On 05/09/13 22:42, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
An ugly workaround to complete the jail closure, when relying on jail.conf, is
to:
jail -r $JAILNAME
umount /$LOCATION_OF_JAILS/$JAILNAME/dev || true
The only problem with devfs I'm aware of is it not catching the right
ruleset when starting in the
On 05/09/13 03:17, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
It's not fixed anywhere yet - it sometimes works in current, and
sometimes doesn't. I've been meaning to patch it up, but it the problem
is what I think it is, the patching up is a pretty
On 03/21/13 17:59, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime):
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly
On 03/21/13 18:20, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Jamie Gritton wrote:
On 03/21/13 17:59, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime):
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer
On 02/18/13 09:29, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:26:42AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
On 02/18/13 01:54, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime):
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
like already posted, on 9.1-R
On 02/18/13 01:54, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime):
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and
jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension
On 02/18/13 09:29, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:26:42AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
On 02/18/13 01:54, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
schrieb Jamie Gritton am 16.02.2013 00:40 (localtime):
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
like already posted, on 9.1
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and
jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension!
Accidentally I saw that devfs_ruleset seems to be ignored.
If I list /dev/ I see all the hosts disk devices etc.
I
On 02/12/13 07:47, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and jail.conf
capabilities. Thanks for that extension!
But I have one problem: If I want to stop a jail with 'jaill -r
jailname', I get umount: unmount of /.jail.jailname failed: Device busy
On 05/31/12 07:56, Serg R wrote:
At system startup, a message:
Starting jails: cannot start jail test:
-1
# /etc/rc.d/jail start
Starts jail successfully.
# ee /var/run/jail_test.id
Setting hostname: test.
# /etc/rc.d/jail stop
Stopping jails: test
# jls
JID IP Address Hostname
On 05/24/12 16:30, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:20:15PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 00:13 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:06:50PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 23:22 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24,
On 05/24/12 16:30, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:20:15PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 00:13 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:06:50PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 23:22 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24,
On 05/24/12 16:59, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:46:52PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
I'll get the patch to jail(8) in - thanks for catching that. But I
wonder about the patch to /etc/rc.d/jail. It looks correct, but I'm
going to see if it's /etc/rc.d/jail that needs changing
On 05/24/12 19:23, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:47:30PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
On 05/24/12 16:59, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:46:52PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
I'll get the patch to jail(8) in - thanks for catching that. But I
wonder about
On 01/19/12 16:08, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 19. Jan 2012, at 22:33 , Philipp Huebner wrote:
On 19/01/12 18:22, Denny Schierz wrote:
hi,
Am 18.01.2012 um 23:21 schrieb Philipp Huebner:
I use 9.0.0 release for host and jail and a generic kernel with
OPTIONS VIMAGE being the only
On 08/20/11 19:19, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org
on 20/08/2011 23:24 Steven Hartland said the following:
- Original Message - From: Steven Hartland
Looking through the code I believe I may have noticed a scenario
which could
On 08/21/11 05:01, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jamie Gritton ja...@freebsd.org
The problem isn't with the conditional locking of tpr in prison_deref.
That locking is actually correct, and there's no race condition.
Are you sure? I do think that unlocking the mtx
Rick Macklem wrote:
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Jamie Gritton wrote:
It seems to be NFS related. I think the null pointer in question is
from the export's anonymous credential. Try the patch below and see
if it helps (which I guess means run it overnight
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
All,
I just got this overnight on my server:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address= 0x90
fault code= supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer= 0x20:0xc05ba39d
stack pointer= 0x28:0xf31077bc
frame
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:06:34PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jamie Gritton wrote:
Michael Butler wrote:
i...@aaron:/home/imb sudo jexec 5 tcsh
jexec: Unable to parse jail ID
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:28:05AM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:06:34PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jamie Gritton wrote
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:50:15AM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
All true - and I'll add the check you mention to my patch.
But what about the malloc case? Is it equally valid to say that errno
should not be set when no error occurred? Or are non-syscall libc
functions
Michael Butler wrote:
After a clean rebuild ('rm -rf /usr/obj/*') ..
i...@aaron:/home/imb uname -a
FreeBSD aaron.protected-networks.net 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #0:
Sat Jul 25 05:39:55 EDT 2009
i...@aaron:/home/imb jls
JID IP Address Hostname Path
[ .. ]
23 matches
Mail list logo
