On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:27:04AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 19/08/2013 00:13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
That's really odd. But then, it's a firmware driven NIC, who knows what
kind of weird crap is going on under the hood.
Yes, it's a black box. So how do I get in contact with intel
The requested information about the deadlock was finally obtained and
provided off-list to the requested parties due to size.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 01:08:05PM -0400, J David wrote:
The requested information about the deadlock was finally obtained and
provided off-list to the requested parties due to size.
Thank you, the problem is clear now.
The problematic process backtrace is
Tracing command httpd pid 86383 tid
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the easiest route is to a partial merge of the r253927 from HEAD.
Is it helpful if we restart testing releng/9.2 using your suggested
fix? And if so, the IGN_SBUSY patch you posted earlier be applied as
well
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 02:03:50PM -0400, J David wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the easiest route is to a partial merge of the r253927 from HEAD.
Is it helpful if we restart testing releng/9.2 using your suggested
fix? And
Hello!
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
This change is about to be MFC-ed.
on 26/07/2013 17:39 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I have just committed a significant change to devfs path matching logic
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/253677
I just rebuilt
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
No, at least not without reverting the r254754 first. The IGN_SBUSY patch
is not critical there.
There is lots of other stuff in r250907 / reverted by r254754. Some
of it looks important for sendfile()
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 04:11:09PM -0400, J David wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
No, at least not without reverting the r254754 first. The IGN_SBUSY patch
is not critical there.
There is lots of other stuff in r250907 / reverted by
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 04:11:09PM -0400, J David wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
No, at least not without reverting the r254754 first. The IGN_SBUSY patch
Kostik wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 01:08:05PM -0400, J David wrote:
The requested information about the deadlock was finally obtained
and
provided off-list to the requested parties due to size.
Thank you, the problem is clear now.
The problematic process backtrace is
Tracing
Some updates:
I could see what happens if I try to boot the FreeBSD boot partition on the
hard drive using the Super Grub Disk with chainloader.
If that works, it would boot FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1, but I would see if it works.
That failed (invalid signature).
I could also try
kfreebsd
11 matches
Mail list logo
