On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:12:17 +0100, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 21 November 2012 20:16, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:08:42 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
.. because some of us like kernel behaviour to be predictable and
controllable, rather than
on 21/11/2012 20:11 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 21/11/2012 20:08 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
On 2012-11-21 19:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 21/11/2012 19:48 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
[snip]
It seems to to be waiting/working in the ZFS code to get things
Dear Manager
Have a nice day
This is Jerry from Shenzhen of China, writing to you to enter into business
relationship with you. We are the professional manufacturer
with nearly 6 years of experience oversea business in supplying USB Flash
Drives, Tablet PC, Keyboard, Mouse, MP3, Digital Photo
On 22 November 2012 04:00, Morgan Reed morgan.s.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've a bit of an odd query which I hope somebody may be able to
assist with.
I'm looking to set up several OpenVPN tunnels on a single machine
(each residing in its own jail) and route data to different
I've not used it myself, but this sound like something VIMAGE may be good
for, basically it's a virtual tcp stack per jail, there's some docs at
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Image but I seem to remember a more up to date one
elsewhere but can't find it at the moment!
AFAIK, VIMAGE is still
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:12:17 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 21 November 2012 20:16, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:08:42 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
[..]
T61_dmesg.boot.10.works (file 1 of 2) lines 1813-1861/1861 byte 82415/82415
Cutting just the hdaa0,
On Nov 22, 2012, at 2:43 AM, nickolas...@gmail.com wrote:
I've not used it myself, but this sound like something VIMAGE may be good
for, basically it's a virtual tcp stack per jail, there's some docs at
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Image but I seem to remember a more up to date one
elsewhere but
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Simon Dick sim...@irrelevant.org wrote:
I've not used it myself, but this sound like something VIMAGE may be good
for, basically it's a virtual tcp stack per jail, there's some docs at
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Image but I seem to remember a more up to date one
Hmm, list was missing from reply-to on this one.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Morgan Reed morgan.s.r...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: natd in a jail
To: Dewayne Geraghty dewayne.gerag...@heuristicsystems.com.au
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:33 PM,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Teske, Devin
devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
I have created a boot script for managing vimages (downloadable as a FreeBSD
package) and made a little write-up on how to use it...
http://druidbsd.sf.net/vimage.shtml
As noted elsewhere, these are VIMAGE jails,
On 11/22/2012 6:00 AM, Morgan Reed wrote:
Hi All,
Hi,
[snipped content]
Any suggestions here?
A quick one. Could you make a try using ipfw nat instead of natd?
I am not sure about divert socket and natd per jail, but NATing using
ipfw and libalias(which natd uses as well) works.
HTH, Nikos
On 22.11.2012 12:53, Ian Smith wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:12:17 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 21 November 2012 20:16, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:08:42 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
[..]
T61_dmesg.boot.10.works (file 1 of 2) lines 1813-1861/1861 byte
On 22 November 2012 06:30, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Neither ICH, nor any other driver I know have amount of information
comparable to what HDA hardware provides. So the analogy is not good.
Respecting that most CODECs have no published datasheets, that information
is the only
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 November 2012 06:30, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Neither ICH, nor any other driver I know have amount of information
comparable to what HDA hardware provides. So the analogy is not good.
Respecting that
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:14:59PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 November 2012 06:30, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Neither ICH, nor any other driver I know have amount of information
comparable to what
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:14:59PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 November 2012 06:30, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Neither ICH, nor
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 08:27:16 +0700
Denny Johannurdin denny336...@gmail.com wrote:
dear admin
how to make freebsd 9.1 prerelease in to stable
you just update the system.
Erich
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:20:52 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:14:59PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 November 2012
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Morgan Reed morgan.s.r...@gmail.com wrote:
BPF is enabled for the jails, and the traffic is getting to where it
needs to (but not via natd). I'll try enabling raw_sockets in the
jails, it is entirely conceivable that natd requires that
functionality.
So it
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Morgan Reed morgan.s.r...@gmail.com wrote:
So it turns out I'd not bought bpf into the jails, however even with
that and raw_sockets enabled I'm still having no joy with natd.
I've been looking at ipfw a bit today but I've run into an issue,
loading ipfw_nat
20 matches
Mail list logo
