage and I have no idea what is consuming
memory as 'Active'.
Last night I had around 6500MB 'Active'
Hi.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:36:12PM +, David Murray wrote:
[...]
On 2010-01-20 Wed 1:22 pm, Crest wrote:
Yes the NAT-T Patch has been integrated into FreeBSD 8.0.
Just rebuild your kernel with this options:
device crypto # IPsec depends on this
options IPSEC
options IPSEC_DEBUG
On Friday 22 January 2010 3:08:45 am Florian Smeets wrote:
On 1/21/10 9:15 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 2:09:34 pm Florian Smeets wrote:
On 1/21/10 8:05 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 1:33:35 pm Florian Smeets wrote:
On 1/21/10 6:58 PM, John
On Friday 22 January 2010 6:17:08 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:45:46AM +, N.J. Mann wrote:
In message 4b596838.9020...@southportcomputers.co.uk,
Colin (free...@southportcomputers.co.uk) wrote:
[snip]
It goes for a while and then the buildkernel fails
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:02:57 +0200 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
So, on some of our freebsd7.1 nfs clients (and it looks like we have had
similar case with 6.3), which have several nfs mounts to the same CentOS 5.3
NFS server (mount options: rw,-3,-T,-s,-i,-r=32768,-w=32768,-o=noinet6), at
some moment
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:02 AM, N.J. Mann n...@njm.me.uk wrote:
In message 717f7a3e1001210137p7884adcbxc66a4f7fff928...@mail.gmail.com,
Marin Atanasov (dna...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello Jeremy,
Now I'm a little confused :)
I've made some tests with my machines and a couple of
Hi,
I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and buildkernel and
buildworld (no custom kernel, no make.conf).
Instaling the new kernel failed, since /boot/kernel/ is already well
over 230 MBytes in size.
Hi All,
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:21:56 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net
wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and buildkernel and
buildworld (no custom kernel, no make.conf).
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:21:56 +0100
Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote:
Instaling the new kernel failed, since /boot/kernel/ is already well
over 230 MBytes in size. moving that to kernel.old and writing a new one
with about the same size fails due to no space left on device.
This
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
Alexander Motin schrieb am 19.01.2010 17:12 (localtime):
...
Patch can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100119.patch
Feedback as always welcome.
Again, thanks a lot for your
Just as a side note: does mergemaster or installworld handle the
installation of /boot/device.hints?
If it's mergemaster, then everything is fine, it'll detect your changes.
If it's installworld, you'll lose your changes at the next update.
Either way, I find it nicer/simpler to use
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:27:52PM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Hi All,
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:21:56 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net
wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and
Hi Yvan,
On 10-01-22 Fri 1:19 pm, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:36:12PM +, David Murray wrote:
On 2010-01-20 Wed 1:22 pm, Crest wrote:
Yes the NAT-T Patch has been integrated into FreeBSD 8.0.
Are we saying that the NAT-T patch is there, but is missing checksum
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:23:55AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
But I had some questions about zfs raidz states. I think that isn't
a matter of atacam but if I removed one disk, zpool status still
showed me the ada3 device online.
After reinserting (and proper detection/initialisazion
On Friday 22 January 2010 15:20:13 John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday 22 January 2010 3:08:45 am Florian Smeets wrote:
...
If it really is IPsec traffic then there are no rewrite rules only 10 pf
pass rules on the enc0 interface and a scrub in all rule.
Perhaps it matters that i have these
In the last episode (Jan 21), Dan Langille said:
Please CC me on replies.
I'm running into issues with hard-coding some devices (see recent post
titled 'device.hints isn't setting what I want').
Associated with this issue is confusion over whether I want to use ch0
or pass1. I have these
Hello
I am curious about posting some coding bounties, my current interest
revolves around improving the ZVOL functionality in FreeBSD: fixing
the known ZVOL SWAP reliability/stability problems as well as making
ZVOLs work as a dumpon device (as is already the case in OpenSolaris)
for crash
Hi Yvan,
On 10-01-22 Fri 5:15 pm, David Murray wrote:
On 10-01-22 Fri 1:19 pm, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:36:12PM +, David Murray wrote:
On 2010-01-20 Wed 1:22 pm, Crest wrote:
Yes the NAT-T Patch has been integrated into FreeBSD 8.0.
Are we saying that the
On 01/22/10 11:48, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
Alexander Motin schrieb am 19.01.2010 17:12 (localtime):
...
Patch can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100119.patch
Feedback as
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:23:43 -0500
Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Please CC me on replies.
I'm running into issues with hard-coding some devices (see recent post
titled 'device.hints isn't setting what I want').
Associated with this issue is confusion over whether I want to use ch0
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Steve Polyack kor...@comcast.net wrote:
On 01/22/10 11:48, Freddie Cash wrote:
In my testing of pulling drives at random (using a 3Ware 9550SXU or 9650SE
controller), you have to zpool offlinepool device while the drive
is
unplugged, before you can
On Friday 22 January 2010 12:18:20 pm Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 22 January 2010 15:20:13 John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday 22 January 2010 3:08:45 am Florian Smeets wrote:
...
If it really is IPsec traffic then there are no rewrite rules only 10 pf
pass rules on the enc0 interface and a
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
We have nonempty nm_bufq, nm_bufqiods = 1, but actually there is no nfsiod
thread run for this mount, which is wrong -- nm_bufq will not be emptied until
some other process starts writing to the nfsmount and starts nfsiod thread for
this mount.
On Friday 22 January 2010 19:49:19 John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday 22 January 2010 12:18:20 pm Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 22 January 2010 15:20:13 John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday 22 January 2010 3:08:45 am Florian Smeets wrote:
...
If it really is IPsec traffic then there are no
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:37:48 -0500 (EST) Rick Macklem wrote:
--- nfs_bio.c.orig 2010-01-22 15:38:02.0 +
+++ nfs_bio.c 2010-01-22 15:39:58.0 +
@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ again:
*/
if (!gotiod) {
iod = nfs_nfsiodnew();
-
On Friday 22 January 2010 11:46:01 am Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:21:56 +0100
Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote:
Instaling the new kernel failed, since /boot/kernel/ is already well
over 230 MBytes in size. moving that to kernel.old and writing a new one
with
2010/1/22 Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de:
Alexander Motin schrieb am 19.01.2010 17:12 (localtime):
...
Patch can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100119.patch
Feedback as always welcome.
Again, thanks a lot for your ongoing great work!
The patch
* Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com [2010-01-19 23:46 -0800]:
You cannot do something like where box1 COM1 is wired to box2 COM1, and
depending on what box you're on doing the cu -l ttyu0 from, get a
login prompt on the other. It doesn't work like that. :-)
Isn't the reason for
--On Friday, January 22, 2010 10:05 PM +0100 Nicolas Rachinsky
fbsd-stabl...@ml.turing-complete.org wrote:
* Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com [2010-01-19 23:46 -0800]:
You cannot do something like where box1 COM1 is wired to box2 COM1, and
depending on what box you're on doing the
On 1/22/10 6:18 PM, Max Laier wrote:
pf does change the byte order in the pfil hook, but changes it back on return
to the stack either when returning from the hook or when calling back into the
stack. There have been some issues where we missed returns to the stack that
would result in this
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Rick Macklem wrote:
There should probably be some sort of 3 way handshake between
the code in nfs_asyncio() after calling nfs_nfsnewiod() and the
code near the beginning of nfssvc_iod(), but I think the following
somewhat cheesy fix might do the trick:
[stuff deleted]
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:06:23 +0100 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Dear all,
I have no idea why top crashes with segmentation fault on my amd64
machine running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2.
If someone wants to have a loot at the core dump:
http://www.schmalzbauer.de/downloads/top.core
core file is
Dan Naumov wrote:
Hello
I am curious about posting some coding bounties, my current interest
revolves around improving the ZVOL functionality in FreeBSD: fixing
the known ZVOL SWAP reliability/stability problems as well as making
ZVOLs work as a dumpon device (as is already the case in
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 03:56:31PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
in your /etc/make.conf, do you have a line like:
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
if so, comment it out.
The GENEREIC kernel by default has the following config:
makeoptions DEBUG=-g# Build kernel with gdb(1)
I'm very interested in this problem -- I want to run an L2TP server myself.
Is anyone actually working on this? I might be able to chip in a few bucks...
But I'm not seeing bad checksums. Here's my setup:
L2tp server AB Freebsd NAT box C ---internal
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
Hello
I am curious about posting some coding bounties, my current interest
revolves around improving the ZVOL functionality in FreeBSD: fixing
the known ZVOL SWAP reliability/stability problems as well
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:49:46PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
I am curious about posting some coding bounties, my current interest
revolves around improving the ZVOL functionality in FreeBSD: fixing
the known ZVOL SWAP reliability/stability problems as well as making
ZVOLs work as a dumpon
Mikolaj Golub schrieb am 22.01.2010 23:26 (localtime):
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:06:23 +0100 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Dear all,
I have no idea why top crashes with segmentation fault on my amd64
machine running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2.
If someone wants to have a loot at the core dump:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:49:46PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
I am curious about posting some coding bounties, my current interest
revolves around improving the ZVOL functionality in FreeBSD: fixing
the known
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:21:56PM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and buildkernel and
buildworld (no custom kernel, no make.conf).
Instaling the new kernel
On Friday 22 January 2010 06:32:02 pm Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 03:56:31PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
in your /etc/make.conf, do you have a line like:
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
if so, comment it out.
The GENEREIC kernel by default has the following config:
55 matches
Mail list logo
