Re: table with bug in ipfw

Hi! > This one was fixed in r266310 (based on bin/189471) but I haven't > merged it to -stable. Because it changes ip_fw.h, would it break KABI or ABI ? Would that prevent a merge to 10.2 ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! _

Re: table with bug in ipfw

Hi! > Do you have a problem report for this in bugzilla ? I try to poke re@ Found it: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200169 -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! ___ freebsd-stable@free

Re: table with bug in ipfw

Hi! > Bug persists. > > (root@mail)[/usr/src]# ipfw table 22 list > > (root@mail)[/usr/src]# ipfw table 22 add 0.0.0.0/8 > (root@mail)[/usr/src]# ipfw table 22 list > ::/8 0 Do you have a problem report for this in bugzilla ? I try to poke re@ -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: problem with geli and LSI controller

Hello, > Replying to myself again, it appears that the safest way is to get a > Rocket Raid controller identical to the one we had, put it in another > system, connect the disks, import the old pool and move the data to the > new pool on the the LSI controller. > > Am I overlooking anything? No,

Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?

Hi! > You kernel hasn't been rebuilt then. Yes, but normally, freebsd-update provides me with an updated kernel. The update provides (among other stuff): /boot/kernel/zfs.ko /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols /lib/libzpool.so.2 so it does not touch the value uname reports until a new kernel is built.

Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?

Hi! I see the same: uname says: 10.1p10 > What does the following say when run from your source directory: > > grep BRANCH sys/conf/newvers.sh BRANCH="RELEASE-p11" -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! _

Re: msk msk0 watchdog timeout freeze hang lock stop problem

Hi! > I've run in to problems using the msk device [...] > I'm working on 10.1-RELEASE source, i.e. if_msk.c revision 262524 and > if_mskreg.h revision 264442. > > Here's the patch to if_mskreg.h [...] Thanks for the suggested fix. There are five PRs, all describe similar things: https://bug

Re: Problems with openssl 1.0.2 update

Hi! > we experiencing a problem after upgrading the openssl port to openssl > 1.0.2. I have 1.0.2 installed on my testbox. vi works fine. > /usr/bin/vi started to crash after some seconds with segfault. Do you have a coredump ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: There has to be a better way of merging /etc during a major freebsd-update

Hi! > This flag to mergemaster saved a lot of work when I did > upgrades the old way, with cvsup and the make steps and > then mergemaster: > " > # Install the new file if it differs only by VCS Id ($FreeBSD) > FREEBSD_ID=yes > " > Is there some equivalent to this flag in freebsd-update/merge? >

Re: Interpreting MCA error output

Hi! Approx. two years ago there was a thread on -stable about MCA output. See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-October/064083.html for a post from Jeremy Chadwick with a link to a AMD paper on that topic ? http://www.amd.com/us/Documents/47644A_ecc_embedded.pdf which is

Re: bin/152154: script(1) -k malfunctions with certain shells (e.g. tcsh, bash, zsh)

Hi! > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/152154 > > It has been suggested to me (by a committer) that I should raise the > issue of this PR here on these lists, because the problem described > within the PR remains a real problem, and despite my having proposed > something that seems

Re: 9.1-Stable rc.conf ifconfig IPv6

Hi! > Try: > > ipv6_enable="YES" > > in rc.conf first. > > > It is not working even I put lo0 instead of alc0. On my laptop with alc0 I have 9.0 i386 FreeBSD, and no ipv6_enable. It still worked ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 7 years to go ! ___

ethtool-like utility for FreeBSD ?

Hi! There is a posting public about Intel ethernet adapters and their packets of death: http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html Now, how can we test the EEPROM from FreeBSD, similar to the ethtool of Linux ? Thanks for any pointer! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: Upgrade to 9.1 failing

Hi! > Today, I was trying to upgrade a 7.0-rel box to 9.1 with freebsd-update, > and I get : [...] > The update metadata is correctly signed, but > failed an integrity check. > Cowardly refusing to proceed any further. You can not upgrade from 7.0 to 9.1 directly. Use two intermediate steps, 7.4

Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?

Hi! > > The last few years it was always shortly after x-mas 8-} > > Christmas comes early this year: there hasn't been an official announce- > ment yet So, as every year: be patient, wait for the official release announcement, it still might change due to some last-minute bug. -- p...@opsec.e

Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?

Hello, > For the future, I also suggest not to make a timeline or a public > schedule at all. That seems to be a very bad idea, it will invite the usual freebsd-is-dead crowd. > It will stop people from making assumptions and plans for their > rollouts that more often than not just turn out to b

Re: smartctl question

Hi! > Still smartctl -a displays a value of 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count I reckon > to be way too high, though ( > 3900 ) . > So is this value now including errors from previous broken cable ? > In other words, when, if at all, is the cache smartmontools read from > flushed and values are to be take

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness?

Hi! > >Oh - will were be an 8.4 release? That would be interesting. > > I'd like to see a trend toward more point versions of FreeBSD. > Particularly in 9.x, because it incorporates most of the items that > have been on people's wish lists. 4.11 was one of the most robust > and stable releases

Re: Thinkpad X61s cannot boot 9.1-BETA1

Hi! > On our X61s's setting 'debug.acpi.disabled="hostres"' does not change > the inability to boot 9-BETA1, 9-RC1 or -current. I tested 9.1-RC1 on X61, and it worked without any troubles. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go ! _

Re: Experience with Intel SATA and fbsd 8.3-amd64 ?

Hi! > Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > I have a problem with some host: If I put heavy IO load on that > > system, write errors happen, and then it crashes. > > What kind of write errors, exactly? What messages do you > get on the console? g_vfs_done():ada0s1f[WRITE(offset=5

Re: Experience with Intel SATA and fbsd 8.3-amd64 ?

Hi! > I don't have the same controller, but we've seen problems with other intel > AHCI controllers and the new AHCI driver. Could you try running with old > ATA driver instead of ahci driver? Same problem. I'll try a different controller, arrived today 8-) -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171

Experience with Intel SATA and fbsd 8.3-amd64 ?

Hi! I have a problem with some host: If I put heavy IO load on that system, write errors happen, and then it crashes. CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU 540 @ 3.07GHz RAM: 8 GB RAM with the following SATA controller: OS: 8.3-REL amd64 Board (from dmidecode): Manufacturer: Intel Corpor

Re: Netflix's New Peering Appliance Uses FreeBSD

Hi! > I didn't see a link to this information in the e-mail below. I found this > info > detailed here: > > > https://signup.netflix.com/openconnect/software If you come from an IP range outside of netflix' footprint, that page is not available. But have a look at that PDF, comes from thei

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

Hi! > For example if one wants an e-mail server, that is better > served in the long run by IMAP+MTA than any form of Exchange, because > you are not tied to one single platform and that vendor's lunacy. In the field, many customers are drawn into the world of Exchange and related technologies

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

Hi! > The point he made was actually not a matter of people not reading > UPDATING but that UPDATING is oftentimes not updated until after > the disruptive/potentially dangerous change has already hit the > ports tree. > > I'm not sure what the solution is for the end user. We have our reference

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

Hi! > I think another thread with the specified subject '"Why Are You NOT Using > FreeBSD ?" may be useful : - Exchange (MAPI) and its groupware functionality I'm eager to test any replacement that will pop up in the ports 8-) - Windows Terminalserver functionality - Telephony (ISDN to SIP ga

Re: Restricting users from certain privileges

Hi! > > > Please do study sudo real power :-) > > > It can give selective privileges per-command, [...] > > Just make sure none of the permitted commands has got the > > feature of starting a shell ;-)) > > Right, think of vi(1), less(1), et al. Even this aspect is taken care of with sudo (at le

Re: Too many open files

Hi! > >>> > > lsof -n | awk '{print $2 "\t" $1}' | sort | uniq -c | sort > > On my system, it shows interesting numbers for firefox-instances: [...] > Does 'procstat -fa' give better results for you? Yes, much better. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years

Re: Too many open files

Hi! > > From knowing that you have too many files open you can increase the > > maxfile numbers - but if you want to know what uses them try this - > > > > lsof -n | awk '{print $2 "\t" $1}' | sort | uniq -c | sort On my system, it shows interesting numbers for firefox-instances: 3895 4150

Re: fbsd 8.2, L2TP over IPsec and pf ?

Hi! > I'm building a setup for incoming L2TP over IPsec connections > using FreeBSD 8.2-REL. > > IPsec based on ports/security/ipsec-tools, the l2tp part > works from net/mpd5/. > > If I disable the PF rules, everything works. > > If I enable the PF rules, the IPsec connection still comes up, >

fbsd 8.2, L2TP over IPsec and pf ?

Hello, I'm building a setup for incoming L2TP over IPsec connections using FreeBSD 8.2-REL. IPsec based on ports/security/ipsec-tools, the l2tp part works from net/mpd5/. If I disable the PF rules, everything works. If I enable the PF rules, the IPsec connection still comes up, but the L2TP req

Re: Running portupgrade from cron (was: /usr/bin/script eating 100% cpu with portupgrade and xargs)

Hi! > Worst of all, you're running portupgrade from cron without > reading UPDATING, which is just asking for trouble. > >>> What specifically is your concern here? > Yes, but updating correctly in first place is better than trying to > understand what happened to software looking for

Re: SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller ?

Hi! > > What kind of SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller is currently suggested > > for use in 8/9 setups with large RAM (64G) setups with ZFS ? > SuperMicro AOC-USAS2-L8i > > PCIe controller with 2 multi-lane connectors (SFF-1087) supporting 8 > SAS/SATA ports. Supports two firmwares: > IR mo

SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller ?

Hi! What kind of SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller is currently suggested for use in 8/9 setups with large RAM (64G) setups with ZFS ? Thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go ! ___ freebsd-stable@free

Re: commit PR 154469, ftp-proxy(8) bug ?

Hi! > > Can someone have a look at > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=154469 > > > > and commit it ? So that it ends up in 8.3 8-} ? > > Does the patch from OpenBSD fix the problem for you? Yes, sure. That why I sent the pr! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

commit PR 154469, ftp-proxy(8) bug ?

Hi! Can someone have a look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=154469 and commit it ? So that it ends up in 8.3 8-} ? Thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go ! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.o

Re: Filesystem strangeness

Hi! > On a FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE i386 (GENERIC kernel): [...] > /dev/ad4s1e 101554150 3143488157741142862 -3143488157647713044 3364544879817% >/usr > The last reboot did not do any fsck, smartctl does not complain. > So, what can I do to fix this ? The last reboot *did* indeed fsck, sorry for

Filesystem strangeness

Hi! On a FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE i386 (GENERIC kernel): # cd /usr/src/sys/boot/efi/libefi/ # ls -l ls: efinet.c: Bad file descriptor total 38 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 461 Oct 25 2009 Makefile -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1777 Oct 25 2009 delay.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2682 Oct 25 2009 efi_con

Re: 3TB disc and block alignment

Hi! > > Basically, I did this: > > > gpart create -s gpt ad7 > > newfs /dev/ad7 > > Wow! Don't do it. It may hurt. ;-) Why may it hurt ? How may it hurt ? Which sector is written to by this 'gpart' command ? As far as I understand, GPT writes some stuff at the beginning and the end of the hard

Re: 3TB disc and block alignment

Hi! > > # glabel status > > Name Status Components > > ufsid/4d62938756e96a72 N/A ad7 > > > If I use gpart, does this somehow imply glabel ? > > I'm not an expert at gpart(8). But my gparted disks have geom labels for > partitions but not for disks: Interesting. > Can

Re: 3TB disc and block alignment

Hi! > > > > Feb 17 22:15:44 vserv1 kernel: GEOM: ufsid/4d5d8faa10b63ac1: using the > > > > primary only -- recovery suggested. > > > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > It may be the case here if you to used glabel(8) to create a label > > > for the whole disk. > > > I did not use glabel on that disk.

Re: 3TB disc and block alignment

Hi! > > Hmm, wasn't the issues with 3T drives, that they internally use > > 4K blocks and emulate 512 and that therefore 8 block alignments > > are an performance issue ? > > > The reason I'm asking: I encounter the problem of the lost > > secondary GPT table: > > > Feb 17 22:15:44 vserv1 kernel

Re: 3TB disc and block alignment

Hi! > > According to Hitachi, this is an 512b drive. > > Correct. This isn't a 4k drive. Datasheet: > > http://www.hgst.com/internal-drives/enterprise/ultrastar/ultrastar-7k3000 Hmm, wasn't the issues with 3T drives, that they internally use 4K blocks and emulate 512 and that therefore 8 bloc

Re: 3TB disc and block alignment

Hi! Edho P Arief wrote: > > I have one of the new 3TB drives: > > > > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device > > da0: 2861588MB (5860533168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 364801C) > > > > Now as far as I understand, one can operate it with many 512byte blocks > > or one can try to use the internal

3TB disc and block alignment

Hi! I have one of the new 3TB drives: da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da0: 2861588MB (5860533168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 364801C) Now as far as I understand, one can operate it with many 512byte blocks or one can try to use the internal 4kbyte blocks. How would one do that with Fre

Intel em, SFPs and DDM ?

Hi! Does anyone know how to read SFP DDM values using Intel em cards ? SFP means Small Form Factor Pluggable fiber transceivers. DDM is Digital Diagnostics Monitoring http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_form-factor_pluggable_transceiver#Digital_Diagnostics_Monitoring There seems to be a way to r

Re: MSIX failure

Hi! > > Basically, when the securelevel is positive, the kernel restricts > > certain tasks; not even the superuser (i.e., root) is allowed to > > do them. > OH YUCK, another root isn't really root, so is it also possibly > the reason for the MSIX failure?? Is this pile, er feature, on by default

Re: MSIX failure

Hi! > > > Is this within a jail or something else along those lines? I can't > > > reproduce the problem otherwise. Frustrating! Someone else on the list > > > might have ideas as to what could cause this. > > > > Nope, this's a normal host. I've got securelevel on 1, but doubt that > > would

Re: MSIX failure

Hi! > > Is this within a jail or something else along those lines? I can't > > reproduce the problem otherwise. Frustrating! Someone else on the list > > might have ideas as to what could cause this. > > Nope, this's a normal host. I've got securelevel on 1, but doubt that > would affect this?

Re: 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem

Hi! > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148112 > > Ok. I've taken ownership of that PR. I can't guarantee I'll get to it > any time soon (I have other ath related work to get into -HEAD and > tested before I look at the AR928x support) but I'll eventually get > there. Cool. I can prov

Re: 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem

Hi! > On 28 July 2010 05:06, Troye Johnson wrote: > > ar9285 driver gives exception message in /var/log/messages: kernel > > ath0 bb hang detected, resetting. I dont know what it means. The > > driver compiles good and I just got sources from cvs server branch > > RELENG_8_1. What is the meaning

Re: 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem

Hi! > Can you show me your config files: rc.conf, /boot/loader.conf, > wpa_supplicant.conf. I just want to see just to make sure I'm not doing it > wrong. I use the stuff in a different way (mostly manually). For example: Step 1) ifconfig wlan0 up Wait a little and check: ifconfig wlan0 list

Re: 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem

Hi! > well i just patched recompiled. Its evwn worse now. Now the > var,log,messages log is even more flooded with the said messages. Sorry for the late answer, I was on the road the last few days. While there are many messages, the adapter itself seems to work, as I used it a little bit. As the

Re: 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem

Hi! > UPDATE: Oh, one more thing. Upon loading the ath driver a couple of days ago > I got a kernel panic and freeze. It panicked and then the system froze. The > driver can scan for access points and associates to the AP, but then the > kernl delivers the message in /var/log/message ("kernel: ath

Re: if_em problems, both 7 and 8-stable

Hi! > We are trying to use an intel platform as a router; this is a > show-stopper. I could try linux though I prefer not to... We use Intel if_em with vlan interfaces on FreeBSD based routers, both with i386, amd64, FreeBSD 6.x, 7.x, 8.x, on many different boards and CPUs with good results for

Re: Trouble with drive size detection - 31MB visible size on 1TB drive.

Hi! > What is HPA? Why drive locks HPA? And... Can I unlock HPA from FreeBSD? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host_protected_area http://matt.simerson.net/2009/07/22/hpa-host-protected-area -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137211 years to go ! ___

freebsd update for 8.0-REL-p1 ?

Hi! Now that the rtld patch is available, how do I upgrade using freebsd-update ? freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE-p1 upgrade says: [...] Fetching metadata signature for 8.0-RELEASE-p1 from update4.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 8.0-RELEASE-p1 from update5.FreeBSD.org...

route(8) and show/sticky/... Re: 8.0-RELEASE completed...

Hi! > Just a quick note in case there are people here who aren't subscribed to > the freebsd-announce@ mailing list. > > We have completed the 8.0-RELEASE cycle. Details about the release are > available from the main web site, in particular the announcement itself > is available here: > > ht

Re: FreeBSD and SATA Port Multipliers

Hello, > A somewhat related diversion: > http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage/ And the quite reasonable Sun answer to that: http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5899-Some-perspective-to-this-DIY-storage-server-mentioned-at-Storagemojo.html http

Re: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b

Hi! > My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64. I now tested 8.0-RC1 and it works now, very nice! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137211 years to go ! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o

Re: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b

Hi! > > I had the same problem with beta4: [...] My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64. I now tested with 8.0-beta3-i386, this time installation and partitioning worked. I'll try to partition using a i386 boot cd and install using the amd64 boot cd 8-) It seems to be a bug with the amd64

Re: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b

Hi! > I had the same problem with beta4: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-September/011470.html > > and I tried this fix, and it did not solve the problem. > > It might be related with the number of slices and partitions one > is creating ? I'll try this again today.

Re: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b

Hello, > > Did not find anything from current, but found the same problem > > has been reported in earlier releases in those archives, and the > > latest was May 2009: > > Try this (for the fix) : > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-September/011254.html I had t

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

Hi! > > I thought coretemp had be modified in HEAD to support Phenoms but I > > can't find any evidence of that in SVN so I am not sure what I am > > thinking.. > > How about 'k8temp'? /usr/ports/sysutils/k8temp This works, very nice! Thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

Hi! > > Any information on what can be done with AMD CPUs with respect > > to temperature monitoring ? > > amdtemp(4) ? :-) home$ man amdtemp No manual entry for amdtemp It's on 8.0-BETA4, but I have no amd64 running with that, yet. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

Hi! [on coretemp module, Alexander Motin wrote:] > AFAIR C2D supports three protection technologies. When CPU is hot, it > starts reducing frequency (multiplier) and voltage, alike to IEST. If it > is insufficient, it starts to skip core cycles, alike to TCC. If it is > still insufficient and tem

Re: Broadcom BCM5784M Support ?

Hello, > > Can anyone point me to patches to support this broadcom device on > > fbsd 7.2 ? > > > > no...@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x11651734 > > chip=0x169814e4 rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > > class = network > > subclass = ethernet > > > > Wh

Broadcom BCM5784M Support ?

Hi! Can anyone point me to patches to support this broadcom device on fbsd 7.2 ? no...@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x11651734 chip=0x169814e4 rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' class = network subclass = ethernet What would be required to get this

zdb core (same problem?)

Hi! > Adding to rw_init looks fine, but I'd rather find out why owner isn't > NULL when the calling convention expects it. Getting a backtrace from > where the assert is hit would be helpful. I have another zdb mypool crash on a 7.2-STABLE. f7# zpool history mypool History for 'mypool': 2009-0

Re: I've borked my ZFS system upgrading to -STABLE

Hello, > I can boot the box using alternate media, but I can't figure out the > procedure to mount the ZFS pool into the filesystem. Either mount -t zfs tank/foo /foo or zfs mount mypool -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137211 years to go ! _

Re: inetd and freebsd service jail

Hi! > > I have a jail for pureftpd service, > > it is possible that inetd from the main system launch FTP server > > inside the jail? > > No, it's not possible. I have to correct myself here. > The reason: > > When your client connects to the IP of the jail, > inetd.conf running on the main sy

Re: inetd and freebsd service jail

Hi! > I have a jail for pureftpd service, > it is possible that inetd from the main system launch FTP server > inside the jail? No, it's not possible. The reason: When your client connects to the IP of the jail, inetd.conf running on the main system can start some jexec /usr/libexec/ftpd ...

Re: recovering from the 6.3 xorg mess

Hi! > > > I'd appreciate suggestions on how to get a working xorg from the mess 6.3 > > > shipped with. [...] > > Basically, the problem is with the matrox board. > I have run the Matrox G550 under both 6 and 7. I had some problems, but > not too many. I do need to use xrandr to set up the prop

Re: recovering from the 6.3 xorg mess

Hi! > I'd appreciate suggestions on how to get a working xorg from the mess 6.3 > shipped with. I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2 and have never had much > trouble with it until the 6 branch was released. My hardware is pretty > generic Intel brand D865 motherboard, matrox g550 video. I don't c

PAUSE support for Ethernet interfaces ?

Hi! I'm researching the topic of PAUSE counters (receiving side) for FreeBSD systems. That's a sort of flow control with ethernet, see e.g.: http://www.techfest.com/networking/lan/ethernet3.htm#3.2.1 Cisco switches seem to receive and count them, which helps to find short-term (seconds) overloa

Re: Can't delete IPV6 addresses with ifconfig

Hi! > > Put ipv6_enable="YES" into your /etc/rc.conf > > Yeah but I need to reboot to have it work it's magic.. > > I'd like to know what goes on behind the mask. It works like this: If ipv6_enable="YES", then you have a "true" from /etc/network.subr:ipv6if(), which is used in /etc/rc.d/auto_l

ipfwpcap in 6.3 ?

Hi! In http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.3R/relnotes-i386.html ipfwpcap(8) is mentioned, but I can't find it after the upgrade ? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]+49 171 310137212 years to go ! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org m

Re: recovery FreeBSD

Hi! > >>only from backup. > >Or from a snapshot ? > >(if it's a UFS2 partition, and "snapshooting" has been enabled) > What does rm -W do? As the manual says: -W Attempt to undelete the named files. Currently, this option can only be used to recover files covere

Re: Unionfs patchset p19 commit?

Hi! > >>I have a big hope to get merged into FreeBSD until > >>7-RELEASE. Progress is step by step slowly, but going > >>forward absolutely. If you have interest in unionfs > >>improvements, push your passion to re@ and fs@ committers ;-) > > > >Did you have a chance to look into this ? > > > >ht

Patch for FreeBSD 6.2 fstat(1) to support unionfs (at least a little bit)

Hi! fstat(1) from FreeBSD 6.2 can not display information about files which reside in a unionfs[1], as can be seen in this example[2]: USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W pi less 31028 root - - ?(unionfs)- pi less 31028 wd -

Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied?

Hi! [on a bikeshed:] > >3. Actual errors *will* be reported, and *will be read* if I don't > >have to delete thousands of non-errors. > > Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script > (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for > expected messages, noting

Re: unionfs6-p19-20070504 and devfs on a very recent 6.2-STABLE

Hi! > I'm using unionfs on a recently (approx. 5 days ago) cvsup'ed > 6.2-STABLE with the > > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p19-20070504.diff > > patch and have a problem with devfs mounted over unionfs. Going back to the most recent stable without unionfs6-p19-20070504 wor

unionfs6-p19-20070504 and devfs on a very recent 6.2-STABLE

Hello, I'm using unionfs on a recently (approx. 5 days ago) cvsup'ed 6.2-STABLE with the http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p19-20070504.diff patch and have a problem with devfs mounted over unionfs. I made a testsetup in March where I used a 6.2-STABLE at that time without addi

Re: local/rc.d/* executed twice

Hi! > after upgrading 3 machines, i noticed that /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* scipts get > exectued twice. > does anyone have a fix for it ? The reason is: /etc/defaults/rc.conf contains local_startup="/usr/local/etc/rc.d /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d" # startup script dirs. To fix it, add a line to /etc/rc.

Sequence of packet processing with ipfw, pf, ipfilter ?

Hello, can someone point me to some documentation about the sequence of packet processing in fbsd6 if more than one of the filter systems is active ? There once was a nice ascii graphic which described the flow of packets through the rules -- I can't find it any more ? Thanks! -- [EMAIL PROTEC

Intel S5000PAL board, onboard ether gige interfaces working?

Hi! Can someone report success with the onboard GigE ports of an Intel S5000PAL board ? Thanks for any report 8-} -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 171 310137214 years to go ! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http:

Re: em(4) update for 6-STABLE

Hello, > here is a patch that merges HEAD em(4) driver to RELENG_6. Does it address the issue raised in the mail with the subject Subject: em promiscuous mode bug? on current@ ? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 171 310137214 years to go ! _

Re: 6.1-RC bge RX CPU self-diagnostic failed

Hi! > I'm running into a problem with some new dual Opteron servers we just > received yesterday on 6.1-STABLE (-RC now I suppose) amd64 updated as of > today. When booting, it sometimes fails to initialize the onboard > Broadcom gigabit Ethernet: Aha, similar to my problem (also broadcom, but 5.

Re: 5.4-STABLE hangs every few days

Hi! > >Been having problems with my Tyan Thunder i7500 (S2720) dual Xeon > >running -STABLE: it's hanging every couple of days. > > Have you had any luck getting to diagnose the issue? I've been > plagued by instability with a S2721-533 ("Thunder i7501 Pro"), also > on 5-stable, and didn't

Re: nfs locking (was: Re: OOO 2.0 compiles but doesn't work properly)

Hello, > >RH> Yes - check the archives. There was at least one other person > >RH> reporting problems with OpenOffice+NFS. > > > >Yes, I see... the problem seems so be that you have to run lockd and > >statd > >to get ooo running on nfs. Same here: NFS server 5.4-REL, client 5.4p8, no lockd

SATA-II, Pentium-D, Intel SE7230NH1-LX Board

Hello, a short question: We will experiment with the following board: Intel SE7230NH1-LX It supports Pentium-Ds and SATA-II and we will try both. Anyone who already has experience with this ? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 171 310137215 years to go ! _

Re: who has experience about updating freebsd from 4.11 to 5.x

Hi! > I update my freebsd ver 4.11 by cvsup src-all tree. > It's successfully as below: > make buildworld > make buildkernel > make installkernel > But some errors appear when i make installworld: Our process for this type of upgrade is: cd /usr/src cvsup -L 2 -g /root/stable-s

<    1   2