TB --- 2010-11-18 08:50:02 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 08:50:02 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2010-11-18 08:50:02 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 08:50:25 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 08:50:25 -
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:02:24 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:02:24 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:02:25 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:02:39 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:02:39 -
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:13:29 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:13:29 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:13:29 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:13:42 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:13:42 -
On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_2637_videonum=1
Well,
it would be nice to have those improvements in FreeBSD, but I doubt this
will make it in due time
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:24:40 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:24:40 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:24:40 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:24:51 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:24:51 -
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:13:42 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:13:42 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:13:42 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:13:56 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:13:56 -
on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_2637_videonum=1
Well,
it would be nice to have those
TB --- 2010-11-18 12:37:22 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 12:37:22 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2010-11-18 12:37:22 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 12:37:33 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 12:37:33 -
On Wednesday, November 17, 2010 7:46:38 pm Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 11:13 +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:56:53PM -0500, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 10:40 +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
on 18/11/2010 01:07 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
I think I know what's going on.
Andriy, it seems this change is missing from your patchset (maybe
more):
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/utilities/utglobal.c?r1=210976r2=213806
Jung-uk,
thanks a lot! It
on 17/11/2010 20:43 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I want to do MFC of ACPICA imports to stable/8 before 8.2 release.
This would obviously include commits that fix mismerges or remove obsolete
code.
Plus some other small enhancements/fixes in our ACPI code.
This is what I currently
On 17/11/2010 21:25, Markus Gebert wrote:
On 17.11.2010, at 20:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/11/2010 18:38 Markus Gebert said the following:
On 17.11.2010, at 11:49, George Mamalakis wrote:
Hi everbody,
from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS I understand that chflags are supported by
zfs. But
On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_2637_videonum=1
On Nov 18, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:39, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
Frankly, I'm also turned off by the attempt to popup a full page ad in
addition to the rest of the advertising content which surrounds what is
nominally supposed to be the real content. That doesn't mean there is
anything
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
that Linux's interactive response when under heavy load
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
that
On Thu Nov 18 10, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:39, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
Frankly, I'm also turned off by the attempt to popup a full page ad in
addition to the rest of the advertising content which surrounds what is
nominally supposed to be the real content.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP and SCHED_ULE, or?
Because
On 11/18/10 19:28, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
that Linux's
On 11/18/10 19:55, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapona...@freebsd.org:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a
On 11/18/10 10:55 AM, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapona...@freebsd.org:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a
Hi John,
On 18/11/2010, at 23:59 , John Baldwin wrote:
You used devinfo -v, so it shows the devices that exist even if they failed
to attach. Try just using 'devinfo' and seeing if est1 still shows up.
OK, you're right: running without -v shows only est0:
nexus0
apic0
ram0
acpi0
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 04:20:17 Yue Wu wrote:
I'm using FreeBSD stable on IBM T60, `acpiconf -s 3` can let T60 into
suspend mode, but then it can't be waked up anyhow.
so my question is, anyone use FreeBSD on IBM T60 and make the
suspend/resume work on it?
According to whitelist.c in
On 11/17/2010 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Meantime, the similar change may be beneficial for padlock(4) too.
f you are going to test it, please note that most likely, openssl padlock
engine does not use padlock(4), I do not know for sure.
I did some more tests since someone said they
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:41:02PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 06:55 pm, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:36:16PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
You may try sysctl hw.acpi.handle_reboot=1. If it works, just
add it in /etc/sysctl.conf.
FYI, it is
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 4:07:27 pm Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hi John,
On 18/11/2010, at 23:59 , John Baldwin wrote:
You used devinfo -v, so it shows the devices that exist even if they failed
to attach. Try just using 'devinfo' and seeing if est1 still shows up.
OK, you're right:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact
Hi
Today I had problem with creating mbr partition on my pendrive.
I tried using gpart as I am most familiar with this tool. On clean device I did:
[~] # gpart create -s mbr da1
da1 created
[~] # gpart add -t mbr da1
gpart: Invalid argument
What the heck? In gpart(8) under partition types I
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 14:12:23 Bruce Cran wrote:
According to whitelist.c in the linux suspend package, the T60 needs s3
bios and s3 mode for the video to work on resume, which I don't think
has been implemented.
Actually it looks like s3 bios is just a POST of the video card when
On Thu Nov 18 10, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
judging from
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:59:43PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
well i did exactly what they did in the video. watch a 1080p video and move
the output window around while compiling the kernel.
It is trivial to bring ULE to its knees. If you
have N cores then all you need is N+1 cpu
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the
On 11/18/10 3:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaevkab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Bestarun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:59:43PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
well i did exactly what they did in the video. watch a 1080p video and move
the output window around while compiling the kernel.
It is
On Thu Nov 18 10, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/18/10 3:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaevkab...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Bestarun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu Nov 18
On Nov 18, 2010, at 18:43, Julian Elischer wrote:
we are part of the way there..
at least we did abstract the scheduler to the point where we have
two completely different ones. you are welcome to develop a
'framework as you describe and plug it into the abstraction we
already have.
It
Not sure if this is the kind of testing you were looking for; but I've
run both mprime and boinc/setiathome for the last two days without any
problem...
It's not a notebook so I can't test suspend/resume..
On 10-11-15 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Hello,
this is a call for testers of the
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 4:07:27 pm Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hi John,
On 18/11/2010, at 23:59 , John Baldwin wrote:
You used devinfo -v, so it shows the devices that exist even if they
failed
to attach. Try just using
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
you think so? judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact
imo.
On Linux. Have you ever seen those sorts of UI problems on FreeBSD? I don't
watch much video on my systems, but I haven't seen that. FreeBSD has
43 matches
Mail list logo
