On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm wondering can I
commit this to
9-stable now? (or is it already in?)
It didn't make it because there was only sparse feedback after
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.com
mailto:alf...@ixsystems.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
mailto:an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann
of replies that it is being
tested but no statements either way if it was good or not. Hence
I erred on the side of caution and refrained from committing it.
Would you do the honors?
Yes, will do later today.
--
Andre
-Alfred
On 7/8/13 7:37 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred
On 01.08.2013 16:47, Mike Tancsa wrote:
After upgrading from a RELENG9 kernel from June 18th to July 27th, I am
seeing this odd new message. Is this a new bug, or just a new
diagnostic message ? I am guessing it happened after r253035 ?
sonewconn: pcb 0xfe001ac76930: Listen queue
it into the PCBSD rolling update as well. I'm thinking it makes
sense to roll this
into the 9.2 release to give us more scalability.
-Alfred
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.07.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre,
Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto
On 15.07.2013 08:38, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 13.07.2013 09:47, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, we have a number of people running this patch in the following
configurations:
6-8GB ram + 10gigE ethernet using iozone over NFS.
As you haven't seen any problems yet I've asked RE to green light
On 08.07.2013 16:37, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing?
Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll stand up a machine and give
feedback.
http://people.freebsd.org/~andre
On 11.07.2013 11:08, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
On 08.07.2013 16:37, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing?
Yes
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing?
Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll stand up a machine and give
feedback.
http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/mfc-autotuning-20130708.diff
On 08.07.2013 16:41, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
mailto:an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing
On 07.07.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre,
Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto-tuning -stable
before 9.2?
I simply ran out of time on Friday and MFCing such a big change requires
more testing.
I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet
On 15.04.2013 05:32, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/11/13 5:18 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Excuse me for being slightly spammy but I've received feedback that we
haven't spread this information widely enough outside the inner circles
and interested people missed the announcement.
EuroBSDcon 2013
Excuse me for being slightly spammy but I've received feedback that we
haven't spread this information widely enough outside the inner circles
and interested people missed the announcement.
EuroBSDcon 2013: September 28-29 in Malta
=
EuroBSDcon is the
On 27.11.2012 23:27, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
I've got an Intel server motherboard with 4x igb (and 1x em) on it.
The motherboard in question is the S3420GPRX and the IGB's show up as:
igb0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.4 port
0x3020-0x303f mem
Hello
I currently working on a number of drivers for popular network
cards and extend them with automatic hybrid interrupt/polling
ithread processing with life-lock prevention (so that the driver
can't consume all CPU when under heavy load or attack).
To properly test this I need the proper
On 20.10.2012 15:11, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Jul 25 01:40:56 EEST 2012
I have the server: 8 cores AMD, 16GB RAM, 4x3TB HDD in RAID10 for ZFS.
Sometime wheels fall off the server and the network.
Can this clean-up memory for ZFS cache?
I enclose a picture with
On 29.08.2010 16:09, Mike Tancsa wrote:
After upgrading to a recent STABLE, I have been seeing the following sporadic
errors
Aug 28 04:15:15 smarthost2 kernel: TCP: [xx.yy.165.120]:53617 to
[xx.yy.164.50]:25; syncache_socket:
Socket create failed due to limits or memory shortage
this is with
On 29.08.2010 19:16, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 11:33 AM 8/29/2010, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 29.08.2010 16:09, Mike Tancsa wrote:
After upgrading to a recent STABLE, I have been seeing the following sporadic
errors
Aug 28 04:15:15 smarthost2 kernel: TCP: [xx.yy.165.120]:53617 to
[xx.yy.164.50
Today I upgraded an AMD64 server from FreeBSD 6.4 to 7-STABLE and got a big
nasty surprise with the Areca RAID controller:
arcmsr0: Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID Controller (RAID6 capable)
mem 0xfdbff000-0xfdb40 irq16 at device 14.0 on pci18
ARECA RAID ADAPTER0: Driver Version 1.20.00.15
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 08:19 AM 6/10/2009, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Today I upgraded an AMD64 server from FreeBSD 6.4 to 7-STABLE and got
a big
nasty surprise with the Areca RAID controller:
arcmsr0: Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID Controller (RAID6 capable)
mem 0xfdbff000-0xfdb40 irq16
Scott Long wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Today I upgraded an AMD64 server from FreeBSD 6.4 to 7-STABLE and got
a big
nasty surprise with the Areca RAID controller:
arcmsr0: Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID Controller (RAID6 capable)
mem 0xfdbff000-0xfdb40 irq16 at device 14.0 on pci18
ARECA
First I want to thank everyone for their great support and numerous donations
to the TCP/IP Cleanup and Optimization[1]! The full funding target has been
reached today. I want thank especially the many individuals who have
contributed
a significant amount of money alone. And of course the
Replying to self:
Of course it's a funraise too, but the Subject should actually be Fundraise
target reached.
Meaningful typo this time... ;)
--
Andre
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
[ cc'ing parties involved in this part of code]
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:07:01PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:04:27AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
T J #25 0xc05a0a0b in m_freem (mb=0x0) at uma.h:304
T J No locals.
T J #26 0xc05ee0d5 in
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:03:53PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A Fixing this one is harder. We take la from unlocked rtentry obtained via
A rt_check(), or from arplookup(). The latter drops lock on rtentry, too.
A Then we do some work and use this la. It may have
David G. Lawrence wrote:
tests. With the re driver, no change except placing a 100BT setup with
no packet loss to a gigE setup (both linksys switches) will cause
serious packet loss at 20Mbps data rates. I have discovered the only
way to get good performance with no packet loss was to
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
I have to disagree. Packet loss is likely according to some of my
tests. With the re driver, no change except placing a 100BT setup with
no packet loss to a gigE setup (both linksys switches) will cause
serious packet loss at 20Mbps
David Gilbert wrote:
During the next week, I will continue testing with full simulated
routing tables, random packets and packets between 350 and 550 bytes
(average ISP out/in packet sizes). I will add to this report then.
If anyone has tuning advice for FreeBSD 5.3, I'd like to hear it.
Three
I've got a strange problem on two of my FreeBSD machines (4.1R and
4.2-STABLE 20001207).
Whenever I try to su to root it (su) just hangs and does not execute
the login. Also when supplying the wrong password after emitting the
message it will just hang and I have to kill it with ^C.
Su'ing to
I'm running a Compaq DL380 under FreeBSD 4.2R. Now the fans all run
on full speed and create quite some noise.
Is there any way of regulating them like with the Insight Manager under
Windoze?
--
Andre
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the
30 matches
Mail list logo
