Re: RELENG_4_3 calls itself -RELEASE?

2001-08-03 Thread Jamie Norwood
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:00:49AM -0400, Antoine Beaupre (LMC) wrote: > Go for RUTABAGA. It's cute. > > Besides, Debian does it and everybody likes it. It allows us to pick > names in honor of dead people. Yay. ;) I like this, and vote for -POUL for this branch, to forever pay homage to a rec

Boot oddness

2001-08-01 Thread Jamie Norwood
So I installed FreeBSD to be duaql boot with WinME; WinME is on disk 1, a 30G drive, FreeBSD on 2, another 30G drive. All went well in install, but when I boot, I have problems. When I get to the promtp for loading an OS, I have the choices of F1 for the OS on the drive, GF5 to change drives. F5

Re: Problems with mergemaster

2001-06-13 Thread Jamie Norwood
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:31:25AM -0600, Darren Gamble wrote: > Good day, > > For each file, I get > >*** Problem installing ./foo , it will remain to merge by hand > I got this too, and ignored it. They merged fine for me, which would be why it ignored them subsequently. Jamie To Unsub

fxp drivers

2001-05-21 Thread Jamie Norwood
Just wondering, for those of you who have older fxp cards and were having problems with the new drivers, have they been fixed yet? I run an old fxp and need to update my machine, but am not willing to until I am certain it will still work afterwards. The machine is remote and if the card doesn't c

Re: Administrative tag a possibility?

2001-05-17 Thread Jamie Norwood
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:43:27AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > That seems a little dangerous - perhaps some of the files will have > md5 appearing in other lines for other reasons, and that would mess > up this simple grep. Perhaps a more complicated tag in the file would > be mor

Re: which branch?

2000-03-16 Thread Jamie Norwood
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 11:58:32AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Oleg Ogurok wrote: > > > > > Does 4.0-STABLE exists? > > Yes. Of course since the 4.x branch has only just been born, there are > likely to be some problems worked out over the course of the next few > weeks,

Re: which branch?

2000-03-16 Thread Jamie Norwood
0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Jamie Norwood wrote: > > > -STABLE is supposed to be safe to put on a server. If 4.x is .not. yet > > safe... Why is it in -STABLE? This kinda bugs me as it fairly well defeats > > the point of having a -STABLE if it isn't,

Re: XF86 on-the-fly color depth change

2000-02-06 Thread Jamie Norwood
Well, it's not on-the-fly like you want, but one way is, when loading X, to specify the color depth, via: xstart -- -bpp XX Where XX is the desired depth. Jamie On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 06:20:58PM -0700, Jason Barnes wrote: > > Stabilizers: > > I find that I have to keep two /etc/XF86Co

Re: Odd DoS

2000-01-28 Thread Jamie Norwood
Whops! My bad. *hangs head in shame* Hee. S'what I get for posting a half hour before my last shift of the week ends. Didn't read far enough. But I bet, still, that what I said is what he was thinking. ;) Jamie On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 06:33:09AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > Not on epX i

Re: Odd DoS

2000-01-28 Thread Jamie Norwood
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 06:11:08AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > #ifconfig_ep1_alias0="inet 194.134.130.170 194.134.128.1 netmask > > 255.255.252.0" > > The above won't even parse correctly by ifconfig, 2 ip's and > again, is this network SUPERNETTED? Or is the netmask suppose to > actu