Re: Poudriere failed to build pkg in 13-stable jail under 12-stable

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:46:43PM +0800, Thomas Legg wrote: > The build of a 13-stable source and kernel were a success under 12-stable > (though with some issues on freeze-ups and hard reboots that I suspect > might be related to the bufdaemon issue and my 0x15 gen AMD cpu). > > Created a 13-sta

Re: pkg thinks kernel is old

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:07:13PM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:50:57PM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > >> Baptiste Daroussin writes: > >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:57:06PM +0200, Bengt

Re: pkg thinks kernel is old

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:50:57PM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:57:06PM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > >> Baptiste Daroussin writes: > >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:54:15AM +0200, Bengt

Re: pkg thinks kernel is old

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:57:06PM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:54:15AM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > >> Baptiste Daroussin writes: > >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Bengt

Re: pkg thinks kernel is old

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:54:15AM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > >> Baptiste Daroussin writes: > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:44:03PM +0200

Re: pkg thinks kernel is old

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:44:03PM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > >> Ronald Klop writes: > >> > >> > Van: Bengt Ahlgren > >> > Datum: woensda

Re: pkg thinks kernel is old

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:44:03PM +0200, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > Ronald Klop writes: > > > Van: Bengt Ahlgren > > Datum: woensdag, 9 oktober 2019 23:38 > > Aan: sta...@freebsd.org > > Onderwerp: pkg thinks kernel is old > >> > >> I've ran into this on my 11.3-STABLE system: > >> > >> # uname -K

Re: pkg thinks kernel is old

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > This message of pkg is misleading. > > It looks at /bin/sh or something like that for the version. And prints that > as the 'kernel' version. So if you did an incremental build and /bin/sh was > not changed the version stays the same

Re: pkg issue after FreeBSD 11 upgrade

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:07:51AM -0300, Cassiano Peixoto wrote: > Ok I know about HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS, it's a good approach. But how to deal > with when I need to restart a service without upgrading? Reaper > functionnality is a trouble for many administrators who made meta ports to > manage their

Re: pkg issue after FreeBSD 11 upgrade

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:01:30PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi Cassiano, > > > On 30. Aug 2017, at 2:55 PM, Cassiano Peixoto > > wrote: > > > > Why it used to work on FreeBSD 10? It stopped worked on FreeBSD 11 only. > > It was a later 10.x change as far as I know. > > > Is there some

Re: pkg issue after FreeBSD 11 upgrade

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:55:22AM -0300, Cassiano Peixoto wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > Why it used to work on FreeBSD 10? It stopped worked on FreeBSD 11 only. It only worked on FreeBSD 10 prior to 10.2, the reaper functionnality in freebsd kernel appeared in 10.2 > > Cron is just an example, I ma

Re: pkg issue after FreeBSD 11 upgrade

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:00:55AM -0300, Cassiano Peixoto wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Sorry back to this subject. But I really need to restart services with a > port. I'm quite sure there is a bug with pkg and FreeBSD 11. > > I made a simple port to restart cron service: It is not a bug, it is by

Re: 11.1-PRERELEASE, waagent crashes attaching reosurce disc in Azure

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 01:26:46PM +0100, Pete French wrote: > Have upgraded one of my Azure boxes to 11.1-PRERELEASE yesterday, and I > now find the below backtrace from waagent when it tries to attach > the resource disc. It looks as if it is finding 'pass1' as the device, > when it should be fin

Re: mandoc 1.14 on FreeBSD 11.1

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:59:35PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Mar 20, 2017, at 3:53 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > mandoc 1.14 has introduced a new database format (removing the requirement > > for > > sqlite). FreeBS

mandoc 1.14 on FreeBSD 11.1

Hi all, mandoc 1.14 has introduced a new database format (removing the requirement for sqlite). FreeBSD 11.x is having right mandoc 1.13, Given the database format is a technical detail (aka new format will be generated anyway automatically and seamlessly replacing the old database). I think it do

Re: Uppercase RE matching problems in FreeBSD 11

On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 10:20:54PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: > > > Am 06.11.2016 um 22:06 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin : > > > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 09:57:00PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: > >> > >>> Am 06.11.2016 um 12:07 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin

Re: Uppercase RE matching problems in FreeBSD 11

On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 09:57:00PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: > > > Am 06.11.2016 um 12:07 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin : > > > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:23:25PM -0500, Greg Rivers wrote: > >> I happened to run an old script today that uses sed(1) to extract t

Re: Uppercase RE matching problems in FreeBSD 11

On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 01:26:51PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote: > 2016-11-06 12:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Yes A-Z only means uppercase in an ASCII only world in a unicode world > > it means > > AaBb... Z because there are way more characters that simple A-Z. In > &g

Re: Uppercase RE matching problems in FreeBSD 11

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:23:25PM -0500, Greg Rivers wrote: > I happened to run an old script today that uses sed(1) to extract the system > boot time from the kern.boottime sysctl MIB. On 11.0 this no longer works as > expected: > > $ sysctl kern.boottime > kern.boottime: { sec = 1478380714, use

Re: Dying jail

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:09:31PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Hi! > > Recently I've upgraded one of my server running 9.3-STABLE with jail > containing 4.11-STABLE system. > The host was source-upgraded upto 10.3-STABLE first and next to 11.0-STABLE > and jail configuration migrated to /etc/

Re: stable/11 Problems with Unicode character and ls(1) sorting

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:38:22AM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 07/15/16 09:55 AM, Thomas Eberhardt wrote: > > % uname -a > > FreeBSD clarence.ocp.lan 11.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 11.0-BETA1 #0 r302457: Sat Jul > > 9 10:41:40 CEST 2016 > > tho...@clarence.ocp.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64

Re: FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #661 - Still Failing

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:06:50AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 17:20:36 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 04:10:33PM +, jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org wrote: > > > FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #661 - Still Failing: > > &g

Re: FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #661 - Still Failing

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 04:10:33PM +, jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org wrote: > FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #661 - Still Failing: > > Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/661/ > Full change log: > https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/661/chan

Re: [CTF] pkg 1.6.0

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:27:49PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: > On 09/22/2015 03:20, Ranjan1018 . wrote: > > 2015-09-21 23:27 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin : > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We are about to release pkg 1.6.0. pkg-devel has been updated to 1.5.

Re: [CTF] pkg 1.6.0

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:20:28AM +0200, Ranjan1018 . wrote: > 2015-09-21 23:27 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin : > > > Hi all, > > > > We are about to release pkg 1.6.0. pkg-devel has been updated to 1.5.99.13 > > aka > > 1.6.0 rc3 that we hope will become

[CTF] pkg 1.6.0

Hi all, We are about to release pkg 1.6.0. pkg-devel has been updated to 1.5.99.13 aka 1.6.0 rc3 that we hope will become the new pkg 1.6.0 btw the end of the Week (release planned for Saturday 26th of September or no important issues are raised) On the list of changes: - Lots of improvements in

Re: 10.2-RELEASE-p2 lost ability to bootstrap pkg with signature_type="pubkey"

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:21:24AM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: > On Wednesday, 09 September 2015 10:56:20 AM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:14:12AM +0200, Marko Cupać wrote: > > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 23:28:59 +0200 > > > > > > Baptiste D

Re: 10.2-RELEASE-p2 lost ability to bootstrap pkg with signature_type="pubkey"

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:14:12AM +0200, Marko Cupać wrote: > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 23:28:59 +0200 > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 12:38:38PM +0200, Marko Cupać wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just found out that 10.2-RELEASE-p

Re: 10.2-RELEASE-p2 lost ability to bootstrap pkg with signature_type="pubkey"

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 12:38:38PM +0200, Marko Cupać wrote: > Hi, > > I just found out that 10.2-RELEASE-p2 lost ability to bootstrap pkg > with signature_type="pubkey". > > Quick search returns: > https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/1309 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202

Re: regression from previous version of pw

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > On 24-8-2015 16:01, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 03:49:52PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> In the previous version before Bapt upgraded pw(8) I

Re: regression from previous version of pw

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 03:49:52PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Hi, > > In the previous version before Bapt upgraded pw(8) I was allowed to do > pw useradd -V /etc > > Even though the manual page instructed otherwise. > > The new version sticks to the manual page and generates: > pw

Re: pkg clean question

On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:49:33AM -0700, jungle Boogie wrote: > On 3 August 2015 at 09:13, Paul Mather > wrote: > > On Aug 3, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote: > > > >> Amd64, 9.3. Updated few times, packages also. At first I > >> found on laptop that /var directory was at 102%. Using > >>

Re: 10.2-BETA1: pw(8) does not support "pw useradd name -u 0"

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 05:08:19PM +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > > > On 13 Jul 2015, at 19:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:36:28AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 04:57:32PM +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:

Re: 10.2-BETA1: pw(8) does not support "pw useradd name -u 0"

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 05:08:19PM +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > > > On 13 Jul 2015, at 19:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:36:28AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 04:57:32PM +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:

Re: 10.2-BETA1: pw(8) does not support "pw useradd name -u 0"

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:36:28AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 04:57:32PM +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In our system build scripts we have this command: > > > > /usr/sbin/pw -V $d useradd toor -u 0 -g 0 -d /root

Re: 10.2-BETA1: pw(8) does not support "pw useradd name -u 0"

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 04:57:32PM +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > Hi, > > In our system build scripts we have this command: > > /usr/sbin/pw -V $d useradd toor -u 0 -g 0 -d /root -s /bin/sh -c > "Bourne-again Superuser" -g wheel -o > > After 10.2-BETA1, the toor account is being added with UID 1

Re: pkg 1.5.0 is out

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:38:18PM +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > 2015-07-01 13:38 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin : > > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:36:14PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > On 04/21/15 12:34, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > On T

Re: pkg 1.5.0 is out

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:36:14PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 04/21/15 12:34, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:05:00PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released. >

Re: protecting some processes from out-of-swap killer

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 01:31:14PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Hi there colleagues, > > I have stable/10 on a rather big machine (2*8*2 e5 Xeon, 64G RAM, SAS+SSD ZFS > raid10+ZIL+L2ARC) acting as a PostgreSQL server. > > To use such a big resource pool that is mostly idle, I'd deployed po

Re: pkg 1.5.0 is out

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 02:22:15PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > > On 14 апр. 2015 г., at 23:05, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released. > > > > Thank a lot for working on pkg! > > > > > For pkg 1.6.0 among

Re: pkg 1.5.0 is out

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:57:28AM +0100, Big Lebowski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released. > > > > > > Best regards, > > Bapt > > Congratulations to entire pk

pkg 1.5.0 is out

Hi all, Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released. What happened since pkg 1.4.0: - Initial provides/requires support - Lots of new regression tests have been added - Initial support for OS X - Initial support for NetBSD/EdgeBSD - Update most of the bundled third party software has been updated to their

Re: boostrapping pkg and ipv6

On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 10:02:04AM +0200, Marten wrote: > Hi all, > > fyi: > pkg does not honor -4 or such config /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf > http://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/vuln.xml.bz2 > is not reachable over ipv6 > > adding ipv4 addresses in /etc

Re: [jos...@joshualokken.com: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0]

On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:50:01AM -0700, Joshua Lokken wrote: > From: Joshua Lokken > To: freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org > Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:36:56 -0700 > Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 > > On Mar/31 09:03PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, &

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:35:43PM +0100, Big Lebowski wrote: > > > > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with > > the > > bug reports :) > > > > Mine just did something like that: > > foobar# uname -a > FreeB

Re: pkgng cannot fetch from PACKAGESITE with nanobsd.sh in FreeBSD 10.1

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +0200, Zenny wrote: > Hi, > > 1. In order to comply with the pkgng in FreeBSD 10.1, the following changes > were appended to my customized nanobsd.conf: > > customize_cmd cust_NANOBSD_setup > > > > cust_NANOBSD_packages() { > > chroot ${NANO_WORLDDIR} sh -c 'cd

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:21:19AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:03:23 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote > > > Hi all, > > > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > > > .. > > Please test and report as much bugs as yo

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 01:56:38PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 1 Apr 2015, at 05:03, Rui Paulo wrote: > > > > That is expected. WITH_PKG=devel is a make(1) option that only affects > > ports (non-binary pkgs). > > Are you sure? I have it in make.conf on one of my systems where I never

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:48:27AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Excerpt from Baptiste Daroussin: > > - Initial support for OS X > - Initial support for NetBSD/EdjeBSD > > How would pkg-1.5.0 integrate with NetBSD pkgsrc? > > I didn't think there were any plans to

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:19:15PM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 21:03 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > > Hey Baptiste, > > Great work to you and all those invol

[CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

Hi all, We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), Here is what happened since pkg 1.4.0: - pkg has grown with an initial support for provides/requires: this is a naive version but good enough to at least make major upgrade of php safer as well as making pear/pecl maintenance

Re: Troubles with dependencies (file -L is broken?)

On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:09:32AM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to portupgrade my subversion and it keeps trying to install > databases/db42 over already installed version (same version), missing the > shared library dependency. > > Adding some debug into bsd.port.mk, I see:

Re: java (openjdk6) segfaults when built with 9-stable clang

On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:15:25PM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Le Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:05:50 +0200, > Baptiste Daroussin a écrit : > > Hi all, Baptiste, > > > > Hi > > > > > > I recently upgraded my home NAS from 9.1-RELEASE to 9-stable >

Re: java (openjdk6) segfaults when built with 9-stable clang

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:51:00AM +0200, Arnaud Houdelette wrote: > Hi > > I recently upgraded my home NAS from 9.1-RELEASE to 9-stable (r253470 > (9.2-BETA1)) > > I also upgraded my poudriere building jail. Since then, multimedia/xbmc > port fails to build in configure stage : java segfaults

Re: [HEADSUP] New pkg-devel 1.1.0 beta1

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:39:03PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:34:19PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:17:24PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:20:54PM +0200, Bap

Re: [HEADSUP] New pkg-devel 1.1.0 beta1

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:17:24PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:20:54PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > The pkg developement team is proud to announce the new 1.1.0 beta1 release > > of > > pkg. > > > - new experimental

[HEADSUP] New pkg-devel 1.1.0 beta1

- documentation - bug report - feedback - ideas List of people who contributed code: Baptiste Daroussin, Matthew Seaman, Bryan Drewery, Vsevolod Stakhov, Marin Atanasov Nikolov, Alexandre Perrin, Romain Tartière, Julien Laffaye, Glen Barber, John Marino, Alex Kozlov, Roman Naumann, Sofian Brabez

Re: Empty @cwd in some ports

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:13:08PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > I noticed I have a lot of ports which have an empty @cwd line in the > +CONTENTS file (even after reinstalling). > > For example a2ps.. > @comment PKG_FORMAT_REVISION:1.1 > @name a2ps-a4-4.13b_4 > @comment ORIGIN:print/a2ps-a4 > @

Re: Why does poudriere always rebuild nginx and GraphicsMagick13?

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Hi, > > poudriere 2.2 here, running on 9.1-amd64 > > Of the 730-ish ports, whenever I run a build, it always rebuilds the above > two ports. > Even if nothing changed. > > Is there are specific reason for this? > > I don't reall

Re: pkgng and updated packages

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:51:20AM +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Hi, > > I run my own pkgng repo (via poudriere) and it seems to work great. > However, I've got more questions... Glad to hear it works well :) > > - when PHP got updated to 5.3.21 (from 5.3.20), all the other stuff >that de

Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:48:45PM -0600, ajtiM wrote: > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:58:00 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:53:16AM -0600, ajtiM wrote: > > > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:26:19 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Fri, De

Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:53:16AM -0600, ajtiM wrote: > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:26:19 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 09:55:00AM -0600, ajtiM wrote: > > > On Friday 21 December 2012 08:12:49 Walter Hurry wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012

Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:53:16AM -0600, ajtiM wrote: > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:26:19 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 09:55:00AM -0600, ajtiM wrote: > > > On Friday 21 December 2012 08:12:49 Walter Hurry wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012

Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 09:55:00AM -0600, ajtiM wrote: > On Friday 21 December 2012 08:12:49 Walter Hurry wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:40:19 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > I've just finished committing fixes for this problem to the master and > > > release-1.0 branches in Github. If anyon

Re: nullfs changes MFC

On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 12:35:42PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 08/12/2012 05:06 Konstantin Belousov said the following: > > On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 03:58:16AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 03:01:09AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >

Re: nullfs changes MFC

On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 03:01:09AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Hi, > I am going to merge latest batch of the nullfs improvements into > stable/9. This will bring up significant performance enchancements due > to use of the shared locks for lookups if the lower layer supports it, > much bett

Re: pkgng (Was: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?)

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 04:09:53PM -0400, Chris Nehren wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 14:50:22 -0500 , Bryan Drewery wrote: > > FWIW, there is freebsd-update(8) now for binary updating of base, and > > pkgng[1] will allow binary upgrading of packages/ports similar to apt-get. > > > > [1] http://

Re: problem with chpass after recent libutil change

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 06:57:38PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote: > Hi, > > I have some 8-STABLE and 9-STABLE systems which have been upgraded from > sources > csuped on June 3, and I found that I could no more change the shell for toor: > > #chpass -s /bin/csh toor > chpass: entry inconsistent >

Re: problem with chpass after recent libutil change

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 06:57:38PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote: > Hi, > > I have some 8-STABLE and 9-STABLE systems which have been upgraded from > sources > csuped on June 3, and I found that I could no more change the shell for toor: > > #chpass -s /bin/csh toor > chpass: entry inconsistent >

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

> Look at the comment of the maintainer of LibreOffice ... btw I tested and libreoffice is still working as expected. Most of the time the libreoffice failures is from people tuning their system without knowing the impact/risk of doing such, for example building some c++ libraries with g++47 let'

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:55:37PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > On 06/03/12 15:29, Erich wrote: > >> > >> And if a port build is broken then the maintainer needs to fix it, that > >> is the solution. > > Look at the comment of the maintainer of LibreOffice ... LibreOffice is not a small port, I m

Re: dhclient script adjustments

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:47:00AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > Anyone ? > Sorry for mess, I'm working on this to figure out why it does that. Thanks for reporting, regards, Bapt pgp2hdjzuz7zb.pgp Description: PGP signature

shouldn't libarchive be MFCed before release?

Hi all, I'm working on suport xz compressed packages for pkg_install, and libarchive on current supports natively xz compression but seems not having been MFCed (it should have beed two weeks after the 10th of may according to the commit message) I still have 2.7.0 on stable (from yesterday) I se