On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:14:13AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Clue to a quick check with CVS is/was
grep RELENG_9_1_0_RELEASE /usr/cvs/src/Makefile,v
grep RELEASE_9_1_0 /usr/cvs/ports/Makefile,v
but as CVS is about to disappear, what's a quick check for svn ?
Some time before
Hi list,
After an upgrade from 8.3 to 9.1-STABLE, this machine started
crashing.
It's a GENERIC kernel with following changes:
options DUMMYNET
options IPFIREWALL
options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD
options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT
options HZ=1000
1. Do you have a full crash dump?
2. Are world and kernel in sync?
- Original Message -
From: Pawel Tyll pt...@nitronet.pl
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 10:54 AM
Subject: 8.3 - 9.1 results in often crashes.
Hi list,
After an upgrade from 8.3 to
Hi,
1. Do you have a full crash dump?
Unfortunately no. This is everything that got logged.
2. Are world and kernel in sync?
I believe so. Is there a fool-proof reliable way to check this?
It's crashing frequently, so I can make changes to get things logged
properly, if given pointers.
p.
Hey Pawel, please force fsck of the filesystem (-f), I had that issue
recently and the system was crashing because of that (su-journal did not
show fs corruption). Fsck -f showed and fixed inconsistencies and now its
fine.
Best regards,
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Hi,
Hey Pawel, please force fsck of the filesystem (-f), I had that issue
recently and the system was crashing because of that (su-journal did not
show fs corruption). Fsck -f showed and fixed inconsistencies and now its
fine.
This is a ZFS-only machine, including root. There are no
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 07:47:01AM -0800, Jakub Lach wrote:
#sound-card-support
First part is fine, assuming man pages will be up to date etc. Not sure
about
support for MIDI cards/MPU-401. Is this covered by uart? Don't know whatever
was Microsoft® Sound System specification.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:13:39 +0100, Pawel Tyll pt...@nitronet.pl wrote:
Hi,
1. Do you have a full crash dump?
Unfortunately no. This is everything that got logged.
2. Are world and kernel in sync?
I believe so. Is there a fool-proof reliable way to check this?
It's crashing frequently,
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Klop ronald-freeb...@klop.yi.org
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: 8.3 - 9.1 results in often crashes.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:13:39 +0100, Pawel Tyll pt...@nitronet.pl wrote:
Hi,
1. Do you have
Dear Experts
i am sure many of you would be the part of the real game, where lot of
technology is implemented (Internet Service Providers) those serve
thousands of clients everyday . i am requesting opinion advice from
those experts. Surfing web does not help much unless someone who is
Ok, but it doesn't change current primary reason of silent devices
(wrong pinout) :)
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5768088.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
If you have swap on a raw disk then adding the following to /etc/rc.conf
is usually sufficent
dumpdev=AUTO
If you don't reboot then run:
/etc/rc.d/dumpon start
Thanks. Dumps will be done to gmirror; I switched balancing to prefer
for the time being. Everything's setup, so hopefully
1) This wrong list, it should be asked on -questions or -chat,
if at all.
2) Your message is too long, and looks like on the first look
like nigerian scam (sorry), most people will not take time
to read it whole.
3) This is not free tech support, this is list about development
of open source
Here's more info, including backtrace:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 3; apic id = 03
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor read data, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0x80956c73
stack pointer =
- Original Message -
From: Pawel Tyll pt...@nitronet.pl
To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Ronald
Klop ronald-freeb...@klop.yi.org
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: 8.3 - 9.1 results in often crashes.
Here's more info,
Hi Steven,
Did you get a dump from this one if so /var/crash/core.txt.X
(X = number) would be of help.
Yes, above is from this file. It's quite large and contains sensitive
information, so I'm not comfortable in uploading whole file. Are you
interested in a particular section?
p.
On 12/11/12 00:27, Pawel Tyll wrote:
Here's more info, including backtrace:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 3; apic id = 03
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor read data, page not present
instruction pointer =
- Original Message -
From: Pawel Tyll pt...@nitronet.pl
To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Ronald Klop ronald-freeb...@klop.yi.org
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: 8.3 - 9.1 results in often crashes.
Hi Steven,
Did you get
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:26:08 +0100, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl
wrote:
1) This wrong list, it should be asked on -questions or -chat,
if at all.
2) Your message is too long, and looks like on the first look
like nigerian scam (sorry), most people will not take time
to read it whole.
I
Hi,
The gdb block at the top as that will help identify where in the code
your panic is occurring. The kdb block you posted only lists offsets where
as gdb lists lines.
Steven,
Please see http://pastie.org/5506669
Lawrence,
0x80a7c1af is in tcp_input
Hi list,
after the security announcement
(http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to update my local
ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not updated. What is the
preferred/recommended way to update port indexes when using svn?
Thanks,
Serguey.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 06:39:56PM +0400, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
Hi list,
after the security announcement
(http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to
update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is
not updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to
You can also list the offending IP:
list *0x80956c73
adrian
On 10 December 2012 06:22, Pawel Tyll pt...@nitronet.pl wrote:
Hi,
The gdb block at the top as that will help identify where in the code
your panic is occurring. The kdb block you posted only lists offsets where
as gdb
On 10/12/2012 14:39, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
after the security announcement
(http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to
update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not
updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to update port indexes
when using svn?
10.12.2012, 18:51, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 06:39:56PM +0400, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
Hi list,
after the security announcement
(http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to update my
local ports tree. I've found out that the port
To OP: I wish if you would have invested only 20-30% of what you have
paid for developing the feature you wanted to opensource developers
including FreeBSD team, you would not only get your solution, but also
get a solution that you can tweak on your own.
However, your explanation is so lengthy
Witam,
You can also list the offending IP:
list *0x80956c73
Excuse my ignorance, but how does that list an IP address?
(gdb) list *0x80956c73
0x80956c73 is in m_tag_delete (mbuf.h:1047).
1042 */
1043static __inline void
1044m_tag_unlink(struct mbuf *m,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:06:36 +0100, Pawel Tyll pt...@nitronet.pl wrote:
Witam,
You can also list the offending IP:
list *0x80956c73
Excuse my ignorance, but how does that list an IP address?
See your first error report mail.
instruction pointer= 0x20:0x80956c73
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:39:56 +0100, S.N.Grigoriev
serguey-grigor...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi list,
after the security announcement
(http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to update
my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not updated.
What is the
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 10/12/2012 14:39, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
after the security announcement
(http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to
update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not
updated. What is the preferred/recommended
On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 08:03:03 -0800, Jakub Lach wrote:
Probably already axed, it was supported by
dev/sound/isa/mss.c and isa/snd/ad1848.c I think.
Add text and items enhancing knowledge for later and latest kit, by all
means, but - just speaking generally - Careful with that axe, Eugene!
At 03:41 PM 12/9/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'll amend my stuff that will help list:
* Donate to the freebsd foundation, along with opening discussions to
them about how your organisation uses / relies upon freebsd;
* Volunteer to join the release engineering / package building teams,
and
Exactly, I assumed mss.c was history already, because I looked
only in modules, while there is plenty isa stuff in
src/sys/dev/sound/isa still!
/usr/src/sys/dev/sound/isa $ ls -a
. ad1816.h mss.c sb16.csndbuf_dma.c
.. ess.c mss.h sb8.c
Hi,
If your product uses FreeBSD wireless code, please ask your vendor to
liaise with the FreeBSD wireless community and work with us to improve
things.
I have no idea who the vendor is though, so this is all total conjecture.
Adrian
On 10 December 2012 04:51, Shiv. Nath
Instruction Pointer. :-)
adrian
On 10 December 2012 07:06, Pawel Tyll pt...@nitronet.pl wrote:
Witam,
You can also list the offending IP:
list *0x80956c73
Excuse my ignorance, but how does that list an IP address?
(gdb) list *0x80956c73
0x80956c73 is in
On 10 December 2012 09:34, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
I've thought about donating manpower; tried to many years ago, in fact.
But I was deterred by the egos, the politics, and the territoriality and
hotheadedness of some of the developers. So, most of my contributions
of code (and I
At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote:
There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every
organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you
feel there are issues, find people inside the community who you do get
along well with and talk with them about
Hi,
On an 8.2 box, I run
freebsd-update -r 8.3-RELEASE upgrade
I am getting hundreds of files with conflicts like:
current version
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/auth.conf,v 1.6.32.1.4.1 2010/06/14 02:09:06 kensmith Exp $
===
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/auth.conf,v 1.6.32.1.8.1 2012/03/03 06:15:13 kensmith
TB --- 2012-12-11 03:23:48 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-11 03:23:48 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-12-11
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote:
There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every
organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you
feel there are issues, find people inside
TB --- 2012-12-11 04:33:48 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-11 04:33:48 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-12-11
TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-12-11
TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:23 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-12-11
TB --- 2012-12-11 04:11:44 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-11 04:11:44 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-12-11
TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-12-11
On 12/11/2012 12:58 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Hi,
On an 8.2 box, I run
freebsd-update -r 8.3-RELEASE upgrade
I am getting hundreds of files with conflicts like:
current version
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/auth.conf,v 1.6.32.1.4.1 2010/06/14 02:09:06 kensmith Exp $
===
# $FreeBSD:
On 10 December 2012 09:39, S.N.Grigoriev serguey-grigor...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi list,
after the security announcement
(http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to update my
local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not updated. What is
the
On 12/10/2012 06:34 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
At 03:41 PM 12/9/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'll amend my stuff that will help list:
* Donate to the freebsd foundation, along with opening discussions to
them about how your organisation uses / relies upon freebsd;
I just had a little
TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-12-11
TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-12-11
50 matches
Mail list logo