change the above to:
jail_jailname_parameters="allow.sysvipc=1"
ps: it's not related to 9, stable/8 rc.d/jail has the same new style
jail invocation and hence the same problem.
On 11/04/2012 07:47 PM, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hi,
I've just tried to upgrade a machine running an older 8-stab
Hi,
I've just tried to upgrade a machine running an older 8-stable to
9-stable@r242549M without success.
It runs an apache with mod_fcgid in a jail and the latter can't start
with the error message of:
[Sun Nov 04 16:09:12 2012] [emerg] (78)Function not implemented:
mod_fcgid: Can't create sha
Hi,
I have a Sun X4540 with LSI C1068E based SAS controllers (FW version:
1.27.02.00-IT).
My problem is if one drive starts to fail with read errors, the machine
becomes completely unusable (running stable/9 with ZFS), because -it
seems- ZFS can't see that there are read errors on a device, th
On 02/23/12 21:44, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
I have to ask more information for the controller to Broadcom.
Not sure whether I can get some hint at this moment though. :-(
Is there anything I can do? I ask this because I have to give back this
server very soon.
Given that you also have USB related
On 02/23/12 05:15, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
bge0: mem
0xf6bf-0xf6bf,0xf6be-0xf6be,0xf6bd-0xf6bd irq 32
at device 0.0 on pci3
bge0: CHIP ID 0x05719001; ASIC REV 0x5719; CHIP REV 0x57190; PCI-E
^^
This controller is new one. Probably BCM5719 A1 but no
Hi,
I get this on a recent stable/9 system with uhci support removed from
the kernel config:
da0 at ciss0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device
da0: 135.168MB/s transfers
da0: Command Queueing enabled
da0: 286070MB (585871964 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 65535C)
cd
On 01/05/12 11:37, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
Strange. may be related to some kind of code optimization
As the line juste before is:
saidx =&sav->sah->saidx;
Could you show the value of&sav->sah->saidx ?
And also check if kgdb can print sav->sah->saidx (without the&) ?
Oh sorry, the previ
On 01/04/12 17:31, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
[]
#7 0x809bf779 in ipsec_process_done (m=0xfe000c7c7a00,
isr=0xfe001bf54380) at
/data/usr/src/sys/netipsec/ipsec_output.c:170
Here seems to be the
Hi,
On 01/04/12 15:51, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
I've just upgraded a 8-STABLE box to 9-STABLE (well, just few commits
before it has been tagged as STABLE), which runs from NFS (pxebooted).
It has some IPSec config in ipsec.conf, like this for several boxes:
add 172.28.16.4 172.16
Hi,
I've just upgraded a 8-STABLE box to 9-STABLE (well, just few commits
before it has been tagged as STABLE), which runs from NFS (pxebooted).
It has some IPSec config in ipsec.conf, like this for several boxes:
add 172.28.16.4 172.16.248.2 ah 15704 -A hmac-md5 "asdfgh";
add 17
On 02/10/2011 05:56 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:09:31 +0100
Attila Nagy wrote:
On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB
eg.), but now it happens on
On 01/30/11 12:09, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:38PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 19 January 2011 16:02, Kostik Belousov wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/tmpfs.h.patch
I don't think this is a complete solution but it's a start. If you can,
try it and see
On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB
eg.), but now it happens on 4G machines too:
tmpfs 0B 0B 0B
100%/tmp
FreeBSD
Hi,
I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB eg.),
but now it happens on 4G machines too:
tmpfs 0B 0B 0B 100%
/tmp
FreeBSD builder 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Jan 8
22:11:54 CET 2011
Maybe it's rel
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi everyone,
following the announcement of Pawel Jakub Dawidek (p...@freebsd.org) I am
providing a ZFSv28 testing patch for 8-STABLE.
Link to the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101215.patch.xz
Link to mfsBS
On 01/10/2011 09:57 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 12:52:56PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
[...]
I've finally found the time to read the v28 patch and figured out the
problem: vfs.zfs.l2arc_noprefetch was changed to 1, so it doesn't use
the prefetched data on
On 01/10/2011 10:02 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 12:49:27PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
No, it's not related. One of the disks in the RAIDZ2 pool went bad:
(da4:arcmsr0:0:4:0): READ(6). CDB: 8 0 2 10 10 0
(da4:arcmsr0:0:4:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error
(da4:arcm
On 01/09/2011 01:18 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 12:49:27PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 01/09/2011 10:00 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi everyone,
following the announcement of Pawel Jakub Dawidek (p...@freebsd.org) I am
On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
What I see:
- increased CPU load
- decreased L2 ARC hit rate, decreased SSD (ad[46]), therefore increased
hard disk load (IOPS graph)
...
Any ideas on what could cause these? I haven&#
On 01/09/2011 10:00 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi everyone,
following the announcement of Pawel Jakub Dawidek (p...@freebsd.org) I am
providing a ZFSv28 testing patch for 8-STABLE.
Link to the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi everyone,
following the announcement of Pawel Jakub Dawidek (p...@freebsd.org) I am
providing a ZFSv28 testing patch for 8-STABLE.
Link to the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101215.patch.xz
I've got an I
On 01/03/2011 10:35 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
After four days, the L2 hit rate is still hovering around 10-20
percents (was between 60-90), so I think it's clearly a regression in
the ZFSv28 patch...
And the massive growth in CPU usage can also very nicely be seen...
I've updated the graph
On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
What I see:
- increased CPU load
- decreased L2 ARC hit rate, decreased SSD (ad[46]), therefore increased
hard disk load (IOPS graph)
...
Any ideas on what could cause these? I haven&#
On 01/02/2011 05:06 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/01/2011 13:18, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Link to the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101215.patch.xz
I've
On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
What I see:
- increased CPU load
- decreased L2 ARC hit rate, decreased SSD (ad[46]), therefore increased
hard disk load (IOPS graph)
...
Any ideas on what could cause these? I haven&#
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Link to the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101215.patch.xz
I've used this:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101223-nopython.patch.xz
on a server with amd64, 8 G RAM, acting as
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 05:57:45PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
>
>> Jonathan Feally wrote:
>>
>>> Attila Nagy wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Bingo, this solved the problem. The current uptime nears fou
Jonathan Feally wrote:
> Attila Nagy wrote:
>>>>>> Bingo, this solved the problem. The current uptime nears four days.
>>>>>> Previously I couldn't go further than a day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The machine gets very light TCP
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:21:42PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
>
>> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:57:59PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:57:59PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Michael Loftis wrote:
>>
>>> --On Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:22 PM +0100 Attila Nagy
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> <...>
>>
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 11:39 AM 3/25/2010, Michael Loftis wrote:
>> --On Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:22 PM +0100 Attila Nagy
>> wrote:
>>
>> <...>
>>> Both unbound and python accepts DNS requests, and it seems when 25%
>>> interrupt happens, o
Hi,
Michael Loftis wrote:
>
>
> --On Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:22 PM +0100 Attila Nagy
> wrote:
>
> <...>
>> Both unbound and python accepts DNS requests, and it seems when 25%
>> interrupt happens, only unbound is in *udp state, where it is 50%, both
&g
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 03:22:04PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have some recursive nameservers, running unbound and 7.2-STABLE #0:
>> Wed Sep 2 13:37:17 CEST 2009 on a bunch of HP BL460c machines (bce
>> interfaces)
Hi,
I have some recursive nameservers, running unbound and 7.2-STABLE #0:
Wed Sep 2 13:37:17 CEST 2009 on a bunch of HP BL460c machines (bce
interfaces).
These work OK.
During the process of migrating to 8.x, I've upgraded one of these
machines to 8.0-STABLE #25: Tue Mar 9 18:15:34 CET 201
Hello,
I've also ran into it, it's a pretty "killer" feature. :-O
Any chance for us on the fix?
Thanks,
Kip Macy wrote:
The flags checks are too strict. File a PR. I'll fix it when I get to
it. Sorrry.
-Kip
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Mike Andrews wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Mike
Hello,
I have a strange error on FreeBSD 7-STABLE (compiled on 7th May, just
few commits after the release, but an earlier kernel did the same).
I'm doing several parallel rsyncs from a machine to another (let's call
them source and destination). The source contains maildirs, so there are
so
On 2008.03.28. 23:59, Vince wrote:
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
I have some jails running on ZFS, so I have to mount devfs's into them.
For this purpose, I have some similar lines in /etc/fstab:
devfs /pool/jail/ldap/dev devfs rw 0 0
Where /pool is a ZFS files
Hello,
I have some jails running on ZFS, so I have to mount devfs's into them.
For this purpose, I have some similar lines in /etc/fstab:
devfs /pool/jail/ldap/dev devfs rw 0 0
Where /pool is a ZFS filesystem.
This has worked until today -when I upgraded from a previou
27;s going on in the
kernel, I will gladly provide console (serial) access to a machine which
has two fxp NICs and is connected to a FEC aware switch.
Any takers?
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMA
ses sendfile() to
transfer data (the easiest to try is the webfsd from the ports tree). It
will send garbage, collected from various places from your harddrive.
------
Attila Nagye-mail: [EMAIL PR
atapi_dma sysctl instead.
------
Attila Nagye-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Budapest Polytechnic (BMF.HU) @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
H-1084 Budapest, Tavaszmezo u. 15-17. cell.: +3630 306 6758
To Unsubscr
41 matches
Mail list logo
