Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2

2013-07-11 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 08.07.2013 16:37, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: Can you help me with with testing? Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll stand up a machine and give feedback. http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/m

Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2

2013-07-11 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 7/11/13 12:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 08.07.2013 16:37, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: Can you help me with with testing? Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll stand up a machine and give fe

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2013-07-11 Thread Łukasz Wąsikowski
W dniu 2013-07-10 17:52, Kevin Oberman pisze: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > >> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm < >> trash...@odo.in-berlin.de> wrote: >> >> Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken, that patch isn't >>> in stable yet. >>>

Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2

2013-07-11 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Andre Oppermann" On 08.07.2013 16:37, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: Can you help me with with testing? Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll stand up a machine

Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2

2013-07-11 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 11.07.2013 11:08, Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message - From: "Andre Oppermann" On 08.07.2013 16:37, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: Can you help me with with testing? Yes. Please give me your

Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2

2013-07-11 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Andre, Peter what about i386? Ever since I touched this Peter has been worried about i386 and said we've broken the platform. I'm going to boot some vms but maybe we ought to get some testing from Peter on i386? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 11, 2013, at 5:47 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On

Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2

2013-07-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Please test on VMs. I've tested -HEAD in i386 virtualbox all the way down to 128mb with no panics. I'll test with 64mb soon. It's easy to do. i think the i386 PAE stuff on ${LARGE} memory systems is still broken. Peter? -adrian On 11 July 2013 07:59, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Andre, Peter wha

Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2

2013-07-11 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Andre Oppermann" To: "Steven Hartland" Cc: "Alfred Perlstein" ; ; ; Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 1:47 PM Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2 On 11.07.2013 11:08, Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message - From: "Andre Oppermann

strange stable/9 buildworld failure

2013-07-11 Thread Andriy Gapon
buildword was run as make -j8 buildworld and the it mysteriously failed like this: sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 liblwres.so.80 /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -l s liblwres.so.80 /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/liblwres.so 1 error *** [librar

Re: strange stable/9 buildworld failure

2013-07-11 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 11/07/2013 19:43 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > buildword was run as make -j8 buildworld and the it mysteriously failed like > this: > > sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 liblwres.so.80 > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib > sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -l s liblwres

Re: strange stable/9 buildworld failure

2013-07-11 Thread Dimitry Andric
On Jul 11, 2013, at 19:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 11/07/2013 19:43 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> >> buildword was run as make -j8 buildworld and the it mysteriously failed like >> this: >> >> sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 liblwres.so.80 >> /usr/obj/usr/src/

Re: locks under printf(9) and WITNESS = panic?

2013-07-11 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, June 29, 2013 9:19:24 pm Steven Hartland wrote: > when booting stable/9 under a debug kernel with WITNESS > enabled and verbose I get the following panic.. > > It seems very much like the discussion from a year back on > current: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012

Re: locks under printf(9) and WITNESS = panic?

2013-07-11 Thread Attilio Rao
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:21 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday, June 29, 2013 9:19:24 pm Steven Hartland wrote: >> when booting stable/9 under a debug kernel with WITNESS >> enabled and verbose I get the following panic.. >> >> It seems very much like the discussion from a year back on >> curr

What are the ideal ranges for kern.ipc.shm*?

2013-07-11 Thread Chris H
Greetings, Over the years using the xfce4 desktop, I would occasionally receive SHM ERROR messages. As they never interfered (so's I could notice), I always put off attempting to track the cause down. However, now having performed a fairly major upgrade (~1yr since last), The error appears to grea

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2013-07-11 Thread Hiroki Sato
Kevin Oberman wrote in : rk> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Mark Felder wrote: rk> rk> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm < rk> > trash...@odo.in-berlin.de> wrote: rk> > rk> > Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken, that patch isn't rk> >> in stable yet. rk>

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2013-07-11 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Kevin Oberman wrote > in : > > rk> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > rk> > rk> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm < > rk> > trash...@odo.in-berlin.de> wrote: > rk> > > rk> > Will that patch make it int

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

2013-07-11 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 19:25:28 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 04:29:19PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > OK, patch is applied. I will reboot the machine later > > and see what happens tomorrow in the morning. However, > > it might take a few days since the last 2 wee

stable/9 fails to compile: kmem_alloc_contig bad definition

2013-07-11 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
Hello. /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc -c -O -pipe -march=native -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs -fdiagnostics-show-opti

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

2013-07-11 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 07:24:40AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 19:25:28 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 04:29:19PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > OK, patch is applied. I will reboot the machine later > > > and see what happens tomorrow i

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

2013-07-11 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 12-Jul-2013 at 08:01:12 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 07:24:40AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 19:25:28 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 04:29:19PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > > OK, patch is appl

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

2013-07-11 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 08:05:27AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > On Fri, 12-Jul-2013 at 08:01:12 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 07:24:40AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 19:25:28 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2013-07-11 Thread Michael Grimm
On 2013-07-12 6:56, Hiroki Sato wrote: Kevin Oberman wrote in : rk> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Mark Felder wrote: rk> rk> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm < rk> > trash...@odo.in-berlin.de> wrote: rk> > rk> > Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken,