Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-08 Thread Hiroki Sato
Ulrich Spörlein wrote in <20130108184051.gi35...@acme.spoerlein.net>: uq> After setting this, it now looks like this: uq> root@acme: ~# ip6addrctl uq> Prefix Prec Label Use uq> ::1/128 50 00 uq> ::/0

Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-08 Thread Hiroki Sato
Gregory Shapiro wrote in <20130108180920.gj36...@rugsucker.smi.sendmail.com>: gs> > How can I unstupid sendmail here? gs> gs> I don't think sendmail is being stupid here as it is doing what it has gs> been doing under 8.x and 9.1 (the code is the same). I think gs> something changed with the u

Re: /etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl

2013-01-08 Thread J.R. Oldroyd
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:02:43 -0500 "J.R. Oldroyd" wrote: > Seems to me that the ip6addrctl script should also prefer IPv6 if any > interface has IPv6 enabled using one of the ifconfig_(interface)_ipv6 > variables. > > -jr > A simple change along the lines of the attached patch, which also

/etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl

2013-01-08 Thread J.R. Oldroyd
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:46:09 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > Turns out it was the missing setting of > ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer" in rc.conf that also bit me in > strange and mysterious ways on another machine where I did the > upgrade. It's very unfortunate that this will runtime-break sendma

Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-08 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:09:20 -0800, Gregory Shapiro wrote: > > How can I unstupid sendmail here? > > I don't think sendmail is being stupid here as it is doing what it has been > doing under 8.x and 9.1 (the code is the same). I think something changed > with the upgrade to 9.1. As far as tr

Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-08 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 18:36:34 +0100, Michiel Boland wrote: > On 01/08/2013 16:18, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I upgraded a server running 8.x to 9.1 over the weekend and sendmail no > > longer wants to bind the AF_INET6 sockets. > > > > So while this still works: > > > > DAEMON_OPTIONS

Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-08 Thread Michiel Boland
On 01/08/2013 16:18, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: [...] 98054 sendmail CALL bind(0x7,0x708dbc,0x1c) 98054 sendmail STRU struct sockaddr { AF_INET6, [:::88.198.49.12]:587 } 98054 sendmail RET bind -1 errno 49 Can't assign requested address Yeah right ... I don't want an IPv6-mapped-IPv4

Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-08 Thread Gregory Shapiro
> How can I unstupid sendmail here? I don't think sendmail is being stupid here as it is doing what it has been doing under 8.x and 9.1 (the code is the same). I think something changed with the upgrade to 9.1. As far as tracking it down, the sendmail code does: getipnodebyname("acme.spoerlei

sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-08 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hey, I upgraded a server running 8.x to 9.1 over the weekend and sendmail no longer wants to bind the AF_INET6 sockets. So while this still works: DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MSA, M=Eu, InputMailFilters=dkim') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=::1, Name=MSA, Family=inet6, M=Eu

Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit

2013-01-08 Thread Simon L. B. Nielsen
On 6 January 2013 20:40, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > Hey, > > tl;dr Wiki is back, and everybody with account need to reset their password. Small followup. The wiki's surge protection (yet again) got confused and blocked the frontend proxy. I think it should be fixed now. If you see any 'varnish

Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit

2013-01-08 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 01/08/2013 10:00 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:39+0100, Bas Smeelen wrote: On 01/08/2013 09:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: 2013/1/8 Bas Smeelen mailto:b.smee...@ose.nl>> On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuning

Re: Some new hardware with 9.1 does not reboot easily

2013-01-08 Thread Julian Stecklina
Thus spake Andriy Gapon : > on 29/11/2012 17:16 Willem Jan Withagen said the following: >> Would that mean that the regular checkout of stable/9 contains enough >> code to allow "painless" rebooting... > > Not yet... Has this been resolved? I still see a hang on reboot/shutdown on my box (zfs roo

Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit

2013-01-08 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Jan 8, 2013, at 3:10 AM, Bas Smeelen wrote: > On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide >> >> Seems not working :) >> > > Works here! What's odd is that it looks like some changes were reverted. I'd asked someone with write privs on it to

Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit

2013-01-08 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:39+0100, Bas Smeelen wrote: > On 01/08/2013 09:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > > > > > > 2013/1/8 Bas Smeelen mailto:b.smee...@ose.nl>> > > > > On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > > > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide > > > >

Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit

2013-01-08 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 01/08/2013 09:37 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:08:33 +0200 Alexander Yerenkow wrote: http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide Error 503 Service Unavailable Service Unavailable Guru Meditation: XID: 931036950 Varnish cache server is all I get. Erich http://wiki

Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit

2013-01-08 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 01/08/2013 09:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: 2013/1/8 Bas Smeelen mailto:b.smee...@ose.nl>> On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide Seems not working :) Works here! Hm, could you look at this: ping wiki.freebsd

Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit

2013-01-08 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:08:33 +0200 Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide Error 503 Service Unavailable Service Unavailable Guru Meditation: XID: 931036950 Varnish cache server is all I get. Erich ___ freebsd-stabl

Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit

2013-01-08 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide Seems not working :) Works here! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any

Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit

2013-01-08 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide Seems not working :) -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...