Re: ntpd struggling to keep up - how to fix?

2010-02-22 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2010-Feb-21 14:29:28 -0500, David Magda wrote: >For future reference, how does the math work? How do you go from >taking a timer number: > > $ sysctl machdep.acpi_timer_freq > machdep.acpi_timer_freq: 3577045 > >And the ntpd(8) time reset log entries to adjust the frequency? Or do

sleep(3) sometimes too sleepy on FreeBSD 8.0?

2010-02-22 Thread John Marshall
Environment: sendmail 8.14.4 on FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 Since upgrading a few local servers to FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE (and subsequently 8.0-RELEASE-p2), I have been seeing VERY intermittent problems with sendmail persistent queue runners. One or more queue runners will fail to wake up (having been to

Re: Incorrect super block

2010-02-22 Thread Chris Knight
This problem is caused by a big-endian, little-endian difference between the OSX implementation of UFS and the FreeBSD implementation. http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=86385 I solved this problem for myself by installing MacFuse -Chris On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Harald Weis

Re: ZFS and sh(1) panic: spin lock [lock addr] (smp rendezvous) held by [sh(1) proc tid] too long

2010-02-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday 20 February 2010 5:19:39 pm Attilio Rao wrote: > 2010/1/27 Brandon Gooch : > > The machine, a Dell Optiplex 755, has been locking up recently. The > > situation usually occurs while using VirtualBox (running a 64-bit > > Windows 7 instance) and doing anything else in another xterm (such

Re: trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode on 8.0-RELEASE (possibly bge(4) related)

2010-02-22 Thread Denis Lamanov
Yes, PCIX BCM5704 FreeBSD vpn2 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #1 r204028: Thu Feb 18 08:29:42 EET 2010 ad...@vpn2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 2010/2/22 Pyun YongHyeon > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:17:17PM +0200, Denis Lamanov wrote: > > I see same trouble (lost packets after 4 day uptim

Re: trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode on 8.0-RELEASE (possibly bge(4) related)

2010-02-22 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:17:17PM +0200, Denis Lamanov wrote: > I see same trouble (lost packets after 4 day uptime and reboot) :( > > dev.bge.0.stats.rx.FCSErrors: 18 > You also have PCIX BCM5704 controller? What FreeBSD version do you use? > 2010/2/19 Slawa Olhovchenkov > > > On Fri, Feb 1

Re: trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode on 8.0-RELEASE (possibly bge(4) related)

2010-02-22 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:18:47AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 03:41:53PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:44:50AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:12:01PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > > > > Norm

Re: trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode on 8.0-RELEASE (possibly bge(4) related)

2010-02-22 Thread Denis Lamanov
vpn2# sysctl dev.bge.0.stats dev.bge.0.stats.FramesDroppedDueToFilters: 0 dev.bge.0.stats.DmaWriteQueueFull: 0 dev.bge.0.stats.DmaWriteHighPriQueueFull: 0 dev.bge.0.stats.NoMoreRxBDs: 0 dev.bge.0.stats.InputDiscards: 0 dev.bge.0.stats.InputErrors: 0 dev.bge.0.stats.RecvThresholdHit: 36622 dev.bge.0

Re: trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode on 8.0-RELEASE (possibly bge(4) related)

2010-02-22 Thread Denis Lamanov
I see same trouble (lost packets after 4 day uptime and reboot) :( dev.bge.0.stats.rx.FCSErrors: 18 2010/2/19 Slawa Olhovchenkov > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:06:47PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > > > dev.bge.1.stats.rx.Fragments: 1 > > > > You received a frame that is less than 64 bytes

Re: ntpd struggling to keep up - how to fix?

2010-02-22 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:18:10PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2010-Feb-22 01:02:54 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > >Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > >> ... Once ntpd decides to continuously step, something is broken. > > > >Is there some reason why, as long as it is not yet synced, ntpd > >sho

Re: ntpd struggling to keep up - how to fix?

2010-02-22 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2010-Feb-22 01:02:54 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: >Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> ... Once ntpd decides to continuously step, something is broken. > >Is there some reason why, as long as it is not yet synced, ntpd >should not do this sort of calculation and rate correction itself >rather than

Re: Incorrect super block

2010-02-22 Thread Harald
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:03:37AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: > > On 02/18/10 16:26, Harald Weis wrote: > > > Has anybody encountered the following problem ? > > > > > > Mac OS X does recognize FreeBSD partitions on USB disks, but > > > doesn't want to mount them becau

Re: ntpd struggling to keep up - how to fix?

2010-02-22 Thread perryh
Peter Jeremy wrote: > ... Once ntpd decides to continuously step, something is broken. Is there some reason why, as long as it is not yet synced, ntpd should not do this sort of calculation and rate correction itself rather than insist on having a human perform the calculation and enter the adju