Stefan Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It might be easier for you to just use the java/diablo-jdk15 port, which
installs precompiled binaries.
Although I have, with the much appreciated help from people here,
successfully installed the jdk15 port in between, I thought about
diablo-jdk15, too.
On 07. Mrz 2007, at 8:12, Tom Samplonius wrote:
There are some license restrictions on distribution of jdk
binaries. In order to be distributable, jdk binaries need to pass
Sun's test suite (TCK). So the Diablo binary passes, and is
distributation. The port, is just source, and does
Juergen Nickelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:22:44AM -0500, Sam Baskinger wrote:
I'm assuming that you installed linux compatibility and then the
linux-jdk 1.4? I failed to do that and saw a very similar error a while
back. :)
That may well be the case. I
Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You could also install the native diablo-jdk15 port instead of a Linux
one.
I was installing the native port /usr/ports/java/jdk15, only it
needs the Linux JDK 1.4.2 to compile the Java sources.
But indeed I was ignorant of the diablo port. What is the
On Feb 27 2007, Chris Timmons wrote:
Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs
mounted. I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4
which cleared up fine after I remembered about linprocfs.
linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
Hm. I
didn't really look close. Thanks for the hint!
I'll report back later.
Regards, Juergen.
[...]
Juergen Nickelsen wrote:
Hello,
on a more or less newly installed machine with 5.5-STABLE (updated
recently) I tried to install JDK 1.5 via /usr/ports/. After
retrieving all necessary files
Hello,
on a more or less newly installed machine with 5.5-STABLE (updated
recently) I tried to install JDK 1.5 via /usr/ports/. After
retrieving all necessary files, the build failed quite mysteriously,
even more so as I had succeeded with another machine fine last year.
In the build protocol
