Re: buildworld fail in stable/11 @r325033 -- r325029?

FWIW - I had a successful build yesterday on stable/11 r325010; I have not tried anything newer yet. Dan David Wolfskill writes: > This is observed on systems (both my laptop & my build machine) running > stable/11 @r325003, after updating sources to r325033: > > ---

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

Andy Farkas writes: > Perhaps you could hack src/tools/tools/whereintheworld/whereintheworld.pl > > -andyf So, I creatd a slightly different build script in perl; kinda works but needs to be optimized: https://github.com/danmack/freebsd-buildtools Basic output looks like

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

Jakub Lach writes: > On the other hand, I'm having tremendous increases in Unixbench scores > comparing to > 11-STABLE in the April (same machine, clang 4 then, clang 5 now) (about > 40%). > > I have never seen something like that, and I'm running Unixbench on -STABLE >

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

Mike Tancsa <m...@sentex.net> writes: > On 10/2/2017 2:34 PM, Dan Mack wrote: >> >> Another significant change in build times this week - not complaining, >> just my observations on build times; same server doing buildworld during >> the various phases of compiler

my build time impact of clang 5.0

Another significant change in build times this week - not complaining, just my observations on build times; same server doing buildworld during the various phases of compiler changes over the last year or so FWIW: |--+--+---+--+---| | Ver

new 'make installworld' warnings

I buildworld / installworld a few times per week. I don't think I've ever seen these messages before: make[1]: "/usr/obj/usr/src/compiler-metadata.mk" line 1: Using cached compiler metadata from build at cow.example.com on Sun May 7 09:13:52 CDT 2017 make[3]:

buildworld build times 10-stable vs. 11-stable

I have a system which builds world, kernel, install, boot, installworld, reboot several times per week. I just noticed that my build times increased from about (just cherry picking a couple build logs): Starting build of FreeBSD SVN [309852] 10.3-STABLE Kernel will be GENERIC

Re: MFC of ZFSv15

___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Dan -- Dan Mack m...@macktronics.com ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing

Re: MFC of ZFSv15

any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Dan -- Dan Mack m...@macktronics.com ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr

Re: MFC of ZFSv15

-i 1 ad7 ad7 has bootcode (zfs) ~/zfs # gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ad8 ad8 has bootcode (zfs) ~/zfs # reboot Dan On Sep 19, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 19/09/2010 17:36:01, Dan Mack wrote: But I should be able to boot my ZFSv14 root pool using

installkernel and nvram.ko on RELENG_6 broken?

I have a custom kernel without nvram defined anywhere, however, make installkernel still attempts to install the module. About 45 days ago, I didn't have this issue. I didn't see anything about this in UPDATING so I thought I would check here. This system is currently running stable

Re: installkernel and nvram.ko on RELENG_6 broken?

I have removed /usr/obj and am going through the whole buildworld/ buildkernel/installkernel process again. There were a bunch of stale files under /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/i386/compile that may be the issue. Dan On Sep 11, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Dan Mack wrote: I have a custom kernel without nvram

Re: 5 to 6

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Randy Bush wrote: for the record, i followed the recipe in UPDATING and it worked. randy Another for the record ... I upgraded my production box from 5.3 to 6.2BETA2 without incident as well. I was surprised that all my services started properly on the first boot

Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out

Thanks for that info. The release engineering page should be updated to reflect this. The last time I looked (yesterday), it read that 5.5 will be out in September 2005. Dan On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:21:31PM -0500, Eriq wrote: I haven't noticed

Re: Machine Replication

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Eli K. Breen wrote: All, Does anyone have a good handle on how to replicate (read: image) a freebsd machine from one machine to an ostensibly similar machine? So far I've used countless variations and combinations of the following: dd (Slow, not usefull if