t; Can anyone explain why this hasn¹t happened yet???
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jack
>
>
>
The new RELEASE has to be uploaded and tested that it works ok with
freebsd-update.
newvers.sh in the releng/10.3/ indicates the proper version.
--
George Kontostanos
---
Once again, do we know if this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198242 has been committed
yet?
--
George Kontostanos
---
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Karli Sjöberg
wrote:
>
> Den 20 maj 2015 9:40 em skrev George Kontostanos :
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Karli Sjöberg
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Den 20 maj 2015 7:50 em skrev Slaw
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>
> Den 20 maj 2015 7:50 em skrev Slawa Olhovchenkov :
> >
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:17:44PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Appologies if that has be
Hello,
Appologies if that has been asked before. I was wondering if the following
bug has been addressed so far:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198242
Thanks
--
George Kontostanos
---
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Trond Endrestøl <
trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:07+0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Trond Endrestøl <
> > trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote:
> >
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Trond Endrestøl <
trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 13:35+0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Trond Endrestøl <
> > trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote:
> >
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Trond Endrestøl <
trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:04+0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013,
ilman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
Yes, it is easier to manage ZFS datasets from the host system but in this
case we are assigning a different jail to each customer. That jail should
be able to receive snapshots. It w
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:53, George Kontostanos wrote:
> >
> > Anybody?
> >
>
> Can you provide your jail configuration? I think 9.2 introduces the new
> /etc/jail.conf functionality and perhaps it somehow it bro
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:26 PM, George Kontostanos wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> With a 9.1 system and the following:
>
> /etc/sysctl.conf:
>
> security.jail.mount_allowed=1
> security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed=1
> security.jail.enforce_statfs=1
>
> zfs set jailed=on Pool
&
MOUNTPOINT
Pool 223K 19.6G31K /Pool
Pool/test1 31K 19.6G31K /Pool/test
After upgrading to 9.2-RC1 the same operation results in:
jail1# zfs create Pool/test2
cannot create 'Pool/test2': permission denied
What am I missing?
Thanks
--
George K
ot; backup complete destroying yesterday snapshot" | sendmail root
zfs destroy -r $snapshot_yesterday
echo "Backup done" | sendmail root
exit 0
else
echo " missing yesterday snapshot aborting, $snapshot_yesterday"
exit 1
fi
--
George Kontostanos
---
http://www.aisecure.net
that I get from clients
that do not feel comfortable staying on a pre release version for so
long.
Thanks
--
George Kontostanos
---
http://www.aisecure.net
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
9.1-RC1 r239708 no issues what so ever.
Can you ping6 each box? How about with their local-link, any results?
--
George Kontostanos
---
http://www.aisecure.net
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 8 Aug, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have a server with a LSI 9240-4i controller configured in JBOD with
>> 4 SATA disks. Running FreeBSD 9.1-Beta1:
>>
>> Relevant dmesg:
>>
>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "George Kontostanos"
>
>
>> You are right, the chip specs say: LSISAS2108 RAID-on-Chip
>>
>> The drives are identified as mfisyspd0, mfisyspd1, etc.
>
>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "George Kontostanos"
>
>>
>>
>> I know. The problem with that controller is that for some reason it
>> doesn't like gpart. I have gnoped the drives directly
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "George Kontostanos"
>
> To: "FreeBSD Stable" ;
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:38 AM
> Subject: Re: LSI 9240-4i 4K alignment
>
>
>
>> A
due to some issue with the driver we've
provided. It will be supported in our upcoming releases which may come
by the end of this year. Please check back on our website during that
time frame for the FreeBSD driver.
Once again please accept my apologies for the inconvenience.
-
--
G
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Works fine for me with 9.0-p3 with the same controller, slight firmware
> differences:
>
> mfi0: 2709 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.120.244-1482
> mfi0: 2710 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 20.10.1-0077
> mfi
with the combination of gnop,
the pool imports fine.
Any suggestions?
--
George Kontostanos
Aicom telecoms ltd
http://www.aisecure.net
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscri
uld let others do the testing
for you. If you plan on moving your environment to 9 at some point in
the future then you have to start your own testing now.
Best Regards,
--
George Kontostanos
Aicom telecoms ltd
http://www.aisecure.net
___
freebsd-stable@fre
ists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
You can not compare 8.2 with 9.0 per ZFS. What problems are you facing
with your swap in 9.0 ?
--
George Kontosta
I don't think that reverting is either an option or a solution at this
point. You can consider filing PRs.
--
George Kontostanos
Aicom telecoms ltd
http://www.aisecure.net
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
o rebuild all the ports is always a good excuse to do it.
For the amount of ports installed on a production server combined with
todays horsepower, a full rebuild doesn't take more than a couple of
hours. On a desktop it is a bit more complicated but it is always a
good opportunity to toss so
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
>> > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
>> >
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> George Kontostanos schreef:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
>>> on 13/01/2012 11:59 Doug Barton said the following:
>>>>
>>>> On 01/13/2012 01:52, George
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/01/2012 11:59 Doug Barton said the following:
>> On 01/13/2012 01:52, George Kontostanos wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:42 PM, George Kontostanos
>>> wrote:
>>>> Greetings all and my apolo
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:42 PM, George Kontostanos
wrote:
> Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting!
>
> There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9
> and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port
> rebuild.
>
> The
!
Regards,
--
George Kontostanos
Aicom telecoms ltd
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 16:24, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> Greetings everyone,
>>
>> I was testing DNSSec resolution on BIND 9.8.1-P1 by adding the
>> following options:
>>
>> options {
>> ...
&g
]: using built-in root key for view _default
Jan 5 02:03:55 hp named[2178]: command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
Jan 5 02:03:55 hp named[2178]: command channel listening on ::1#953
an 5 02:03:55 hp named[2178]: running
Anybody has come across a similar behavior ?
Cheers,
--
George Kontosta
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2011-Dec-23 23:40:10 +0200, George Kontostanos
> wrote:
>>In any case, and IMHO this was not the proper time for this kind of
>>advisories considering the fact that many companies are in a freeze
>>period.
>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
> As others have mentioned, you don't _have_ to patch this weekend. All
> of the vulnerabilities have been [semi-]public knowledge for at least
> a week. What's the harm in waiting till next week? Just pretend like
> the patches came in on Tuesda
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 08:55:35PM +0200, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Matthew Seaman
>> wrote:
>> > On 23/12/2011 18:05, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> >> Are all cvs mi
gt;>
>> you're right, these were discussed on the mailinglists also
>> _but_ FreeBSD is not a distribution
>> It is *a complete operating system*
>> Happy holidays
>
> And the D in BSD is for? ;-)
So, are we done for today with the security advisories ?
I hate t
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 23/12/2011 18:05, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> Are all cvs mirror servers updated regarding these changes ?
>>
>> ANYBODY
>
> Should have by now. Commits usually take about an hour to propagate to
&
ternet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
> Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Are all
nsubscr...@freebsd.org"
To sum up this mess. Are all cvs mirror servers updated regarding this changes ?
Also, I see that FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE is included. Has it been released ?
Regards--
George Kontostanos
Aicom telecoms ltd
http://www.barebsd.com
__
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-12-06 14:11, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>
>> On 06/12/2011 12:51, George Kontostanos wrote:
>>>
>>> I apologize for the noise, I am running 9.0-RC3 since last Sunday but
>>> I haven't seen
I apologize for the noise, I am running 9.0-RC3 since last Sunday but
I haven't seen anything related in svn9-stable. Is it just me perhaps
?
Cheers,
--
George Kontostanos
Aicom telecoms ltd
http://www.barebsd.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebs
IRROR or CONCAT), but
> if your motherboard has at least one SATA port, single modern hard drive may
> give you even higher speeds then stripe of old PATA drives on PCI
> controller.
>
>
> --
> Alexander Motin
> ___
> freebsd-stab
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:27 AM, George Kontostanos
> wrote:
>>
>> Just out of curiosity or confusion maybe..
>>
>> Will those commits be included to FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
&
Just out of curiosity or confusion maybe..
Will those commits be included to FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE ?
Thanks
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
of this.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> CL Martinez
> carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
Regar
ttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
I had the same problem. It was solved by recompiling rubby1-8, and
performing a portsnap fetch extract again.
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 8:30 PM, George Kontostanos
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Ronald Klop
> wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:24:32 +0200, George Kontostanos
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:54 AM, George Kontostanos
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Ronald Klop
wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:24:32 +0200, George Kontostanos
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:54 AM, George Kontostanos
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Matthew Seaman
>>>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:54 AM, George Kontostanos
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
>> On 12/10/2011 11:24, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:12:55 +0300
>>> George Kontostanos wrote:
>>>
>>>>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 11:24, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:12:55 +0300
>> George Kontostanos wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Sergey V. Dyatko
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Sergey V. Dyatko
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:31:12 +0300
> George Kontostanos wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I was wondering if there is any progress regarding the
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149232 .
>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
>
> Nope. But you can just do 'make fetchindex' to get INDEX-9 now.
> Or build your own.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
Yes, I am aware of this however, it creates some inconsistencies.
--
Hi everyone,
I was wondering if there is any progress regarding the
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149232 .
Thanks
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Ronald Klop
wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:36:13 +0200, George Kontostanos
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Today I upgraded one of my servers from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-BETA3. I
>> noticed that after the upgrade portsnap does
ths ago in my desktop PC but I thought that it would be solved by
now.
Am I doing something wrong or is this an expected behavior ?
Thanks
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
cause I can't find anything relevant in HCL and I read
that some people use it without problems.
Thanks
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Christian Baer
wrote:
> On 05.07.2011 17:48, George Kontostanos wrote:
>
>> I am not sure if it is the same controller:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=158268
>
> Sure is. Here from my dmesg:
>
> atapci1: port
>
ap ---
>
> The strange thing is that I wasn't actually accessing ad12 at the time.
> I was running a "-t long" on it, but no more. That test had been running
> for over two hours at the time of the crash.
>
> Does this still somehow point to a power problem (since
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:15 PM, George Kontostanos
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Alexander Sabourenkov
> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Seems like my patch fell off the bus when the ata subsystem was rewamped.
>>
>> The problem is a silicon bug in TX4 A
ot;
>
Thanks for the info!!!
Unfortunately ata-chipset.c doesn't exist in my source tree. Maybe
something has changed and the patch has to be applied differently ?
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailin
Selective self-test flags (0x0):
After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk.
If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:52:39PM +0300, George Kontosta
hris Brennan wrote:
> * George Kontostanos [2011-06-23 00:43:09 +0300]:
>
> > You already mentioned your thought about a faulty card. If you don't have
> to
> > add anything beyond that then please keep it for yourself.
>
> And yet, your still top posting. I was only p
You already mentioned your thought about a faulty card. If you don't have to
add anything beyond that then please keep it for yourself.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * George Kontostanos [2011-06-22 19:58:50 +0300]:
>
> > I have also changed the
I have also changed the SATA port in the controller!
I am afraid that I might get a new controller and still have the same
issues. I just want to eliminate any other options first.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * George Kontostanos [2011-06-22 18:48:45 +0
Forgot to mention, I have changed the SATA cables too.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:52 PM, George Kontostanos
wrote:
> This is the 3rd disk I replace in 3 disk- Raiz1 pool and I really start to
> believe that the problem is somewhere else. The disks reside in a Promise
> PDC40718 SATA300 c
label/zdisk3 ONLINE 0 0 0 (resilvering)
But those errors have started to appear again. Again this is the 3rd disk
replaced !!! Full dmesg attached
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net <http://www.aisecure.net>
Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979
_Filing_Protocol
>
> Regards,
> --
> -Chuck
>
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.or
:
Apr 25 22:08:35 hp kernel: ata4: timeout waiting to issue command
Apr 25 22:08:35 hp kernel: ata4: error issuing SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE
command
.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> George Kontostanos wrote:
> > Please let me know wha
r a long
> time. Mostly because I have no any documentation for them. For the same
> reason I hardly can say what could be wrong there. Some additional
> information is definitely required.
>
> --
> Alexander Motin
>
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net <http://www.aise
s ago might be related.
Thanks
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net <http://www.aisecure.net>
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd
can't boot
>
> What mistake I made?
>
> What best solution with my hardware exist?
>
> --
> Lystopad Olexandr
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>
I think that at this point it takes more than a patch. That is way I am
asking if there is a plan to MFC to 8-Stable.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Leon Meßner
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
> > I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be
I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not.
Regards,
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net <http://www.aisecure.net>
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsub
d be wrong), but userspace memory will, so it is
> guaranteed to be available to userspace processes only.
>
> -Boris
>
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>
that people like having systems that come up quickly after a
> crash, but is it worth reconsidering disabling background fsck by default
> since it can cause issues like this?
>
> --
> Bruce Cran
>
>
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net <http://www.aisecure.net>
_
_
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net <http://www.aisecure.net>
___
Don't use the -j flag when installing your kernel.
make installkernel KERNCONF=VPN2
On 28 Μαρ 2011, at 3:04 μ.μ., Márcio Luciano Donada wrote:
> I am updated on FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 to 8.2-STABLE using cvsup.conf,
> as follows:
>
> *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
> *default base=/usr
> *defa
Hi,
I was wondering if there are any updates regarding
"http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148655"; bug ?
It appears to be sirius since a failure of the first disk makes the system
unbeatable.
Thanks
George___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mail
On Jan 15, 2008 10:25 PM, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:51:13PM +0200, George Kontostanos wrote:
> > So may I guess that we have a release ?
>
> This question happens every time we get near a release.
>
> There will be a release wh
On Jan 15, 2008 10:23 PM, Royce Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Kontostanos wrote, on 1/15/2008 10:51 AM:
> > So may I guess that we have a release ?
> >
> > 6.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE #1: Tue Jan 15 21:25:07 EET 2008
>
> Not quite yet ...
>
So may I guess that we have a release ?
6.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE #1: Tue Jan 15 21:25:07 EET 2008
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECT
Same from here in Greece.
George
On 10/4/07, Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:03:09 -0700
> "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> > Lately I've been finding it difficult, to impossible to reach
> > freebsd.org. (hope this message
And ?
On 12/15/06, Patrick Okui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 15 December 2006 18:33, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
> Will there be a RC2 or just a realease?
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/schedule.html
--
patrick
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
84 matches
Mail list logo
